skip to main content
10.1145/2441776.2441838acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Non-static nature of patient consent: shifting privacy perspectives in health information sharing

Published: 23 February 2013 Publication History

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to explore how chronically ill patients and their specialized care network have viewed their personal medical information privacy and how it has impacted their perspectives of sharing their records with their network of healthcare providers and secondary use organizations. Diabetes patients and specialized diabetes medical care providers in Eastern England were interviewed about their sharing of medical information and their privacy concerns to inform a descriptive qualitative and exploratory thematic analysis. From the interview data, we see that diabetes patients shift their perceived privacy concerns and needs throughout their lifetime due to persistence of health data, changes in health, technology advances, and experience with technology that affect one's consent decisions. From these findings, we begin to take a translational research approach in critically examining current privacy enhancing technologies for secondary use consent management and motivate the further exploration of both temporally-sensitive privacy perspectives and new options in consent management that support shifting privacy concerns over one's lifetime.

References

[1]
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77--10
[2]
Bridson, J., Hammond, C., Leach, A. and Chester, M.R. Making consent patient centred. British Medical Jour. 327, 7424 (2003), 1159--1161.
[3]
Chalmers, J. and Muir, R. Patient privacy and confidentiality. British Medical Jour 326, (2003), 725--726.
[4]
Chochinov, H.M. Dignity and the essence of medicine: The A, B, C, and D of dignity conserving care. British Medical Jour 335 (2007), 18
[5]
Cleeff, A., Dimkov, T., Pieters, W. and Wieringa, R. Realizing Security Requirements with Physical Properties: A Case Study on Paper Voting. In Proc. IT Convergence and Security 2011. Springer Netherlands (2012), 51--67.
[6]
Department of Health. Improving Chronic Disease Management. http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4075214.
[7]
Department of Health. Newly available Health Data will support Medical Research and Patient Empowerment. http://mediacentre.dh.gov.uk/2011/11/29/newly-available-health-data-will-support-medical-research-and-patient-empowerment/.
[8]
Diabetes UK. Current Research. http://www.diabetes.org.uk/Research/Current-research/.
[9]
Forsythe, D.E. Using ethnography to build a working system: rethinking basic design assumptions. In Proc. Computer Applications in Medical Care 1992. McGraw-Hill (1992), 510--514.
[10]
Fox, S., and Jones, S. The social life of health information. Pew Internet. www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2009/8-The-Social-Life-of-Health-Information.aspx.
[11]
General Medical Council Standards. Confidentiality guidance: Research and other secondary uses. http://www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/ethical_guidance/confidentiality_40_50_research_and_secondary_issues.asp.
[12]
Golafshani, N. Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report 8, 4 (2003), 597--607.
[13]
Greene, J.A., Choudhry, N.K., Kilabuk, E. and Shrank, W.H. Online social networking by patients with diabetes: a qualitative evaluation of communication with Facebook. Jour. General Internal Medicine 26, 3 (2011), 287--292.
[14]
Gross, L.S., Li, L., Ford, E.S. and Liu, S. Increased consumption of refined carbohydrates and the epidemic of type 2 diabetes in the United States: an ecologic assessment. American Jour. of Clinical Nutrition 79, 5 (2004), 774--779.
[15]
International Diabetes Federation. One Adult in Ten Will Have Diabetes by 2030. http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/documents/digitalasset/dh_4075213.pdf.
[16]
Kaufman, D.J., Murphy-Bollinger, J., Scott, J. and Hudson, K.L. Public opinion about the importance of privacy in biobank research. American Jour. of Human Genetics 85, 5 20(2009), 643--54.
[17]
Kaufman, F.R. Type 2 diabetes mellitus in children and youth: a new epidemic. Jour. of Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism, 15, Supplement (2011), 737--744.
[18]
Koro, C.E., Bowlin, S.J., Bourgeois, N. and Fedder, D.O. Glycemic control from 1988 to 2000 among US adults diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 27, 1 (2004),17--20.
[19]
Lowrance, W.W. Learning from experience. Privacy and the seconda3ry use of data in health research. Nuffield Trust (2002).
[20]
Lubkin, I.M. NS Larsen, P.D. Chronic illness: Impact and interventions. Jones & Bartlett Learning (2006).
[21]
