skip to main content
10.1145/2212908.2212924acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The tradeoffs of fused memory hierarchies in heterogeneous computing architectures

Published: 15 May 2012 Publication History

Abstract

With the rise of general purpose computing on graphics processing units (GPGPU), the influence from consumer markets can now be seen across the spectrum of computer architectures. In fact, many of the high-ranking Top500 HPC systems now include these accelerators. Traditionally, GPUs have connected to the CPU via the PCIe bus, which has proved to be a significant bottleneck for scalable scientific applications. Now, a trend toward tighter integration between CPU and GPU has removed this bottleneck and unified the memory hierarchy for both CPU and GPU cores. We examine the impact of this trend for high performance scientific computing by investigating AMD's new Fusion Accelerated Processing Unit (APU) as a testbed. In particular, we evaluate the tradeoffs in performance, power consumption, and programmability when comparing this unified memory hierarchy with similar, but discrete GPUs.

References

[1]
E. Agullo, J. Demmel, J. Dongarra, B. Hadri, J. Kurzak, J. Langou, H. Ltaief, P. Luszczek, and S. Tomov. Numerical Linear Algebra on Emerging Architectures: the PLASMA and MAGMA Projects. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 180, 2009.
[2]
C. Augonnet, S. Thibault, R. Namyst, and P.-A. Wacrenier. StarPU: A Unified Platform for Task Scheduling on Heterogeneous Multicore Architectures. In Euro-Par 2009 Parallel Processing, volume 5704 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 863--874. 2009.
[3]
D. C. B. Chamberlain and H. P. Zima. Parallel Programmability and the Chapel Language. The International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications, 2007.
[4]
N. Brookwood. AMD Fusion Family of APUs: Enabling a Superior, Immersive PC Experience. http://sites.amd.com/us/Documents/48423B_fusion_whitepaper_WEB.pdf, Mar 2010.
[5]
W. M. Brown, A. Kohlmeyer, S. J. Plimpton, and A. N. Tharrington. Implementing Molecular Dynamics on Hybrid High Performance Computers | Particle-Particle Particle-Mesh. Computer Physics Communications, 183(3):449 -- 459, 2012.
[6]
W. M. Brown, P. Wang, S. J. Plimpton, and A. N. Tharrington. Implementing Molecular Dynamics on Hybrid High Performance Computers | Short Range Forces. Computer Physics Communications, 182(4):898 -- 911, 2011.
[7]
S. Carrillo, J. Siegel, and X. Li. A Control-Structure Splitting Optimization for GPGPU. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM Conference on Computing Frontiers, CF'09, pages 147--150, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM.
[8]
M. Daga, A. Aji, and W. Feng. On the Efficacy of a Fused CPU+GPU Processor (or APU) for Parallel Computing. In 2011 Symposium on Application Accelerators in High-Performance Computing (SAAHPC), pages 141--149, July 2011.
[9]
A. Danalis, G. Marin, C. McCurdy, J. S. Meredith, P. C. Roth, K. Spa ord, V. Tipparaju, and J. S. Vetter. The Scalable Heterogeneous Computing (SHOC) Benchmark Suite. In Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on General-Purpose Computation on Graphics Processing Units, GPGPU '10, pages 63--74, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM.
[10]
J. J. Dongarra and P. Luszczek. Introduction to the HPCChallenge Benchmark Suite. Technical Report ICL-UT-05-01, Innovative Computing Laboratory, University of Tennessee-Knoxville, 2005.
[11]
T. Endo, A. Nukada, S. Matsuoka, and N. Maruyama. Linpack Evaluation on a Supercomputer with Heterogeneous Accelerators. In 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Processing (IPDPS), pages 1--8, 2010.
[12]
J. Dongarra, P. Beckman et al. International exascale software roadmap. International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications, 25(1), 2011.
[13]
D. Kaeli and D. Akodes. The Convergence of HPC and Embedded Systems in Our Heterogeneous Computing Future. In 2011 IEEE 29th International Conference on Computer Design (ICCD), pages 9--11, oct. 2011.
[14]
L. V. Kale and G. Zheng. Charm++ and AMPI: Adaptive Runtime Strategies via Migratable Objects. Advanced Computational Infrastructures for Parallel and Distributed Adaptive Applications, pages 265--282, 2009.
[15]
C. Leiserson. The Cilk++ Concurrency Platform. The Journal of Supercomputing, 51:244--257, 2010.
[16]
M. Daga, T. Scogland, and W. Feng. Performance Characterization and Optimization of Atomic Operations on AMD GPUs. In Technical Report TR-11-08, Computer Science, Virginia Tech, Retrieved from http://eprints.cs.vt.edu/archive/00001159/.
[17]
M. Elteir, H. Lin, and W. Feng. Performance Characterization and Optimization of Atomic Operations on AMD GPUs. In 2011 IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing (CLUSTER), pages 234--243, sept. 2011.
[18]
A. Nukada and S. Matsuoka. Auto-tuning 3-D FFT Library for CUDA GPUs. In Proceedings of the Conference on High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis, SC '09, pages 30:1--30:10, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM.
[19]
J. D. Owens, M. Houston, D. Luebke, S. Green, J. E. Stone, and J. C. Phillips. GPU Computing. Proceedings of the IEEE, 96(5):879--899, May 2008.
[20]
S. Ryoo, C. I. Rodrigues, S. S. Stone, S. S. Baghsorkhi, S.-Z. Ueng, J. A. Stratton, and W. Hwu. Program Optimization Space Pruning for a Multithreaded GPU. In Proceedings of the 6th Annual IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Code Generation and Optimization, CGO '08, pages 195--204, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM.
[21]
S. Ryoo, C. I. Rodrigues, S. S. Stone, S. S. Baghsorkhi, S. zee Ueng, and W. Hwu. Program Optimization Study on a 128-Core GPU. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on General Purpose Processing on Graphics Processing Units, 2007.
[22]
S. Ryoo, C. I. Rodrigues, S. S. Stone, J. A. Stratton, S.-Z. Ueng, S. S. Baghsorkhi, and W. Hwu. Program Optimization Carving for GPU Computing. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 68(10):1389--1401, 2008. General-Purpose Processing using Graphics Processing Units.
[23]
K. Spafford, J. S. Meredith, and J. S. Vetter. Quantifying NUMA and Contention Effects in Multi-GPU Systems. In Proceedings of The Fourth Workshop on General Purpose Processing on Graphics Processing Units. ACM, 2011.
[24]
J. Stoer and R. Bulirsch. Introduction to Numerical Analysis. Springer; 2nd edition, 1996.
[25]
V. Volkov and J. W. Demmel. Benchmarking GPUs to Tune Dense Linear Algebra. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM/IEEE Conference on Supercomputing, SC '08, pages -11, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2008. IEEE Press.
[26]
Y. Zhang, Y. Hu, B. Li, and L. Peng. Performance and Power Analysis of ATI GPU: A Statistical Approach. In 2011 6th IEEE International Conference on Networking, Architecture and Storage (NAS), pages 149--158, July 2011.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. The tradeoffs of fused memory hierarchies in heterogeneous computing architectures

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CF '12: Proceedings of the 9th conference on Computing Frontiers
    May 2012
    320 pages
    ISBN:9781450312158
    DOI:10.1145/2212908
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 15 May 2012

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. apu
    2. gpgpu
    3. heterogeneous
    4. performance analysis

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    CF'12
    Sponsor:
    CF'12: Computing Frontiers Conference
    May 15 - 17, 2012
    Cagliari, Italy

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 273 of 785 submissions, 35%

    Upcoming Conference

    CF '25

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)11
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 25 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media