skip to main content
10.1145/1593105.1593167acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesacm-seConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Improving the Capstone project experience: a case study in software engineering

Published: 28 March 2008 Publication History

Abstract

During the fall 2007 academic semester, nine students, including myself, were enrolled in the Capstone Software Engineering Project course (CSCE 492) under the instruction of Dr. John B. Bowles at the University of South Carolina. This paper describes the software engineering process as experienced by one team of students enrolled in the course, examines the strengths and weaknesses of the course's implementation of the process through the use of team member surveys, and finally suggests ways in which the course may be improved. Potential benefits of proposed changes include providing a more complete software engineering experience to students and the strengthening of local industry, the university, and its home city of Columbia, South Carolina.

References

[1]
Bowles, John B. Development Process, 2007. Class notes. Retrieved August 27, 2007, from University of South Carolina, Department of Computer Science and Engineering: http://www.cse.sc.edu/~bowles/CSCE492/NotesandMaterials/DevelopmentProcess.htm.
[2]
CSCE 492: Capstone Software Engineering Project, June 2005. Retrieved November 15, 2007, from University of South Carolina, Department of Computer Science and Engineering: http://www.cse.sc.edu/syllabus/CSCE492.pdf.
[3]
Davis, Denny, Larry McKenzie, Michael Trevisan, David McLean, Steven Beyerlein, Cynthia Atman, Robin Adams, Kenneth Gentili, Robert Christianson, Jeffrey McCauley, Patricia Daniels, Teodora Rutar, and Phillip Thompson. Design Team Knowledge Assessment: Component 1 of the TIDEE Design Team Readiness Assessment, 2002. Retrieved December 18, 2007, from Transferable Integrated Design Engineering Education: http://www.tidee.wsu.edu/resources/assessment/Design-Team-Knowledge-Assessment.pdf.
[4]
Gentili, Kenneth, Jim Lyons, Eric Davishahl, Denny Davis, Steven Beyerlein. Measuring Added-Value Using a Team Design Skills Growth Survey, 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition; Portland, Oregon. Retrieved December 18, 2007, from Washington State University: http://www.tidee.wsu.edu/publications/documents/Team-Design-Skills-Growth-Survey.pdf.
[5]
RateMyProfessors.com: About Us, 2007. Retrieved November 25, 2007, from RateMyProfessors.com, LLC.: http://ratemyprofessors.com/About.jsp.
[6]
Stiller, Evelyn, and Cathie LeBlanc. Project-Based Software Engineering: An Object-Oriented Approach. New York: Addison-Wesley, 2002. pp. 17, 73--74, 235, 316.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
ACMSE '08: Proceedings of the 46th annual ACM Southeast Conference
March 2008
548 pages
ISBN:9781605581057
DOI:10.1145/1593105
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 28 March 2008

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Capstone project
  2. software engineering

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

ACM SE08
ACM SE08: ACM Southeast Regional Conference
March 28 - 29, 2008
Alabama, Auburn

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 502 of 1,023 submissions, 49%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 23 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media