short-paper

On the implementation of self-assessment in an introductory programming course

Authors:

Winnie W.Y. Lau,

Stephen C.F. Chan,

Hong-va LeongAuthors Info & Claims

ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, Volume 41, Issue 4

Pages 85 - 89

https://doi.org/10.1145/1709424.1709453

Published: 18 January 2010 Publication History

Abstract

Much of the work in making the introductory programming course more attractive to students has centered around the course content. However, many student frustrations and anxieties stem from the assessment of the course: students do not have a clear idea of what they need to do to achieve a certain grade, and whether their work meets the expectations. We present the results of a pilot study that aims to reduce student frustrations and anxieties through the use of student self-assessment with clearly-defined criteria. Our study shows that given the proper instruction and guidance, students are able to accurately assess and predict their own grades. The result is an improved and more satisfactory learning experience.

References

[1]

J. D. Bayliss, S. Strout, "Games as a 'flavor' of CS1", Procs of the 37th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, March 03-05, 2006, Houston, TX, USA.

Digital Library

[2]

K. J. Bierre, A. M. Phelps, "The use of MUPPETS in an introductory java programming course", Proceedings of the 5th conference on Information technology education, October 28-30, 2004, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Digital Library

[3]

K. Bierre, P. Ventura, A. Phelps, C. Egert, "Motivating OOP by blowing things up: an exercise in cooperation and competition in an introductory java programming course", Proceedings of the 37th SIGCSE technical symposium on Comp. sci. education, Mar 03-05, 2006, Houston, Texas, USA.

Digital Library

[4]

K. Bruce, "Controversy on how to teach CS1: a discussion on the SIGCSE-members Mailing List", Inroads- The SIGCSE Bulletin, Vol 36, N. 4, 2004, 29--35.

Digital Library

[5]

D. C. Cliburn, S. Miller, "Games, stories, or something more traditional: the types of assignments college students prefer", Proceedings of the 39th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, March 12-15, 2008, Portland, OR, USA.

Digital Library

[6]

S. Cooper, W. Dann, R. Pausch, "Teaching objects-first in introductory computer science", Proceedings of the 34th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, February 19-23, 2003, Reno, NV, USA.

Digital Library

[7]

M. Feldgen and O. Clua, "Games as a motivation for freshman students learn programming," Proceedings of ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education, Savannah, GA, 2004, pp. S1H11--S1H16.

[8]

L. Layman, L. Williams, K. Slaten, "Note to self: make assignments meaningful", Proceedings of the 38th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, March 07-11, 2007, Covington, KY, USA.

Digital Library

[9]

Lawhead, P.B., Duncan, M.E., Bland, C.G., Goldweber, M.,Schep, M., and Barnes, D.J. 2002. "A road map for teaching introductory programming using LEGO Mindstorms robots." Working Group Reports from ITiCSE on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, 191--201.

Digital Library

[10]

S. Leutenegger, J. Edgington, "A games first approach to teaching introductory programming", Proceedings of the 38th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, March 07-11, 2007, Covington, Kentucky, USA.

Digital Library

[11]

T. Lorenzen, A. Sattar, "Objects first using Alice to introduce object constructs in CS1", ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, Volume 40, Issue 2 (June 2008), Pages 62--64.

Digital Library

[12]

A. Luxton-Reilly & P. Denny," A Simple Framework for Interactive Games in CS1", in Proceedings of SIGCSE 2009. ACM Press.Pages 216--220.

Digital Library

[13]

D. J. Malan, H. H. Leitner, "Scratch for budding computer scientists", Proceedings of the 38th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, March 07-11, 2007, Covington, Kentucky, USA.

Digital Library

[14]

Mannila, L., de Raadt, M.: "An objective comparison of languages for teaching introductory programming". In: Proceedings of the 6th Baltic Sea conference on Computing education research: Koli Calling 2006. pp.32--37.ACM Press, New York (2006).

Digital Library

[15]

A. Pears, S. Seidman, L. Malmi, L. Mannila, E. Adams, J. Bennedsen, M. Devlin, J. Paterson, "A survey of literature on the teaching of introductory programming", ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, v.39 n.4, December 2007.

Digital Library

[16]

Summet, J., et al., "Personalizing CS1 with Robots", in proceedings of SIGCSE 2009. ACM Press. Pages 433--437.

Digital Library

[17]

K. Sung, R. Rosenberg, M. Panitz, R. Anderson, "Assessing Game-Themed Programming Assignments for CS1/2 Courses", Procs of the 3rd int'l conference on Game development in comp. sci. education (GDCSE 08), Miami, FL, USA. 2008 Pages 51--55.

Digital Library

Cited By

Pereira FJunior HRodriguez LToda AOliveira ECristea AOliveira DCarvalho LFonseca SAlamri AIsotani S(2021)A Recommender System Based on Effort: Towards Minimising Negative Affects and Maximising Achievement in CS1 LearningIntelligent Tutoring Systems10.1007/978-3-030-80421-3_51(466-480)Online publication date: 7-Jun-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-030-80421-3_51
Duran RRybicki JSorva JHellas AMcCartney RPetersen ARobins AMoskal AMcCartney RRobins A(2019)Exploring the Value of Student Self-Evaluation in Introductory ProgrammingProceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research10.1145/3291279.3339407(121-130)Online publication date: 30-Jul-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3291279.3339407
Luxton-Reilly ASimon Albluwi IBecker BGiannakos MKumar AOtt LPaterson JScott MSheard JSzabo CRößling GScharlau B(2018)Introductory programming: a systematic literature reviewProceedings Companion of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education10.1145/3293881.3295779(55-106)Online publication date: 2-Jul-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3293881.3295779
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

On the implementation of self-assessment in an introductory programming course
1. Social and professional topics
  1. Professional topics
    1. Computing education
      1. Computing education programs
        Computer science education
        Information science education

Recommendations

Self-evaluation Interventions: Impact on Self-efficacy and Performance in Introductory Programming
Research has repeatedly shown self-efficacy to be associated with course outcomes in CS and across other fields. CS education research has documented this and has developed CS-specific self-efficacy measurement instruments, but to date there have been ...
Utilization of Rubrics for Self-assessment of Computer Science Students Enrolled in a Research Writing Course
WCCCE '17: Proceedings of the 22nd Western Canadian Conference on Computing Education

This study 1 determined the utilization of rubrics in self-assessment of Computer Science students who underwent research writing course. Two sections with a total of 69 students served as participants of the study. The grades of the teacher in the ...
Effect of software development course on programming self-efficacy
Abstract
Negative attitudes and perceptions on programming impair the effectiveness of learning programming skills. In this study the attitude related to programming, problem solving, and self-views on importance of IT/programming knowledge were assessed ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM SIGCSE Bulletin

ACM SIGCSE Bulletin Volume 41, Issue 4

December 2009

205 pages

ISSN:0097-8418

DOI:10.1145/1709424

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © 2010 Authors.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 18 January 2010

Published in SIGCSE Volume 41, Issue 4

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Short-paper

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

4
Total Citations
View Citations
300
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)11
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

Reflects downloads up to 01 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Pereira FJunior HRodriguez LToda AOliveira ECristea AOliveira DCarvalho LFonseca SAlamri AIsotani S(2021)A Recommender System Based on Effort: Towards Minimising Negative Affects and Maximising Achievement in CS1 LearningIntelligent Tutoring Systems10.1007/978-3-030-80421-3_51(466-480)Online publication date: 7-Jun-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-030-80421-3_51
Duran RRybicki JSorva JHellas AMcCartney RPetersen ARobins AMoskal AMcCartney RRobins A(2019)Exploring the Value of Student Self-Evaluation in Introductory ProgrammingProceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research10.1145/3291279.3339407(121-130)Online publication date: 30-Jul-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3291279.3339407
Luxton-Reilly ASimon Albluwi IBecker BGiannakos MKumar AOtt LPaterson JScott MSheard JSzabo CRößling GScharlau B(2018)Introductory programming: a systematic literature reviewProceedings Companion of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education10.1145/3293881.3295779(55-106)Online publication date: 2-Jul-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3293881.3295779
Nolan KBergin SSheard JMontero C(2016)The role of anxiety when learning to programProceedings of the 16th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research10.1145/2999541.2999557(61-70)Online publication date: 24-Nov-2016
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2999541.2999557

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents