skip to main content
10.1145/1298091.1298106acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobicomConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

A terminal-assisted route optimized NEMO management

Published: 22 October 2007 Publication History

Abstract

The NEMO basic support protocol enhances mobile IPv6 (MIPv6) to enable mobile router (MR) to move together with mobile network node (MNN) as a unit. This protocol suffers from pinball routing effect which has triggered research works to enable direct routing between MNNs in the presence of network mobility. Instead of relying on MIPv6, this paper describes network mobility using a novel terminal-assisted IP mobility protocol on MNNs that work cooperatively with MRs and access routers to provide seamless connectivity. This protocol is superior as it neither suffers from pinball routing effect nor requires dedicated infrastructure support such as home agent. It also does not dynamically increase the size of IP header. Through quantitative comparisons with existing protocol, this protocol triumphs in terms of average packet delivery overhead and packet generation.

References

[1]
V. Devarapalli, R. Wakikawa, A. Petrescu, and P. Thubert. Network Mobility (NEMO) Basic Support Protocol. RFC 3963, Jan. 2005.
[2]
P. Ferguson and D. Senie. Network Ingress Filtering: Defeating Denial of Service Attacks which empoly IP Source Address Spoofing. RFC 2267, Jan. 1998.
[3]
D. Johnson, C. Perkins, and J. Arkko. Mobililty Support in IPv6. RFC 3775, June 2004.
[4]
B. S. Lee, T. M. Lim, C. K. Yeo, and Q. V. Le. Terminal Mobility Support Protocol. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications, Glasgow, Scotland, UK, June 8--12, 2007.
[5]
T. M. Lim, B. S. Lee, and C. K. Yeo. IPv6 Network Mobility for Flat Ad hoc Routing Protocol. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Global Telecommunications, St. Louis, USA, Nov. 28--2, 2005.
[6]
C. Ng, P. Thubert, M. Watari, and F. Zhao. Network Mobility Route Optimization Problem Statement. Internet Draft, Sept. 2006. Working in Progress.
[7]
J. Rosenberg, H. Schulzrinne, G. Camarillo, A. Johnston, J. Peterson, R. Sparks, M. Handley, and E. Schooler. SIP: Session Initiation Protocol. RFC 3261, June 2002.
[8]
S. Thomson and T. Narten. IPv6 Stateless Address Autoconfiguration. RFC 2462, Dec. 1998.
[9]
P. Thubert and M. Molteni. IPv6 Reverse Routing Header and its application to Mobile Networks. Internet Draft, Sept. 2006. Working in Progress.
[10]
P. Vixie, S. Thomson, Y. Rekhter, and J. Bound. Dynamic Updates in the Domain Name System (DNS UPDATE). RFC 2136, Apr. 1997.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. A terminal-assisted route optimized NEMO management

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      MobiWac '07: Proceedings of the 5th ACM international workshop on Mobility management and wireless access
      October 2007
      196 pages
      ISBN:9781595938091
      DOI:10.1145/1298091
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 22 October 2007

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. IPv6
      2. inter-vehicular communications
      3. network mobility

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Conference

      MSWiM07
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 83 of 272 submissions, 31%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 03 Jan 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media