skip to main content
10.1145/1148170.1148205acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Adapting ranking SVM to document retrieval

Published: 06 August 2006 Publication History

Abstract

The paper is concerned with applying learning to rank to document retrieval. Ranking SVM is a typical method of learning to rank. We point out that there are two factors one must consider when applying Ranking SVM, in general a "learning to rank" method, to document retrieval. First, correctly ranking documents on the top of the result list is crucial for an Information Retrieval system. One must conduct training in a way that such ranked results are accurate. Second, the number of relevant documents can vary from query to query. One must avoid training a model biased toward queries with a large number of relevant documents. Previously, when existing methods that include Ranking SVM were applied to document retrieval, none of the two factors was taken into consideration. We show it is possible to make modifications in conventional Ranking SVM, so it can be better used for document retrieval. Specifically, we modify the "Hinge Loss" function in Ranking SVM to deal with the problems described above. We employ two methods to conduct optimization on the loss function: gradient descent and quadratic programming. Experimental results show that our method, referred to as Ranking SVM for IR, can outperform the conventional Ranking SVM and other existing methods for document retrieval on two datasets.

References

[1]
C. Burges, T. Shaked, E. Renshaw, A. Lazier, M. Deeds, N. Hamilton, and G. Hullender. Learning to Rank using Gradient Descent. Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Machine Learning, 2005.
[2]
W. Chu and Z. Ghahramani. Gaussian Process for Ordinal Regression. Technical Report. Univ. College London, 2004.
[3]
W. Chu and S. Keerthi. New Approaches to Support Vector Ordinal Regression. Proceedings of International Conference on Machine Learning, 2005.
[4]
K. Crammer and Y. Singer. Pranking with Ranking. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 14, pages 641--647, 2002.
[5]
J. Gao, H. Qi, X. Xia, and J. Nie. Linear Discriminant Model for Information Retrieval. Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM SIGIR Conference, 2005.
[6]
E. F. Harrington. Online Ranking/Collaborative filtering using the Perceptron Algorithm. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 250--257, 2003.
[7]
T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani, and J. Friedman. The Elements of Statistical Learning: data mining, inference and prediction. Springer-Verlag, 2001.
[8]
R. Herbrich, T. Graepel, and K. Obermayer. Large Margin Rank Boundaries for Ordinal Regression. Advances in Large Margin Classifiers, pages 115--132, 2000.
[9]
W. R. Hersh, C. Buckley, T. J. Leone, and D. H. Hickam. OHSUMED: An interactive retrieval evaluation and new large test collection for research. Proceedings of the 17th Annual ACM SIGIR Conference, pages 192--201, 1994.
[10]
K. Jarvelin and J. Kekalainen. IR evaluation methods for retrieving highly relevant documents. Proceedings of the 23rd annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pages 41--48, 2000.
[11]
T. Joachims. Optimizing Search Engines Using Clickthrough Data. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2002.
[12]
R. Nallapati. Discriminative models for information retrieval. Proceedings of the 27th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pages 64--71, 2004.
[13]
information retrieval. Proceedings of the 21st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pages 275--281, 1998.
[14]
S. Robertson and D. A. Hull. The TREC-9 Filtering Track Final Report. Proceedings of the 9th Text REtrieval Conference, pages 25--40, 2000.
[15]
A. Shashua and A. Levin. Taxonomy of Large Margin Principle Algorithm for Ordinal Regression Problems. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 15. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000.
[16]
C. Silverstein, M. Henzinger, H. Marais, and M. Moricz. Analysis of a Very Large AltaVista Query Log. Technical Report SRC 1998-014, Digital Systems Research Center, 1998.
[17]
A. Spink, B. J. Jansen, D. Wolfram, and T. Saracevic. From e-sex to e-commerce: web search changes. IEEE Computer, 35(3), pages 107--109, 2002.
[18]
A. Spink, D. Wolfram, B. J. Jansen, and T. Saracevic. Searching the web: the public and their queries. Journal of the American Society of Information Science and Technology, 52(3), pages 226--234, 2001.
[19]
Y. Freund, R. Iyer, R. E. Schapire, and Y. Singer. An efficient boosting algorithm for combining preferences. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 4, pages 933--969, 2003.
[20]
G. Salton. The SMART Retrieval System: Experiments in automatic document processing. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1971.
[21]
J. Lafferty and C. Zhai Document Language Models, Query Models, and Risk Minimization for Information Retrieval. Proceedings of the 24th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pages 111--119, 2001.
[22]
D. Grangier and S. Bengio. Exploiting Hyperlinks to Learn a Retrieval Model. Proceedings of NIPS Workshop, 2005.
[23]
S. Rajaram and S. Agarwal Generalization Bounds for k-Partite Ranking. Proceedings of NIPS Workshop, 2005.
[24]
C. Burges. Ranking as Learning Structured Outputs. Proceedings of NIPS Workshop, 2005.
[25]
N. Usunier, V. Truong, R. A. Massih, and P. Gallinari, Ranking with Unlabeled Data: A First Study. Proceedings of NIPS Workshop, 2005.
[26]
W. Chu and Z. Ghahramani Extensions of Gaussian Processes for Ranking: Semi-Supervised and Active Learning. Proceedings of NIPS Workshop, 2005.
[27]
S. Yu, K. Yu, and V. Tresp, Collaborative Ordinal Regression. Proceedings of NIPS Workshop, 2005.
[28]
K. Morik, P. Brockhausen, and T. Joachims. Combining statistical learning with a knowledge-based approach - A case study in intensive care monitoring. Proceedings of ICML, 1999.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Adapting ranking SVM to document retrieval

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SIGIR '06: Proceedings of the 29th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
    August 2006
    768 pages
    ISBN:1595933697
    DOI:10.1145/1148170
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 06 August 2006

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. information retrieval
    2. loss function
    3. ranking SVM

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Conference

    SIGIR06
    Sponsor:
    SIGIR06: The 29th Annual International SIGIR Conference
    August 6 - 11, 2006
    Washington, Seattle, USA

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 792 of 3,983 submissions, 20%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)61
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)9
    Reflects downloads up to 25 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media