research-article

Understanding exploratory creativity in a visual domain

Authors:

Kyle E. Jennings,

Dean Keith Simonton,

Stephen E. PalmerAuthors Info & Claims

C&C '11: Proceedings of the 8th ACM conference on Creativity and cognition

Pages 223 - 232

https://doi.org/10.1145/2069618.2069656

Published: 03 November 2011 Publication History

Abstract

This paper describes a computerized aesthetic composition task that is based on a "creativity as search" metaphor. The technique collects detailed, moment-to-moment data about people's search behavior, which can help open the "black box" that separates independent variables that influence creativity from their outcomes. We first describe the technique and provide a detailed theoretical framework. Then, we discuss how the technique is typically applied, describe several in-progress studies, and present some preliminary results. Finally, we discuss relations to other work, limitations, and future directions. We argue that this technique and the research that it enables will facilitate a deeper understanding of the creative process, become a valued tool for creativity researchers, and contribute to methodological and theoretical advances in how creativity is studied and understood.

References

[1]

L. Altenberg. NK fitness landscapes. In T. Back, D. Fogel, and Z. Michalewicz, editors, The Handbook of Evolutionary Computation, chapter B2.7.2. Institue of Physics Press, 1996.

[2]

T. Amabile. Creativity in Context. Westview Press, Boulder, CO, 1996.

[3]

H. X. Barnhart, J. Song, and M. J. Haber. Assessing intra, inter and total agreement with replicated readings. Statistics in Medicine, 24:1371--1384, 2005.

[4]

C. Blum and A. Roli. Metaheuristics in combinatorial optimization: Overview and conceptual comparison. ACM Computing Surveys, 35(3):268--308, 2003.

Digital Library

[5]

M. A. Boden. The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms. BasicBooks, New York, 1991.

Digital Library

[6]

D. T. Campbell. Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67:380--400, 1960.

[7]

S. H. Carson, J. B. Peterson, and D. M. Higgins. Decreased latent inhibition is associated with increased creative achievement in high-functioning individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3):499--506, 2003.

[8]

R. I. Damian and D. K. Simonton. From past to future art: The creative impact of Picasso's 1935 Minotauromachy on his 1937 Guernica. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, March 21 2011. Advance online publication.

[9]

R. A. Finke, T. B. Ward, and S. M. Smith. Creative Cognition: Theory, Research, and Applications. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1992.

[10]

J. W. Getzels and M. Csikszentmihalyi. The Creative Vision: A Longitudinal Study of Problem Finding in Art. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1976.

[11]

D. M. Harrington. Effects of explicit instructions to "be creative" on the psychological meaning of divergent thinking test scores. Journal of Personality, 43:434--454, 1975.

[12]

T. T. Hills, P. M. Todd, and R. L. Goldstone. Search in external and internal spaces. Psychological Science, 19(8):802--808, 2008.

[13]

A. M. Isen, K. A. Daubman, and G. P. Nowicki. Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52:1122--1131, 1987.

[14]

K. E. Jennings. Early results with faceted classification of "alternate uses" test responses. In C&C '09: Proceeding of the seventh ACM conference on Creativity and Cognition, pages 383--384, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM.

Digital Library

[15]

K. E. Jennings. Search strategies and the creative process. In First International Conference on Computational Creativity, pages 130--139, Lisbon, Portugal, 2010.

[16]

O. P. John and S. Srivastava. The big-five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin and O. P. John, editors, Handbook of personality: Theory and research, pages 102--139. Guilford Press, New York, 2 edition, 1999.

[17]

S. A. Kauffman. The Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution. Oxford University Press, New York, 1993.

[18]

D. Klahr and K. Dunbar. Dual space search during scientific reasoning. Cognitive Science, 12:1--55, 1988.

[19]

D. Klahr and H. A. Simon. Studies of scientific creativity: Complementary approaches and convergent findings. Psychological Bulletin, 125:524--543, 1999.

[20]

P. Langley, H. A. Simon, G. L. Bradshaw, and J. M. Zythow. Scientific discovery. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1987.

[21]

C. Martindale. The clockwork muse: The predictability of artistic styles. Basic Books, New York, 1990.

[22]

A. Newell and H. A. Simon. Human problem solving. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1972.

Digital Library

[23]

T. Nickles. Evolutionary models of innovation and the meno problem. In L. V. Shavinina, editor, The international handbook on innovation, pages 54--78. Elsevier Science, New York, 2003.

[24]

D. Perkins. The Eureka Effect: The Art and Logic of Breakthrough Thinking. W. W. Norton, New York, 2000.

[25]

P. E. Shrout and J. L. Fleiss. Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2):420--428, 1979.

[26]

D. K. Simonton. Scientific creativity as constrained stochastic behavior: The integration of the product, person, and process perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 129(4):475--494, 2003.

[27]

D. K. Simonton. Creativity in science: Chance, logic, genius, and zeitgeist. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004.

