Community wealth: Co-creating digital infrastructure for economic justice
Pages 45 - 50
Abstract
This research addresses economic inequality by investigating community wealth building (CWB) through digital tools for collaborative funding, employing an interdisciplinary approach merging insights from feminist economics, solidarity economy and human-computer interaction design (HCID). Through qualitative studies, the research explores participatory design methods like subversion and remix to foster grassroots involvement, advocating for cooperative principles and ethical considerations in DIS/HCI to promote economic justice, ultimately offering pathways for inclusive digital infrastructure and transformation in DIS/HCI research.
References
[1]
Ahmadi, M. (2020) ‘Feminist Living Labs as Research Infrastructures for HCI: The Case of a Video Game Company’, in Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery (CHI ’20), pp. 1–15. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376716.
[2]
Ashby, S. (2019) ‘Fourth-Wave HCI Meets the 21st Century Manifesto’, in Proceedings of the Halfway to the Future Symposium 2019. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery (HTTF 2019), pp. 1–11. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1145/3363384.3363467.
[3]
Bardzell, S. (2010) ‘Feminist HCI: taking stock and outlining an agenda for design’, in Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI ’10. the 28th international conference, Atlanta, Georgia, USA: ACM Press, p. 1301. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753521.
[4]
Bardzell, S. and Bardzell, J. (2011) ‘Towards a feminist HCI methodology: social science, feminism, and HCI’, in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery (CHI ’11), pp. 675–684. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979041.
[5]
Bellini, R. (2022) ‘Feminist human–computer interaction: Struggles for past, contemporary and futuristic feminist theories in digital innovation’, Feminist Theory, 23(2), pp. 143–149. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/14647001221082291.
[6]
Bødker, S. (2015) ‘Third-wave HCI, 10 years later—participation and sharing’, Interactions, 22(5), pp. 24–31. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1145/2804405.
[7]
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006) ‘Using thematic analysis in psychology’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), pp. 77–101. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
[8]
Bria, F. and Morozov, E. (2022) Francesca Bria on Decentralisation, Sovereignty, and Web3, The Crypto Syllabus. Available at: https://the-crypto-syllabus.com/francesca-bria-on-decentralisation/ (Accessed: 28 March 2023).
[9]
Cabaña, G. and Linares, J. (2022) ‘Decolonising money: learning from collective struggles for self-determination’, Sustainability Science, 17(4), pp. 1159–1170. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-022-01104-3.
[10]
Cameron, J. and Gibson-Graham, J.K. (2003) ‘Feminising the Economy: Metaphors, strategies, politics’, Gender, Place & Culture, 10(2), pp. 145–157. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369032000079569.
[11]
Cameron, J. and Gibson-Graham, J.K. (2022) The Diverse Economies Approach. Available at: http://www.communityeconomies.org/publications/chapters/diverse-economies-approach (Accessed: 5 February 2023).
[12]
Cila, N. (2020) ‘The Blockchain and the Commons: Dilemmas in the Design of Local Platforms’, in Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI ’20: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Honolulu HI USA: ACM, pp. 1–14. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376660.
[13]
De Filippi, P. and Hassan, S. (2015) ‘Measuring Value in Commons-Based Ecosystem: Bridging the Gap between the Commons and the Market’. Rochester, NY. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2725399 (Accessed: 6 April 2023).
[14]
DiSalvo, C. (2010) ‘HCI, communities and politics’, in CHI ’10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI ’10: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Atlanta Georgia USA: ACM, pp. 3151–3154. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1145/1753846.1753940.
[15]
DiSalvo, C., Clement, A. and Pipek, V. (2012) ‘Communities: Participatory Design for, with and by communities’. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203108543-15.
[16]
Elsden, C. (2018) ‘Making Sense of Blockchain Applications: A Typology for HCI’, in Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery (CHI ’18), pp. 1–14. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174032.
[17]
European Commission. Joint Research Centre. (2020) Scanning the European ecosystem of distributed ledger technologies for social and public good: what, why, where, how, and ways to move forward. LU: Publications Office. Available at: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2760/802653 (Accessed: 24 January 2023).
[18]
Flanagan, M. (2005) Playculture: Developing a Feminist Game Design. phd. University of the Arts London (United Kingdom).
[19]
Fröhlich, M. (2022) ‘Blockchain and Cryptocurrency in Human Computer Interaction: A Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda’, in Designing Interactive Systems Conference, pp. 155–177. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1145/3532106.3533478.
[20]
Hassan, S. (2020) Scanning the European Ecosystem of Distributed Ledger Technologies for Social and Public Good, JRC Publications Repository. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2760/802653.
[21]
Heitlinger, S. (2016) ‘Talking Plants and a Bug Hotel: Participatory Design of ludic encounters with an urban farming community’, Available at: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Talking-Plants-and-a-Bug-Hotel%3A-Participatory-of-an-Heitlinger/23fa25f4e79851d1f9c43f3e48fd85d4035efaa2 (Accessed: 10 April 2023).
[22]
Manley, J.Y. (2021) ‘The Preston Model: from top-down to rhizomatic-up’, in J.Y. Manley and P.B. Whyman (eds). Routledge. Available at: https://www.routledge.com/The-Preston-Model-and-Community-Wealth-Building-Creating-a-Socio-Economic/Manley-Whyman/p/book/9781003053736 (Accessed: 5 January 2023).
[23]
Manski, S. and Bauwens, M. (2020) ‘Reimagining New Socio-Technical Economics Through the Application of Distributed Ledger Technologies’, Frontiers in Blockchain, 2. Available at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbloc.2019.00029 (Accessed: 19 December 2022).
[24]
Nakamoto, S. (2008) ‘Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System’.
[25]
Nembhard, J.G. (2014) Collective Courage: A History of African American Cooperative Economic Thought and Practice, Collective Courage. Penn State University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780271064260.
[26]
Reijers, W., O'Brolcháin, F. and Haynes, P. (2016) ‘Governance in Blockchain Technologies & Social Contract Theories’, Ledger, 1, pp. 134–151. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5195/ledger.2016.62
[27]
Roio, D. and Sachy, M. (2015) ‘D5.5 Implementation of digital social currency infrastructure’.
[28]
Rozas, D. (2021) ‘When Ostrom Meets Blockchain: Exploring the Potentials of Blockchain for Commons Governance’, SAGE Open, 11(1), p. 21582440211002530. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211002526.
[29]
Strohmayer, A. (2018) ‘#CHIversity: Implications for Equality, Diversity, and Inclusion Campaigns’, in Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery (CHI EA ’18), pp. 1–10. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3188396.
[30]
Teli, M., Lyle, P. and Sciannamblo, M. (2018) ‘Institutioning the common: the case of commonfare’, in Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Full Papers - Volume 1. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery (PDC ’18), pp. 1–11. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1145/3210586.3210590.
[31]
Vlachokyriakos, V. (2018) ‘Infrastructuring the Solidarity Economy: Unpacking Strategies and Tactics in Designing Social Innovation’, in Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 1–12. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174055 (Accessed: 12 February 2022).
Recommendations
Digital Community Planning: The Open Source Way to the Top of Arnstein's Ladder
Citizen participation in planning as a decision-making and future-oriented activity is still in the hands of government. New advances in Information Communication Technologies and community informatics have allowed new forms of e-participation and e-...
Trust and Community Engagement in Digital Civics: Exploring Opportunities for Design
DIS '18 Companion: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference Companion Publication on Designing Interactive SystemsThe work of community engagement performed by public officials in local government provides valuable opportunities for city residents to participate in governance. Technology stands to play an increasingly important role in mediating community ...
Creating friction: infrastructuring civic engagement in everyday life
CA '15: Proceedings of The Fifth Decennial Aarhus Conference on Critical AlternativesThis paper introduces the theoretical lens of the everyday to intersect and extend the emerging bodies of research on contestational design and infrastructures of civic engagement. Our analysis of social theories of everyday life suggests a design space ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
July 2024
501 pages
ISBN:9798400706325
DOI:10.1145/3656156
Copyright © 2024 Owner/Author.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 01 July 2024
Check for updates
Qualifiers
- Extended-abstract
- Research
- Refereed limited
Conference
DIS '24
Sponsor:
DIS '24: Designing Interactive Systems Conference
July 1 - 5, 2024
IT University of Copenhagen, Denmark
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 1,158 of 4,684 submissions, 25%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 37Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)37
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 04 Jan 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in