skip to main content
10.1145/2788412.2788435acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesecceConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Psychological comfort and discomfort in transport modes

Published: 01 July 2015 Publication History

Abstract

Since a decade in ergonomics, comfort has been increasingly investigated with a focus on its psychological dimensions, based on the idea that comfort is an enjoyable, pleasant and relaxed psychological state felt by a person who is interacting with its surroundings. In contrast, discomfort is a tense and unpleasant state linked to negative emotions and sensations. We examine the various factors related to psychological comfort and discomfort experienced by users in different transport modes situations. From the literature we identified the following sources of comfort/discomfort: social relationship, safe/unsafe feeling, variable time control, attentional charge and possible multiactivity, need for control and social image. Our research question is twofold. On one hand, we want to specify situations of comfort/discomfort experienced by users. On the other hand, we aim at developing projective techniques to help users in anticipating the comfort/discomfort experience as well as their adhesion and reticence to change towards innovative ecological-friendly modes.

References

[1]
Cahour, B. (2010). Emotions, affects et confort comme nouveaux déterminants de l'activité et de l'usage. In G. Valléry, M. Zouinar, MC. Leport (Eds), Ergonomie des produits et des services médiatisés, Paris: PUF.
[2]
Cahour B. (2008). Discomfort, affects and coping strategies in driving activity. Proceedings of ECCE 2008 conference, Madeira, 16--19 sept.
[3]
Coeugnet, S. (2011). La pression temporelle dans les environnements dynamiques: le cas de la conduite automobile. Université de Valenciennes et du Hainaut-Cambresis.
[4]
Dumur, E., Barnard, Y., & Boy, G. (2004). Designing for comfort. Human Factors in Design, 111--127.
[5]
Gatersleben, B., & Uzzell, D. (2007). Affective Appraisals of the Daily Commute Comparing Perceptions of Drivers, Cyclists, Walkers, and Users of Public Transport. Environment and Behavior, 39(3), 416--431.
[6]
Giacomin, J., & Quattrocolo, S. (1997). An analysis of human comfort when entering and exiting the rear seat of an automobile. Applied Ergonomics, 28(5), 397--406.
[7]
Marchand, D., & Weiss, K. (2009). Repréésentations sociales du confort dans le train: vers une conceptualisation de la notion de confort social. Les Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, (4), 107--124.
[8]
Nordfjaern, T., Simsekoglu, Ö., Brende Lind, H., Halvard Jorgensen, S., & Rundmo, T. (2014). Transport priorities, risk perception and worry associated with mode use and preferences among Norwegian commuters. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 72, 391--400.
[9]
Oborne, D. J., & Clarke, M. J. (1975). Questionnaire surveys of passenger comfort. Applied ergonomics, 6(2), 97--103.
[10]
Urquhart, C., Light, A., Thomas, R., Barker, A., Yeoman, A., Cooper, J., Armstrong, C., Fenton, R., Lonsdale, R. & Spink, S. (2003). Critical incident technique and explicitation interviewing in studies of information behavior. Library & Information Science Research, 25(1), 63--88.
[11]
Vink, P., & Hallbeck, S. (2012). Editorial: Comfort and discomfort studies demonstrate the need for a new model. Applied Ergonomics, 43(2), 271--276.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Psychological comfort and discomfort in transport modes

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ECCE '15: Proceedings of the European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics 2015
    July 2015
    185 pages
    ISBN:9781450336123
    DOI:10.1145/2788412
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    In-Cooperation

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 01 July 2015

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Discomfort
    2. Psychological comfort
    3. Transport modes

    Qualifiers

    • Poster
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    ECCE '15

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 56 of 91 submissions, 62%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)10
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
    Reflects downloads up to 06 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media