skip to main content
10.5555/3639940.3639970acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesewsnConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Black carbon proxy sensor model for air quality IoT monitoring networks

Published: 15 December 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Most Internet of Things (IoT) air quality monitoring networks measure and report regulated pollutants such as O3, NO, NO2, SO2 or CO and PM2.5, PM10 particulates. However, there are pollutants such as black carbon that are not regulated by the authorities and are rarely measured, and if they are measured, the instrumentation is very expensive. One way to obtain measurements with cheaper equipment is to use the proxy concept, where from indirect measurements of other pollutants a virtual sensor is constructed using machine learning techniques. In this work, we design a machine learning-based proxy for black carbon based on low-cost sensor (LCS) nodes. We compare three techniques to build the proxy: support vector regression, random forest and a neural network. The LCSs have to be pre-calibrated also using machine learning techniques, linear or nonlinear. The results show, using data from a real deployment of IoT air quality sensor nodes, that the results obtained by the proxy with LCSs (R2=0.72) using support vector regression are a good approximation in terms of performance to those obtained by a proxy using high-cost reference instrumentation (R2=0.76).

References

[1]
Alphansense. No-b4 sensor datasheet. [Online] https://www.alphasense.com/products/nitric-oxide-safety/. [Accessed:13/04/2023].
[2]
Alphansense. No2-b43f sensor datasheet. [Online] https://www.alphasense.com/products/nitrogen-dioxide/. [Accessed: 13/04/2023].
[3]
Alphansense. Ox-b431 sensor datasheet. [Online] https://www.alphasense.com/products/ozone/. [Accessed: 13/04/2023].
[4]
Wu,Q.,Chen,X.,Zhou,Z., and Zhang,J. 2020. "Fedhome: Cloud-edge based personalized federated learning for in-home health monitoring". In IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing. pp. 1--1.
[5]
Alphansense. Support circuits (ppb): Isb individual sensor board datasheet. [Online] https://www.alphasense.com/products/support-circuits-air/. [Accessed: 13/04/2023].
[6]
J. M. Barcelo-Ordinas, M. Doudou, J. Garcia-Vidal, and N. Badache. 2019. "Self-calibration methods for uncontrolled environments in sensor networks: A reference survey". In Ad Hoc Networks. Vol. 88 Pp. 142-159
[7]
Concas, F., Mineraud, J., Lagerspetz, E., Varjonen, S., Liu, X., et al. 2021. "Low-cost outdoor air quality monitoring and sensor calibration: A survey and critical analysis." ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks, 17(2), May.
[8]
Coulby, G., Clear, A. K., Jones, O., & Godfrey, A. 2021. "Low-cost, multimodal environmental monitoring based on the internet of things." Building and Environment, 203:108014.
[9]
Ferrer-Cid, P., Barcelo-Ordinas, J. M., & Garcia-Vidal, J. 2022. "Data reconstruction applications for iot air pollution sensor networks using graph signal processing." Journal of Network and Computer Applications, page 103434.
[10]
Ferrer-Cid, P., Barcelo-Ordinas, J. M., & Garcia-Vidal, J. 2022. "Graph signal reconstruction techniques for iot air pollution monitoring platforms." IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 9(24):25350–25362.
[11]
Ferrer-Cid, P., Barcelo-Ordinas, J. M., Garcia-Vidal, J., Ripoll, A., & Viana, M. 2019. "A comparative study of calibration methods for low-cost ozone sensors in iot platforms." IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 6(6):9563–9571.
[12]
Fung, P. L., Zaidan, M. A., Sillanpa¨a, S., Kousa, A., Niemi, J. V., Tim- ¨ onen, H., Kuula, J., Saukko, E., Luoma, K., Petaj¨ a, T., et al. 2019. "Input-adaptive ¨ proxy for black carbon as a virtual sensor." Sensors, 20(1):182.
[13]
Liu, L., Kuo, S. M., & Zhou, M. 2009. "Virtual sensing techniques and their applications." In Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control, pages 31–36. IEEE.
[14]
Maag, B., Zhou, Z., & Thiele, L. 2018. "A survey on sensor calibration in air pollution monitoring deployments." IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 5(6):4857–4870.
[15]
Motlagh, N. H., Lagerspetz, E., Nurmi, P., Li, X., Varjonen, S., Mineraud, J., Siekkinen, M., Rebeiro-Hargrave, A., Hussein, T., Petaja, T., et al. 2020. "Toward massive scale air quality monitoring." IEEE Communications Magazine, 58(2):54–59.
[16]
PurpleAir. Classic air quality monitor. [Online] https://www2.purpleair.com/products/purpleair-pa-ii. [Accessed: 13/04/2023].
[17]
Rovira, J., Paredes-Ahumada, J. A., Barcelo-Ordinas, J. M., Garcia-Vidal, J., Reche, C., Sola, Y., Fung, P. L., Petaja, T., Hussein, T., & Viana, M. 2022. "Non-linear models for black carbon exposure modelling using air pollution datasets." Environmental Research, 212:113269.
[18]
Woo, J., An, S., Hong, K., Kim, J., Lim, S., Kim, H., & Eum, J. 2016. "Integration of cfd-based virtual sensors to a ubiquitous sensor network to support micro-scale air quality management." Journal of Environmental Informatics, 27(2).
[19]
Zaidan, M. A., Motlagh, N. H., Fung, P. L., et al. 2020. "Intelligent calibration and virtual sensing for integrated low-cost air quality sensors." IEEE Sensors Journal, 20(22):13638–13652.
[20]
Zaidan, M. A., Wraith, D., Boor, B. E., & Hussein, T. 2019. "Bayesian proxy modelling for estimating black carbon concentrations using white-box and black-box models." Applied Sciences, 9(22):4976.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
EWSN '23: Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on embedded Wireless Systems and Networks
December 2023
426 pages

Sponsors

In-Cooperation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 15 December 2023

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Low-cost sensors
  2. machine learning
  3. proxy

Qualifiers

  • Article

Conference

September 25 - 27, 2023
Rende, Italy

Acceptance Rates

EWSN '23 Paper Acceptance Rate 31 of 56 submissions, 55%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 81 of 195 submissions, 42%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 0
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 03 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media