Ludman, E.J., Fullerton, S.M., Spangler, L., Trinidad, S.B., Fujii, M.M., Jarvik, G.P., Larson, E.B. and Burke, W. Glad you asked: participants' opinions of re-consent for dbGap data submission. Jour. Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 5, 3 (2010), 9--16.
[22]
Mays, N. and Pope, C. Qualitative research: rigour and qualitative research. British Medical Jour 311, 6997 (1995), 109.
[23]
Medical Research Council. e-Health Informatics Research -- Securing the UK as a world leader. http://www.mrc.ac.uk/Ourresearch/ResearchInitiatives/E-HealthInformaticsResearch/index.htm.
[24]
Merton, R.K. Thematic Analysis in Science: Notes on Holton. Science 188, 4186 (1975), 335--338.
[25]
Narayanan, A. and Shmatikov, V. De-anonymizing social networks. In Proc. Security and Privacy 2009. IEEE (2009),173--187.
[26]
National Health Service. Pseudonymisation Implementation Project. http://www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/systemsandservices/pseudo.
[27]
National Health Service. Pseudonymisation Implementation Project (PIP): Implementation Guidance on Local NHS Data Usage and Governance for Secondary Uses. http://www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/systemsandservices/pseudo/impguide.pdf.
[28]
National Health Service. "Sealed Envelopes" Briefing Paper: "Selective Alerting" Approach. http://www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/systemsandservices/infogov/confidentiality/sealedpaper.pdf.
[29]
National Health Service. Secondary Uses Service (SUS). http://www.ic.nhs.uk/services/secondary-uses-service-sus.
[30]
Nied, R.J. and Franklin, B. Promoting and prescribing exercise for the elderly. American Family Physician 65, 3 (2002), 419--4
[31]
Or, C.K.L. and Karsh, B.T. A systematic review of patient acceptance of consumer health information technology. Jour. of the American Medical Informatics Association 16, 4 (2009), 550--560.
[32]
Palen, L. and Aaløkke. Of pill boxes and piano benches: Home-made methods for managing medication. In Proc. of CSCW 2006, ACM Press (2006), pp. 79--88.
[33]
Paterson, B.L. The shifting perspectives model of chronic illness. Jour. of Nursing Scholarship 33, 1 (2001), 21--26.
[34]
Reddy, M.C., Dourish, P. and Pratt, W. Temporality in medical work: Time also matters. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 15, 1 (2006) 29--53.
[35]
Regan, P.M. Legislating privacy: Technology, social values, and public policy, University of North Carolina Press (1995).
[36]
Rial, A. and Danezis, G. Privacy-preserving smart metering. In Proc. Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society 2011, ACM (2011), 49--60.
[37]
Rind, D.M., Kohane, I.S., Szolovits, P., Safran, C., Chueh, H.C. and Barnett, G.O. Maintaining the confidentiality of medical records shared over the Internet and World Wide Web. Annals Internal Medicine 127, 2 (1997), 138--141.
[38]
Robertson, A., Cresswell, K., Takian, A., Petrakaki, D., Crowe, S., Cornford, T., Barber, N., Avery, A., Fernando, B., Jacklin, A., Prescott, R., Klecun, E., Paton, J. Lichtner, V., Quinn, C., Ali, M., Morrison, Z., Jani, Y., Waring, J., Marsden, K. and Sheikh, A. Implementation and adoption of nationwide electronic health records in secondary care in England: qualitative analysis of interim results from a prospective national evaluation. British Medical Jour 341, (2010).
[39]
Roter, D.L. and Hall, J.A. Physicians' interviewing styles and medical information obtained from patients. Jour. General Internal Medicine 2, 5 (1987), 325--329.
[40]
Strauss, A.L. and Fagerhaugh, S. Social organization of medical work. Transaction Publishers (1997).
[41]
Sweeney, L. Guaranteeing anonymity when sharing medical data: the Datafly system. In Proc. AMIA Annual Fall Symposium 1997. Central (1997), 51--55.
[42]
Sweeney, L. Replacing personally-identifying information in medical records: the SCRUB system. In Proc. AMIA Annual Fall Symposium 1996. Central (1997), 333--7.
[43]
Tunstall-Pedoe, H. Preventing Chronic Diseases. A Vital Investment: WHO Global Report. Jour. Epidemiology 35, 4 (2006), 1107.
[44]
Wagner, E.H., Austin, B.T., Davis, C., Hindmarsh, M., Schaefer, J. and Bonomi, A. Improving Chronic Illness Care: Translating Evidence Into Action. Health Affairs 20, 6 (2001), 64--78.
[45]
Wicks, P., Massagli, M., Frost, J., Brownstein, C., Okun, S., Vaughan, T., Bradley, R. and Heywood, J. Sharing health data for better outcomes on PatientsLikeMe. Jour. Medical Internet Research 12, 2 (2010).
[46]
Willison, D.J., Schwartz, L., Abelson, J., Charles, C., Swinton, M., Northrup, D. and Thabane, L. Alternatives to Project-specific Consent for Access to Personal Information for Health Research: What Is the Opinion of the Canadian Public? Jour. American Medical Informatics Association 14, 6 (2007), 706--712.
[47]
World Health Organization. Chronic diseases. http://www.who.int/topics/chronic_diseases/en/.
[48]
Wu, S. and Green, A. Projection of chronic illness prevalence and cost inflation. RAND Health (2000).

