skip to main content
research-article

Visualizing Sets with Linear Diagrams

Published: 24 September 2015 Publication History

Abstract

This paper presents the first design principles that optimize the visualization of sets using linear diagrams. These principles are justified through empirical studies that evaluate the impact of graphical features on task performance. Linear diagrams represent sets using straight line segments, with line overlaps corresponding to set intersections. This study builds on recent empirical research, which establishes that linear diagrams can be superior to prominent set visualization techniques, namely Euler and Venn diagrams. We address the problem of how to best visualize overlapping sets using linear diagrams. To solve the problem, we investigate which graphical features of linear diagrams significantly impact user task performance. To this end, we conducted seven crowdsourced empirical studies involving a total of 1,760 participants. These studies allowed us to identify the following design principles, which significantly aid task performance: use a minimal number of line segments, use guidelines where overlaps start and end, and draw lines that are thin as opposed to thick bars. We also evaluated the following graphical properties that did not significantly impact task performance: color, orientation, and set order. The results are brought to life through a freely available software implementation that automatically draws linear diagrams with user-controlled graphical choices. An important consequence of our research is that users are now able to create effective visualizations of sets automatically, thus improving human--computer interaction.

References

[1]
Y. Y. Ahn, J. Bagrow, and S. Lehmann. 2010. Link communities reveal multiscale complexity in networks. Nature 466, 7307, 761--764.
[2]
B. Alper, N. Henry Riche, G. Ramos, and M. Czerwinski. 2011. Design study of LineSets, a novel set visualization technique. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 17, 12, 2259--2267.
[3]
B. Alsallakh, W. Aigner, S. Miksch, and H. Hauser. 2013. Radial sets: Interactive visual analysis of large overlapping sets. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 19, 12, 2496--2505.
[4]
B. Alsallakh, L. Micallef, W. Aigner, H. Hauser, S. Miksch, and P. Rodgers. 2014. Visualizing sets and set-typed data: State-of-the-art and future challenges. In Eurographics Conference on Visualization (EuroVis). 124--138.
[5]
J. Bertin. 1983. Semiology of Graphics: Diagrams, Networks, Maps. University of Wisconsin Press.
[6]
A. Blake, G. Stapleton, P. Rodgers, L. Cheek, and J. Howse. 2014a. The impact of shape on the perception of Euler diagrams. In 8th International Conference on the Theory and Application of Diagrams. Springer, Berlin, 124--138.
[7]
A. Blake, G. Stapleton, P. Rodgers, and J. Howse. 2014b. How should we use colour in Euler diagrams. In 7th International Symposium on Visual Information Communication and Interaction. ACM, 149.
[8]
S. K. Card, J. D. Mackinlay, and B. Shneiderman. 1999. Readings in Information Visualisation: Using Vision to Think. Academic Press, San Francisco, CA.
[9]
P. Chapman, G. Stapleton, P. Rodgers, L. Michallef, and A. Blake. 2014. Visualizing sets: An empirical comparison of diagram types. In Diagrams 2014. Springer, 146--160.
[10]
J. Chen, N. Menezes, A. Bradley, and T. North. 2011. Opportunities for crowdsourcing research on amazon mechanical turk. Human Factors 5, 3.
[11]
C. Collins, G. Penn, and M. Sheelagh T. Carpendale. 2009. Bubble sets: Revealing set relations with isocontours over existing visualizations. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 15, 6, 1009--1016.
[12]
L. Couturat. 1903. Opuscules et fragments inédits de Leibniz. Felix Alcan, Paris.
[13]
K. Dinkla, M. El-Kebir, C.-I. Bucur, M. Siderius, M. Smit, M. Westenberg, and G. Klau. 2014. eXamine: Exploring annotated modules in networks. BMC Bioinformat. 15, 1, 201.
[14]
M. Dörk, N. H. Riche, G. Ramos, and S. Dumais. 2012. PivotPaths: Strolling through faceted information spaces. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 18, 12, 2709--2718.
[15]
J. Feldman. 2007. Formation of visual “objects” in the early computation of spatial relations. Percept. Psychophys. 69, 5, 816--827.
[16]
J. Flower and J. Howse. 2002. Generating Euler diagrams. In 2nd International Conference on the Theory and Application of Diagrams. Springer, Georgia, USA, 61--75.
[17]
W. Freiler, K. Matković, and H. Hauser. 2008. Interactive visual analysis of set-typed data. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 14, 6, 1340--1347.
