research-article

A survey of literature on the teaching of introductory programming

Authors:

Stephen Seidman,

Elizabeth Adams,

Jens Bennedsen,

James PatersonAuthors Info & Claims

ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, Volume 39, Issue 4

Pages 204 - 223

https://doi.org/10.1145/1345375.1345441

Published: 01 December 2007 Publication History

Abstract

Three decades of active research on the teaching of introductory programming has had limited effect on classroom practice. Although relevant research exists across several disciplines including education and cognitive science, disciplinary differences have made this material inaccessible to many computing educators. Furthermore, computer science instructors have not had access to a comprehensive survey of research in this area. This paper collects and classifies this literature, identifies important work and mediates it to computing educators and professional bodies.

We identify research that gives well-supported advice to computing academics teaching introductory programming. Limitations and areas of incomplete coverage of existing research efforts are also identified. The analysis applies publication and research quality metrics developed by a previous ITiCSE working group [74].

References

[1]

H. Abelson, J. Sussman, and J. Sussman. Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs. MIT Press, 1984.

Digital Library

[2]

T. Ahoniemi and T. Reinikainen. ALOHA - A Grading Tool for Semi-Automatic Assessment of Mass Programming Courses. In Proceedings of the 6th Baltic Sea Conference on Computing Education Research, pages 139--140. Department of Information Technology, Uppsala University, 2006.

Digital Library

[3]

K. Ala-Mutka. A survey of automated assessment approaches for programming assignments. Computer Science Education, 15(2):83--102, 2005.

[4]

E. Allen, R. Cartwright, and B. Stoler. DrJava: a lightweight pedagogic environment for Java. SIGCSE Bulletin, 34(1):137--141, 2002.

Digital Library

[5]

C. Alphonce and B. Martin. Green: a customizable UML class diagram plug-in for Eclipse. In Companion to the 20th annual ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Object-Oriented Programming Systems, Languages, and Applications, pages 168--169. ACM Press, 2005.

Digital Library

[6]

J. R. Anderson and E. Skwarecki. The automated tutoring of introductory computer programming. Communications of the ACM, 29(9):842--849, 1986.

Digital Library

[7]

B. W. Becker. Teaching CS1 with Karel the Robot in Java. In Proceedings of the 32nd SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pages 50--54. ACM Press, 2001.

Digital Library

[8]

K. Becker. Back to Pascal: Retro but not backwards. Journal of Computing in Small Colleges, 18(2):17--27, 2002.

Digital Library

[9]

M. Ben-Ari. Constructivism in computer science education. In Proceedings of the 29th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pages 257--261. ACM Press, 1998.

Digital Library

[10]

J. Bennedsen and M. E. Caspersen. Programming in context: a model-first approach to CS1. In Proceedings of the 35th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pages 477--481. ACM Press, 2004.

Digital Library

[11]

J. Bergin, J. Roberts, R. Pattis, and M. Stehlik. Karel++: A Gentle Introduction to the Art of Object-Oriented Programming. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, USA, 1996.

Digital Library

[12]

R. Biddle and E. Tempero. Java pitfalls for beginners. SIGCSE Bulletin, 30(2):48--52, 1998.

Digital Library

[13]

K. Bierre, P. Ventura, A. Phelps, and C. Egert. Motivating OOP by blowing things up: an exercise in cooperation and competition in an introductory Java programming course. In Proceedings of the 37th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pages 354--358. ACM Press, 2006.

Digital Library

[14]

J. Biggs. What the student does: teaching for enhanced learning. Higher Education Research and Development, 18(1):57--75, 1999.

[15]

L. Böszörményi. Why Java is not my favorite first-course language. Software-Concepts & Tools, 19(3):141--145, 1998.

[16]

E. Boyer. Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. Jossey-Bass, Hillsdale, NJ, 1997.

[17]

S. Brilliant and T. Wiseman. The first programming paradigm and language dilemma. SIGCSE Bulletin, 28(1):338--342, 1996.

Digital Library

[18]

B. M. Brosgol. A comparison of Ada and Java as a foundation teaching language. Ada Letters, 18(5):12--38, 1998.

Digital Library

[19]

D. Buck and D. J. Stucki. JKarelRobot: a case study in supporting levels of cognitive development in the computer science curriculum. In Proceedings of the 32nd SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pages 16--20, 2001.

Digital Library

[20]

M. C. Carlisle, T. A. Wilson, J. W. Humphries, and S. M. Hadfield. Raptor: introducing programming to non-majors with flowcharts. Journal of Computing in Small Colleges, 19(4):52--60, 2004.

Digital Library

[21]

Computing curricula 2005; the overview report, 2005.

[22]

D. Clark, C. MacNish, and G. F. Royle. Java as a teaching language: opportunities, pitfalls and solutions. In Proceedings of the 3rd Australasian Conference on Computer Science Education, pages 173--179, 1998.

Digital Library

[23]

R. Close, D. Kopec, and J. Aman. CS1: perspectives on programming languages and the breadth-first approach. In Proceedings of the 5th annual CCSC Northeastern Conference on Computing in Small Colleges, pages 228--234. Consortium for Computing Sciences in Colleges, 2000.

Digital Library

[24]

A. Collins, J. Brown, and S. E. Newman. Knowing, learning and instruction: Essays in honour of Robert Glaser, section Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing and mathematics. Erlbaum, San Francisco, 1989.

[25]

S. Cooper, W. Dann, and R. Pausch. Using animated 3d graphics to prepare novices for CS1. Computer Science Education, 13(1):3--30, 2003.

[26]

L. N. de Barros, A. P. dos Santos Mota, K. V. Delgado, and P. M. Matsumoto. A tool for programming learning with pedagogical patterns. In Proceedings of the 2005 OOPSLA Workshop on Eclipse Technology Exchange, pages 125--129. ACM Press, 2005.

Digital Library

[27]

M. de Raadt, R. Watson, and M. Toleman. Language Trends in Introductory Programming. In Proceedings of Informing Science and IT Education Conference, pages 329--337. InformingScience.org, June 2002.

[28]

M. de Raadt, R. Watson, and M. Toleman. Introductory programming: what's happening today and will there be any students to teach tomorrow? In Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Australasian Computing Education, pages 277--282. Australian Computer Society, Inc., 2004.

Digital Library

[29]

P. J. Denning. A debate on teaching computing science. Communications of the ACM, 32:1397--1414, 1989.

Digital Library

[30]

E. Dijkstra. Go To statement considered harmful. Communications of the ACM, 11(3):147--148, 1968.

Digital Library

[31]

A. Dingle and C. Zander. Assessing the ripple effect of CS1 language choice. In Proceedings of the 2nd Annual CCSC Computing in Small Colleges Northwestern Conference, pages 85--93. Consortium for Computing Sciences in Colleges, 2000.

Digital Library

[32]

C. Douce, D. Livingstone, and J. Orwell. Automatic test-based assessment of programming: a review. ACM Journal of Educational Resources in Computing, 5(3):4, 2005.

Digital Library

[33]

A. B. Downey and L. A. Stein. Designing a small-footprint curriculum in computer science. In Proceedings of the 36th Frontiers in Education Conference, pages 21--26. IEEE Computer Society, 2006.

[34]

J. Driel, D. Beijaard, and N. Verloop. Professional development and reform in science education: the role of teachers' practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38:137--158, 2001.

[35]

S. H. Edwards. Improving student performance by evaluating how well students test their own programs. ACM Journal of Educational Resources in Computing, 3(3):1, 2003.

Digital Library

[36]

J. English. Automated assessment of GUI programs using JEWL. In Proceedings of the 9th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, pages 137--141. ACM Press, 2004.

Digital Library

[37]

M. B. Feldman. Ada experience in the undergraduate curriculum. Communications of the ACM, 35(11):53--67, 1992.

Digital Library

[38]

M. Felleisen, R. B. Findler, M. Flatt, and S. Krishnamurthi. The TeachScheme! Project: computing and programming for every student. Computer Science Education, 14(1):55--77, 2004.

[39]

A. Forte and M. Guzdial. Motivation and nonmajors in computer science: identifying discrete audiences for introductory courses. IEEE Transactions on Education, 48(2):248--253, 2005.

Digital Library

[40]

U. Fuller, A. Pears, J. Amillo, C. Avram, and L. Mannila. A computing perspective on the Bologna process. SIGCSE Bulletin, 38(4):142--158, December 2006.

Digital Library

[41]

E. Giangrande, Jr. CS1 programming language options. Journal of Computing in Small Colleges, 22(3):153--160, 2007.

Digital Library

[42]

K. J. Goldman. A concepts-first introduction to computer science. In Proceedings of the 35th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pages 432--436. ACM Press, 2004.

Digital Library

[43]

T. R. G. Green. Instructions and descriptions: some cognitive aspects of programming and similar activities. In Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, pages 21--28. ACM Press, 2000.

Digital Library

[44]

T. R. G. Green and M. Petre. Usability analysis of visual programming environments: a 'cognitive dimensions' framework. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 7(2):131--174, 1996.

[45]

D. Gries. What should we teach in an introductory programming course? In Proceedings of the 4th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pages 81--89. ACM Press, 1974.

Digital Library

[46]

P. Gross and K. Powers. Evaluating assessments of novice programming environments. In Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Computing Education Research, pages 99--110. ACM Press, 2005.

Digital Library

[47]

S. Hadjerrouit. Java as first programming language: a critical evaluation. SIGCSE Bulletin, 30(2):43--47, 1998.

Digital Library

[48]

P. Henriksen and M. Kölling. Greenfoot: combining object visualisation with interaction. In Companion to the 19th annual ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Object-Oriented Programming Systems, Languages, and Applications, pages 73--82. ACM Press, 2004.

Digital Library

[49]

C. A. Higgins, G. Gray, P. Symeonidis, and A. Tsintsifas. Automated assessment and experiences of teaching programming. ACM Journal on Educational Resources in Computing, 5(3):5, 2005.

Digital Library

[50]

C. A. R. Hoare. An axiomatic basis for computer programming. Communications of the ACM, 12(10):576--580, 1969.

Digital Library

[51]

E. Howe, M. Thornton, and B. W. Weide. Components-first approaches to CS1/CS2: principles and practice. In Proceedings of the 35th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pages 291--295. ACM Press, 2004.

Digital Library

[52]

C. Hundhausen, S. Douglas, and J. T. Stasko. A meta-study of algorithm visualization effectiveness. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 13(3):259--290, 2002.

[53]

C. Hundhausen and S. A. Douglas. SALSA and ALVIS: A language and system for constructing and presenting low fidelity algorithm visualizations. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Visual Languages, pages 67--68. IEEE Press, 2000.

Digital Library

[54]

J. Jain, I. James H. Cross, T. D. Hendrix, and L. A. Barowski. Experimental evaluation of animated-verifying object viewers for Java. In Proceedings of the 2006 ACM Symposium on Software Visualization, pages 27--36. ACM Press, 2006.

Digital Library

[55]

M. Joy, N. Griffiths, and R. Boyatt. The BOSS online submission and assessment system. ACM Journal of Educational Resources in Computing, 5(3):2, 2005.

Digital Library

[56]

V. Karavirta, A. Korhonen, L. Malmi, and K. Stålnacke. MatrixPro - A tool for on-the-fly demonstration of data structures and algorithms. In Proceedings of the 3rd Program Visualization Workshop, pages 26--33, The University of Warwick, UK, July 2004.

[57]

C. Kelleher and R. Pausch. Lowering the barriers to programming: A taxonomy of programming environments and languages for novice programmers. ACM Computing Surveys, 37(2):83--137, 2005.

Digital Library

[58]

E. B. Koffman. The case for Modula-2 in CS1 and CS2. In Proceedings of the 19th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pages 49--53. ACM Press, 1988.

Digital Library

[59]

M. Kölling, B. Quig, A. Patterson, and J. Rosenberg. The BlueJ system and its pedagogy. Computer Science Education, 13, Dec 2003.

[60]

J. Kramer. Is abstraction the key to computing? Communications of the ACM, 50(4):36--42, 2007.

Digital Library

[61]

L. Malmi, V. Karavirta, A. Korhonen, J. Nikander, O. Seppälä, and P. Silvasti. Visual algorithm simulation exercise system with automatic assessment: TRAKLA2. Informatics in Education, 3(2):267--288, 2004.

