skip to main content
10.1145/2600428.2609468acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Comparing client and server dwell time estimates for click-level satisfaction prediction

Published: 03 July 2014 Publication History

Abstract

Click dwell time is the amount of time that a user spends on a clicked search result. Many previous studies have shown that click dwell time is strongly correlated with result-level satisfaction and document relevance. Accurate estimates of dwell time are therefore important for applications such as search satisfaction prediction and result ranking. However, dwell time can be estimated in different ways according to the information available about the search process. For example, a result reached for the query [Garfield] may involve 145s of "server-side" dwell time (observable to the search engine) and 40s of "client-side" dwell time (observable from the browser). Since search engines can only observe server-side actions (i.e., activity on the search engine result page), server-side dwell times are estimated by measuring the time between a search result click and the next search event (click or query). Conversely, more detailed information about page dwell times can be obtained via client-side methods such as Web browser toolbars. The client-side information enables the estimation of more accurate dwell times by measuring the amount of time that a user spends on pages of interest (either the landing page, or pages on the full navigation trail). In this paper, we define three different dwell times, i.e., server-side, client-side, and trail dwell time, and examine their effectiveness for predicting click satisfaction. For this, we collect toolbar and search engine logs from real users, and provide an analysis of dwell times for improving prediction performance. Moreover, we show further improvements in predicting click-level satisfaction by combining dwell times with other query features (e.g., query clarity).

References

[1]
Bilenko, M. and White, R. W. (2008). Mining the search trails of surfing crowds: Identifying relevant websites from user ac-tivity. Proc. WWW, 51--60.
[2]
Claypool, M., Le, Phong, Waseda, M., and Brown, D. (2001). Implicit interest indicators. Proc. IUI, 33--40.
[3]
Cronen-Townsend, S., Zhou, Y., and Croft, W.B. (2002). Predicting query performance. Proc. SIGIR, 299--306.
[4]
Downey, D., Dumais, S.T., and Horvitz, E. (2007). Models of searching and browsing: Languages, studies, and applications. Proc. IJCAI, 2740--2747.
[5]
Fox, S., Karnawat, K., Mydland, M., Dumais, S., and White, T. (2005). Evaluating implicit measures to improve web search. ACM TOIS, 23(2): 147--168.
[6]
Friedman, J.H. (2001). Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. The Annals of Statistics, 29(5): 1189--1232.
[7]
Hassan, A., Jones, R., and Klinkner, K.L. (2010). Beyond DCG: User behavior as a predictor of a successful search. Proc. WSDM, 221--230.
[8]
He, B. and Ounis, I. (2006). Query performance prediction. Information Systems, 31(7): 585--594.
[9]
Huffman, S. and Hochster, M. (2007). How well does result relevance predict session satisfaction? Proc. SIGIR, 567--574.
[10]
Kelly, D. and Belkin, N.J. (2001). Reading time, scrolling, and interaction: Exploring implicit sources of user preferences for relevance feedback. Proc. SIGIR, 408--409.
[11]
Kelly, D. and Belkin, N.J. (2004). Display time as implicit feedback: Understanding task effects. Proc. SIGIR, 377--384.
[12]
Kim, Y., Hassan, A., White, R.W., and Zitouni, I. (2014). Modeling dwell time to predict click-level satisfaction. Proc. WSDM, 193--202.
[13]
Liu C., White, R.W., and Dumais, S. (2010). Understanding web browsing behaviors through Weibull analysis of dwell time. Proc. SIGIR. 379--386.
[14]
Wang, K., Thrasher, C., Viegas, E., Li, X. and Hsu, P. (2010). An overview of Microsoft web n-gram corpus and applica-tions. NAACL HLT Demo Session, 45--48.
[15]
White, R.W. and Kelly, D. (2006). A study on the effects of personalization and task information on implicit feedback per-formance. Proc. CIKM, 297--306.
[16]
White, R.W. and Singla, A. (2011). Finding our way on the Web: Exploring the role of waypoints in search interaction, Proc. WWW, 147--148.
[17]
Xu, S., Jiang, H., and Lau, F.C.M. (2011). Mining user dwell time for personalized web search re-ranking. Proc. IJCAI, 2367--2372.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Comparing client and server dwell time estimates for click-level satisfaction prediction

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SIGIR '14: Proceedings of the 37th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research & development in information retrieval
    July 2014
    1330 pages
    ISBN:9781450322577
    DOI:10.1145/2600428
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 03 July 2014

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. click satisfaction
    2. dwell time analysis

    Qualifiers

    • Poster

    Conference

    SIGIR '14
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    SIGIR '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 82 of 387 submissions, 21%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 792 of 3,983 submissions, 20%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)30
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
    Reflects downloads up to 16 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media