skip to main content
10.1145/2147805.2147822acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesbcbConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Classification of breast cancer grades through quantitative characterization of ductal structure morphology in three-dimensional cultures

Published: 01 August 2011 Publication History

Abstract

A set of morphological features for mammary ductal structures is proposed for the evaluation of tissue's metastatic potential and exploited for the classification of six cell lines (MCF10 series) from three cancer grades in three-dimensional in vitro breast culture systems. These cultures mimic various grades of breast cancer along the metastatic cascade. Particular proteins of interest are fluorescently labeled and subsequently imaged via multi-spectral confocal microscopy in order to analyze cellular organization and polarity between various tumor grades. A Fourier-based image registration method is employed to stitch the images, 3D watershed segmentation method is used to identify the ductal structures, and morphological image processing techniques are utilized to extract the features. In addition to capturing both expected and visually-differentiable changes, we quantify subtle differences that are challenging to assess by microscopic inspection. Support vector machine-based supervised learning achieves 69.4% and 79.0% accuracy in classifying the ductal structures into pre-cancerous, non-invasive ductal carcinoma, and invasive ductal carcinoma grades after 7 and 14 days in the cell cultures, respectively. These results indicate that the proposed features can be used to describe the effects of morphological changes to the functional changes of the cells along the metastatic cascade.

References

[1]
M.A. Hayat, Ed., Methods of Cancer Diagnosis, Therapy and Prognosis: Breast Carcinoma, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, 2008.
[2]
A. J. Jensen, A. M. Naik, R. F. Pommier, J. T. Vetto, and M. L. Troxell, "Factors influencing accuracy of axillary sentinel lymph node frozen section for breast cancer," The American Journal of Surgery, vol. 199, no. 5, pp. 629--635, 2010.
[3]
J.S. Suri and R. M. Rangayyan, Eds., Recent advances in breast imaging, mammography, and computer-aided diagnosis of breast cancer, SPIE, Bellingham, WA, 2006.
[4]
M. N. Gurcan, L. E. Boucheron, A. Can, A. Madabhushi, N. M. Rajpoot, and B. Yener, "Histopathological image analysis: A review," IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, vol. 2, pp. 147--171, Feb. 2009.
[5]
V.M. Weaver, A. H. Fischer, O. W. Peterson, and M. J. Bissell, "The importance of the microenvironment in breast cancer progression: recapitulation of mammary tumorigenesis using a unique human mammary epithelial cell model and a three-dimensional culture assay," Biochemistry and cell biology, vol. 74, no. 6, pp. 833--851, 1996.
[6]
B. Weigelt and M. J. Bissell, "Unraveling the microenvironmental influences on the normal mammary gland and breast cancer," Seminars in cancer biology, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 311--321, 2008.
[7]
C. Hebner, V. M. Weaver, and J. Debnath, "Modeling morphogenesis and oncogenesis in three-dimensional breast epithelial cultures," Annual Review of Pathology: Mechanisms of Disease, vol. 3, pp. 313--339, 2008.
[8]
H. Chang, C. Park, and B. Parvin, "Quantitative representation of three-dimensional cell culture models," in Proc. of IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, 2007, 2007, pp. 89--92.
[9]
R. Fernandez-Gonzalez and M. H. Barcellos-Hoff, "A tool for the quantitative spatial analysis of complex cellular systems," IEEE Trans. Image Proc., vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 1300--1313, 2005.
[10]
L. McKeen, C. C. Bilgin, G. E. Plopper, and B. Yener, "Investigation of structure-function relationships of breast cancer's metastatic potential," in Proc. of 49th American Society for Cell Biology Annual Meeting, 2009.
[11]
L. McKeen-Polizzotti, K. M. Henderson, B. Oztan, C. C. Bilgin, B. Yener, and G. E. Plopper, "Quantitative metric profiles capture three-dimensional temporospatial architecture to discriminate cellular functional states," BMC Medical Imaging, 2011, revised and resubmitted for review.
[12]
S. Preibisch, S. Saalfeld, and P. Tomancak, "Globally optimal stitching of tiled 3D microscopic image acquisitions," Bioinformatics, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 1463--1465, 2009.
[13]
C. D. Kuglin and D. C. Hines, "The phase correlation image alignment method," in Proc. of IEEE 1975 Conference on cybernetics and society, 1975, pp. 163--165.
[14]
F. Meyer, "Topographic distance and watershed lines," Signal Processing, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 113--125, Jul. 1994.
[15]
N. Otsu, "A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms," IEEE Trans. Sys., Man, and Cyber., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 225--236, Jan. 1979.
[16]
B. Oztan, G. Sharma, A. Pasupuleti, and P. R. Mukund, "Processing of degraded documents for long-term archival using waferfiche#8482; technology," in Final Program and Proceedings: Archiving 2009, Springfield, VA, 2009, pp. 197--202, IS&T.
[17]
P. Soille, Morphological image analysis: principles and applications, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, second edition, 2002.
[18]
C. R. Maurer Jr, R. Qi, and V. Raghavan, "A linear time algorithm for computing exact euclidean distance transforms of binary images in arbitrary dimensions," IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intel., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 265--270, 2003.
[19]
H. Byun and S. W. Lee, "Applications of support vector machines for pattern recognition: A survey," Pattern Recognition with Support Vector Machines, pp. 571--591, 2002.
[20]
Z.R. Yang, "Biological applications of support vector machines," Briefings in bioinformatics, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 328--338, 2004.
[21]
N. Cristianini and J. Shawe-Taylor, An introduction to support Vector Machines: and other kernel-based learning methods, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2000.
[22]
C.W. Hsu and C. J. Lin, "A comparison of methods for multiclass support vector machines," IEEE Trans. on Neural Networks, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 415--425, 2002.
[23]
G.W. Snedecor and W. G. Cochran, Statistical methods, Iowa State University Press, Iowa City, IA, eighth edition, 1989.

Index Terms

  1. Classification of breast cancer grades through quantitative characterization of ductal structure morphology in three-dimensional cultures

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Information & Contributors

            Information

            Published In

            cover image ACM Conferences
            BCB '11: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine
            August 2011
            688 pages
            ISBN:9781450307963
            DOI:10.1145/2147805
            • General Chairs:
            • Robert Grossman,
            • Andrey Rzhetsky,
            • Program Chairs:
            • Sun Kim,
            • Wei Wang
            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Sponsors

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            Published: 01 August 2011

            Permissions

            Request permissions for this article.

            Check for updates

            Author Tags

            1. in vitro breast culture
            2. acinus
            3. breast cancer classification
            4. ductal structure
            5. invasive carcinoma
            6. non-invasive carcinoma

            Qualifiers

            • Research-article

            Funding Sources

            Conference

            BCB' 11
            Sponsor:

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate 254 of 885 submissions, 29%

            Contributors

            Other Metrics

            Bibliometrics & Citations

            Bibliometrics

            Article Metrics

            • 0
              Total Citations
            • 141
              Total Downloads
            • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
            Reflects downloads up to 24 Jan 2025

            Other Metrics

            Citations

            View Options

            Login options

            View options

            PDF

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader

            Figures

            Tables

            Media

            Share

            Share

            Share this Publication link

            Share on social media