skip to main content
10.1145/1985793.1985830acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Configuring global software teams: a multi-company analysis of project productivity, quality, and profits

Published: 21 May 2011 Publication History

Abstract

In this paper, we examined the impact of project-level configurational choices of globally distributed software teams on project productivity, quality, and profits. Our analysis used data from 362 projects of four different firms. These projects spanned a wide range of programming languages, application domain, process choices, and development sites spread over 15 countries and 5 continents. Our analysis revealed fundamental tradeoffs in choosing configurational choices that are optimized for productivity, quality, and/or profits. In particular, achieving higher levels of productivity and quality require diametrically opposed configurational choices. In addition, creating imbalances in the expertise and personnel distribution of project teams significantly helps increase profit margins. However, a profit-oriented imbalance could also significantly affect productivity and/or quality outcomes. Analyzing these complex tradeoffs, we provide actionable managerial insights that can help software firms and their clients choose configurations that achieve desired project outcomes in globally distributed software development.

References

[1]
R. D. Banker and S. A. Slaughter, "The Moderating Effects of Structure on Volatility and Complexity in Software Enhancement," Information Systems Research, vol. 11, pp. 0219--0240, 2000.
[2]
C. Bird, N. Nagappan, P. Devanbu, H. Gall, and B. Murphy, "Does Distributed Development Affect Software Quality? An Empirical Case Study of Windows Vista," ICSE 2009.
[3]
W. F. Boh, S. A. Slaughter, and J. A. Espinosa, "Learning from Experience in Software Development: A Multilevel Analysis," Management Science, vol. 53, pp. 1315--1331, 2007.
[4]
E. Carmel, Global Software Teams: Collaboration across Borders and Time Zones: Prentice-Hall, 1999.
[5]
E. Carmel and P. Abbott, "Why 'Nearshore' Means That Distance Matters," CACM, vol. 50, pp. 40--46, 2007.
[6]
M. Cataldo, M. Bass, J. D. Herbsleb, and L. Bass, "On Coordination Mechanisms in Global Software Development," ICGSE, Munich, Germany, 2007.
[7]
M. Cataldo, J. D. Herbsleb, and K. M. Carley, "Socio-Technical Congruence," Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement symposium, Kaiserslautern, Germany, 2008.
[8]
M. Cataldo and S. Nambiar, "On the Relationship between Process Maturity and Geographic Distribution: An Empirical Analysis of Their Impact on Software Quality," FSE 2009.
[9]
J. N. Cummings, J. A. Espinosa, and C. K. Pickering, "Crossing Spatial and Temporal Boundaries in Globally Distributed Projects," Information Systems Research, vol. 20, pp. 420--439, 2009.
[10]
B. Curtis, H. Krasner, and N. Iscoe, "A Field Study of the Software Design Process for Large Systems," Communications of ACM, vol. 31, pp. 1268--1287, 1988.
[11]
R. Davidson and J. G. Mackinnon, Estimation and Inference in Econometrics. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.
[12]
J. A. Espinosa, N. Nan, and E. Carmel, "Do Gradations of Time Zone Separation Make a Difference in Performance? A First Laboratory Study," ICGSE, Munich, Germany, 2007.
[13]
J. A. Espinosa, S. A. Slaughter, R. E. Kraut, and J. D. Herbsleb, "Familiarity, Complexity, and Team Performance in Geographically Distributed Software Development," Organization Science, vol. 18, pp. 613--630, 2007.
[14]
R. E. Grinter, J. D. Herbsleb, and D. E. Perry, "The Geography of Coordination: Dealing with Distance in R&D Work," in International ACM SIGGROUP conference on Supporting Group Work, Phoenix, Arizona, 1999.
[15]
D. E. Harter, M. S. Krishnan, and S. A. Slaughter, "Effects of Process Maturity on Quality, Cycle Time, and Effort in Software Product Development," Management Science, vol. 46, pp. 0451--0466, 2000.
[16]
J. D. Herbsleb and A. Mockus, "An Empirical Study of Speed and Communication in Globally Distributed Software Development," IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 29, pp. 481--494, 2003.
[17]
M. S. Krishnan, C. H. Kriebel, S. Kekre, and T. Mukhopadhyay, "An Empirical Analysis of Productivity and Quality in Software Products," Management Science, vol. 46, pp. 0745-0759, 2000.
[18]
M. B. O'Leary and J. N. Cummings, "The Spatial, Temporal, and Configurational Characteristics of Geographic Dispersion in Teams," MIS Quarterly, vol. 31, pp. 433--452, 2007.
[19]
M. B. O'Leary and M. Mortensen, "Subgroups, Imbalance, and Isolates in Geographically Dispersed Teams," Organization Science, vol. 21, pp. 115--131, 2010.
[20]
G. M. Olson and J. S. Olson, "Distance Matters," Int. Journal of Human Computer Interaction, vol. 15, pp. 139--178, 2000.
[21]
R. Prikladnicki and J. Audy, "Distributed Software Development: Toward an Understanding of the Relationship between Project Team, Users and Customers," International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, 2003.
[22]
N. Ramasubbu and R. K. Balan, "Globally Distributed Software Development Project Performance: An Empirical Analysis," FSE, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 2007.
[23]
C. R. B. d. Souza, D. Redmiles, L.-T. Cheng, D. Millen, and J. Patterson, "How a Good Software Practice Thwarts Collaboration: The Multiple Roles of Apis in Software Development," ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, vol. 29, pp. 221--230, 2004.
[24]
J. J. Treinen and S. L. Miller-Frost, "Following the Sun: Case Studies in Global Software Development," IBM Systems Journal, vol. 45, pp. 773--783, 2006.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
ICSE '11: Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Software Engineering
May 2011
1258 pages
ISBN:9781450304450
DOI:10.1145/1985793
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 21 May 2011

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. empirical analysis
  2. globally distributed software development
  3. quality management
  4. software engineering economics

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

ICSE11
Sponsor:
ICSE11: International Conference on Software Engineering
May 21 - 28, 2011
HI, Waikiki, Honolulu, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 276 of 1,856 submissions, 15%

Upcoming Conference

ICSE 2025

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)29
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
Reflects downloads up to 28 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media