skip to main content
research-article

User-Specific Feature-Based Similarity Models for Top-n Recommendation of New Items

Published: 30 April 2015 Publication History

Abstract

Recommending new items for suitable users is an important yet challenging problem due to the lack of preference history for the new items. Noncollaborative user modeling techniques that rely on the item features can be used to recommend new items. However, they only use the past preferences of each user to provide recommendations for that user. They do not utilize information from the past preferences of other users, which can potentially be ignoring useful information. More recent factor models transfer knowledge across users using their preference information in order to provide more accurate recommendations. These methods learn a low-rank approximation for the preference matrix, which can lead to loss of information. Moreover, they might not be able to learn useful patterns given very sparse datasets. In this work, we present <scp>UFSM</scp>, a method for top-<i>n</i> recommendation of new items given binary user preferences. <scp>UFSM</scp> learns <b>U</b>ser-specific <b>F</b>eature-based item-<b>S</b>imilarity <b>M</b>odels, and its strength lies in combining two points: (1) exploiting preference information across all users to learn multiple global item similarity functions and (2) learning user-specific weights that determine the contribution of each global similarity function in generating recommendations for each user. <scp>UFSM</scp> can be considered as a sparse high-dimensional factor model where the previous preferences of each user are incorporated within his or her latent representation. This way, <scp>UFSM</scp> combines the merits of item similarity models that capture local relations among items and factor models that learn global preference patterns. A comprehensive set of experiments was conduced to compare <scp>UFSM</scp> against state-of-the-art collaborative factor models and noncollaborative user modeling techniques. Results show that <scp>UFSM</scp> outperforms other techniques in terms of recommendation quality. <scp>UFSM</scp> manages to yield better recommendations even with very sparse datasets. Results also show that <scp>UFSM</scp> can efficiently handle high-dimensional as well as low-dimensional item feature spaces.

References

[1]
Deepak Agarwal and Bee-Chung Chen. 2009. Regression-based latent factor models. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD’09). ACM, 19--28.
[2]
Amr Ahmed, Bhargav Kanagal, Sandeep Pandey, Vanja Josifovski, Lluis Garcia Pueyo, and Jeffrey Yuan. 2013. Latent factor models with additive and hierarchically-smoothed user preferences. In Proceedings of the Sixth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM’13). ACM, 385--394.
[3]
Evangelos Banos, Ioannis Katakis, Nick Bassiliades, Grigorios Tsoumakas, and Ioannis P. Vlahavas. 2006. PersoNews: A personalized news reader enhanced by machine learning and semantic filtering. In Proceedings of the 2006 Confederated International Conference on the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: CoopIS, DOA, GADA, and ODBASE - Volume Part I (ODBASE’06/OTM’06). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 975--982.
[4]
Daniel Billsus and Michael J. Pazzani. 1999. A hybrid user model for news story classification. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on User Modeling. 99--108.
[5]
Léon Bottou. 1998. Online algorithms and stochastic approximations. In Online Learning and Neural Networks, David Saad (Ed.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. http://leon.bottou.org/papers/bottou-98x.
[6]
Iván Cantador, Peter Brusilovsky, and Tsvi Kuflik. 2011. 2nd workshop on information heterogeneity and fusion in recommender systems (HetRec 2011). In Proceedings of the 5th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys’11).
[7]
Zeno Gantner, Lucas Drumond, Christoph Freudenthaler, Steffen Rendle, and Schmidt-Thie Lars. 2010. Learning attribute-to-feature mappings for cold-start recommendations. In Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM’10). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, 176--185.
[8]
Rong Hu and Pearl Pu. 2011. Enhancing collaborative filtering systems with personality information. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys’11). ACM, New York, NY, 197--204.
[9]
Santosh Kabbur, Xia Ning, and George Karypis. 2013. FISM: Factored item similarity models for top-N recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD’13). ACM, 659--667.
[10]
Gilad Katz, Nir Ofek, Bracha Shapira, Lior Rokach, and Guy Shani. 2011. Using Wikipedia to boost collaborative filtering techniques. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys’11). ACM, New York, NY, 285--288.
[11]
Yehuda Koren. 2008. Factorization meets the neighborhood: A multifaceted collaborative filtering model. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD’08). ACM, New York, NY, 426--434.
[12]
Seung-Taek Park and Wei Chu. 2009. Pairwise preference regression for cold-start recommendation. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys’09). ACM, New York, NY, 21--28.
[13]
Steffen Rendle. 2012. Factorization machines with libFM. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 3, 3, Article 57 (May 2012), 22 pages.
[14]
Steffen Rendle, Christoph Freudenthaler, Zeno Gantner, and Lars Schmidt-Thieme. 2009. BPR: Bayesian personalized ranking from implicit feedback. In Proceedings of the 25th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI’09). AUAI Press, Arlington, VA, 452--461. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm&quest;id=1795114.1795167.
[15]
Manuel de Buenaga Rodríguez, Manuel J. Maña López, Alberto Díaz Esteban, and Pablo Gervás Gómez-Navarro. 2001. A user model based on content analysis for the intelligent personalization of a news service. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on User Modeling 2001 (UM’01). Springer-Verlag, London, 216--218. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm&quest;id=647664.733412.
[16]
Badrul Sarwar, George Karypis, Joseph Konstan, and John Riedl. 2001. Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW’01). ACM, New York, NY, 11.
[17]
Chong Wang and David M. Blei. 2011. Collaborative topic modeling for recommending scientific articles. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD’11). ACM, New York, NY, 448--456.
[18]
Wen-tau Yih. 2009. Learning term-weighting functions for similarity measures. In Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: Volume 2 - Volume 2 (EMNLP’09).
[19]
Liang Zhang, Deepak Agarwal, and Bee-Chung Chen. 2011. Generalizing matrix factorization through flexible regression priors. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys’11). ACM, New York, NY, 13--20.
[20]
Lanbo Zhang and Yi Zhang. 2010. Discriminative factored prior models for personalized content-based recommendation. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM’10). ACM, New York, NY, 1569--1572.
[21]
Yi Zhang and Jonathan Koren. 2007. Efficient Bayesian hierarchical user modeling for recommendation system. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR’07). 47--54.
[22]
Cai-Nicolas Ziegler, Sean M. McNee, Joseph A. Konstan, and Georg Lausen. 2005. Improving recommendation lists through topic diversification. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW’05). ACM, New York, NY, 22--32.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. User-Specific Feature-Based Similarity Models for Top-n Recommendation of New Items

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology
      ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology  Volume 6, Issue 3
      Survey Paper, Regular Papers and Special Section on Participatory Sensing and Crowd Intelligence
      May 2015
      319 pages
      ISSN:2157-6904
      EISSN:2157-6912
      DOI:10.1145/2764959
      • Editor:
      • Huan Liu
      Issue’s Table of Contents
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 30 April 2015
      Accepted: 01 January 2015
      Revised: 01 January 2015
      Received: 01 March 2014
      Published in TIST Volume 6, Issue 3

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Recommender systems
      2. cold start
      3. item content
      4. item features
      5. item similarity
      6. top-<i>n</i>

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

      Funding Sources

      • Digital Technology Center at the University of Minnesota
      • NSF

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)20
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
      Reflects downloads up to 03 Nov 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      Full Access

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media