skip to main content
10.1145/2468356.2479655acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
tutorial

Made for sharing: HCI stories of transfer, triumph and tragedy

Published: 27 April 2013 Publication History

Abstract

Recent studies on how traditional HCI methods are applied in practice entail re-conceptualization of the nature of such methods, leading to the notion of 'method-as-set-of-resources'. Re-usable resources provide some, but not all, of the required resources for design work. Others must be provided within design work contexts. The expanding scope of use contexts alongside the shift of emphasis to user experience calls for the development of alternative HCI practices. These two trends can influence each other. Understanding, via structured case studies, how HCI professionals transfer the same (set) of design and evaluation methods across use contexts in terms of appropriating and configuring method-resources can provide applied knowledge for: (i) creating new methods, (ii) training novices, and (iii) laying a firmer groundwork for formal analysis of HCI methods. This workshop aims to bring together HCI professionals who have method-transfer experience and knowledge to share, analyze and synthesize insights so gained. Methods, transfer, approaches, resources, use context, case study, usability, user experience, practice

References

[1]
Andrews, M. Squire, C., & Tamboukou, M. (Eds.) (2008). Doing narrative research. Sage.
[2]
Bygstad, B.,Ghinea, G., & Brevik,E. (2008). Software development methods and usability: Perspectives from a survey in the software industry in Norway. Interacting with Computers, 20, 375--385.
[3]
Hartson, R., & Pyla, P. (2012). The UX Book. Morgan Kaufmann.
[4]
Jeffries, R., Miller, J., Wharton, C., & Uyeda, K. (1991). User interface evaluation in the real world: A comparison of four techniques. Proc. CHI'91, 119--24.
[5]
John, B. E. (2000). Learning and using the cognitive walkthrough method: a case study approach. In Proc. CHI'95 (pp. 429--436).
[6]
Følstad, A., Law, E. L.-C. & Hornbæk, K. (2010). Analysis in usability evaluation: An exploratory study. In Proc. NordiCHI 2012, 647--650.
[7]
Furniss, D. (2008). Beyond problem identification: Valuing methods in a 'system of usability practice'. PhD Thesis,: University College London.
[8]
Gulliksen, J., Boivie, I., & Göransson, B. (2006). Usability professionals: current practices and future development. Interacting with Computers, 203--261.
[9]
Lárusdóttir, M.K., Cajander, A., & Gulliksen, J. (2012). The big picture of UX is missing in Scrum projects. In Proc. I-UxSED 2012.
[10]
Nonaka, I., & Krogh, von G. (2009). Perspective-tacit knowledge and knowledge conversion. Organizational Science, 20, 635--652
[11]
Schön, D. A. (1984). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
[12]
Suchman, L. (1987). Plans and situated actions. Cambridge University Press.
[13]
Tullis, T., & Albert, B. (2008). Measuring the user experience: collecting, analyzing, and presenting usability metrics. Morgan Kaufmann.
[14]
Venturi, G.,Troost, J.& Jokela, T. (2006). People, organizations, and processes: An inquiry into the adoption of user-centered design in industry. Int J, HCI21(2), 219--38.
[15]
Wixon, D.R. (2003). Evaluating usability methods: why the current literature fails the practitioner. Interactions 10(4), 28--34.
[16]
Woolrych, A., Hornbæk, K., Frøkjær, E., & Cockton, G. (2011). Ingredients and meals rather than recipes: A proposal for research that does not treat usability evaluation methods as indivisible wholes. Int. J. HCI 27(10), 940--70. \ \

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Made for sharing: HCI stories of transfer, triumph and tragedy

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CHI EA '13: CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 2013
    3360 pages
    ISBN:9781450319522
    DOI:10.1145/2468356
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 27 April 2013

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. approaches
    2. case study
    3. methods
    4. practice
    5. resources
    6. transfer
    7. usability
    8. use context
    9. user experience

    Qualifiers

    • Tutorial

    Conference

    CHI '13
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    CHI EA '13 Paper Acceptance Rate 630 of 1,963 submissions, 32%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 6,164 of 23,696 submissions, 26%

    Upcoming Conference

    CHI 2025
    ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 26 - May 1, 2025
    Yokohama , Japan

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 03 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media