Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Technical Report
  • Published:

GroEL as a molecular scaffold for structural analysis of the anthrax toxin pore

Abstract

We analyzed the 440-kDa transmembrane pore formed by the protective antigen (PA) moiety of anthrax toxin in the presence of GroEL by negative-stain electron microscopy. GroEL binds both the heptameric PA prepore and the PA pore. The latter interaction retards aggregation of the pore, prolonging its insertion-competent state. Two populations of unaggregated pores were visible: GroEL-bound pores and unbound pores. This allowed two virtually identical structures to be reconstructed, at 25-Å and 28-Å resolution, respectively. The structures were mushroom-shaped objects with a 125-Å-diameter cap and a 100-Å-long stem, consistent with earlier biochemical data. Thus, GroEL provides a platform for obtaining initial glimpses of a membrane protein structure in the absence of lipids or detergents and can function as a scaffold for higher-resolution structural analysis of the PA pore.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: GroEL binds to the PA prepore and pore.
Figure 2: PA pore formed in the presence of GroEL is functional.
Figure 3: Two-dimensional average of GroEL-bound and free PA pore particles.
Figure 4: Three-dimensional reconstructions of GroEL-bound and free PA pore particles.
Figure 5: Manual fit of the PA prepore crystal structure into the PA pore EM structure.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Young, J.A. & Collier, R.J. Anthrax toxin: receptor binding, internalization, pore formation, and translocation. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 76, 243–265 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Krantz, B.A., Finkelstein, A. & Collier, R.J. Protein translocation through the anthrax toxin transmembrane pore is driven by a proton gradient. J. Mol. Biol. 355, 968–979 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Deaton, J. et al. Functional bacteriorhodopsin is efficiently solubilized and delivered to membranes by the chaperonin GroEL. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 2281–2286 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sun, J. et al. Asymmetric binding of membrane proteins to GroEL. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 434, 352–357 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Benson, E.L., Huynh, P.D., Finkelstein, A. & Collier, R.J. Identification of residues lining the anthrax protective antigen channel. Biochemistry 37, 3941–3948 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Nassi, S., Collier, R.J. & Finkelstein, A. PA63 channel of anthrax toxin: an extended beta-barrel. Biochemistry 41, 1445–1450 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Petosa, C., Collier, R.J., Klimpel, K.R., Leppla, S.H. & Liddington, R.C. Crystal structure of the anthrax toxin protective antigen. Nature 385, 833–838 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lacy, D.B. et al. A model of anthrax toxin lethal factor bound to protective antigen. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 16409–16414 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Song, L. et al. Structure of staphylococcal alpha-hemolysin, a heptameric transmembrane pore. Science 274, 1859–1866 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nguyen, T.L. Three-dimensional model of the pore form of anthrax protective antigen. Structure and biological implications. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 22, 253–265 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Horovitz, A., Fridmann, Y., Kafri, G. & Yifrach, O. Review: allostery in chaperonins. J. Struct. Biol. 135, 104–114 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lacy, D.B. et al. Structure of heptameric protective bound to an anthrax toxin receptor: a role for receptor in pH-dependent pore formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 13147–13151 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rosovitz, M.J. et al. Alanine-scanning mutations in domain 4 of anthrax toxin protective antigen reveal residues important for binding to the cellular receptor and to a neutralizing monoclonal antibody. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 30936–30944 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Voziyan, P.A., Jadhav, L. & Fisher, M.T. Refolding a glutamine synthetase truncation mutant in vitro: identifying superior conditions using a combination of chaperonins and osmolytes. J. Pharm. Sci. 89, 1036–1045 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Voziyan, P.A., Johnston, M., Chao, A., Bomhoff, G. & Fisher, M.T. Designing a high throughput refolding array using a combination of the GroEL chaperonin and osmolytes. J. Struct. Funct. Genomics 6, 183–188 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Goulhen, F., Dé, E., Pagès, J.-M. & Bolla, J.-M. Functional refolding of the Campylobacter jejuni MOMP (major outer membrane protein) porin by GroEL from the same species. Biochem. J. 378, 851–856 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Krantz, B.A. et al. A phenylalanine clamp catalyzes protein translocation through the anthrax toxin pore. Science 309, 777–781 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Miller, C.J., Elliott, J.L. & Collier, R.J. Anthrax protective antigen: prepore-to-pore conversion. Biochemistry 38, 10432–10441 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wigelsworth, D.J. et al. Binding stoichiometry and kinetics of the interaction of a human anthrax toxin receptor, CMG2, with protective antigen. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 23349–23356 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang, S., Finkelstein, A. & Collier, R.J. Evidence that translocation of anthrax toxin's lethal factor is initiated by entry of its N terminus into the protective antigen channel. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 16756–16761 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Voziyan, P.A. & Fisher, M.T. GroE-mediated folding of glutamine synthetase under non-permissive conditions; off-pathway aggregation propensity does not determine the co-chaperonin requirement. Protein Sci. 9, 2405–2415 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mueller, P. & Rudin, D.O. Induced excitability in reconstituted cell membrane structure. J. Theor. Biol. 4, 268–280 (1963).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Blaustein, R.O. & Finkelstein, A. Voltage-dependent block of anthrax toxin channels in planar phospholipid bilayer membranes by symmetric tetraalkylammonium ions. J. Gen. Physiol. 96, 905–919 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Frank, J. et al. SPIDER and WEB: processing and visualization of images in 3D electron microscopy and other fields. J. Struct. Biol. 116, 190–199 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Huang, C.C., Couch, G.S., Pettersen, E.F. & Ferrin, T.E. Chimera: an extensible molecular modeling application constructed using standard components. Pac. Symp. Biocomput. 724 (1996).

Download references

Acknowledgements

M.T.F. dedicates this work to the memory of Earl R. Stadtman, his mentor during his postdoctoral years at the US National Institutes of Health (NIH). Earl's influence, scientific philosophy and sense of generosity will be with M.T.F. for the rest of his days. This research was supported in part by US National Science Foundation (NSF) grant MCB-0445936 (M.T.F.), NIH grant R41 GM080074 (M.T.F.), a grant from the Kansas Technology Enterprise Corporation (M.T.F.) and NIH grant 5R37AI022021 (R.J.C.). The NSF grant supported J.J. and M.B. GroEL was a gift from EdgeBiosystems.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

H.K. and B.E.J. contributed equally to the experimental design, the execution of the experiments and the interpretation of the data; they also contributed to the writing of the manuscript. Undergraduates J.J. and M.B. were involved in computer setup, network support, image scanning, data cataloging, some particle picking and initial alignment work under the guidance of H.K., S.F., E.P.G. and M.T.F. E.P.G, R.J.C. and M.T.F. contributed to experimental design, provided guidance, analysis and interpretation of the data and were responsible for writing the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark T Fisher.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

R.J.C. holds equity in PharmAthene, Inc., and is a consultant for CombinatoRx, Inc.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Figures 1–6 and Supplementary Discussion (PDF 361 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Katayama, H., Janowiak, B., Brzozowski, M. et al. GroEL as a molecular scaffold for structural analysis of the anthrax toxin pore. Nat Struct Mol Biol 15, 754–760 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.1442

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.1442

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing