skip to main content
10.1145/2465529.2465545acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmetricsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Practical conflict graphs for dynamic spectrum distribution

Published: 17 June 2013 Publication History

Abstract

Most spectrum distribution proposals today develop their allocation algorithms that use conflict graphs to capture interference relationships. The use of conflict graphs, however, is often questioned by the wireless community because of two issues. First, building conflict graphs requires significant overhead and hence generally does not scale to outdoor networks, and second, the resulting conflict graphs do not capture accumulative interference. In this paper, we use large-scale measurement data as ground truth to understand just how severe these issues are in practice, and whether they can be overcome. We build "practical" conflict graphs using measurement-calibrated propagation models, which remove the need for exhaustive signal measurements by interpolating signal strengths using calibrated models. These propagation models are imperfect, and we study the impact of their errors by tracing the impact on multiple steps in the process, from calibrating propagation models to predicting signal strength and building conflict graphs. At each step, we analyze the introduction, propagation and final impact of errors, by comparing each intermediate result to its ground truth counterpart generated from measurements. Our work produces several findings. Calibrated propagation models generate location-dependent prediction errors, ultimately producing conservative conflict graphs. While these "estimated conflict graphs" lose some spectrum utilization, their conservative nature improves reliability by reducing the impact of accumulative interference. Finally, we propose a graph augmentation technique that addresses any remaining accumulative interference, the last missing piece in a practical spectrum distribution system using measurement-calibrated conflict graphs.