[62]

L. Mannila, M. Peltomäki, and T. Salakoski. What about a simple language? Analyzing the difficulties in learning to program. Computer Science Education, 16(3):211--227, 2006.

[63]

E. Martin, M. Prosser, K. Trigwell, P. Ramsden, and J. Benjamin. What university teachers teach and how they teach it. Intructional Science. Special issue: Teacher Thinking, Beliefs and Knowledge in Higher Education, 28((5--6)):387--412, 2000.

[64]

L. McIver and D. Conway. Seven deadly sins of introductory programming language design. Proceedings of the 1996 International Conference on Software Engineering Education and Practice, pages 309--316, 1996.

Digital Library

[65]

J. Meyer and R. Land. Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (2): Epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning. Higher Education, 49(3):725--734, 2003.

[66]

R. P. Mody. C in education and software engineering. SIGCSE Bulletin, 23(3):45--56, 1991.

Digital Library

[67]

A. Moreno, N. Myller, E. Sutinen, and M. Ben-Ari. Visualizing programs with Jeliot 3. In Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, pages 373--376. ACM Press, 2004.

Digital Library

[68]

T. L. Naps. JHAVÉ - Supporting Algorithm Visualization. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 25(5):49--55, 2005.

Digital Library

[69]

T. L. Naps, G. Rößling, V. Almstrum, W. Dann, R. Fleischer, C. Hundhausen, A. Korhonen, L. Malmi, M. McNally, S. Rodger, and J. Ángel Velázquez-Iturbide. Exploring the role of visualization and engagement in computer science education. In Working Group Reports from the 2002 Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, pages 131--152. ACM Press, 2002.

Digital Library

[70]

D. Palumbo. Programming language/problem-solving research: a review of relevant issues. Review of Educational Research, 60(1):65--89, 1990.

[71]

A. Patterson, M. Kölling, and J. Rosenberg. Introducing unit testing with BlueJ. In Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, pages 11--15. ACM Press, 2003.

Digital Library

[72]

R. E. Pattis. Karel the Robot: A Gentle Introduction to the Art of Programming. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, USA, 1981.

Digital Library

[73]

R. E. Pattis. The "procedures early" approach in CS 1: a heresy. In Proceedings of the 24th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pages 122--126. ACM Press, 1993.

Digital Library

[74]

A. Pears, S. Seidman, C. Eney, P. Kinnunen, and L. Malmi. Constructing a core literature for computing education research. SIGCSE Bulletin, 37(4):152--161, 2005.

Digital Library

[75]

N. Pillay. Developing intelligent programming tutors for novice programmers. SIGCSE Bulletin, 35(2):78--82, 2003.

Digital Library

[76]

B. A. Price, R. M. Baecker, and I. S. Small. A principled taxonomy of software visualization. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 4(3):211--266, 1993.

[77]

N. Ragonis and M. Ben-Ari. On understanding the statics and dynamics of object-oriented programs. In Proceedings of the 36th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pages 226--230. ACM Press, 2005.

Digital Library

[78]

A. Ralston. Fortran and the first course in computer science. SIGCSE Bulletin, 3(4):24--29, 1971.

Digital Library

[79]

S. Reges. Back to basics in CS1 and CS2. In Proceedings of the 37th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pages 293--297. ACM Press, 2006.

Digital Library

[80]

E. S. Roberts. Using C in CS1: evaluating the Stanford experience. In Proceedings of the 24th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pages 117--121. ACM Press, 1993.

Digital Library

[81]

A. Robins, J. Rountree, and N. Rountree. Learning and teaching programming: a review and discussion. Computer Science Education, 13(2):137--172, 2003.

[82]

H. Roumani. Practice what you preach: full separation of concerns in CS1/CS2. In Proceedings of the 37th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pages 491--494. ACM Press, 2006.

Digital Library

[83]

R. Saikkonen, L. Malmi, and A. Korhonen. Fully automatic assessment of programming exercises. In Proceedings of the 6th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, pages 133--136. ACM Press, 2001.

Digital Library

[84]

D. Sanders and B. Dorn. Jeroo: a tool for introducing object-oriented programming. In Proceedings of the 34th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pages 201--204. ACM Press, 2003.

