skip to main content
10.1145/2637002.2637018acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiiixConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Diversifying contextual suggestions from location-based social networks

Published: 26 August 2014 Publication History

Abstract

In this paper, we study the emerging Information Retrieval (IR) task of contextual suggestion in location-based social networks. The aim of this task is to make personalised recommendations of venues for entertainments or activities whilst visiting a city, by appropriately representing the context of the user, such as their location and personal interests. Instead of only representing the specific low-level interests of a user, our approach is driven by estimates of the high-level categories of venues that the user may be interested in. Moreover, we argue that an effective model for contextual suggestion should not only promote the categories that the user is interested in, but it should also be capable of eliminating redundancy by diversifying the recommended venues in the sense that they should cover various categories of interest to the given user. Therefore, we adapt web search result diversification approaches to the task of contextual suggestion. For categorising the venues, we use the category classifications employed by location-based social networks such as FourSquare, urban guides such as Yelp, and a large collection of web pages, the ClueWeb12 corpus, to build a textual classifier that is capable of predicting the category distribution for a certain venue given its web page. We thoroughly evaluate our approach using the TREC 2013 Contextual Suggestion track. We conduct a number of experiments where we consider venues from the closed environments of both FourSquare and Yelp, and the general web using the ClueWeb12 corpus. Our empirical results suggest that category diversification consistently improves the effectiveness of the recommendation model over a reasonable baseline that only considers the similarity between the user's profile and venue. The results also give insights on the effectiveness of our approach with different types of users.

References

[1]
R. Agrawal, S. Gollapudi, A. Halverson, and S. Ieong. Diversifying Search Results. In Proceedings of WSDM, 2009.
[2]
J. Allan, B. W. Croft, A. Moffat, and M. Sanderson. Frontiers, Challenges, and Opportunities for Information Retrieval: Report from SWIRL 2012 the Second Strategic Workshop on Information Retrieval in Lorne. SIGIR Forum, 46(1):2--32, May 2012.
[3]
J. Bao, Y. Zheng, and M. F. Mokbel. Location-based and Preference-aware Recommendation using Sparse Geo-social Networking Data. In Proceedings of SIGSPATIAL, 2012.
[4]
N. J. Belkin. Some(what) Grand Challenges for Information Retrieval. SIGIR Forum, 42(1):47--54, June 2008.
[5]
B. Bi, M. Shokouhi, M. Kosinski, and T. Graepel. Inferring the Demographics of Search Users: Social Data Meets Search Queries. In Proceedings of WWW, 2013.
[6]
V. Bicer and V. Lopez. Searching in the City of Knowledge: Challenges and Recent Developments. In Proceedings of SIGIR, 2013.
[7]
L. Breiman. Random forests. Machine learning, 45(1):5--32, 2001.
[8]
A. Dean-Hall, C. L. A. Clarke, J. Kamps, and P. Thomas. Overview of the TREC 2012 Contextual Suggestion Track. In Proceedings of TREC, 2012.
[9]
A. Dean-Hall, C. L. A. Clarke, J. Kamps, P. Thomas, N. Simone, and E. Vorhees. Overview of the TREC 2013 Contextual Suggestion Track. In Proceedings of TREC, 2013.
[10]
M. D. Ekstrand, J. T. Riedl, and J. A. Konstan. Collaborative Filtering Recommender Systems. Now Publishers Inc., 2011.
[11]
Y. Ganjisaffar, R. Caruana, and C. Lopes. Bagging Gradient-boosted Trees for High Precision, Low Variance Ranking Models. In Proceedings of SIGIR, 2011.
[12]
R. Ghorab, D. Zhou, A. O'Connor, and V. Wade. Personalised Information Retrieval: Survey and Classification. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, pages 1--63, 2012.
[13]
B. Hu and M. Ester. Spatial Topic Modeling in Online Social Media for Location Recommendation. In Proceedings of RecSys, 2013.
[14]
T. Joachims. A Statistical Learning Model of Text Classification for Support Vector Machines. In Proceedings of SIGIR, 2001.
[15]
H. Kukka, V. Kostakos, T. Ojala, J. Ylipulli, T. Suopajärvi, M. Jurmu, and S. Hosio. This is Not Classified: Everyday Information Seeking and Encountering in Smart Urban Spaces. Personal & Ubiquitous Computing, 17(1), 2013.
[16]
T. Kurashima, T. Iwata, T. Hoshide, N. Takaya, and K. Fujimura. Geo Topic Model: Joint Modeling of User's Activity Area and Interests for Location Recommendation. In Proceedings of WSDM, 2013
[17]
D. Metzler. Automatic Feature Selection in the Markov Random Field Model for Information Retrieval. In Proceedings of CIKM, 2007.
[18]
M. G. Noll and C. Meinel. Web search Personalization via Social Bookmarking and Tagging. In Proceedings of ISWC'07, 2007.
[19]
A. Noulas, S. Scellato, N. Lathia, and C. Mascolo. A Random Walk around the City: New Venue Recommendation in Location-based Social Networks. In Proceedings of PASSAT, 2012.
[20]
I. Ounis, G. Amati, V. Plachouras, B. He, C. Macdonald, and D. Johnson. Terrier Information Retrieval Platform. In Advances in Information Retrieval, pages 517--519. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2005.
[21]
J. R. Quinlan. C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 1993.
[22]
R. L. T. Santos, C. Macdonald, and I. Ounis. Exploiting Query Reformulations for Web Search Result Diversification. In Proceedings of WWW, 2010.
[23]
R. L. T. Santos, C. Macdonald, and I. Ounis. On the Role of Novelty for Search Result Diversification. Information Retrieval, 15(5):478--502, 2012.
[24]
S. Vargas and P. Castells. Exploiting the Diversity of User Preferences for Recommendation. In Proceedings of OAIR, 2013.
[25]
Q. Wu, C. J. C. Burges, K. M. Svore, and J. Gao. Ranking, Boosting, and Model Aaptation. Technical Report MSR-TR-2008-109, Microsoft, 2008.
[26]
P. Yang and H. Fang. Opinion-based User Profile Modeling for Contextual Suggestions. In Proceedings of ICTIR, 2013.
[27]
M. Ye, P. Yin, W. Lee, and D-.L. Lee. Exploiting Geographical Influence for Collaborative Point-of-interest Recommendation. In Proceedings of SIGIR, 2011.
[28]
C. Zhai and J. Lafferty. A Study of Smoothing Methods for Language Models Applied to Information Retrieval. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 22(2), 2004.
[29]
M. Zhang and N. Hurley. Novel Item Recommendation by User Profile Partitioning. In Proceedings of WI-IAT, 2009.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
IIiX '14: Proceedings of the 5th Information Interaction in Context Symposium
August 2014
368 pages
ISBN:9781450329767
DOI:10.1145/2637002
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

  • University of Regensburg: University of Regensburg

In-Cooperation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 26 August 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

IIiX '14
Sponsor:
  • University of Regensburg

Acceptance Rates

IIiX '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 21 of 45 submissions, 47%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 21 of 45 submissions, 47%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 06 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media