skip to main content
10.1145/3650104.3652904acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesihmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Work in Progress

Toward a New Framework for XR-Adaptive Ethical Design: a State of the Art: Vers un nouveau modèle pour une conception de technologie XR-adaptative éthique : un état de l’art

Published: 24 May 2024 Publication History

Abstract

De nouvelles approches doivent émerger pour faire évoluer les pratiques de conception face à (1) la convergence entre technologies immersives et neuro-adaptative (XR-adaptative) et (2) la prise de conscience croissante des conséquences négatives que les technologies numériques peuvent avoir sur les personnes. Cet état de l’art permet d’identifier les dimensions auxquelles il convient d’accorder une attention particulière pour mieux assurer le bien-être des utilisateurs.

Supplemental Material

PDF File
Poster

References

[1]
Dor Abrahamson. 2019. Embodied Design. https://edrl.berkeley.edu/glossary/embodied-design/
[2]
Asam Almohamed, Dhaval Vyas, and Jinglan Zhang. 2018. Designing for refugees: insights from design workshop. In Proceedings of the 30th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction(OzCHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1145/3292147.3292196
[3]
Anne Alombert and Olga Kokshagina. 2022. Votre attention, s’il vous plaît ! Quels leviers face à l’économie de l’attention ?Technical Report 5. Conseil National du Numérique. 85 pages. https://cnnumerique.fr/votre-attention-sil-vous-plait-quels-leviers-face-leconomie-de-lattention
[4]
Christopher Baker and Stephen H. Fairclough. 2022. Chapter 9 - Adaptive virtual reality. In Current Research in Neuroadaptive Technology, Stephen H. Fairclough and Thorsten O. Zander (Eds.). Academic Press, 159–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-821413-8.00014-2
[5]
Guillermo Bernal, Nelson Hidalgo, Conor Russomanno, and Pattie Maes. 2022. Galea: A physiological sensing system for behavioral research in Virtual Environments. In 2022 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR51125.2022.00024 ISSN: 2642-5254.
[6]
Guillermo Bernal, Sean M. Montgomery, and Pattie Maes. 2021. Brain-Computer Interfaces, Open-Source, and Democratizing the Future of Augmented Consciousness. Frontiers in Computer Science 3 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2021.661300 Publisher: Frontiers.
[7]
Guillermo Bernal, Tao Yang, Abhinandan Jain, and Pattie Maes. 2018. PhysioHMD: a conformable, modular toolkit for collecting physiological data from head-mounted displays. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers(ISWC ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 160–167. https://doi.org/10.1145/3267242.3267268
[8]
Carl Boel, Kim Dekeyser, Fien Depaepe, Luis Quintero, Tom van Daele, and Brenda Wiederhold. 2023. Extended reality: opportunities, success stories and challenges (health, education) : final report. Technical Report. Publications Office of the European Union, European Commission. 202 pages. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2759/121671
[9]
Elise Bonnail, Wen-Jie Tseng, Mark Mcgill, Eric Lecolinet, Samuel Huron, and Jan Gugenheimer. 2023. Memory Manipulations in Extended Reality. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580988
[10]
Jolie Bonner, Florian Mathis, Joseph O’Hagan, and Mark Mcgill. 2023. When Filters Escape the Smartphone: Exploring Acceptance and Concerns Regarding Augmented Expression of Social Identity for Everyday AR. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology(VRST ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3611659.3615707
[11]
Philip Brey. 1999. The ethics of representation and action in virtual reality. Ethics and Information Technology 1, 1 (March 1999), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010069907461
[12]
Harry Brignull, Marc Leiser, Cristiana Santos, and Kosha Doshi. 2023. Deceptive patterns – user interfaces designed to trick you. https://www.deceptive.design/
[13]
Kent Bye, Diane Hosfelt, Sam Chase, Matt Miesnieks, and Taylor Beck. 2019. The ethical and privacy implications of mixed reality. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2019 Panels(SIGGRAPH ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1145/3306212.3328138
[14]
Rafael A. Calvo and Dorian Peters. 2014. Positive Computing: Technology for Wellbeing and Human Potential. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9764.001.0001
[15]
Rafael A. Calvo and Dorian Peters. 2017. Positive Computing: Research & Practice in Wellbeing Technology. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1220–1223. https://doi.org/10.1145/3027063.3027099
[16]
Michelle Carr, Adam Haar, Judith Amores, Pedro Lopes, Guillermo Bernal, Tomás Vega, Oscar Rosello, Abhinandan Jain, and Pattie Maes. 2020. Dream engineering: Simulating worlds through sensory stimulation. Consciousness and Cognition 83 (Aug. 2020), 102955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2020.102955
