skip to main content
research-article

Perceptual Tolerance to Stereoscopic 3D Image Distortion

Published: 21 July 2015 Publication History

Abstract

An intriguing aspect of picture perception is the viewer’s tolerance to variation in viewing position, perspective, and display size. These factors are also present in stereoscopic media, where there are additional parameters associated with the camera arrangement (e.g., separation, orientation). The predicted amount of depth from disparity can be obtained trigonometrically; however, perceived depth in complex scenes often differs from geometric predictions based on binocular disparity alone. To evaluate the extent and the cause of deviations from geometric predictions of depth from disparity in naturalistic scenes, we recorded stereoscopic footage of an indoor scene with a range of camera separations (camera interaxial (IA) ranged from 3 to 95 mm) and displayed them on a range of screen sizes. In a series of experiments participants estimated 3D distances in the scene relative to a reference scene, compared depth between shots with different parameters, or reproduced the depth between pairs of objects in the scene using reaching or blind walking. The effects of IA and screen size were consistently and markedly smaller than predicted from the binocular viewing geometry, suggesting that observers are able to compensate for the predicted distortions. We conclude that the presence of multiple realistic monocular depth cues drives normalization of perceived depth from binocular disparity. It is not clear to what extent these differences are due to cognitive as opposed to perceptual factors. However, it is notable that these normalization processes are not task specific; they are evident in both perception- and action-oriented tasks.

References

[1]
Robert S. Allison. 2007. Analysis of the influence of vertical disparities arising in toed-in stereoscopic cameras. Journal of Imaging Science and Technology 51, 4, 317--327.
[2]
Robert S. Allison and Ian P. Howard. 2000. Temporal dependencies in resolving monocular and binocular cue conflict in slant perception. Vision Research 40, 14, 1869--1885.
[3]
Robert S. Allison, Laurie M. Wilcox, and Ali Kazimi. 2013. Perceptual artefacts, suspension of disbelief and realism in stereoscopic 3D film. Public 24, 47, 149--160.
[4]
Martin S. Banks, Emily A. Cooper, and Elise A. Piazza. 2014. Camera focal length and the perception of pictures. Ecological Psychology 26, 1--2, 30--46.
[5]
Martin S. Banks, Robert T. Held, and Ahna R. Girshick. 2009. Perception of 3-D layout in stereo displays. Information Display 25, 1, 12--16.
[6]
Karim Benzeroual, Robert S. Allison, and Laurie M. Wilcox. 2011a. Distortions of space in stereoscopic 3D content. In Proceedings of the SMPTE International Conference on Stereoscopic 3D for Media and Entertainment. 6.1--6.10.
[7]
Karim Benzeroual, Laurie M. Wilcox, and Robert S. Allison. 2011b. On the distinction between perceived and predicted depth in S3D films. In Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on 3D Imaging (IC3D’11). 59.1--59.8.
[8]
Heinrich H. Bülthoff and Hanspeter A. Mallot. 1988. Integration of depth modules: Stereo and shading. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 5, 10, 1749--1758.
[9]
Songpei Du, Shimin Hu, and Ralph Martin. 2013. Changing perspective in stereoscopic images. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 19, 8, 1288--1297.
[10]
John M. Foley. 1980. Binocular distance perception. Psychological Review 87, 5, 411--434.
[11]
Andrew Glennerster, Lili Tcheang, Stuart J. Gilson, Andrew W. Fitzgibbon, and Andrew J. Parker. 2006. Humans ignore motion and stereo cues in favor of a fictional stable world. Current Biology 16, 4, 428--432.
[12]
Melvyn A. Goodale. 2014. How (and why) the visual control of action differs from visual perception. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 281, 1785, 20140337.
[13]
James M. Hillis, Simon J. Watt, Michael S. Landy, and Martin S. Banks. 2004. Slant from texture and disparity cues: Optimal cue combination. Journal of Vision 4, 12, 967--992.
[14]
Jonathan W. Kelly, Melissa Burton, Brice Pollock, Eduardo Rubio, Michael Curtis, Julio De La Cruz, Stephen Gilbert, and Eliot Winer. 2013. Space perception in virtual environments: Displacement from the center of projection causes less distortion than predicted by cue-based models. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception 10, 4, 18:1--18:23.
[15]
Jack M. Loomis, Jos A. da Silva, Naofumi Fujita, and Sergio S. Fukusima. 1992. Visual space perception and visually directed action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 18, 4, 906--921.
[16]
H. A. Sedgwick. 1993. The effects of viewpoint on the virtual space of pictures. In Pictorial Communication in Virtual and Real Environments, S. R. Ellis, M. K. Kaiser, and A. J. Grunwald (Eds.). CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 460--479.
[17]
Takashi Shibata, Joohwan Kim, David M. Hoffman, and Martin S. Banks. 2011. The zone of comfort: Predicting visual discomfort with stereo displays. Journal of Vision 11, 8, Article No. 11.
[18]
Raymond Spottiswoode and Nigel Spottiswoode. 1953. The Theory of Stereoscopic Transmission and Its Application to the Motion Picture. University of California Press.
[19]
Stanley Stevens. 1962. The surprising simplicity of sensory metrics. American Psychologist 17, 1, 29--39.
[20]
Peter Vangorp, Christian Richardt, Emily A. Cooper, Gaurav Chaurasia, Martin S. Banks, and George Drettakis. 2013. Perception of perspective distortions in image-based rendering. ACM Transactions on Graphics 32, 4, 58:1--58:12.
[21]
Dhanraj Vishwanath, Ahna R. Girshick, and Martin S. Banks. 2005. Why pictures look right when viewed from the wrong place. Nature Neuroscience 8, 10, 1401--1410.
[22]
Zachary Wartell, Larry F. Hodges, and William Ribarsky. 1999. Balancing fusion, image depth and distortion in stereoscopic head-tracked displays. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques. 351--358.
[23]
Laurie M. Wilcox and Robert S. Allison. 2009. Coarse-fine dichotomies in human stereopsis. Vision Research 49, 22, 2653--65.
[24]
Andrew J. Woods, Tom Docherty, and Rolf Koch. 1993. Image distortions in stereoscopic video systems. In Proceedings of SPIE 1915: Stereoscopic Displays and Applications IV. 36--48.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Perceptual Tolerance to Stereoscopic 3D Image Distortion

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Transactions on Applied Perception
      ACM Transactions on Applied Perception  Volume 12, Issue 3
      July 2015
      92 pages
      ISSN:1544-3558
      EISSN:1544-3965
      DOI:10.1145/2798084
      Issue’s Table of Contents
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 21 July 2015
      Accepted: 01 May 2015
      Revised: 01 May 2015
      Received: 01 February 2015
      Published in TAP Volume 12, Issue 3

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Stereoscopic 3D
      2. convergence
      3. film
      4. interaxial
      5. scaling

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

      Funding Sources

      • the 3DFlic project from the Ontario Media Development Corporation
      • the Ontario Centres of Excellence

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)16
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
      Reflects downloads up to 27 Jan 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all

      View Options

      Login options

      Full Access

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media