skip to main content
10.1145/2661829.2661944acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Vertical-Aware Click Model-Based Effectiveness Metrics

Published: 03 November 2014 Publication History

Abstract

Today's web search systems present users with heterogeneous information coming from sources of different types, also known as verticals. Evaluating such systems is an important but complex task, which is still far from being solved. In this paper we examine the hypothesis that the use of models that capture user search behavior on heterogeneous result pages helps to improve the quality of offline metrics. We propose two vertical-aware metrics based on user click models for federated search and evaluate them using query logs of the Yandex search engine. We show that depending on the type of vertical, the proposed metrics have higher correlation with online user behavior than other state-of-the-art techniques.

References

[1]
O. Chapelle and Y. Zhang. A dynamic bayesian network click model for web search ranking. In WWW '09, pages 1--10, 2009.
[2]
O. Chapelle, D. Metzler, Y. Zhang, and P. Grinspan. Expected reciprocal rank for graded relevance. In CIKM '09, pages 621--630, 2009.
[3]
D. Chen, W. Chen, H. Wang, Z. Chen, and Q. Yang. Beyond ten blue links: enabling user click modeling in federated web search. In WSDM '12, pages 463--472, 2012.
[4]
A. Chuklin, P. Serdyukov, and M. de Rijke. Click model-based information retrieval metrics. In SIGIR '13, pages 493--502, 2013.
[5]
G. E. Dupret and B. Piwowarski. A user browsing model to predict search engine click data from past observations. In SIGIR '08, pages 331--338, 2008.
[6]
F. Guo, C. Liu, and Y. M. Wang. Efficient multiple-click models in web search. In WSDM '09, pages 124--131, 2009.
[7]
K. Järvelin and J. Kekäläinen. Cumulated gain-based evaluation of IR techniques. ACM Trans. Information Systems, 20 (4): 422--446, 2002.
[8]
A. Moffat and J. Zobel. Rank-biased precision for measurement of retrieval effectiveness. ACM Trans. Information Systems, 27 (1): 2:1--2:27, 2008.
[9]
Y. Song, X. Shi, R. W. White, and A. Hassan. Context-aware web search abandonment prediction. In SIGIR '14, 2014.
[10]
C. Wang, Y. Liu, M. Zhang, S. Ma, M. Zheng, J. Qian, and K. Zhang. Incorporating vertical results into search click models. In SIGIR '13, pages 503--512, 2013.
[11]
E. Yilmaz, M. Shokouhi, N. Craswell, and S. Robertson. Expected browsing utility for web search evaluation. In CIKM '10, pages 1561--1564, 2010.
[12]
K. Zhou, T. Sakai, M. Lalmas, Z. Dou, and J. M. Jose. Evaluating heterogeneous information access. In Proc. MUBE workshop, 2013.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Vertical-Aware Click Model-Based Effectiveness Metrics

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CIKM '14: Proceedings of the 23rd ACM International Conference on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
    November 2014
    2152 pages
    ISBN:9781450325981
    DOI:10.1145/2661829
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 03 November 2014

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. aggregated search
    2. click models
    3. evaluation

    Qualifiers

    • Poster

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    CIKM '14
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    CIKM '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 175 of 838 submissions, 21%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,861 of 8,427 submissions, 22%

    Upcoming Conference

    CIKM '25

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 15 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media