skip to main content
10.1145/2505469.2505473acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobicomConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

MASERATI: mobile adaptive streaming based on environmental and contextual information

Published: 30 September 2013 Publication History

Abstract

Wireless/mobile video streaming has become increasingly popular, which makes wireless link bandwidth scarce. To provide streaming services to mobile users, it is crucial to adapt to the link condition and traffic fluctuation. We investigate which factors in natural environments and user contexts affect the available link bandwidth. To this end, we conduct a measurement study which contains 38 repeated trips along the same 5~km circular road in the campus of Seoul National University in April and May 2013. We measure the download throughput of video streaming from two different networks (3G and 4G LTE) with varying location, time, humidity, and speed. Our measurement results reveal that the humidity and location are the more important factors in the 3G network, while the speed, time, and location are the more important ones in the 4G LTE network to predict the available link bandwidth. We then propose an adaptive video streaming framework, MASERATI, where the information of environments and contexts is used to predict the available bandwidth. We demonstrate that MASERATI significantly improves the QoE of mobile streaming users in terms of the playout success rate, video quality, and stability, in comparison to DASH.

References

[1]
Apple. Best practices for creating and deploying http live streaming media for the iphone and ipad, 2012. http://developer.apple.com/library/ios/#technotes/tn2224/_index.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/DTS40009745-CH1-SETTINGSFILES.
[2]
Cisco. Cisco visual networking index: Global mobile data traffic forecast update, 2012.
[3]
J. Derksen, R. Jansen, M. Maijala, and E. Westerberg. Hsdpa performance and evolution. Ericsson Review, 3:117--120, 2006.
[4]
K. Evensen, A. Petlund, H. Riiser, P. Vigmostad, D. Kaspar, C. Griwodz, and P. Halvorsen. Mobile video streaming using location-based network prediction and transparent handover. In ACM NOSSDAV, 2011.
[5]
S.-s. Kim. Data consumption tsunami expected as lte passed 3g in subscribers, 2013. http://english.etnews.com/communication/2750398_1300.html.
[6]
Z. Lu and G. de Veciana. Optimizing stored video delivery for mobile networks: the value of knowing the future. In IEEE INFOCOM, 2013.
[7]
P. Ni, A. Eichhorn, C. Griwodz, and P. Halvorsen. Fine-grained scalable streaming from coarse-grained videos. In ACM NOSSDAV, 2009.
[8]
O. Oyman and S. Singh. Quality of experience for http adaptive streaming services. IEEE Communications Magazine, 50(4):20--27, 2012.
[9]
B. J. B. D. M. B. Pantos, R. and A. Tseng. Http live streaming, 2010. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pantos-http-live-streaming-04.
[10]
E. Piri, J. Pinola, I. Harjula, and K. Pentikousis. Empirical evaluation of mobile wimax with mimo. In IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Workshop, 2009.
[11]
A. Rao, A. Legout, Y.-s. Lim, D. Towsley, C. Barakat, and W. Dabbous. Network characteristics of video streaming traffic. In ACM CoNEXT, 2011.
[12]
H. Riiser, T. Endestad, P. Vigmostad, C. Griwodz, and P. Halvorsen. Video streaming using a location-based bandwidth-lookup service for bitrate planning. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computimg, Communications, and Applications, 8(3):24:1--24:19, 2012.
[13]
H. Ruser, P. Halvorsen, C. Griwodz, and B. Hestnes. Performance measurements and evaluation of video streaming in hsdpa networks with 16qam modulation. In IEEE ICME, 2008.
[14]
C. E. Shannon. Prediction and entropy of printed english. Bell system technical journal, 30(1):50--64, 1951.
[15]
T. Stockhammer. Dynamic adaptive streaming over http: standards and design principles. In ACM MMSys, 2011.
[16]
J. Yao, S. S. Kanhere, and M. Hassan. An empirical study of bandwidth predictability in mobile computing. In ACM WiNTECH, 2008.
[17]
A. Zambelli. Smooth streaming technical overview, 2009. http://learn.iis.net/page.aspx/626/smooth-streaming-technical-overview/.
[18]
M. Zink, O. Kunzel, J. Schmitt, and R. Steinmetz. Subjective impression of variations in layer encoded videos. In IEEE IWQoS, 2003.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. MASERATI: mobile adaptive streaming based on environmental and contextual information

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      WiNTECH '13: Proceedings of the 8th ACM international workshop on Wireless network testbeds, experimental evaluation & characterization
      September 2013
      114 pages
      ISBN:9781450323642
      DOI:10.1145/2505469
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 30 September 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. 3G
      2. 4G
      3. adaptive streaming
      4. bandwidth prediction
      5. bitrate planning
      6. entropy
      7. measurement
      8. mobile computing
      9. video streaming
      10. wireless

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Conference

      MobiCom'13
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      WiNTECH '13 Paper Acceptance Rate 11 of 26 submissions, 42%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 63 of 100 submissions, 63%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 30 Jan 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media