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Non-static nature of patient consent: shifting privacy perspectives in health information sharing

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CSCW '13: Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work
    February 2013
    1594 pages
    ISBN:9781450313315
    DOI:10.1145/2441776
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 23 February 2013

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. chronic illness
    2. illness trajectory
    3. medical records
    4. privacy
    5. temporality

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    CSCW '13
    Sponsor:
    CSCW '13: Computer Supported Cooperative Work
    February 23 - 27, 2013
    Texas, San Antonio, USA

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 2,235 of 8,521 submissions, 26%

    Upcoming Conference

    CSCW '24

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)34
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
    Reflects downloads up to 09 Oct 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Healthcare Voice AI Assistants: Factors Influencing Trust and Intention to UseProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373398:CSCW1(1-37)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
    • (2023)People with long-term conditions sharing personal health data via digital health technologies: A scoping review to inform designPLOS Digital Health10.1371/journal.pdig.00002642:5(e0000264)Online publication date: 24-May-2023
    • (2023)Explanation before Adoption: Supporting Informed Consent for Complex Machine Learning and IoT Health PlatformsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35794827:CSCW1(1-25)Online publication date: 16-Apr-2023
    • (2023)Co-designing opportunities for Human-Centred Machine Learning in supporting Type 1 diabetes decision-makingInternational Journal of Human-Computer Studies10.1016/j.ijhcs.2023.103003173(103003)Online publication date: May-2023
    • (2022)Understanding the attitudes and experiences of people living with potentially stigmatised long-term health conditions with respect to collecting and sharing health and lifestyle dataDIGITAL HEALTH10.1177/205520762210897988(205520762210897)Online publication date: 18-Apr-2022
    • (2022)Beyond the Pandemic and Privacy Concerns: Perceived Benefit and Expected Use of Pandemic-Tracking Apps in IndiaProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35555966:CSCW2(1-29)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022
    • (2022)Being a Solo Endeavor or Team Worker in Crowdsourcing Contests? It is a Long-term Decision You Need to MakeProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35555956:CSCW2(1-32)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022
    • (2022)Amazon Echo Show as a Multimodal Human-to-Human Care Support Tool within Self-Isolating Older UK HouseholdsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35551936:CSCW2(1-31)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022
    • (2022)"We're so much more than the in-game clan": Gaming Experiences and Group Management in Multi-Space Online CommunitiesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35551196:CSCW2(1-29)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022
    • (2022)How Should the Agent Communicate to the Group? Communication Strategies of a Conversational Agent in Group Chat DiscussionsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35551126:CSCW2(1-23)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media