skip to main content
10.1145/3674829.3675358acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescompassConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper
Open access

Towards Deep Learning for Predicting Microbial Fuel Cell Energy Output

Published: 28 August 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Soil microbial fuel cells (SMFCs) are an emerging technology which offer clean and renewable energy in environments where more traditional power sources, such as chemical batteries or solar, are not suitable. With further development, SMFCs show great promise for use in robust and affordable outdoor sensor networks, particularly for farmers. One of the greatest challenges in the development of this technology is understanding and predicting the fluctuations of SMFC energy generation, as the electro-generative process is not yet fully understood. Very little work currently exists attempting to model and predict the relationship between soil conditions and SMFC energy generation, and we are the first to use machine learning to do so. In this paper, we train Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) models to predict the future energy generation of SMFCs across timescales ranging from 3 minutes to 1 hour, with results ranging from 2.33% to 5.71% MAPE for median voltage prediction. For each timescale, we use quantile regression to obtain point estimates and to establish bounds on the uncertainty of these estimates. When comparing the median predicted vs. actual values for the total energy generated during the testing period, the magnitude of prediction errors ranged from 2.29% to 16.05%. To demonstrate the real-world utility of this research, we also simulate how the models could be used in an automated environment where SMFC-powered devices shut down and activate intermittently to preserve charge, with promising initial results. Our deep learning-based prediction and simulation framework would allow a fully automated SMFC-powered device to achieve a median 100+% increase in successful operations, compared to a naive model that schedules operations based on the average voltage generated in the past.

References

[1]
Syed Zaghum Abbas, Jia-Yi Wang, Hongcheng Wang, Jing-Xian Wang, Yi-Ting Wang, and Yang-Chun Yong. 2022. Recent advances in soil microbial fuel cells based self-powered biosensor. Chemosphere 303 (2022), 135036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135036
[2]
Bradford Campbell, Joshua Adkins, and Prabal Dutta. 2016. Cinamin: A Perpetual and Nearly Invisible BLE Beacon. In Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Embedded Wireless Systems and Networks (Graz, Austria) (EWSN ’16). Junction Publishing, USA, 331–332.
[3]
[3] Analog Devices. [n. d.]. https://www.analog.com/media/en/technical-documentation/data-sheets/ADP5091-5092.pdf
[4]
Jakub Dziegielowski, Michele Mascia, Benjamin Metcalfe, and Mirella Di Lorenzo. 2023. Voltage evolution and electrochemical behaviour of Soil microbial fuel cells operated in different quality soils. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments 56 (2023), 103071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2023.103071
[5]
Yuda Feng, Yaxiong Xie, Deepak Ganesan, and Jie Xiong. 2023. LTE-Based Low-Cost and Low-Power Soil Moisture Sensing. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (, Boston, Massachusetts,) (SenSys ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 421–434. https://doi.org/10.1145/3560905.3568525
[6]
Aiichiro Fujinaga, Saiki Umeda, Manabu Heya, Hitoshi Ogata, and Naoyuki Kishimoto. 2022. Evaluation of Methods for Measuring Internal Resistances of Discharging Microbial Fuel Cells. Journal of Water and Environment Technology 20 (02 2022), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.2965/jwet.21-087
[7]
Jakob Gawlikowski, Cedrique Rovile Njieutcheu Tassi, Mohsin Ali, Jongseok Lee, Matthias Humt, Jianxiang Feng, Anna Kruspe, Rudolph Triebel, Peter Jung, Ribana Roscher, Muhammad Shahzad, Wen Yang, Richard Bamler, and Xiao Xiang Zhu. 2023. A Survey of Uncertainty in Deep Neural Networks. Artif. Intell. Rev. 56, Suppl 1 (jul 2023), 1513–1589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-023-10562-9
[8]
Hess-Dunlop. 2024. Jlab MFC Modeling. https://github.com/jlab-sensing/MFC_Modeling
[9]
Egor Howell. 2023. How To Correctly Perform Cross-Validation For Time Series. https://towardsdatascience.com/how-to-correctly-perform-cross-validation-for-time-series-b083b869e42c
[10]
Bashima Islam and Shahriar Nirjon. 2020. Zygarde: Time-Sensitive On-Device Deep Inference and Adaptation on Intermittently-Powered Systems. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 4, 3, Article 82 (sep 2020), 29 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411808
[11]
Colleen Josephson, Manikanta Kotaru, Keith Winstein, Sachin Katti, and Ranveer Chandra. 2021. Low-Cost In-Ground Soil Moisture Sensing with Radar Backscatter Tags. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM SIGCAS Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies (Virtual Event, Australia) (COMPASS ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 299–311. https://doi.org/10.1145/3460112.3472326
[12]
Colleen Josephson, Weitao Shuai, Gabriel Marcano, Pat Pannuto, Josiah Hester, and George Wells. 2022. The Future of Clean Computing May Be Dirty. GetMobile: Mobile Comp. and Comm. 26, 3 (oct 2022), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3568113.3568117
[13]
Brandon Lucia, Vignesh Balaji, Alexei Colin, Kiwan Maeng, and Emily Ruppel. 2017. Intermittent Computing: Challenges and Opportunities. In 2nd Summit on Advances in Programming Languages (SNAPL 2017)(Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Vol. 71), Benjamin S. Lerner, Rastislav Bodík, and Shriram Krishnamurthi (Eds.). Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, Dagstuhl, Germany, 8:1–8:14. https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.SNAPL.2017.8
[14]
John Madden, Gabriel Marcano, Stephen Taylor, Pat Pannuto, and Colleen Josephson. 2023. Hardware to Enable Large-Scale Deployment and Observation of Soil Microbial Fuel Cells. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (, Boston, Massachusetts,) (SenSys ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 906–912. https://doi.org/10.1145/3560905.3568110
[15]
Gabriel Marcano and Pat Pannuto. 2021. Powering an E-Ink Display from Soil Bacteria. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (Coimbra, Portugal) (SenSys ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 590–591. https://doi.org/10.1145/3485730.3493363
[16]
[16] Meter. 2018. https://metergroup.com/products/teros-12/
[17]
Lola Gonzalez Olias, Alba Rodríguez Otero, Petra J. Cameron, and Mirella Di Lorenzo. 2020. A soil microbial fuel cell-based biosensor for dissolved oxygen monitoring in water. Electrochimica Acta 362 (2020), 137108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2020.137108
[18]
Prem Rajak, Abhratanu Ganguly, Satadal Adhikary, and Suchandra Bhattacharya. 2023. Internet of Things and smart sensors in agriculture: Scopes and challenges. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research 14 (2023), 100776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2023.100776
[19]
Filipe Rodrigues and Francisco C. Pereira. 2018. Beyond expectation: Deep joint mean and quantile regression for spatio-temporal problems. arxiv:1808.08798 [stat.ML]
[20]
Lukas Sigrist, Andres Gomez, Roman Lim, Stefan Lippuner, Matthias Leubin, and Lothar Thiele. 2017. Measurement and validation of energy harvesting IoT devices. In Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE), 2017. 1159–1164. https://doi.org/10.23919/DATE.2017.7927164
[21]
Shikhar Srivastava and Stefan Lessmann. 2018. A comparative study of LSTM neural networks in forecasting day-ahead global horizontal irradiance with satellite data. Solar Energy 162 (2018), 232–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2018.01.005
[22]
Ingo Steinwart and Andreas Christmann. 2011. Estimating conditional quantiles with the help of the pinball loss. Bernoulli 17, 1 (2011), 211 – 225. https://doi.org/10.3150/10-BEJ267
[23]
Shi-Hang Wang, Jian-Wei Wang, Li-Ting Zhao, Syed Zaghum Abbas, Zhugen Yang, and Yang-Chun Yong. 2023. Soil Microbial Fuel Cell Based Self-Powered Cathodic Biosensor for Sensitive Detection of Heavy Metals. Biosensors 13, 1 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13010145
[24]
Yi Wang, Dahua Gan, Mingyang Sun, Ning Zhang, Zongxiang Lu, and Chongqing Kang. 2019. Probabilistic individual load forecasting using pinball loss guided LSTM. Applied Energy 235 (2019), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.10.078
[25]
Chengliang Xu, Yongjun Sun, Anran Du, and Dian ce Gao. 2023. Quantile regression based probabilistic forecasting of renewable energy generation and building electrical load: A state of the art review. Journal of Building Engineering 79 (2023), 107772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107772
[26]
Yen. 2023. Ka Moamoa Practical SMFC Design Guide. https://github.com/ka-moamoa/Practical_SMFC_Design_Guide
[27]
Bill Yen, Laura Jaliff, Louis Gutierrez, Philothei Sahinidis, Sadie Bernstein, John Madden, Stephen Taylor, Colleen Josephson, Pat Pannuto, Weitao Shuai, George Wellsa, Nivedita Arora, and Josiah Hester. 2023. Soil-Powered Computing: The Engineer’s Guide to Practical Soil Microbial Fuel Cell Design. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 7, 4, Article 196 (Dec. 2023). https://doi.org/10.1145/3631410
[28]
Changtian Ying, Weiqing Wang, Jiong Yu, Qi Li, Donghua Yu, and Jianhua Liu. 2023. Deep learning for renewable energy forecasting: A taxonomy, and systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production 384 (2023), 135414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135414
[29]
Lincoln Zotarelli, Johannes M. Scholberg, Michael D. Dukes, Rafael Muñoz-Carpena, and Jason Icerman. 2009. Tomato yield, biomass accumulation, root distribution and irrigation water use efficiency on a sandy soil, as affected by nitrogen rate and irrigation scheduling. Agricultural Water Management 96, 1 (2009), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2008.06.007

Index Terms

  1. Towards Deep Learning for Predicting Microbial Fuel Cell Energy Output

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    COMPASS '24: Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGCAS/SIGCHI Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies
    July 2024
    354 pages
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial International 4.0 License.

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 28 August 2024

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Deep Learning
    2. Energy Prediction
    3. Intermittent Computing
    4. Long Short Term Memory (LSTM)
    5. Microbial Fuel Cells
    6. Predictive Modeling
    7. Quantile Regression
    8. Soil Microbial Fuel Cells
    9. Time-Series Analysis

    Qualifiers

    • Short-paper
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Funding Sources

    • FFAR

    Conference

    COMPASS '24
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 25 of 50 submissions, 50%

    Upcoming Conference

    COMPASS '25

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 118
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)118
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)34
    Reflects downloads up to 03 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media