[18]
B. Gottfried. 2015. A comparative study of linear and region based diagrams. J. Spatial Inf. Sci. 2015, 10, 3--20.
[19]
J. Heer and M. Bostock. 2010. Crowdsourcing graphical perception: Using mechanical turk to assess visualization design. In 28th SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI). ACM, 203--212.
[20]
H. Hofmann, A. Siebes, and A. Wilhelm. 2000. Visualizing association rules with interactive mosaic plots. In Proceedings of the sixth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, 227--235.
[21]
J. Huo. 2008. KMVQL: A visual query interface based on karnaugh map. In Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI2008). ACM, 243--250.
[22]
K. Koffka. 1935. Principles of Gestalt Pschology. Lund Humphries, London.
[23]
S. Leborg. 2006. Visual Grammar. Princeton Architectural Press, New York.
[24]
J. Leskovec. 2011. Stanford large network dataset collection. Retrieved from URL http://snap.stanford.edu/data/index.html.
[25]
A. Lex, N. Gehlenborg, H. Strobelt, R. Vuillemot, and H. Pfister. 2014. UpSet: Visualization of intersecting sets. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 20, 12, 1983--1992.
[26]
R. Mazza. 2009. Introduction to Information Visualisation. Springer, New York.
[27]
L. Micallef, P. Dragicevic, and J.-D. Fekete. 2012. Assessing the effect of visualizations on bayesian reasoning through crowdsourcing. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 18, 12, 2536--2545.
[28]
P. Mutton, P. Rodgers, and J. Flower. 2004. Drawing graphs in Euler diagrams. In 3rd International Conference on the Theory and Application of Diagrams, Vol. 2980. Springer, 66--81.
[29]
D. Oppenheimer, T. Meyvis, and N. Davidenko. 2009. Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 45, 4, 867--872.
[30]
G. Paolacci, J. Chandler, and P. G. Ipeirotis. 2010. Running experiments on amazon mechanical turk. Judgm. Decision Making 5, 5, 411--419.
[31]
N. Riche and T. Dwyer. 2010. Untangling Euler diagrams. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 16, 6, 1090--1099.
[32]
P. Rodgers, L. Zhang, and H. Purchase. 2012. Wellformedness properties in Euler diagrams: which should be used? IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 18, 7, 1089--1100.
[33]
P. Rodgers, L. Zhang, and A. Fish. 2008. General Euler diagram generation. In 5th International Conference on the Theory and Application of Diagrams. Springer, 13--27.
[34]
Set Visualiser. (March 2014). Retrieved from http://www-edc.eng.cam.ac.uk/tools/set_visualiser/.
[35]
Ben Shneiderman. 1996. The eyes have it: A task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations. In IEEE Symposium Visual Languages. 336--343.
[36]
P. Simonetto. 2012. Visualisation of Overlapping Sets and Clusters with Euler Diagrams. Ph.D. Dissertation. Université Bordeaux, France.
[37]
P. Simonetto, D. Auber, and D. Archambault. 2009. Fully automatic visualisation of overlapping sets. Comput. Graph. Forum 28, 3, 967--974.
[38]
G. Stapleton, P. Rodgers, J. Howse, and L. Zhang. 2011a. Inductively generating Euler diagrams. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 17, 1, 88--100.
[39]
G. Stapleton, L. Zhang, J. Howse, and P. Rodgers. 2011b. Drawing Euler diagrams with circles: The theory of piercings. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 17, 7, 1020--1032.
[40]
J. Wagemans, J. Elder, M. Kubovy, S. Palmer, M. Peterson, and M. Singh. 2012. A century of gestalt psychology in visual perception: I. perceptual grouping and figure-ground organisation. Psychol. Bull. 138, 6, 1172--1217.
[41]
S. Wasserman and K. Faust. 1994. Social Network Analysis. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
[42]
K. Wittenburg, T. Lanning, M. Heinrichs, and M. Stanton. 2001. Parallel bargrams for consumer-based information exploration and choice. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. ACM, 51--60.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction  Volume 22, Issue 6
December 2015
232 pages
ISSN:1073-0516
EISSN:1557-7325
DOI:10.1145/2830543
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 24 September 2015
Accepted: 01 July 2015
Revised: 01 July 2015
Received: 01 March 2015
Published in TOCHI Volume 22, Issue 6

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Sets
  2. linear diagrams
  3. visualization

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)31
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)9
Reflects downloads up to 01 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media