skip to main content
10.1145/1166253.1166263acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesuistConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Comparing and managing multiple versions of slide presentations

Published: 15 October 2006 Publication History

Abstract

Despite the ubiquity of slide presentations, managing multiple presentations remains a challenge. Understanding how multiple versions of a presentation are related to one another, assembling new presentations from existing presentations, and collaborating to create and edit presentations are difficult tasks. In this paper, we explore techniques for comparing and managing multiple slide presentations. We propose a general comparison framework for computing similarities and differences between slides. Based on this framework we develop an interactive tool for visually comparing multiple presentations. The interactive visualization facilitates understanding how presentations have evolved over time. We show how the interactive tool can be used to assemble new presentations from a collection of older ones and to merge changes from multiple presentation authors.

Supplementary Material

JPG File (1166263.jpg)
index.html (index.html)
Slides from the presentation
ZIP File (p47-slides.zip)
Supplemental material for Comparing and managing multiple versions of slide presentations
Audio only (1166263.mp3)
Video (1166263.mp4)

References

[1]
Apple. Keynote. 2005. www.apple.com/keynote; Keynote Document Reference: developer.apple.com/technotes/tn2002/tn2073.html
[2]
Baker, M. J., and Eick, S. 1995. Space-filling software visualization. Journal of Visual Language and Computing. 6. pp.119--133
[3]
Brand, John. 2004. Presentation (Mis)management: Content and Collaboration Strategies, Delta 3057. Sept 14, 2004.
[4]
Charras, C. Lecroq, T. Sequence comparison. www-igm.univ-mlv.fr/~lecroq/seqcomp/index.html
[5]
Eick, S., Steffen, J. L., and Sumner, E. E. 1992. Seesoft - A tool for visualizing line oriented software statistics. IEEE Transactions on Sotware Engineering. 18, 11. pp. 957--968.
[6]
Eick, S. 1994. Graphically displaying text. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics. 3, 2. pp. 127--142.
[7]
Good, L., and Bederson, B. 2002. Zoomable user interfaces as a medium for slide show presentations. Information Visualization. 1, 1. pp. 35--49.
[8]
Heckel, P. 1978. A technique for isolating differences between files. Comm. of the ACM 21, 4. pp. 264--268.
[9]
Hirschberg, D. S. 1975. A linear space algorithm for computing maximal common subsequences. Communications of the ACM. 18, 6. pp.341--343.
[10]
Hunt, J. W., and McIlroy, M. D. 1976. An algorithm for differential file comparison. Bell Laboratories CSTR #41.
[11]
Levenshtein, V. I. 1966. Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions and reversals. Soviet Physics Doklady.
[12]
Microsoft. PowerPoint. www.microsoft.com/powerpoint
[13]
Microsoft PowerPoint Object Model Reference, http://msdn.microsoft.com/office/understanding/powerpoint
[14]
Moscovich, T., Scholz, K., Hughes, J. F., and Salesin, D. 2004. Customizable presentations. Technical Report CS-04-16, Computer Science Department, Brown University.
[15]
Needleman, S. and Wunsch, C. 1970. A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins, J Mol Biol. 48(3):443--53
[16]
Nelson, L., Ichimura, S., Pedersen, E. R., and Adams, L. 1999. Palette: A paper interface for giving presentations. In Proceedings of CHI 1999. pp. 354--361.
[17]
OpenOffice Impress. www.openoffice.org
[18]
Parker, A., and Hamblen, J. O. 1989. Computer algorithms for plagiarism detection. IEEE Transactions on Education. 32, 2: pp. 94--99.
[19]
Parker, I. 2001. Absolute PowerPoint: Can a software package edit our thoughts? The New Yorker. pp. 76--87.
[20]
Perlin, K., and Fox, D. 1993. Pad: An alternative approach to the computer interface. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2003. pp. 57--64.
[21]
Salton, G. and McGill, M. J. 1986. Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval. McGraw-Hill, Inc.
[22]
Viégas, F. B., Wattenberg, M., and Dave, K. 2004. Studying cooperation and conflict between authors with history flow visualizations. In Proceedings of CHI 2004. pp. 575--582.
[23]
Zellweger, P. T. 1989. Scripted documents: A hypermedia path mechanism. In Proceedings of ACM Hypertext 1989.
[24]
Zongker, D. E. and Salesin, D. H. 2003. On creating animated presentations. In Proceedings of the 2003 SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Symp. on Computer Animation. pp.298--308

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Comparing and managing multiple versions of slide presentations

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    UIST '06: Proceedings of the 19th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology
    October 2006
    354 pages
    ISBN:1595933131
    DOI:10.1145/1166253
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 15 October 2006

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. alignment
    2. correspondence
    3. distance metrics
    4. slide presentations
    5. versions

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Conference

    UIST06

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 561 of 2,567 submissions, 22%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)19
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
    Reflects downloads up to 06 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media