extended-abstract

Co-reflection: user involvement for highly dynamic design processes

Authors:

Oscar Tomico,

Joep W. Frens,

C. J. OverbeekeAuthors Info & Claims

CHI EA '09: CHI '09 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Pages 2695 - 2698

https://doi.org/10.1145/1520340.1520389

Published: 04 April 2009 Publication History

Get Access

Abstract

User involvement in systems, products and related services design has increased considerably in relevance. The way user involvement actually progresses depends on how the users are situated in relation to the design process. Their influence may extend from the results of the design project to planning and managing the course of the design project. Sequential techniques developed for the rational problem solving or reflective process have a limited application in highly dynamic design processes. More precisely, in sequential design processes validation steers reflection into a single direction. For this reason, a methodological approach not based on the sequential (hypothetical-deductive) paradigm but on the dialectical inquiry (inductive paradigm) between designers and users is considered. The versatile and holistic nature of this co-reflective process makes it suitable for dynamic and unstructured design processes based on different streams of reflection.

Supplementary Material

index.html (index.html)

Slides from the presentation

Download
.94 KB

Audio only (1520389.mp3)

Download
10.43 MB

Video (1520389.mp4)

Download
143.73 MB

References

[1]

Hummels, C. & Frens, J. Designing for the unknown. In Proc. of EPDE conference, (2008).

Google Scholar

[2]

Roozenburg, NFM & Eekels, J. Product Design: Fundamentals and methods. Wiley, Chichester, 1995.

Google Scholar

[3]

Schön, D.A. The Reflective practitioner. Basic Books, New York, 1983.

Google Scholar

[4]

Kelly, G.A. The psychology of personal constructs, vol. 1 & 2. Routledge, London, 1955.

Google Scholar

[5]

Tomico, O., Pifarré, M. and Lloveras, J. Analyzing the role of constructivist psychology methods into user subjective experience gathering techniques for product design. In Proc. ICED'07 (2007).

Google Scholar

[6]

Hinkle, D.N. The change of personal constructs from the viewpoint of a theory of implications. Doctoral dissertation. Ohio State University, USA, 1965.

Google Scholar

[7]

Tomico, O. Subjective experience gathering techniques for interaction design. Doctoral dissertation, UPC, Barcelona, 2007.

Google Scholar

[8]

Ippolito, M.F. & Tweney, R. D. The inception of insight. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davison (Eds.) The nature of insight. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995), 433 -- 462.

Google Scholar

[9]

Stevens, C. D. & Walker, B. M. Insight: Transcending the obvious. In Neimeyer, G.J., Neimeyer, R.A. (Eds.) Advances in Personal Constructs Psychology, New directions and perspectives. Praeger Publishers, Westport (2002).

Google Scholar

Cited By

View all

Bourgeois JKleinsmann M(2023)AIEDAM thematic collection: a perspective on data-enabled design – design meet data scienceArtificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing10.1017/S089006042200022137Online publication date: 21-Feb-2023
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060422000221
Ruster LOliva-Altamirano PDaniell K(2022)Centring dignity in algorithm development: testing a Dignity LensProceedings of the 34th Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3572921.3572938(1-8)Online publication date: 29-Nov-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3572921.3572938
Cheng RZeng ZLiu MDow S(2020)Critique MeProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/34152324:CSCW2(1-24)Online publication date: 15-Oct-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3415232
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Co-reflection: user involvement for highly dynamic design processes
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)
    1. HCI design and evaluation methods

Recommendations

Reviewing reflection: on the use of reflection in interactive system design
DIS '14: Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems

Designers have demonstrated an increased interest in designing for reflection. However, that work currently occurs under a variety of diverse auspices. To help organize and investigate this literature, this paper present a review of research on systems ...
Power of peripheral designers: how users learn to design
DESRIST '09: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology

In information system development, end-users often participate in design and in many cases learn to design their own system. Design, however, requires a distinct approach that users typically are not familiar with. The unique position in which users ...
Supporting user participation design using a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process approach