Digital Library

[85]

G. M. Schneider. The introductory programming course in computer science: ten principles. In Papers of the 9th SIGCSE/CSA Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pages 107--114. ACM Press, 1978.

Digital Library

[86]

E. Soloway. Learning to program = learning to construct mechanisms and explanations. Communications of the ACM, 29(9):850--858, 1986.

Digital Library

[87]

J. T. Stasko. TANGO: A framework and system for algorithm animation. IEEE Computer, 23(9):27--39, 1990.

Digital Library

[88]

J. T. Stasko. Using student-built algorithm animations as learning aids. In The Proceedings of the 28th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pages 25--29. ACM Press, 1997.

Digital Library

[89]

J. T. Stasko and E. Kraemer. A methodology for building application-specific visualizations of parallel programs. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 18(2):258--264, 1993.

Digital Library

[90]

L. Stein. What we've swept under the rug: radically rethinking CS1. Computer Science Education, 8(2):118--129, 1998.

[91]

L. Stein. Challenging the computational metaphor: implications for how we think. Cybernetics & Systems, 30(6):473--507, 1999.

[92]

C. Stephenson and T. West. Language Choice and Key Concepts in Introductory Computer Science Courses. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31(1):89--95, 1998.

[93]

M.-A. Storey, D. Damian, J. Michaud, D. Myers, M. Mindel, D. German, M. Sanseverino, and E. Hargreaves. Improving the usability of Eclipse for novice programmers. In Proceedings of the 2003 OOPSLA Workshop on Eclipse Technology Exchange, pages 35--39. ACM Press, 2003.

Digital Library

[94]

K. Trigwell and M. Prosser. Development and use of the approaches to teaching inventory. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), December 2004.

[95]

K. Trigwell, M. Prosser, and F. Waterhouse. Relations between teachers' approaches to teaching and students' approaches to learning. Higher Education, 37:57--70, 1999.

[96]

P. Tymann, June 2007. http://www.cs.rit.edu/ptt/apac06/Life_After_CS.pdf.

[97]

D. W. Valentine. CS educational research: a meta-analysis of SIGCSE technical symposium proceedings. In Proceedings of the 35th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pages 255--259. ACM Press, 2004.

Digital Library

[98]

T. Vilner, E. Zur, and J. Gal-Ezer. Fundamental concepts of CS1: procedural vs. object oriented paradigm - a case study. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, pages 171--175. ACM Press, June 2007.

Digital Library

[99]

G. Weber and P. Brusilovsky. ELM-ART: An adaptive versatile system for web-based instruction. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12:351--384, 2001.

[100]

S. Xinogalos, M. Satratzemi, and V. Dagdilelis. An introduction to object-oriented programming with a didactic microworld: objectKarel. Computers and Education, 47(2):148--171, 2006.

Digital Library

[101]

A. Zeller and D. Lütkehaus. DDD, a free graphical front-end for UNIX debuggers. SIGPLAN Notices, 31(1):22--27, 1996.

Digital Library

Cited By

Lauber ABlumenschein MPampel B(2024)Teaching Programming Skills in Large Digital Settings: Challenges and Experiences2024 IEEE 3rd German Education Conference (GECon)10.1109/GECon62014.2024.10734024(1-6)Online publication date: 5-Aug-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/GECon62014.2024.10734024
Campbell EChristensen KNuwer MAhuja ABoram OLiu JMiller ROsuna IRiser S(2024)Cracking the code: An evidence-based approach to teaching Python in an undergraduate earth science settingJournal of Geoscience Education10.1080/10899995.2024.2384338(1-20)Online publication date: 12-Aug-2024
https://doi.org/10.1080/10899995.2024.2384338
Asgari MTsai FMannila LStrömbäck FSadique K(2024)Students’ perspectives on using digital tools in programming coursesDiscover Education10.1007/s44217-024-00144-43:1Online publication date: 22-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00144-4
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

A survey of literature on the teaching of introductory programming
1. Applied computing
  1. Education
2. Social and professional topics
  1. Professional topics
    1. Computing education
      1. Computing education programs
        Computer science education
        Information science education

Recommendations

Introductory programming: a systematic literature review
ITiCSE 2018 Companion: Proceedings Companion of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education