[17]
Ke Wan Ching and Manmeet Mahinderjit Singh. 2016. Wearable Technology Devices Security and Privacy Vulnerability Analysis. International Journal of Network Security & Its Applications 8, 3 (May 2016), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijnsa.2016.8302
[18]
Francesco Chiossi, Ekaterina Stepanova, Benjamin Tag, Monica Perusquía Hernández, Alexandra Kitson, Arindam Dey, Sven Mayer, and Abdallah El Ali. 2023. PhysioCHI: Towards Best Practices for Integrating Physiological Signals in HCI. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613905.3636286
[19]
Yves Citton and Jonathan Crary (Eds.). 2014. L’économie de l’attention: nouvel horizon du capitalisme?La Découverte, Paris. OCLC: ocn882902971.
[20]
Collectif. 2018. Il faut « développer la culture numérique dès le plus jeune âge ». Le Monde.fr (Jan. 2018). https://www.lemonde.fr/idees/article/2018/01/31/il-faut-developper-la-culture-numerique-des-le-plus-jeune-age_5249740_3232.html
[21]
Ana Maria Bustamante Duarte, Nina Brendel, Auriol Degbelo, and Christian Kray. 2018. Participatory Design and Participatory Research: An HCI Case Study with Young Forced Migrants. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 25, 1 (2018), 3:1–3:39. https://doi.org/10.1145/3145472
[22]
Laura Déléant, J. M. Christian Bastien, and Valérie Fointiat. 2019. Les technologies persuasives pour favoriser les attitudes et/ou comportements pro environnementaux. Revue de la littérature des travaux en psychologie sociale et interaction homme-machine. In 4ème colloque de psychologie sociale de la communication : ”De la communication interpersonnelle aux interactions virtuelles”. Metz, France. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02333143
[23]
Chloe Eghtebas, Gudrun Klinker, Susanne Boll, and Marion Koelle. 2023. Co-Speculating on Dark Scenarios and Unintended Consequences of a Ubiquitous(ly) Augmented Reality. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference(DIS ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2392–2407. https://doi.org/10.1145/3563657.3596073
[24]
João Marcelo Evangelista Belo, Anna Maria Feit, Tiare Feuchtner, and Kaj Grønbæk. 2021. XRgonomics: Facilitating the Creation of Ergonomic 3D Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445349
[25]
Stéphane Faedda. 2023. Générer et évaluer des expériences eudémoniques en contexte scolaire : étude du potentiel des interfaces tangibles. Troyes, France. https://hal.science/hal-04042317
[26]
Nita A. Farahany. 2023. The battle for your brain: defending the right to think freely in the age of neurotechnology (first edition ed.). St. Martin’s Press, New York.
[27]
Alessandro Fenicio. 2019. Ingénierie de l’Interaction Homme-Machine et Persuasion Technologique : étude du concept de Chemin Persuasif. These de doctorat. Université Grenoble Alpes (ComUE). https://www.theses.fr/2019GREAM035
[28]
B.J. Fogg. 2003. Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA.
[29]
Harry G. Frankfurt. 1988. The Importance of What We Care About: Philosophical Essays (1 ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511818172
[30]
Philippe Fuchs, Yann Toullec, Bahman Ajang, and Alexandre Chiriac. 2019. Charte de recommandations sur l’usage de la Réalité Virtuelle. Technical Report. GIE VR Connection. 61 pages. https://www.vr-connection.com/comite-dethique-vr/charte-de-recommandations/
[31]
Miguel Gomez-Hernandez, Xavier Ferre, Cristian Moral, and Elena Villalba-Mora. 2023. Design Guidelines of Mobile Apps for Older Adults: Systematic Review and Thematic Analysis. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 11, 1 (Sept. 2023), e43186. https://doi.org/10.2196/43186 Company: JMIR mHealth and uHealth Distributor: JMIR mHealth and uHealth Institution: JMIR mHealth and uHealth Label: JMIR mHealth and uHealth Publisher: JMIR Publications Inc., Toronto, Canada.
[32]
Guendalina Graffigna, Serena Barello, Brenda K. Wiederhold, A. Claudio Bosio, and Giuseppe Riva. 2013. Positive technology as a driver for health engagement. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 191 (2013), 9–17. https:// .ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23792833/
[33]
Colin M. Gray, Yubo Kou, Bryan Battles, Joseph Hoggatt, and Austin L. Toombs. 2018. The Dark (Patterns) Side of UX Design. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174108
[34]
David Philip Green, Guy Peter Schofield, James Hodge, Mandy Rose, Kirsten Cater, Chris Bevan, and Stuart Iain Gray. 2019. Using Design Fiction to Explore the Ethics of VR ‘In the Wild’. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video(TVX ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 293–299. https://doi.org/10.1145/3317697.3323346
[35]
Judith Guez. 2015. Illusions entre le réel et le virtuel (IRV) comme nouvelles formes artistiques : présence et émerveillement. These de doctorat. Paris 8. https://www.theses.fr/2015PA080109
[36]