References

[1]
Coverage or capacity? best use of 802.11n. Trapeze Networks Whitepaper.
[2]
MetroFi. http://crawdad.cs.dartmouth.edu/pdx/metrofi/2007/coverage.
[3]
Secondary markets in radio spectrum. http://www.fcc.gov/events/secondary-markets-radio-spectrum.
[4]
TFA. http://tfa.rice.edu/measurements/.
[5]
Ahmed, N., Ismail, U., and Keshav, S. Online estimation of RF interference. In Proc. of CoNEXT (2008).
[6]
Ahmed, N., and Keshav, S. SMARTA: a self-managing architecture for thin access points. In Proc. of CoNEXT (2006).
[7]
Alicherry, M., Bhatia, R., and Li, L. E. Joint channel assignment and routing for throughput optimization in multi-radio wireless mesh networks. In Proc. of MobiCom (2005).
[8]
Cai, K., et al. Non-intrusive, dynamic interference detection for 802.11 networks. In Proc. of IMC (2009).
[9]
Cao, L., et al. Optimus: SINR-Driven Spectrum Distribution via Constraint Transformation. In Proc. of DySPAN (2010).
[10]
Cao, L., and Zheng, H. Distributed spectrum allocation via local bargaining. In Proc. of SECON (2005).
[11]
Das, S. M., et al. Characterizing multi-way interference in wireless mesh networks. In Proc. of WiNTECH (2006).
[12]
Deb, S., Srinivasan, V., and Maheshwari, R. Dynamic spectrum access in DTV whitespaces: design rules, architecture and algorithms. In Proc. of MobiCom (2009).
[13]
Gandhi, S., Buragohain, C., Cao, L., Zheng, H., and Suri, S. A general framework for wireless spectrum auctions. In Proc. of DySPAN (2007).
[14]
Goldsmith, A. Wireless communications. Cambridge Univ Pr.
[15]
Goldsmith, A., and Greenstein, L. A measurement-based model for predicting coverage areas of urban microcells. IEEE JSAC 11, 7(1993).
[16]
Green, E. Radio link design for microcellular systems. British Telecom technology journal 8, 1(1990), 85--96.
[17]
Green, E., and Hata, M. Microcellular propagation measurements in an urban environment. In Proc. of PIMRC (1991).
[18]
Haas, Z., Winters, J., and Johnson, D. Simulation study of the capacity bounds in cellular systems. In PIMRC/WCN (1994).
[19]
Hurley, S. Planning effective cellular mobile radio networks. IEEE TVT 51, 2(2002), 243--253.
[20]
Jain, K., Padhye, J., Padmanabhan, V. N., and Qiu, L. Impact of interference on multi-hop wireless network performance. In Proc. of MobiCom (2003).
[21]
Jang, K.-Y., et al. Passive on-line in-band interference inference in centralized WLANs. In Tech. Rep. 916, USC (2010).
[22]
Katzela, I., and Naghshineh, M. Channel assignment schemes for cellular mobile telecommunication systems: a comprehensive survey. Personal Communications, IEEE 3, 3(1996),10--31.
[23]
Kotz, D., et al. Experimental evaluation of wireless simulation assumptions. In Proc. of MSWiM (2004).
[24]
Kuurne, A. Mobile measurement based frequency planning in GSM networks. MS thesis, Helsinki University of Technology (2001).
[25]
Li, Y., et al. Predictable performance optimization for wireless networks. In Proc. of SIGCOMM (2008).
[26]
Liu, X., et al. DIRC: Increasing indoor wireless capacity using directional antennas. In Proc. of SIGCOMM (2009).
[27]
Maheshwari, R., Jain, S., and Das, S. R. Ameasurement study of interference modeling and scheduling in low-power wireless networks. In Proc. of SenSys (2008).
[28]
Manweiler, J., et al. Order matters: Interference-aware transmission reordering in wireless networks. In Proc. of MobiCom (2009).
[29]
Mishra, A. Fundamentals of cellular network planning and optimisation. Wiley Online Library, 2004.
[30]
Moscibroda, T., Wattenhofer, R., and Weber, Y. Protocol design beyond graph-based models. In Proc. of HotNets (2006).
[31]
Murty, R., et al. SenseLess: A database-driven white spaces network. In Proc. of DySPAN (2011).
[32]
Necker, M. C. Towards frequency reuse 1 cellular FDM/TDM systems. In Proc. of MSWiM (2006).
[33]
Niculescu, D. Interference map for 802.11 networks. In Proc. of IMC (2007).
[34]
Padhye, J., et al. Estimation of link interference in static multi-hop wireless networks. In Proc. of IMC (2005).
[35]
Peng, C., Zheng, H., and Zhao, B. Y. Utilization and fairness in spectrum assignment for opportunistic spectrum access. MONET 11, 4(2006), 555--576.
[36]
Phillips, C., Sicker, D., and Grunwald, D. Bounding the error of path loss models. In Proc. of DySPAN (2011).
[37]
Qiu, L., et al. Ageneralmodelofwirelessinterference.In Proc. of MobiCom (2007).
[38]
Ramanathan, S. Aunifiedframeworkandalgorithmfor channel assignment in wireless networks. Wirel. Netw. 5,2 (1999), 81--94.
[39]
Rayanchu, S., et al. FLUID: improving throughputs in enterprise wireless LANs through flexible channelization. In Proc. of MobiCom (2011).
[40]
Reis, C., et al. Measurement-based models of delivery and interference in static wireless networks. InProc. of SIGCOMM (2006).
[41]
Riback, M., et al. Carrier frequency effects on path loss. In Proc. of VTC (2006).
[42]
Robinson, J., Swaminathan, R., and Knightly, E. W. Assessment of urban-scale wireless networks with a small number of measurements. In Proc. of MobiCom (2008).
[43]
Rozner, E., et al. Traffic-aware channel assignment in enterprise wireless networks. In Proc. of ICNP (2007).
[44]
Sala, A., Cao, L., Wilson, C., Zablit, R., Zheng, H., and Zhao, B. Y. Measurement-calibrated graph models for social network experiments. In Proc. of WWW (2010).
[45]
Shrivastava, V., et al. PIE in the sky: Online passive interference estimation for enterprise WLANs. In Proc. of NSDI (2011).
[46]
Song, L., and Shen, J. Evolved cellular network planning and optimization for UMTS and LTE. CRC Press, 2010.
[47]
Subramanian, P., et al. Near-optimal dynamic spectrum allocation in cellular networks. In Proc. of DySPAN (2008).
[48]
Yang, L., Cao, L., and Zheng, H. Physical interference driven dynamic spectrum management. In Proc. of DySPAN (2008).
[49]
Younis, M., and Akkaya, K. Strategies and techniques for node placement in wireless sensor networks: A survey. Ad Hoc Networks 6, 4(2008), 621--655.
[50]
Zhou, X., Gandhi, S., Suri, S., and Zheng, H. eBay in the sky: Strategy-proof wireless spectrum auctions. In Proc. of MobiCom (2008).

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Practical conflict graphs for dynamic spectrum distribution

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SIGMETRICS '13: Proceedings of the ACM SIGMETRICS/international conference on Measurement and modeling of computer systems
    June 2013
    406 pages
    ISBN:9781450319003
    DOI:10.1145/2465529
    • cover image ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review
      ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review  Volume 41, Issue 1
      Performance evaluation review
      June 2013
      385 pages
      ISSN:0163-5999
      DOI:10.1145/2494232
      Issue’s Table of Contents
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 17 June 2013

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. conflict graphs
    2. dynamic spectrum access
    3. interference

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    SIGMETRICS '13
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    SIGMETRICS '13 Paper Acceptance Rate 54 of 196 submissions, 28%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 459 of 2,691 submissions, 17%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)13
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
    Reflects downloads up to 14 Sep 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media