skip to main content
10.1145/1878537.1878576acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesspringsimConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Applying advanced user models and input technologies to augment military simulation-based training

Published: 11 April 2010 Publication History

Abstract

The paper presents the current state of requirement specification for an initiative based tactics virtual training environment. The methodology for collecting requirements followed three concurrent processes of task analysis, simulated firearms specification, and cognitive modeling. Prior research in Close Quarter Battle tasks analysis and cognitive modeling applications provide an initial identification of key perceptual and motor primitives for the development of constructive simulations. Both task analysis and cognitive modeling sections report on some of these initial requirements. A short description of simulated firearms specifications is also presented. A conclusion summarizes the paper.

References

[1]
J. F. Lapointe, and G. Godin, "On-Screen Laser Spot Detection for Large Display Interaction," Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Haptic Audio Environments and their Applications (HAVE'2005), pp. 72--76, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, 2005.
[2]
P. A. Roman, and D. Brown, "Note to file - Constructive simulation versus serious games for the army: a Canadian case study," Canadian Army Journal, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 80--88, 2007.
[3]
A. Helsdingen, "Games for Training," in VV&A Methods, Defense Simulation and Training Conference, London, 2006.
[4]
D. Liu, N. D. Macchiarella, and D. A. Vincenzi, "Simulation fidelity," Human factors in simulation and training, D. A. Vincenzi, J. A. Wise, A. Mouloua et al., eds., pp. 61--73, Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis Group, 2009.
[5]
W. F. Moroney, and M. G. Lilienthal, "Human factors in simulation and training: an overview," Human factors in simulation and training, D. A. Vincenzi, J. A. Wise, A. Mouloua et al., eds., pp. 3--38, Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis Group, 2009.
[6]
P. Gorman, The Military Value of Training, Alexandria, VA: Institute for Defense Analysis, 1990.
[7]
M. D. Proctor, and J. C. Gubler, "Military simulation worlds and organizational learning," Proceedings of the 1998 Winter Simulation Conference, D. J. Medeiros, E. F. Watson, J. S. Carson et al., eds., pp. 773--779, 1998.
[8]
B. Emond, "Human Capacity Development Through Simulations: Constructive Simulations as a Basis for Understanding Competency Requirements in Initiative Based Tactics" in Conference on Behavior Representation in Modeling and Simulation, submitted.
[9]
National_Research_Council, "Modeling and Simulation in Defense Acquisition," Modeling and Simulation in Manufacturing and Defense Acquisition: Pathways to Success, pp. 29--46, Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2002.
[10]
R. E. Wray, J. E. Laird, A. Nuxoll et al., "Synthetic adversaries for urban combat training," AI Magazine, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 82--92, 2005.
[11]
N. A. Gorski, and J. E. Laird, Investigating Transfer Learning in the Urban Combat Testbed, Center for Cognitive Architecture, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 2007.
[12]
M. D. Byrne, and J. R. Anderson, "Serial modules in parallel: The psychological refractory period and perfect time-sharing," Psychological Review, vol. 108, pp. 847--869., 2001.
[13]
J. E. Laird, "Extending the Soar cognitive architecture."
[14]
B. J. Best, and C. Lebiere, "Spatial plans, communication, and teamwork in synthetic MOUT agents."
[15]
C. Cox, and D. Fu, "AI for Automated Combatants in a Training Application," Proceedings of the second Australasian conference on Interactive entertainment, pp. 57--64, Sydney, Australia, 2005.
[16]
G. M. Youngblood, B. Nolen, M. Ross et al., "Building testbeds for AI with the Q3 Mod Base," Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment, pp. 153--154, 2006.
[17]
R. Evertsz, F. E. Ritter, S. Russell et al., "Modeling rules of engagement in computer generated forces," Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Behavior Representation in Modeling and Simulation, pp. 80--89, Orlando, FL: U. of Central Florida, 2007.
[18]
D. Choi, T. Konik, N. Nejati et al., "A believable agent for first-person shooter games," Proceedings of the Third Annual Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment Conference, pp. 71--73, 2007.
[19]
R. E. Wray, and R. S. Chong, "Comparing cognitive models and human behavior models: Computational tools for expressing human behavior," Journal of Aerospace Computing, Information and Communication, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 836--852, 2007.
[20]
S.-P. Ting, and S. Zhou, "Dealing with dynamic changes in time critical decision-making for MOUT simulations," Computer Animation and Virtual Worlds, vol. 20, pp. 427--436, 2009.
[21]
C. M. Macal, and M. J. North, "Agent-based modeling and simulation: desktop ABMS," Proceedings of the 2007 Winter Simulation Conference, S. G. Henderson, B. Biller, M.-H. Hsieh et al., eds., pp. 95--106, 2007.
[22]
S. M. Guerin, "Peeking into the black box: some art and science to visualizing agent-based models," Proceedings of the 2004 Winter Simulation Conference R. G. Ingalls, R. M. D., J. S. Smith et al., eds., pp. 749--754, 2004.
[23]
J. R. Anderson, How can the human mind exist in the physical universe?, New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2007.
[24]
J. R. Anderson, D. Bothell, M. D. Byrne et al., "An integrated theory of the mind," Psychologica Review, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 1036--1060, 2004.
[25]
M. Dawes, and R. Hall, "Towards using first-person shooter computer games as an artificial intelligence testbed," Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 2005, pp. 276--282.
[26]
B. J. Best, and C. Lebiere, "Software integration for Computational Cognitive Models in Virtual Environments: The CASEMIL Middleware Infrastructure," Proceedings of the 18th Conference on Behavior Representation in Modeling and Simulation, pp. 105--112, Sundace, UT, 2009.
[27]
B. J. Best, and C. Lebiere, "Teamwork, Communication, and Planning in ACT-R Agents Engaging in Urban Combat in Virtual Environments," Proceedings of the 2003 IJCAI Workshop on Cognitive Modeling of Agents and Multi-Agent Interactions, pp. 64--72, 2003.
[28]
J. N. Templeman, L. E. Sibert, R. C. Page et al., "Pointman - A New Control for Simulating Tactical Infantry Movements," IEEE Virtual Reality Conference, pp. 285--286, 2007.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
SpringSim '10: Proceedings of the 2010 Spring Simulation Multiconference
April 2010
1726 pages
ISBN:9781450300698

Sponsors

  • SCS: Society for Modeling and Simulation International

In-Cooperation

Publisher

Society for Computer Simulation International

San Diego, CA, United States

Publication History

Published: 11 April 2010

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. agent-based combat modeling
  2. exercises
  3. military operations
  4. requirements
  5. simulation and modeling for acquisition
  6. simulation/exercise integration
  7. simulations in training
  8. training
  9. training (SMART)
  10. virtual training environment

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

SpringSim '10
Sponsor:
  • SCS
SpringSim '10: 2010 Spring Simulation Conference
April 11 - 15, 2010
Florida, Orlando

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 06 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media