Jan Gugenheimer, Mark McGill, Samuel Huron, Christian Mai, Julie Williamson, and Michael Nebeling. 2020. Exploring Potentially Abusive Ethical, Social and Political Implications of Mixed Reality Research in HCI. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, Honolulu, HI, USA, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3375180
[37]
Hubert Guillaud. 2022. Coincés dans Zoom: à qui profite le télétravail ?Fyp éditions, Limoges. https://boutique.fypeditions.com/products/coinces-dans-zoom-a-qui-profite-le-teletravail
[38]
Peter A. Hancock, Aaron A. Pepe, and Lauren L. Murphy. 2005. Hedonomics: The Power of Positive and Pleasurable Ergonomics. Ergonomics in Design 13, 1 (Jan. 2005), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/106480460501300104 Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc.
[39]
Estelle Hary. 2019. Dark patterns : quelle grille de lecture pour les réguler ?https://linc.cnil.fr/fr/dark-patterns-quelle-grille-de-lecture-pour-les-reguler
[40]
Cristina Hermosa Perrino and Michael Burmester. 2020. Designing for Temporal Harmony: Exploring the Well-Being Concept for Designing the Temporal Dimension of User Experience. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 4, 3 (Sept. 2020), 66. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti4030066 Number: 3 Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute.
[41]
C. Barry Hoffmaster. 2006. What Does Vulnerability Mean?Hastings Center Report 36, 2 (2006), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.1353/hcr.2006.0024
[42]
Comité international de bioéthique. 2011. Rapport du CIB sur le principe du respect de la vulnérabilité humaine et de l’intégrité personnelle. Technical Report. UNESCO, Paris. 15 pages. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000189591_freSHS/EST/CIB-17/10/CONF.501/2 REV2.
[43]
David Jones, Shiva Ghasemi, Denis Gračanin, and Mohamed Azab. 2023. Privacy, Safety, and Security in Extended Reality: User Experience Challenges for Neurodiverse Users. In HCI for Cybersecurity, Privacy and Trust(Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Abbas Moallem (Ed.). Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, 511–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35822-7_33
[44]
Kent Bye. 2019. XR Ethics Manifesto. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CXgY3YXxqJ8
[45]
Michael H. Kottow. 2005. Vulnerability: What kind of principle is it?Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 7, 3 (Jan. 2005), 281–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-004-6857-6
[46]
Jacob Leon Kröger, Otto Hans-Martin Lutz, and Florian Müller. 2019. What Does Your Gaze Reveal About You? On the Privacy Implications of Eye Tracking. In Privacy and Identity Management. Data for Better Living: AI and Privacy, Vol. 576. Springer, Cham, Windisch, Switzerland, 226–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42504-3_15
[47]
Glyn Lawson, Davide Salanitri, and Brian Waterfield. 2015. VR Processes in the Automotive Industry. In Human-Computer Interaction: Users and Contexts, Masaaki Kurosu (Ed.). Vol. 9171. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 208–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21006-3_21
[48]
Joey J. Lee and Elliot Hu-Au. 2021. E3XR: An Analytical Framework for Ethical, Educational and Eudaimonic XR Design. Frontiers in Virtual Reality 2 (2021). https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/frvir.2021.697667
[49]
Ziheng ’Leo’ Li, Haowen ’John’ Wei, Ziwen Xie, Yunxiang Peng, June Pyo Suh, Steven Feiner, and Paul Sajda. 2024. PhysioLabXR: A Python Platform for Real-Time, Multi-modal, Brain–Computer Interfaces and Extended Reality Experiments. Journal of Open Source Software 9, 93 (Jan. 2024), 5854. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.05854
[50]
Marie Liendle. 2012. Vulnérabilité. In Les concepts en sciences infirmières. Association de Recherche en Soins Infirmiers, Toulouse, 304–306. https://doi.org/10.3917/arsi.forma.2012.01.0304
[51]
Sjors Ligthart, Marcello Ienca, Gerben Meynen, Fruzsina Molnar-Gabor, Roberto Andorno, Christoph Bublitz, Paul Catley, Lisa Claydon, Thomas Douglas, Nita Farahany, Joseph J. Fins, Sara Goering, Pim Haselager, Fabrice Jotterand, Andrea Lavazza, Allan McCay, Abel Wajnerman Paz, Stephen Rainey, Jesper Ryberg, and Philipp Kellmeyer. 2023. Minding Rights: Mapping Ethical and Legal Foundations of ‘Neurorights’. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 32, 4 (Oct. 2023), 461–481. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180123000245 Publisher: Cambridge University Press.
[52]
Sjors Ligthart, Gerben Meynen, Nikola Biller-Andorno, Tijs Kooijmans, and Philipp Kellmeyer. 2022. Is Virtually Everything Possible? The Relevance of Ethics and Human Rights for Introducing Extended Reality in Forensic Psychiatry. AJOB neuroscience 13, 3 (2022), 144–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/21507740.2021.1898489
[53]
Jamie Luguri and Lior Strahilevitz. 2019. Shining a Light on Dark Patterns. SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3431205. Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3431205
[54]
Rocci Luppicini. 2009. The Emerging Field of Technoethics. In Handbook of Research on Technoethics. IGI Global, Hershey, PA, 1–19. https://www.igi-global.com/gateway/chapter/21568 Archive Location: emerging-field-technoethics ISBN: 9781605660226 Publisher: IGI Global.
[55]
Michael Madary and Thomas K. Metzinger. 2016. Real Virtuality: A Code of Ethical Conduct. Recommendations for Good Scientific Practice and the Consumers of VR-Technology. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 3 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2016.00003
[56]
McGill Mark. 2021. The IEEE Global Initiative on Ethics of Extended Reality (XR) Report–Extended Reality (XR) and the Erosion of Anonymity and Privacy. Technical Report. IEEE. 1–24 pages. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9619999Conference Name: Extended Reality (XR) and the Erosion of Anonymity and Privacy - White Paper.
[57]
Arunesh Mathur, Gunes Acar, Michael J. Friedman, Elena Lucherini, Jonathan Mayer, Marshini Chetty, and Arvind Narayanan. 2019. Dark Patterns at Scale: Findings from a Crawl of 11K Shopping Websites. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (Nov. 2019), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359183 arXiv:1907.07032.
[58]
Paul Milgram, Haruo Takemura, Akira Utsumi, and Fumio Kishino. 1995. Augmented reality: a class of displays on the reality-virtuality continuum. In Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies, Vol. 2351. International Society for Optics and Photonics, Boston, MA, United States, 282–292. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.197321
[59]
Yosra Mourali, Benoit Barathon, Maxime Bourgois Colin, Sondès Chaabane, Raja Fassi, Yohan Guerrier, Dorothee Guilain, Christophe Kolski, Yoann Lebrun, Sophie Lepreux, and Jason Sauve. 2023. Conception centrée utilisateur d’un jeu sérieux sur table interactive avec objets tangibles : application au handicap en entreprise. Université de Technologie de Troyes, Troyes, France. https://doi.org/hal-04045921
[60]
Giovanna Nunes Vilaza, Kevin Doherty, Darragh McCashin, David Coyle, Jakob Bardram, and Marguerite Barry. 2022. A Scoping Review of Ethics Across SIGCHI. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference(DIS ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 137–154. https://doi.org/10.1145/3532106.3533511
[61]
OCDE. 2020. How’s Life? 2020 : Measuring Well-being. Technical Report. Éditions OCDE, Paris. https://www.oecd.org/wise/better-life-initiative.htm
[62]
Joseph O’Hagan, Jan Gugenheimer, Jolie Bonner, Florian Mathis, and Mark McGill. 2023. Augmenting People, Places & Media: The Societal Harms Posed by Everyday Augmented Reality, and the Case for Perceptual Human Rights. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia(MUM ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 219–229. https://doi.org/10.1145/3626705.3627782
[63]
Harri Oinas-Kukkonen and Marja Harjumaa. 2009. Persuasive Systems Design: Key Issues, Process Model, and System Features. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 24, 1 (March 2009). https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.02428
[64]
Yun Suen Pai, Mark Armstrong, Kinga Skiers, Anish Kundu, Danyang Peng, Yixin Wang, Tamil Selvan Gunasekaran, Chi-Lan Yang, and Kouta Minamizawa. 2023. The Empathic Metaverse: An Assistive Bioresponsive Platform For Emotional Experience Sharing. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2311.16610 arXiv:2311.16610 [cs].
[65]
Dorian Peters, Rafael A. Calvo, and Richard M. Ryan. 2018. Designing for Motivation, Engagement and Wellbeing in Digital Experience. Frontiers in Psychology 9, Sec. Human-Media Interaction (May 2018), 797. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00797
[66]
Karl Pineau. 2022. Si designer c’est manipuler. Quelle est l’intention ? Échange avec Karl Pineau. https://cnnumerique.fr/si-designer-cest-manipuler-quelle-est-lintention-echange-avec-karl-pineau
[67]
Karl Pineau and Aurelia Fabre. 2021. Évaluer la captologie et le design persuasif des services numériques. Approche empirique de mesure de la persuasion et proposition d’une matrice d’évaluation. I2D - Information, données & documents 2, 2 (2021), 151–173. https://doi.org/10.3917/i2d.212.0151 Place: Paris Publisher: A.D.B.S.
[68]
Michel Puech. 2016. Une éthique de sagesse pour l’ère de la technologie : pourquoi et surtout comment ?Revue française d’éthique appliquée 1, 1 (2016), 113–117. https://doi.org/10.3917/rfeap.001.0113 Place: Toulouse Publisher: Érès.
[69]
Jon Rueda. 2023. Doing Good With Virtual Reality: The Ethics of using Virtual Simulations for Improving Human Morality. In Exploring Extended Realities. Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003359494-14/good-virtual-reality-jon-rueda Num Pages: 25.
[70]
Jon Rueda and Francisco Lara. 2020. Virtual Reality and Empathy Enhancement: Ethical Aspects. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 7 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2020.506984 Publisher: Frontiers.
[71]
Danny Schott, Julia Moritz, Christian Hansen, and Fabian Joeres. 2023. The UUXR-Framework: A Draft Classification for Using Extended Reality in Usability and User Experience Research. In ISMAR-Adjunct. IEEE Computer Society, Sydney, Australia, 460–465. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct60411.2023.00100
[72]
Carly Seedal, Tom Lindemann, Renate Klar, and Lisa Tambornino. 2023. Criteria for ethical review by RECs in emerging technology research. Technical Report. https://www.techethos.eu/criteria-for-ethical-review-by-recs/
[73]
Kshitij Sharma and Michail Giannakos. 2021. Sensing technologies and child–computer interaction: Opportunities, challenges and ethical considerations. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 30 (Dec. 2021), 100331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2021.100331
[74]
Richard Skarbez, Missie Smith, and Mary C. Whitton. 2021. Revisiting Milgram and Kishino’s Reality-Virtuality Continuum. Frontiers in Virtual Reality 2 (March 2021), 647997. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2021.647997 Publisher: Frontiers.
[75]
Felicity Slater. 2023. The Future of Manipulative Design Regulation. https://fpf.org/blog/the-future-of-manipulative-design-regulation/ Section: Blog.
[76]
Mel Slater. 2021. Beyond Speculation About the Ethics of Virtual Reality: The Need for Empirical Results. Frontiers in Virtual Reality 2 (2021), 81. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2021.687609
[77]
Mel Slater, Cristina Gonzalez-Liencres, Patrick Haggard, Charlotte Vinkers, Rebecca Gregory-Clarke, Steve Jelley, Zillah Watson, Graham Breen, Raz Schwarz, William Steptoe, Dalila Szostak, Shivashankar Halan, Deborah Fox, and Jeremy Silver. 2020. The Ethics of Realism in Virtual and Augmented Reality. Frontiers in Virtual Reality 1 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2020.00001 Publisher: Frontiers.
[78]
James S. Spiegel. 2018. The Ethics of Virtual Reality Technology: Social Hazards and Public Policy Recommendations. Science and Engineering Ethics 24, 5 (Oct. 2018), 1537–1550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9979-y
[79]
IEEE Brain Neuroethics Subcommittee. 2021. IEEE Neuroethics Framework: Addressing the Ethical, Legal, Social, and Cultural Implications of Neurotechnology. Technical Report. IEEE Brain. 2 pages. https://brain.ieee.org/publications/ieee-neuroethics-framework/
[80]
Wen-Jie Tseng, Elise Bonnail, Mark McGill, Mohamed Khamis, Eric Lecolinet, Samuel Huron, and Jan Gugenheimer. 2022. The Dark Side of Perceptual Manipulations in Virtual Reality. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New Orleans LA USA, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517728
[81]
Maarten Van Mechelen, Gökçe Elif Baykal, Christian Dindler, Eva Eriksson, and Ole Sejer Iversen. 2020. 18 Years of ethics in child-computer interaction research: a systematic literature review. In Proceedings of the Interaction Design and Children Conference(IDC ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 161–183. https://doi.org/10.1145/3392063.3394407
[82]
Xian Wang, Lik-Hang Lee, Carlos Bermejo Fernandez, and Pan Hui. 2023. The Dark Side of Augmented Reality: Exploring Manipulative Designs in AR. (March 2023). https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2188799
[83]
Yan Wang, Wei Song, Wei Tao, Antonio Liotta, Dawei Yang, Xinlei Li, Shuyong Gao, Yixuan Sun, Weifeng Ge, Wei Zhang, and Wenqiang Zhang. 2022. A systematic review on affective computing: emotion models, databases, and recent advances. Information Fusion 83-84 (July 2022), 19–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2022.03.009
[84]
Wikipédia. 2022. Dilemme de Collingridge. https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dilemme_de_Collingridge&oldid=192343181 Page Version ID: 192343181.
[85]
Nick Yee and Jeremy Bailenson. 2007. The Proteus Effect: The Effect of Transformed Self-Representation on Behavior. Human Communication Research 33, 3 (July 2007), 271–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00299.x Publisher: Oxford Academic.
[86]
Mathilde Yousefi and Stéphanie Fleck. 2023. Incarnation de la présence émotionnelle grâce à une interface tangible en situation d’apprentissage collaboratif hybride : état de l’art. (March 2023). https://hal.science/hal-04046144
[87]
Ruo-Qiao Zhao and Li-Hao Chen. 2020. Research on Interface Design for the Elderly. In HCI International 2020 - Posters(Communications in Computer and Information Science), Constantine Stephanidis and Margherita Antona (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 128–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50732-9_18

Index Terms

  1. Toward a New Framework for XR-Adaptive Ethical Design: a State of the Art: Vers un nouveau modèle pour une conception de technologie XR-adaptative éthique : un état de l’art

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Information & Contributors

          Information

          Published In

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          IHM '24: Proceedings of the 35th International Francophone Conference on Human-Computer Interaction
          March 2024
          52 pages
          ISBN:9798400706080
          DOI:10.1145/3650104
          Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          Published: 24 May 2024

          Check for updates

          Author Tags

          1. Éthique
          2. Bien-être
          3. Ethics
          4. Expérience utilisateur
          5. Framework,
          6. Modèle de conception
          7. Réalité étendue
          8. User Experience
          9. Well-being
          10. eXtended Reality

          Qualifiers

          • Work in progress
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Data Availability

          Conference

          IHM '24

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate 103 of 199 submissions, 52%

          Contributors

          Other Metrics

          Bibliometrics & Citations

          Bibliometrics

          Article Metrics

          • 0
            Total Citations
          • 58
            Total Downloads
          • Downloads (Last 12 months)58
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)14
          Reflects downloads up to 23 Dec 2024

          Other Metrics

          Citations

          View Options

          Login options

          View options

          PDF

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          Media

          Figures

          Other

          Tables

          Share

          Share

          Share this Publication link

          Share on social media