There are three fundamental problems that may occur in the process of user participation design: first, the participants/users may not be able to express their requirements clearly; second, they have little knowledge about design; and third, they are ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

CHI EA '09: CHI '09 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 2009

2470 pages

ISBN:9781605582474

DOI:10.1145/1520340

General Chair:
Dan R. Olsen
Brigham Young University
,
Program Chairs:
Ken Hinckley
Microsoft Research
,
Meredith Ringel Morris
Microsoft Research
,
Scott Hudson
Carnegie Mellon University
,
Saul Greenberg
University of Calgary

Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 04 April 2009

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Extended-abstract

Conference

CHI '09

Sponsor:

CHI '09: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 4 - 9, 2009

MA, Boston, USA

Acceptance Rates

CHI EA '09 Paper Acceptance Rate 385 of 1,130 submissions, 34%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,164 of 23,696 submissions, 26%

Upcoming Conference

CHI 2025

Sponsor:
sigchi

ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 26 - May 1, 2025

Yokohama , Japan

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

11
Total Citations
View Citations
1,090
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)23
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4

Reflects downloads up to 01 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

Bourgeois JKleinsmann M(2023)AIEDAM thematic collection: a perspective on data-enabled design – design meet data scienceArtificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing10.1017/S089006042200022137Online publication date: 21-Feb-2023
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060422000221
Ruster LOliva-Altamirano PDaniell K(2022)Centring dignity in algorithm development: testing a Dignity LensProceedings of the 34th Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3572921.3572938(1-8)Online publication date: 29-Nov-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3572921.3572938
Cheng RZeng ZLiu MDow S(2020)Critique MeProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/34152324:CSCW2(1-24)Online publication date: 15-Oct-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3415232
Ren XSpina GFaber BGeraedts ABernhaupt RMueller FVerweij DAndres JMcGrenere JCockburn AAvellino IGoguey ABjørn PZhao SSamson BKocielnik R(2020)Engaging Stakeholders to Design an Intelligent Decision Support Tool in the Occupational Health ContextExtended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3334480.3383061(1-8)Online publication date: 25-Apr-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3334480.3383061
Thoolen MBrankaert RLu Y(2020)Designing Sentic: Participatory Design with People Living with DementiaHCI and Design in the Context of Dementia10.1007/978-3-030-32835-1_17(269-288)Online publication date: 17-Jul-2020
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32835-1_17
Yen YDow SGerber EBailey BShamma DYew JBailey B(2017)Listen to Others, Listen to YourselfProceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition10.1145/3059454.3059468(158-170)Online publication date: 22-Jun-2017
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3059454.3059468
van Kollenburg JBogers SDeckers EFrens JHummels CMark GFussell SLampe Cschraefel mHourcade JAppert CWigdor D(2017)How Design-inclusive UXR Influenced the Integration of Project ActivitiesProceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3025453.3025541(1408-1418)Online publication date: 2-May-2017
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3025453.3025541
Bogers SFrens Jvan Kollenburg JDeckers EHummels CFoth MJu WSchroeter RViller S(2016)Connected Baby BottleProceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems10.1145/2901790.2901855(301-311)Online publication date: 4-Jun-2016
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2901790.2901855
Baumer EKhovanskaya VMatthews MReynolds LSchwanda Sosik VGay GWakkary RHarrison SNeustaedter CBardzell SPaulos E(2014)Reviewing reflectionProceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems10.1145/2598510.2598598(93-102)Online publication date: 21-Jun-2014
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2598510.2598598
Hu JFunk MZhang YWang F(2014)Designing Interactive Public Art Installations: New Material Therefore New ChallengesAdvanced Information Systems Engineering10.1007/978-3-662-45212-7_25(199-206)Online publication date: 2014
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45212-7_25
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Cited By

Index Terms

Recommendations

Reviewing reflection: on the use of reflection in interactive system design

Power of peripheral designers: how users learn to design

Supporting user participation design using a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process approach