skip to main content
10.1145/1858996.1859049acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Timesheet assistant: mining and reporting developer effort

Published: 20 September 2010 Publication History

Abstract

Timesheets are an important instrument used to track time spent by team members in a software project on the tasks assigned to them. In a typical project, developers fill timesheets manually on a periodic basis. This is often tedious, time consuming and error prone. Over or under reporting of time spent on tasks causes errors in billing development costs to customers and wrong estimation baselines for future work, which can have serious business consequences. In order to assist developers in filling their timesheets accurately, we present a tool called Timesheet Assistant (TA) that non-intrusively mines developer activities and uses statistical analysis on historical data to estimate the actual effort the developer may have spent on individual assigned tasks. TA further helps the developer or project manager by presenting the details of the activities along with effort data so that the effort may be seen in the context of the actual work performed. We report on an empirical study of TA in a software maintenance project at IBM that provides preliminary validation of its feasibility and usefulness. Some of the limitations of the TA approach and possible ways to address those are also discussed.

References

[1]
}}Actitime,. http://www.actitime.com.
[2]
}}Baralga,. http://baralga.origo.ethz.ch.
[3]
}}FreeTime,. http://www.zoo2.com.au.
[4]
}}GNU Octave,. http://www.gnu.org/software/octave/.
[5]
}}oDesk,. http://www.odesk.com.
[6]
}}PROxy Based Estimation (PROBE) for Structured Query Language (SQL),. http://www.sei.cmu.edu/reports/06tn017.pdf.
[7]
}}QSM,. http://www.qsm.com/tools/slim-estimate/index.html.
[8]
}}Tasktop,. http://www.tasktop.com.
[9]
}}B. W. Boehm. Software Cost Estimation with COCOMO II. Prentice-Hall, Inc., 2000.
[10]
}}L. Breiman, J. Friedman, C. J. Stone, and R. Olshen. Classification and Regression Trees. Chapman and Hall/CRC, 1 edition, 1984.
[11]
}}G. Canfora, L. Cerulo, and M. D. Penta. Tracking your changes: A language-independent approach. IEEE Software, 26(1):50--57, 2009.
[12]
}}S. Chulani. Bayesian analysis of software cost and quality models. In ICSM, pages 565-, 2001.
[13]
}}T. L. Graves and A. Mockus. Inferring change effort from configuration management databases. In IEEE METRICS, pages 267-, 1998.
[14]
}}H. H. Kagdi, M. L. Collard, and J. I. Maletic. Towards a taxonomy of approaches for mining of source code repositories. In MSR, 2005.
[15]
}}A. Mockus and J. D. Herbsleb. Expertise browser: a quantitative approach to identifying expertise. In ICSE, pages 503--512, 2002.
[16]
}}B. Rotibi. Development Intelligence: Business Intelligence for Software-Development. http://www.borland.com/resources/en/pdf/solutions/lqm-ovum-developmental-intellligence.pdf.
[17]
}}C. K. Roy, J. R. Cordy, and R. Koschke. Comparison and evaluation of code clone detection techniques and tools: A qualitative approach. Sci. Comput. Program., 74(7):470--495, 2009.
[18]
}}Y.-S. Seo, K.-A. Yoon, and D.-H. Bae. An empirical analysis of software effort estimation with outlier elimination. In PROMISE '08, pages 25--32, New York, NY, USA, 2008.
[19]
}}T. R. L. B. C. Taylor. Qualitative Communication Research Methods. SAGE, Inc., 2002.
[20]
}}A. Trendowicz, J. Heidrich, J. Münch, Y. Ishigai, K. Yokoyama, and N. Kikuchi. Development of a hybrid cost estimation model in an iterative manner. In ICSE, pages 331--340, 2006.
[21]
}}C. Weiß, R. Premraj, T. Zimmermann, and A. Zeller. How long will it take to fix this bug? In MSR, page 1, 2007.
[22]
}}T. Zimmermann. Fine-grained processing of cvs archives with apfel. In ETX, pages 16--20, 2006.
[23]
}}T. Zimmermann, S. Kim, A. Zeller, and E. J. W. Jr. Mining version archives for co-changed lines. In MSR, pages 72--75, 2006.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
ASE '10: Proceedings of the 25th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering
September 2010
534 pages
ISBN:9781450301169
DOI:10.1145/1858996
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

In-Cooperation

  • IEEE CS

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 20 September 2010

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. development activity
  2. estimation
  3. mining
  4. timesheet

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

ASE10
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 82 of 337 submissions, 24%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 09 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media