skip to main content
article

Estimation of travel distance from visual motion in virtual environments

Published: 01 January 2007 Publication History

Abstract

Distance estimation of visually simulated self-motion is difficult, because one has to know or make assumptions about scene layout to judge ego speed. Discrimination of the travel distances of two sequentially simulated self-motions in the same scene can be performed quite accurately (Bremmer and Lappe 1999; Frenz et al., 2003). However, the indication of the perceived distance of a single movement in terms of a spatial interval results in a depth scaling error: Intervals are correlated with the true travel distance, but underestimate travel distance by about 25% (Frenz and Lappe, 2005). Here we investigated whether the inclusion of further depth cues (disparity/motion parallax/figural cues) in the virtual environment allows more veridical interval adjustment. Experiments were conducted on a large single projection screen and in a fully immersive computer-animated virtual environment (CAVE). Forward movements in simple virtual environments were simulated with distances between 1.5 and 13 m with varying speeds. Subjects indicated the perceived distance of each movement in terms of a depth interval on the virtual ground plane. We found good correlation between simulated and indicated distances, indicative of an internal representation of the perceived distance. The slopes of the fitted regression lines revealed an underestimation of distance by about 25% under all conditions. We conclude that estimation of travel distance from optic flow is subject to scaling when compared to static intervals in the environment, irrespective of additional depth cues.

References

[1]
Berthoz, A., Israel, I., Georges--Francois, P., Grasso, R., and Tsuzuku, T. 1995. Spatial memory of body linear displacement: What is being stored? Science 269, 95--98.
[2]
Beusmans, J. M. 1998. Optic flow and the metric of the visual ground plane. Vision Res. 38, 1153--1170.
[3]
Bremmer, F. and Lappe, M. 1999. The use of optic flow for distance discrimination and reproduction during visually simulated self motion. Exp. Brain Res. 127, 33--42.
[4]
Bronstein, A. and Buckwell, D. 1997. Automatic control of postural sway by visual motion parallax. Exp. Brain Res. 113, 243--248.
[5]
Cuijpers, R. H., Kappers, A. M. L., and Koenderink, J. J. 2000. Large systematic deviations in visual parallelism. Perception 29, 1467--1482.
[6]
Cuijpers, R. H., Kappers, A. M. L., and Koenderink, J. J. 2002. Visual perception of collinearity. Percep. Psychophys. 64, 392--404.
[7]
Durgin, F. H. and Pelah, A. 1999. Visuomotor adaption without vision? Exp. Brain Res. 127, 12--18.
[8]
Durgin, F. H., Pelah, A., Fox, L. F., Lewis, J., Kane, R., and Walley, K. A. 2005. Self-motion perception during locomotor recalibration: More than meets the eye. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 31, 398--419.
[9]
Foley, J. M. 1980. Binocular distance perception. Psychol. Rev. 87, 411--434.
[10]
Foley, J. M., Ribeiro-Filho, N. P., and Da Silva, J. A. 2004. Visual perception of extent and the geometry of visual space. Vision Res. 44, 147--156.
[11]
Frenz, H. and Lappe, M. 2005. Absolute travel distances from optic flow. Vision Res. 45, 1679--1692.
[12]
Frenz, H., Bremmer, F., and Lappe, M. 2003. Discrimination of travel distances from ‘situated’ optic flow. Vision Res. 43, 2173--2183.
[13]
Gibson, J. J. 1950. The Perception of the Visual World. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA.
[14]
Grigo, A. and Lappe, M. 1998. Interaction of stereo vision and optic flow processing revealed by an illusory stimulus. Vision Res. 38, 281--290.
[15]
Harris, L. R., Jenkin, M., and Zikovitz, D. C. 2000. Visual and non-visual cues in the perception of linear self motion. Exp. Brain Res. 135, 12--21.
[16]
Indow, T. 1991. A critical review of Luneburg‘s model with regard to global structure of visual space. Psychol Rev. 98, 430--453.
[17]
Kearns, M. J., Warren, W. H., Duchon, A. P., and Tarr, M. J. 2002. Path integration from optic flow and body senses in a homing task. Perception 31, 349--374.
[18]
Lee, D. N. 1980. The optic flow field: The foundation of vision. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 290, 169--179.
[19]
Li, L. and Warren, W. H. 2004. Path perception during rotation: influence of instructions, depth range, and dot density. Vision Res. 44, 1879--1889.
[20]
Loomis, J. M., Klatzky, R. L., Golledge, R. G., Cicinelli, J. G., Pellegrino, J. W., and Fry, P. A. 1993. Nonvisual navigation by blind and sighted: Assessment of path integration ability. J. Exp. Psych. Gen. 122, 73--91.
[21]
Messing, R. and Durgin, F. 2005. Distance perception and the visual horizon in head-mounted displays. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception 2, 234--250.
[22]
Palmisano, S. 2002. Consistent stereoscopic information increases the perceived speed of vection in depth. Vision Res. 31, 463--480.
[23]
Pelah, A. and Barlow, H. B. 1996. Visual illusion from running. Nature (London) 381, 283.
[24]
Peruch, P., May, M., and Wartenberg, F. 1997. Homing in virtual environments: Effects of field of view and path layout. Perception 26, 301--311.
[25]
Prokop, T., Schubert, M., and Berger, W. 1997. Visual influence on human locomotion. modulation to changes in optic flow. Exp. Brain Res. 114, 63--70.
[26]
Redlick, F. P., Jenkin, M., and Harris, L. R. 2001. Humans can use optic flow to estimate distance of travel. Vision Res. 41, 213--219.
[27]
Riecke, B. E., van Veen, H. A. H. C., and Bülthoff, H. H. 2002. Visual homing is possible without landmarks: A path integration study in virtual reality. Presence 11, 443--473.
[28]
Rushton, S. K., Harris, J. M., and Wann, J. P. 1999. Steering, optic flow, and the respective importance of depth and retinal motion distribution. Perception 28, 255--266.
[29]
Sun, H.-J., Campos, J. L., and Chan, G. S. 2004. Multisensory integration in the estimation of relative path length. Exp. Brain Res. 154, 246--254.
[30]
Thompson, W. B., Creem-Regehr, S. H., Mohler, B. J., and Willemsen, P. 2005. Investigations on the interactions between vision and locomotion using a treadmill virtual environment. Proceedings of SPIE 5666. 481--492.
[31]
van den Berg, A. V. and Brenner, E. 1994a. Humans combine the optic flow with static depth cues for robust perception of heading. Vision Res. 34, 2153--2167.
[32]
van den Berg, A. V. and Brenner, E. 1994b. Why two eyes are better than one for judgements of heading. Nature (London) 371, 700--702.
[33]
Wagner, M. 1985. The metric of visual space. Percept Psychophys. 38, 483--495.
[34]
Warren, W. H. and Hannon, D. J. 1990. Eye movements and optical flow. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 7, 160--169.
[35]
Warren, W. H., Morris, M. W., and Kalish, M. 1988. Perception of translational heading from optical flow. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 14, 646--660.
[36]
Witmer, B. G. and Kline, P. B. 1998. Judging perceived and traversed distance in virtual environments. Presence 7, 144--167.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Applied Perception
ACM Transactions on Applied Perception  Volume 4, Issue 1
January 2007
129 pages
ISSN:1544-3558
EISSN:1544-3965
DOI:10.1145/1227134
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 January 2007
Published in TAP Volume 4, Issue 1

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Optic flow
  2. depth
  3. distance estimation
  4. stereo
  5. virtual reality

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)38
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6
Reflects downloads up to 14 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media