skip to main content
10.1145/288195.288251acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesfseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free access

Formal modeling and analysis of the HLA component integration standard

Published: 01 November 1998 Publication History

Abstract

An increasingly important trend in the engineering of complex systems is the design of component integration standards. Such standards define rules of interaction and shared communication infrastructure that permit composition of systems out of independently-developed parts. A problem with these standards is that it is often difficult to understand exactly what they require and provide, and to analyze them in order to understand their deeper properties. In this paper we use our experience in modeling the High Level Architecture (HLA) for Distributed Simulation to show how one can capture the structured protocol inherent in an integration standard as a formal architectural model that can be analyzed to detect anomalies, race conditions, and deadlocks.

References

[1]
G. Abowd, R. Allen, and D. Garlan. Formalizing style to understand descriptions of software architecture. ACAr Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, October 1995.
[2]
R. Allen. Formalism and informalism in architectural style: A case study. In Proc of the First Intl. Workshop on Architectures for Software Systems, April 1995.
[3]
R. Allen. A Formal Approach to Software Architecture. PhD thesis, CMU, School of Computer Science, January 1997. CMU/SCS Report CMU-CS-97-144.
[4]
R. Allen and D. Garlan. A formal basis for architectural connection. A Cfif Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, July 1997.
[5]
R. J. Allen, D. Garlan, and J. Ivers. A Wright specification of the HLA. Technical report, Carnegie Mellon University, School of Computer Science, 199s.
[6]
E. Clarke et al. Automatic verification of finite state concurrent systems using temporal logic specifications. ACAl Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, April 1986.
[7]
C. A. Damon, R. Melton, R. J. Allen, E. Bigelow, J. M. Irers, and D. Garlan. Formalizing a specification for analysis: The HLA ownership properties. Technical Report CMU-CS-93-149, Carnegie Mellon University, School of Computer Science, 1998.
[8]
Failures Divergence Refinement: FDRL User Manual. Formal Systems (Europe) Ltd., O.uford, England, version 2.22 edition, October 1997.
[9]
D. Garlan, R. Allen, and J. Ockerbloom. Architectural mismatch: Why reuse is so hard. IEEE Software, November 1995.
[10]
C. A. R. Hoare. Communicating Sequential Processes. Prentice Hall, 1985.
[11]
G. J. Holzmann. Design and Validation of Computer Protocols. Prentice Hall, 1991.
[12]
D. C. Luckham, L. M. Augustin, J. J. Kenney, J. Veera, D. Bryan, and W. Mann. Specification and analysis of system architecture using Rapide. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, April 1995.
[13]
N. A. Lynch and M. R. Tuttle. An introduction to input/output automata. MIT/LCS/TM-373, MIT LCS, 198s. Technical Report
[14]
J. Magee, N. Dulay, S. Eisenbach, and J. Kramer. Specifying distributed software architectures. In Proceedings ESEC' 95, September 1995.
[15]
M. Moriconi, X. Qian, and R. Riemenschneider. Correct architecture refinement. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, April 1995.
[16]
J. Peterson. Petri nets. ACM Computing Surveys, September 1977.
[17]
RASSP project overview, Version 1.0. CSIS TR, Dept of Electrical Engineering, University of Virginia, 1994.
[18]
A. W. Roscoe. The Theory and Practice of Concurrency. Prentice Hall, 1993.
[19]
M. Shaw, R. DeLine, D. V. Klein, T. L. Ross, D. M. Young, and G. Zelesnik. Abstractions for software architecture and tools to support them. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, April 1995.
[20]
D. B. Stewart, R. A. Volpe, and P. K. Khosla. Integration of real-time software modules for reconflgm-able sensor-based control systems. In Proc 1992 IEEE/RSJ Intl Conf on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE Computer Society Press, July 1992.
[21]
K. Sullivan, J. Socha, and M. Marchukov. Using formal methods to reason about architectural standards. In Proceedings of the 1997 International Conference on Software Engineering, May 1997.
[22]
U.S. Department of Defense. High Level Architecture Interface Specification, Version 1.2, August 1997. Also available via http://www.dmso.mil/projects/hla/.
[23]
U.S. Department of Defense. High Level Architecture Interface Specification, Version 1.3, draft 1, April 1995. Also available via http://www.dmso.mil/projects/hla/.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
SIGSOFT '98/FSE-6: Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGSOFT international symposium on Foundations of software engineering
November 1998
248 pages
ISBN:1581131089
DOI:10.1145/288195
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 November 1998

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. component integration standards
  2. component-based software
  3. formal specification
  4. protocol families
  5. software architecture

Qualifiers

  • Article

Conference

SOFT98

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 17 of 128 submissions, 13%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)128
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)26
Reflects downloads up to 06 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media