skip to main content
10.1145/1013367.1013446acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesthewebconfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Choosing the best knowledge base system for large semantic web applications

Published: 19 May 2004 Publication History

Abstract

We present an evaluation of four knowledge base systems with respect to use in large Semantic Web applications. We discuss the performance of each system. In particular, we show that existing systems need to place a greater emphasis on scalability.

References

[1]
Broekstra, J. and Kampman, A. Sesame: A Generic Architecture for Storing and Querying RDF and RDF Schema. In Proc. of ISWC2002.
[2]
Guo, Y., Heflin, J., and Pan, Z. Benchmarking DAML+OIL Repositories. In Proc. of ISWC2003.
[3]
Horrocks, I. The FaCT System. In Proc. of Tableaux'98.
[4]
Jess: the Rule Engine for the Java Platform http://herzberg.ca.sandia.gov/jess
[5]
Karvounarakis, G. et al. RQL: A Declarative Query Language for RDF. In Proc. of WWW2002.
[6]
Kopena, J. B. and Regli, W. C. DAMLJessKB: A Tool for Reasoning with the Semantic Web. In Proc. of ISWC2003.
[7]
Pan, Z. and Heflin, J. DLDB: Extending Relational Databases to Support Semantic Web Queries. In Workshop on Practical and Scalable Semantic Systems, ISWC2003.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Choosing the best knowledge base system for large semantic web applications

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    WWW Alt. '04: Proceedings of the 13th international World Wide Web conference on Alternate track papers & posters
    May 2004
    532 pages
    ISBN:1581139128
    DOI:10.1145/1013367
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 19 May 2004

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. DAML+OIL
    2. benchmark
    3. evaluation
    4. knowledge base system
    5. semantic web

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Conference

    WWW04
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,899 of 8,196 submissions, 23%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 06 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media