As computing becomes a mainstream discipline embedded in the school curriculum and acts as an enabler for an increasing range of academic disciplines in higher education, the literature on introductory programming is growing. Although there have been ...
A survey of literature on the teaching of introductory programming
ITiCSE-WGR '07: Working group reports on ITiCSE on Innovation and technology in computer science education

Three decades of active research on the teaching of introductory programming has had limited effect on classroom practice. Although relevant research exists across several disciplines including education and cognitive science, disciplinary differences ...
A Survey of Introductory Programming Courses in Ireland
ITiCSE '19: Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education

Between January and April of 2018, a comprehensive survey of introductory programming courses was undertaken across all sectors of Irish third-level institutions (universities, institutes of technology, and private colleges). The survey instrument was ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM SIGCSE Bulletin

ACM SIGCSE Bulletin Volume 39, Issue 4

December 2007

236 pages

ISSN:0097-8418

DOI:10.1145/1345375

Issue’s Table of Contents

ITiCSE-WGR '07: Working group reports on ITiCSE on Innovation and technology in computer science education
December 2007
255 pages
ISBN:9781450378420
DOI:10.1145/1345443
Editors:
Janet Carter
University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
,
June Amillo
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

Copyright © 2007 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 December 2007

Published in SIGCSE Volume 39, Issue 4

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

385
Total Citations
View Citations
7,623
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)239
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)23

Reflects downloads up to 06 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Lauber ABlumenschein MPampel B(2024)Teaching Programming Skills in Large Digital Settings: Challenges and Experiences2024 IEEE 3rd German Education Conference (GECon)10.1109/GECon62014.2024.10734024(1-6)Online publication date: 5-Aug-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/GECon62014.2024.10734024
Campbell EChristensen KNuwer MAhuja ABoram OLiu JMiller ROsuna IRiser S(2024)Cracking the code: An evidence-based approach to teaching Python in an undergraduate earth science settingJournal of Geoscience Education10.1080/10899995.2024.2384338(1-20)Online publication date: 12-Aug-2024
https://doi.org/10.1080/10899995.2024.2384338
Asgari MTsai FMannila LStrömbäck FSadique K(2024)Students’ perspectives on using digital tools in programming coursesDiscover Education10.1007/s44217-024-00144-43:1Online publication date: 22-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00144-4
Bunn TAnslow CLundqvist K(2024)Towards a Python 3 processing IDE for teaching creative programmingMultimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-024-20345-183:38(86247-86260)Online publication date: 10-Oct-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-024-20345-1
Martins Nunes Avellar GFioravanti MSimao de Deus WLucas Jaquie Castelo Branco KBarbosa E(2024)SSPOT-VR: An immersive and affordable mobile application for supporting K-12 students in learning programming conceptsEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-024-12499-029:13(16411-16439)Online publication date: 9-Feb-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10639-024-12499-0
De Silva DJayasinghe PIllesinghe AMallawaarachchi DVithanage CVidhanaarachchi S(2024)CodeRookie: Educational Java Programming Environment for BeginnersProceedings of Ninth International Congress on Information and Communication Technology10.1007/978-981-97-3559-4_19(243-253)Online publication date: 28-Jul-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-3559-4_19
Liang YUehara M(2024)Jupyter-Based Java Development Environment for Programming EducationComplex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems10.1007/978-3-031-70011-8_7(72-81)Online publication date: 6-Sep-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-70011-8_7
Liang YUehara M(2024)How to Run GUI Applications on a Java Development Environment Based on JupyterLabAdvanced Information Networking and Applications10.1007/978-3-031-57840-3_26(286-297)Online publication date: 11-Apr-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57840-3_26
Jamal NJawawi DHassan RMohamad RHalim SSaadon NIsa MHamed H(2024)Adaptive learning framework for learning computational thinking using educational roboticsComputer Applications in Engineering Education10.1002/cae.2273232:4Online publication date: 6-Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22732
Schnieder MWilliams S(2023)Educational Mobile Apps for Programming in Python: Review and AnalysisEducation Sciences10.3390/educsci1301006613:1(66)Online publication date: 8-Jan-2023
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13010066
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents