Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

An electronic Mach–Zehnder interferometer

Nature volume 422, pages 415–418 (2003)Cite this article

Abstract

Double-slit electron interferometers fabricated in high mobility two-dimensional electron gases are powerful tools for studying coherent wave-like phenomena in mesoscopic systems1,2,3,4,5,6. However, they suffer from low visibility of the interference patterns due to the many channels present in each slit, and from poor sensitivity to small currents due to their open geometry3,4,5,7. Moreover, these interferometers do not function in high magnetic fields—such as those required to enter the quantum Hall effect regime8—as the field destroys the symmetry between left and right slits. Here we report the fabrication and operation of a single-channel, two-path electron interferometer that functions in a high magnetic field. This device is the first electronic analogue of the optical Mach–Zehnder interferometer9, and opens the way to measuring interference of quasiparticles with fractional charges. On the basis of measurements of single edge state and closed geometry transport in the quantum Hall effect regime, we find that the interferometer is highly sensitive and exhibits very high visibility (62%). However, the interference pattern decays precipitously with increasing electron temperature or energy. Although the origin of this dephasing is unclear, we show, via shot-noise measurements, that it is not a decoherence process that results from inelastic scattering events.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: The configuration and operation of an optical Mach–Zehnder interferometer, and its realization with electrons.
Figure 2: Interference pattern of electrons in a Mach–Zehnder interferometer and the dependence on transmission.
Figure 3: The dependence of the visibility of the interference pattern on temperature and applied voltage.
Figure 4: Shot-noise measurement (at filling factor 2) as function of T2 when the transmission of QPC1 was set to T1 = 0.5. A 30-µV d.c. voltage (under which the AB interference pattern was quenched) was used to measure shot noise.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yacoby, A., Heiblum, M., Umansky, V., Shtrikman, H. & Mahalu, D. Unexpected periodicity in an electronic double slit interference experiment. Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 3149–3152 (1994)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Yacoby, A., Heiblum, M., Mahalu, D. & Shtrikman, H. Coherency and phase sensitive measurements in a quantum dot. Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4047–4050 (1994)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Schuster, R. et al. Phase measurement in a quantum dot via a double-slit interference measurement. Nature 385, 417–420 (1997)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ji, Y., Heiblum, M., Sprinzak, D., Mahalu, D. & Shtrikman, H. Phase evolution in a Kondo-correlated system. Science 290, 779–783 (2000)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Buks, E., Schuster, R., Heiblum, M., Mahalu, D. & Shtrikman, H. Dephasing in electron interference by a ‘which-path’ detector. Nature 391, 871–820 (1998)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. van der Viel, W. G. et al. The Kondo effect at unitary limit. Science 289, 2105–2108 (2000)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Buttiker, M. Four terminal phase coherent conductance. Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 1761–1764 (1986)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Prange, R. E. & Girvin, S. M. (eds) The Quantum Hall Effect (Springer, New York, 1987)

  9. Born, M. & Wolf, E. Principles of Optics 348–352, 7th edn (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, 1999)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Aharonov, Y. & Bohm, D. Significance of electromagnetic potentials in the quantum theory. Phys. Rev. 115, 485–491 (1959)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Aronov, A. G. & Sharvin, Yu. V. Magnetic flux effects in disordered conductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 59, 755–779 (1987)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. de-Picciotto, R. et al. Direct observation of a fractional charge. Nature 389, 162–165 (1997)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Reznikov, M. et al. Quantum shot noise. Superlattice Microstruct. 23, 901–915 (1998)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Chklovskii, D. B., Shklovskii, B. I. & Glazman, L. I. Electrostatics of edge channels. Phys. Rev. B 46, 4026–4034 (1992)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kane, C. L. Telegraph noise and fractional statistics in the quantum Hall effect. Preprint cond-mat/0210621 at 〈http://xxx.lanl.gov〉 (2002).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Y. Levinson for clarifying the issue of phase averaging, and C. Kane for comments on the manuscript. The work was partly supported by the MINERVA Foundation, the Israeli Academy of Science, the German Israeli Project Cooperation (DIP), the German Israeli Foundation (GIF), and the EU QUACS network.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Braun Center for Submicron Research, Department of Condensed Matter Physics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, 76100, Israel

    Yang Ji, Yunchul Chung, D. Sprinzak, M. Heiblum, D. Mahalu & Hadas Shtrikman

Authors
  1. Yang Ji
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yunchul Chung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D. Sprinzak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. Heiblum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. D. Mahalu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hadas Shtrikman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Heiblum.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ji, Y., Chung, Y., Sprinzak, D. et al. An electronic Mach–Zehnder interferometer. Nature 422, 415–418 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01503

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01503

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing