Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Photocatalytic solar hydrogen production from water on a 100-m2 scale

Nature volume 598, pages 304–307 (2021)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

The unprecedented impact of human activity on Earth’s climate and the ongoing increase in global energy demand have made the development of carbon-neutral energy sources ever more important. Hydrogen is an attractive and versatile energy carrier (and important and widely used chemical) obtainable from water through photocatalysis using sunlight, and through electrolysis driven by solar or wind energy1,2. The most efficient solar hydrogen production schemes, which couple solar cells to electrolysis systems, reach solar-to-hydrogen (STH) energy conversion efficiencies of 30% at a laboratory scale3. Photocatalytic water splitting reaches notably lower conversion efficiencies of only around 1%, but the system design is much simpler and cheaper and more amenable to scale-up1,2—provided the moist, stoichiometric hydrogen and oxygen product mixture can be handled safely in a field environment and the hydrogen recovered. Extending our earlier demonstration of a 1-m2 panel reactor system based on a modified, aluminium-doped strontium titanate particulate photocatalyst4, we here report safe operation of a 100-m2 array of panel reactors over several months with autonomous recovery of hydrogen from the moist gas product mixture using a commercial polyimide membrane5. The system, optimized for safety and durability, and remaining undamaged on intentional ignition of recovered hydrogen, reaches a maximum STH of 0.76%. While the hydrogen production is inefficient and energy negative overall, our findings demonstrate that safe, large-scale photocatalytic water splitting, and gas collection and separation are possible. To make the technology economically viable and practically useful, essential next steps are reactor and process optimization to substantially reduce costs and improve STH efficiency, photocatalyst stability and gas separation efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: The 100-m2 water splitting photocatalyst panel reactor.
Fig. 2: Electron microscopy images of photocatalyst sheets.
Fig. 3: Performance of the gas separation unit connected to the 100-m2 water splitting photocatalyst panel reactor on 2 October 2020 at the Kakioka Research Facility.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its Supplementary Information. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Hisatomi, T. & Domen, K. Reaction systems for solar hydrogen production via water splitting with particulate semiconductor. Nat. Catal. 2, 387–399 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kim, J. H., Hansora, D., Sharma, P., Jang, J.-W. & Lee, J. Toward practical solar hydrogen production – an artificial photosynthetic leaf-to-farm challenge. Chem. Soc. Rev. 48, 1908–1971 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Jia, J. et al. Solar water splitting by photovoltaic-electrolysis with a solar-to-hydrogen efficiency over 30%. Nat. Commun. 7, 13237 (2016).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Goto, Y. et al. A particulate photocatalyst water-splitting panel for large-scale solar hydrogen production. Joule 2, 509–520 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tanihara, N., Nakanishi, S. & Yoshinaga, T. Gas and vapor separation through polyimide membranes. J. Jpn. Petrol. Inst. 59, 276–282 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pagliaro, M. Preparing for the future: solar energy and bioeconomy in the United Arab Emirates. Energy Sci. Eng. 7, 1451–1457 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Boretti, A., Castelletto, S. & Al-Zubaidy, S. Concentrating solar power tower technology: present status and outlook. Nonlinear Eng. 8, 10–31 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang, Q. et al. Scalable water splitting on particulate photocatalyst sheets with a solar-to-hydrogen energy conversion efficiency exceeding 1%. Nat. Mater. 15, 611–615 (2016).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Takata, T. et al. Photocatalytic water splitting with quantum efficiency of almost unity. Nature 581, 411–414 (2020).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang, Z. et al. Overall water splitting by Ta3N5 nanorod single crystals grown on the edges of KTaO3 particles. Nat. Catal. 1, 756–763 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang, Q. et al. Oxysulfide photocatalyst for visible-light-driven overall water splitting. Nat. Mater. 18, 827–832 (2019).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lyu, H. et al. An Al-doped SrTiO3 photocatalyst maintaining sunlight-driven overall water splitting activity over 1000 h of constant illumination. Chem. Sci. 10, 3196–3201 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Yamada, T. & Domen, K. Development of sunlight driven water splitting devices towards future artificial photosynthetic industry. ChemEngineering 2, 36 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Maeda, K. et al. Characterization of Rh-Cr mixed-oxide nanoparticles dispersed on (Ga1-xZnx)(N1-xOx) as a cocatalyst for visible-light-driven overall water splitting. J. Phys. Chem. B 110, 13753–13758 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Peñas, P. et al. Decoupling gas evolution from water-splitting electrodes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 166, H769–H776 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kemppainen, E. et al. Effect of the ambient conditions on the operation of a large-area integrated photovoltaic-electrolyser. Sustain. Energy Fuel 4, 4831–4847 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang, Q. et al. Particulate photocatalyst sheets based on carbon conductor layer for efficient Z-scheme pure-water splitting at ambient pressure. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 1675–1683 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sayama, K. & Miseki, Y. Research and development of solar hydrogen production – toward the realization of ingenious photocatalysis-electrolysis hybrid system. Synthesiology (Eng. edn) 7, 79–91 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schroeder, V. & Holtappels K. Explosion characteristics of hydrogen-air and hydrogen-oxygen mixtures at elevated pressures. In Proc. International Conference on Hydrogen Safety 120001 (ICHS, 2005).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO), Japan. A part of this work was supported by the Nanotechnology Platform project by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (grant number JPMXP09A20UT0004). We are grateful to R. Dobashi and T. Mogi of the University of Tokyo for their advice with regard to gas explosion experiments and safety procedures. We are also grateful to H. Kita of Yamaguchi University and N. Tanihara of Ube Industries, Ltd for providing advice concerning polyimide separation membranes. We thank H. Ito of ARPChem for his support on the construction of the arrayed panel reactor. Finally, we thank all of the technical staff that participated in the fabrication and construction of the complete system.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Sayuri Okunaka

    Present address: Global Zero Emission Research Center (GZR), National Institution of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan

  2. These authors contributed equally: Hiroshi Nishiyama, Taro Yamada

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Office of University Professors, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

    Hiroshi Nishiyama, Taro Yamada, Masaharu Yamaguchi, Yasuko Kuromiya, Yoshie Nagatsuma, Ryoichi Narushima & Kazunari Domen

  2. Institute of Engineering Innovation, School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

    Mamiko Nakabayashi & Naoya Shibata

  3. Japan Technological Research Association of Artificial Photosynthetic Chemical Process (ARPChem), Tokyo, Japan

    Yoshiki Maehara, Hiromasa Tokudome, Seiji Akiyama & Sayuri Okunaka

  4. FUJIFILM Corporation, Ashigarakami-gun, Kanagawa, Japan

    Yoshiki Maehara

  5. Research Institute, TOTO Ltd., Chigasaki, Kanagawa, Japan

    Hiromasa Tokudome & Sayuri Okunaka

  6. Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation, Science & Innovation Center, Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa, Japan

    Seiji Akiyama

  7. Department of Applied Chemistry, School of Science and Technology, Meiji University, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, Japan

    Tomoaki Watanabe

  8. Research Initiative for Supra-Materials, Interdisciplinary Cluster for Cutting Edge Research, Shinshu University, Nagano-shi, Nagano, Japan

    Tsuyoshi Takata, Takashi Hisatomi & Kazunari Domen

Authors
  1. Hiroshi Nishiyama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Taro Yamada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mamiko Nakabayashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yoshiki Maehara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Masaharu Yamaguchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yasuko Kuromiya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yoshie Nagatsuma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Hiromasa Tokudome
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Seiji Akiyama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Tomoaki Watanabe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Ryoichi Narushima
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Sayuri Okunaka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Naoya Shibata
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Tsuyoshi Takata
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Takashi Hisatomi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Kazunari Domen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

K.D. planned and supervised this project. H.N. and T.Y. were responsible for the basic design, on-site design, construction and supervision of the plant. H.N. and T.T. investigated the cocatalyst deposition process, and designed, tested, fabricated and supervised the mass production of the photocatalytic reactors. S.O. and H.T. prepared the SrTiO3:Al photocatalyst on a large scale. M.Y., Y.K., Y.N., R.N. and T.H. prepared the modified photocatalyst. M.N. and N.S. performed electron microscopy. Y.M. examined in situ gas evolution. T.Y. designed and constructed the gas filtration apparatus. T.Y. and H.N. performed the field testing of the entire solar hydrogen production system. H.N., T.Y., S.A, T.W. and K.D. examined the safety issues. T.Y., H.N., T.H. and K.D. discussed the results and wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kazunari Domen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

H.N., T.Y. and K.D. of the University of Tokyo hold patents related to this work (Japanese Unexamined Patent Application publication no. 2021-75,319).

Additional information

Peer review information Nature thanks Frank Osterloh and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 The photocatalyst panel reactors.

a, The design of a panel reactor unit (625 cm2). b, A diagram showing the structure. c, d, Photographic images of the 3-m2 module consisting of 48 panel reactor units viewed from the front (c) and rear (d).

Extended Data Fig. 2 Photocatalyst sheet microstructures.

a, b, Cross-sectional backscattered electron images acquired by scanning electron microscopy of photocatalyst sheets prepared using a manual sprayer on a flat, clear glass sheet (a) or a program-controlled sprayer on a frosted glass sheet (b). c, d, Cross-sectional images of a photocatalyst deposited by manual spraying on a flat, clear glass sheet, acquired by transmission electron microscopy before (c) and after (d) a field test lasting approximately six months.

Extended Data Fig. 3 The dependence of the water splitting rate of the photocatalyst sheet on the loading amount of the photocatalyst layer.

Small photocatalyst sheets (5 cm × 5 cm) prepared on the flat, clear glass were irradiated with the ultraviolet light emitting diode array. The loading amount of the photocatalyst layer is expressed as a relative value to the case where the modified SrTiO3:Al loading is 0.89 mg cm−2.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 4 Durability of photocatalyst sheets.

a, b, The STH values of small photocatalyst sheets (25 cm2) prepared using manual spraying with flat, clear glass (a) and a program-controlled sprayer with frosted glass (b) during the overall water splitting reaction under continuous irradiation with simulated standard sunlight.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 5 Long-term records of the field test of the 100-m2 photocatalyst panel reactor at Kakioka Research Facility from 22 September to 21 December 2020.

a–f, Solar radiation (a), ultraviolet power (b), oxyhydrogen gas production rate (c), ambient temperature (d), daily STH value (e) and proportion of ultraviolet energy (f). The oxyhydrogen gas was not produced in late December 2020, because of the cold weather freezing the panel reactor units and other equipment. On 2, 6 and 30 October, the gas was directed to the gas separation equipment, without delivery to the gas flowmeter. On 9 and 10 October, the daily STH values were abnormally high. These values are not reliable because of bad weather and the low solar radiation. On 9 and 10 October, the daily STH values were abnormally high. These values are not reliable because of bad weather and the low solar radiation. The data on 18 November and 8 December were not reliable either, owing to malfunction of the soap-film flowmeter.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 6 Structure of the gas separating facility.

a, Schematic of the gas filtration cartridge. b, Schematic of the oxyhydrogen gas separation apparatus. The routes for the incoming oxyhydrogen gas, hydrogen-enriched filtrate gas and oxygen-enriched residual gas are shown in purple, red and black, respectively.

Extended Data Fig. 7 Performance of the gas separation unit connected to the 100-m2 water splitting photocatalyst panel reactor.

The hydrogen concentration in the filtrate gas and the oxygen concentration in the residue gas are intermittently notated along the curves. a, b, The data were acquired on a day with mixed sun and cloud (6 February 2020; a) and a consistently sunny day (1 May 2020; b) at the Kakioka Research Facility. Note that the throttle valve was partially closed at 10:00 am on 1 May 2020 to reduce the gas feed rate.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 8 Ignition test of the panel reactor.

The gas in the area indicated within the red square, with a light receiving area of 70 m2, was ignited by a spark. The spark gap was an assembly of two needle electrodes facing each other within a tube. The distance between the electrodes was adjusted at approximately 0.5 mm. The ignition voltage was 15-kV a.c. and pulsed for approximately 1 s.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Video 1

| Nucleation of moist oxyhydrogen bubbles on a photocatalyst sheet under irradiation from a Xe lamp, played at ten times the original speed.

Supplementary Video 2

| A reactor unit evolving and expelling oxyhydrogen gas bubbles at approximately 13 ml min−1 under a diode array emitting ultraviolet light.

Supplementary Video 3

| Moist oxyhydrogen gas bubbles generated at a rate of 3.7 l min−1 by the 100-m2 photocatalyst panel reactor under natural sunlight on 30 September 2020, played at the original speed.

Supplementary Video 4

| Intentional ignition of the oxyhydrogen gas in polyurethane gas collection and carrying tubes with an inner diameter of 8 mm connected to the water splitting panel reactor with a 70-m2 light receiving area during water splitting under natural sunlight at 10:00 am on 20 August 2020, played in slow motion (1/240 of the original speed). Reactor internal pressure = 101 kPa, temperature = 30 °C. This experiment was conducted twice without damaging the setup.

Supplementary Video 5

| Intentional ignition of a mixed gas of hydrogen and oxygen (H2/O2 = 2) saturated with water vapour, filled in the soft polyvinyl chloride tube with an inner diameter of 10 mm and a length of 100 m with the end bobbed in a water tub, played in the original speed. Internal pressure = 101 kPa, temperature = 20 °C. This experiment was conducted five times without any damage.

Supplementary Video 6

| The same experiment with Supplementary Video 5 but recorded from a different angle and played in slow motion (1/132 of the original speed).

Source data

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nishiyama, H., Yamada, T., Nakabayashi, M. et al. Photocatalytic solar hydrogen production from water on a 100-m2 scale. Nature 598, 304–307 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03907-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03907-3

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing