skip to main content
10.1145/2811780.2811921acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswhConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Mood self-assessment on smartphones

Published: 14 October 2015 Publication History

Abstract

Mood has been systematically studied by psychologists for over 100 years. As mood is a subjective feeling, any study of mood must take into account and accurately capture user's perception of an experienced feeling. In last 40 years, a number of pen-and-paper mood self-assessment scales have been proposed. Typically, a person is asked to separately rate various dimensions of the experienced feeling (e.g., pleasure and arousal) or mood items (interested, agitated, excited, etc.) on numeric scales (e.g., between 0 and 10). These partial ratings are then combined into an overall mood rating (or into its positive and negative affect). Pen-and-paper mood scales are used in basic research on mood and in clinical practice. Mobile technology makes it possible to extend mood self-assessment from lab to real life rather, collecting mood data frequently, over long time, in variety of life situations. With these motivations, we developed mobile versions of validated pen-and-paper scales for mood self-assessment to facilitate accurate in-situ mood self-assessment in real-life situations by smartphone users. The novelty of our Mobile Mood Scales (MMS) app is the use of visual effects such as color, changing brightness, animation and photos. We believe these mobile-technology-enabled aids involving user's senses can make mood self-assessment more intuitive and engaging for users than pen-and-paper mood scales that rely on linguistic terms and numerical rating. We built a customization layer that allows a doctor to generate a required mood app by selecting the mood scale required (e.g., PANAS or SPANE) as well as specific optional features such as the granularity of a rating scale (e.g., 5-point scale with radio buttons) and visual effects. In an evaluation survey, 61% of 48 participants found special features such as use of color, brightness and photos helpful in reflecting on own mood. 83% of 48 participants preferred mobile mood scales over pen-and-paper scales. We received encouraging feedback from the designers of original pen-and-paper mood scales. We envision applications of MMS in psychological studies of mood, in monitoring the efficacy of medical interventions and medication, as a component for mHealth apps where it is important to know fluctuations of patient's mood.

References

[1]
Bannon, L. 2005. A human-centered perspective on interaction design. Future Interaction Design, Springer (2005), 9--30.
[2]
Bradley, M. and Peter J. Lang, P. 1994. Measuring emotion: The Self-Assessment Manikin and The Semantic Differential. J. Behav. Ther. & Exp. Psychiat. 25, 1 (Mar. 1994), 49--59.
[3]
Broekens, J. and Brinkman, W. P. 2009. AffectButton: Towards a Standard for Dynamic Affective User Feedback. Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII) (2009).
[4]
Brooke, J. 1996. SUS: a "quick and dirty" usability scale (1996).
[5]
Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Chu Kim-Prieto, Dong-won Choi, Shigehiro Oishi, S. and Biswas-Diener, R. 2009. New Well-being Measures: Short Scales to Assess Flourishing and Positive and Negative Feelings. Social Indicators Research. 97, 2, 143--156.
[6]
Healey, J. 2011. Recording Affect in the field: Towards Methods and Metrics for Improving Ground Truth labels. Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction. 6974 (2011), 107--116.
[7]
Lang, P. 1995. The Emotion Probe: Studies of Motivation and Attention. American Psychologist. 50, 5 (1995), 372--85.
[8]
Larsen, J. T., McGraw A. P. and Cacioppo, J. T. 1988. Can people feel happy and sad at the same time? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
[9]
LiKamWa, R., Liu, Y., Lane, N. D. and Zhong, L. 2013. MoodScope: Building a Mood Sensor from Smartphone Usage Patterns. MobiSys, (Jun 2013), 389--402.
[10]
Measuring Usability: http://www.measuringusability.com/
[11]
Mehrabian, A. 1996. Pleasure-Arousal-Dominance: A general framework for describing and measuring individual differences in temperament. Current Psychology Developmental, Learning, Personality. 14, 4 (Winter 1996), 261--292.
[12]
Mehrabian, A. and Russell, A. J. 1974. An Approach to Environmental Psychology. Cambridge: M. I. T. Press (1974).
[13]
Morris, M. M., Kathawala, Q., Leen, T. K., Gorenstein, E. E., Guilak, F., Labhard, M., Deleeuw, W. 2010. Mobile Therapy: Case study evaluations of a Cell phone application for Emotion Self-Awareness. Journal of Medical Internet Research (April 2010).
[14]
Novak, G., Carlson, D. and Jarzabek, S. 2014. An Adaptable and Extensible Mobile Sensing Framework for Patient Monitoring. IEEE 9th Int. Conf. on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information Processing (ISSNIP), Singapore (Apr. 2014).
[15]
O'Brien, H. L., Toms, E. G. 2010. The Development and Evaluation of a Survey to Measure User Engagement. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61, 1 (2010), 50--69.
[16]
Palen, L. Marilyn Salzman, M. 2002. Voice-Mail diary studies for naturalistic data capture under mobile conditions. ACM Conference on Computer supported cooperative work (2002), 87--95.
[17]
Picard, R. W. 1997. Affective Computing, MIT Press, Cambridge (1997).
[18]
Pollak, J. P., Adams, P. and Gay, G. 2011. PAM: A photographic affect meter for frequent, in situ measurement of affect. CHI (2011), 725--734.
[19]
Posner, J., Russell, J. A. and Peterson, B. S. 2005. The Circumplex model of affect: An integrative approach to affective neuroscience, cognitive development and psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology (2005), 715--734.
[20]
Rieman, J. 1993. The diary study: A workplace-oriented research tool to guide laboratory efforts. ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (1993), 321--326.
[21]
Russell, J. 2009. Emotion, core affect, and psychological construction. Cognition and Emotion. 23, 7 (2009), 1259--1283.
[22]
Thompson, E. R. 2007. Development and Validation of an Internationally Reliable Short-Form of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 38, 2 (Mar. 2007), 227--242.
[23]
Adaptive Reuse Technique: http://art.comp.nus.edu.sg/
[24]
Watson, D., Clark, L. A. and Tellegen, A. 1988. Development and Validation of Brief Measures of Positive and Negative Affect: The PANAS Scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
[25]
ESOMAR World Research. ESOMAR/GRBN Guideline on Online Sample Quality https://www.esomar.org/knowledge-and-standards/codes-and-guidelines/guideline-on-online-sample-quality.php

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
WH '15: Proceedings of the conference on Wireless Health
October 2015
157 pages
ISBN:9781450338516
DOI:10.1145/2811780
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

In-Cooperation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 14 October 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. evaluation
  2. experience sampling
  3. mobile technologies
  4. mood scales
  5. mood self-assessment

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

WH '15
WH '15: Wireless Health 2015 Conference
October 14 - 16, 2015
Maryland, Bethesda

Acceptance Rates

WH '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 28 of 106 submissions, 26%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 35 of 139 submissions, 25%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)30
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
Reflects downloads up to 24 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media