Digital Library

[28]

D. K. Simonton. Creativity as a Darwinian phenomenon: The blind-variation and selective-retention model. In M. Krausz, D. Dutton, and K. Bardsley, editors, The idea of creativity, pages 63--81. Brill, Leiden, Netherlands, 2nd edition, 2009.

[29]

D. K. Simonton. Creativity as blind-variation and selective-retention: Constrained combinatorial models of exceptional creativity. Physics of Life Reviews, 7:156--179, 2010.

[30]

D. K. Simonton. Creativity and discovery as blind variation: Campbell's (1960) BVSR model after the half-century mark. Review of General Psychology, 2011--In press.

[31]

B. M. Staw. An evolutionary approach to creativity and innovations. In M. A. West and J. L. Farr, editors, Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies, pages 287--308. Wiley, New York, 1990.

[32]

G. A. Wiggins. A preliminary framework for description, analysis and comparison of creative systems. Knowledge-Based Systems, 19:449--458, 2006.

Digital Library

Cited By

Chen LSong YSun LChilds PYin Y(2024)Development of an exploratory creativity assessment scaleInternational Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation10.1080/21650349.2024.231977212:2(101-117)Online publication date: 3-Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2024.2319772
Rezwana JMaher M(2023)User Perspectives on Ethical Challenges in Human-AI Co-Creativity: A Design Fiction StudyProceedings of the 15th Conference on Creativity and Cognition10.1145/3591196.3593364(62-74)Online publication date: 19-Jun-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3591196.3593364
Rezwana JMaher M(2023)Designing Creative AI Partners with COFI: A Framework for Modeling Interaction in Human-AI Co-Creative SystemsACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/351902630:5(1-28)Online publication date: 23-Sep-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3519026
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Understanding exploratory creativity in a visual domain
1. Applied computing
  1. Law, social and behavioral sciences
    1. Psychology

Recommendations

Understanding and evaluating creativity
C&C '09: Proceedings of the seventh ACM conference on Creativity and cognition

This tutorial presents different perspectives on creativity based on knowledge from research and practice. The aim is to provide an understanding of creativity and how to evaluate it in terms of the ways audiences respond, how we assess the creative ...
Improving Group Creativity: Brainstorming Versus Non-Brainstorming Techniques in a GSS Environment
HICSS '01: Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences ( HICSS-34)-Volume 1 - Volume 1

Creativity is increasingly important in today's fast changing world. The use of Group Support Systems has been shown to improve the quantity and quality of ideas produced by groups during idea generation. Similarly, creative techniques may be used to ...
Understanding Creativity Methods in Design
DIS '17: Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems

This paper contributes an analytical framework to improve understanding of the composition of recognized creativity methods used in design. Based on an extensive literature review, our framework synthesizes key concepts from design and particularly ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

C&C '11: Proceedings of the 8th ACM conference on Creativity and cognition

November 2011

492 pages

ISBN:9781450308205

DOI:10.1145/2069618

General Chair:
Ashok K. Goel
Georgia Institute of Technology, USA
,
Program Chairs:
Fox Harrell
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA
,
Brian Magerko
Georgia Institute of Technology, USA
,
Yukari Nagai
Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Japan
,
Jane Prophet
Goldsmiths College, University of London, UK

Copyright © 2011 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

In-Cooperation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 03 November 2011

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Conference

C&C '11

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

C&C '11: Creativity and Cognition 2011

November 3 - 6, 2011

Georgia, Atlanta, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 108 of 371 submissions, 29%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

5
Total Citations
View Citations
259
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)23
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3

Reflects downloads up to 06 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Chen LSong YSun LChilds PYin Y(2024)Development of an exploratory creativity assessment scaleInternational Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation10.1080/21650349.2024.231977212:2(101-117)Online publication date: 3-Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2024.2319772
Rezwana JMaher M(2023)User Perspectives on Ethical Challenges in Human-AI Co-Creativity: A Design Fiction StudyProceedings of the 15th Conference on Creativity and Cognition10.1145/3591196.3593364(62-74)Online publication date: 19-Jun-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3591196.3593364
Rezwana JMaher M(2023)Designing Creative AI Partners with COFI: A Framework for Modeling Interaction in Human-AI Co-Creative SystemsACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/351902630:5(1-28)Online publication date: 23-Sep-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3519026
Hart YMayo AMayo RRozenkrantz LTendler AAlon UNoy L(2017)Creative foraging: An experimental paradigm for studying exploration and discoveryPLOS ONE10.1371/journal.pone.018213312:8(e0182133)Online publication date: 2-Aug-2017
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182133
Jongwan Kim (2014)An assessment method to evaluate team project based engineering design2014 9th International Conference on Computer Science & Education10.1109/ICCSE.2014.6926465(257-260)Online publication date: Aug-2014
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSE.2014.6926465

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents