skip to main content
10.1145/1569901.1570110acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Tracking multiple objects in non-stationary video

Published: 08 July 2009 Publication History

Abstract

One of the key problems in computer vision and pattern recognition is tracking. Multiple objects, occlusion, and tracking moving objects using a moving camera are some of the challenges that one may face in developing an effective approach for tracking. While there are numerous algorithms and approaches to the tracking problem with their own shortcomings, a less-studied approach considers swarm intelligence. Swarm intelligence algorithms are often suited for optimization problems, but require advancements for tracking objects in video. This paper presents an improved algorithm based on Bacterial Foraging Optimization in order to track multiple objects in real-time video exposed to full and partial occlusion, using video from both fixed and moving cameras. A comparison with various algorithms is provided.

References

[1]
S. Birchfeld. Elliptical head tracking using intensity gradients and color histograms. CVPR 1998, pages 232--237, 1998.
[2]
G. Bradski. The OpenCV Library. Dr. Dobb's Journal of Software Tools, 2000.
[3]
G.R. Bradski. Computer vision face tracking for use in a perceptual user interface. Intel Technology Journal Q2 '98, 1998.
[4]
A.J. Carlisle. Applying the Particle Swarm Optimizer to Non-stationary Environments. PhD thesis, Auburn University, 2002.
[5]
D. Comaniciu, V. Ramesh, and P. Meer. Real-time tracking of non-rigid objects using mean shift. CVPR 2000, 2:142--149 vol.2, 2000.
[6]
W. Ding, Z. Gong, S. Xie, and H. Zou. Real-time vision-based object tracking from a moving platform in the air. IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Robots and Systems, pages 681--685, 2006.
[7]
D.A. Forsyth and J. Ponce. Computer Vision: A Modern Approach. Prentice Hall, August 2002.
[8]
M. Isard and A. Blake. CONDENSATION -- conditional density propagation for visual tracking. IJCV, 29:5--28, 1998.
[9]
J. Kang, I. Cohen, G. Medioni, and C. Yuan. Detection and tracking of moving objects from a moving platform in presence of strong parallax. ICCV 2005, 1:10--17 Vol. 1, 2005.
[10]
J. Kennedy and R. Eberhart. Particle swarm optimization. Neural Networks, IEEE Int. Conf., 4:1942--1948 vol.4, 1995.
[11]
Y. Owechko and S. Medasani. Cognitive swarms for rapid detection of objects and associations in visual imagery. Swarm Intelligence Symposium, IEEE, pages 420--423, 2005.
[12]
K.M. Passino. Biomimicry of bacterial foraging for distributed optimization and control. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, Vol. 22, No. 3:52--67, 2002.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
GECCO '09: Proceedings of the 11th Annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation
July 2009
2036 pages
ISBN:9781605583259
DOI:10.1145/1569901
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 08 July 2009

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. bacterial foraging optimization
  2. multi-object tracking
  3. non-stationary video
  4. occlusion
  5. swarm intelligence

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

GECCO09
Sponsor:
GECCO09: Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
July 8 - 12, 2009
Québec, Montreal, Canada

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,669 of 4,410 submissions, 38%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 06 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media