skip to main content
10.1145/3641825.3687713acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesvrstConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

The Influence of a Low-Resolution Peripheral Display Extension on the Perceived Plausibility and Presence

Published: 09 October 2024 Publication History

Abstract

The Field of View (FoV) is a central technical display characteristic of Head-Mounted Displays (HMDs), which has been shown to have a notable impact on important aspects of the user experience. For example, an increased FoV has been shown to foster a sense of presence and improve peripheral information processing, but it also increases the risk of VR sickness. This article investigates the impact of a wider but inhomogeneous FoV on the perceived plausibility, measuring its effects on presence, spatial presence, and VR sickness as a comparison to and replication of effects from prior work. We developed a low-resolution peripheral display extension to pragmatically increase the FoV, taking into account the lower peripheral acuity of the human eye. While this design results in inhomogeneous resolutions of HMDs at the display edges, it also is a low complexity and low-cost extension. However, its effects on important VR qualities have to be identified. We conducted two experiments with 30 and 27 participants, respectively. In a randomized 2x3 within-subject design, participants played three rounds of bowling in VR, both with and without the display extension. Two rounds contained incongruencies to induce breaks in plausibility. In experiment 2, we enhanced one incongruency to make it more noticeable and improved the shortcomings of the display extension that had previously been identified. However, neither study measured the low-resolution FoV extension’s effect in terms of perceived plausibility, presence, spatial presence, or VR sickness. We found that one of the incongruencies could cause a break in plausibility without the extension, confirming the results of a previous study.

Supplemental Material

PDF File
Additional tables and figures

References

[1]
Isayas Berhe Adhanom, Nathan Navarro Griffin, Paul MacNeilage, and Eelke Folmer. 2020. The Effect of a Foveated Field-of-view Restrictor on VR Sickness. In 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR) (2020-03). IEEE, Atlanta, GA, USA, 645–652. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR46266.2020.00087 ISSN: 2642-5254.
[2]
Larissa Brübach, Franziska Westermeier, Carolin Wienrich, and Marc Erich Latoschik. 2022. Breaking Plausibility Without Breaking Presence - Evidence For The Multi-Layer Nature Of Plausibility. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 28, 5 (May 2022), 2267–2276. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2022.3150496 Conference Name: IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.
[3]
Larissa Brübach, Franziska Westermeier, Carolin Wienrich, and Marc Erich Latoschik. 2023. A Systematic Evaluation of Incongruencies and Their Influence on Plausibility in Virtual Reality. In 2023 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR)(ISMAR ’23). IEEE Computer Society, Sydney, Autralia, 894–901. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR59233.2023.00105
[4]
John Carmack. 2013. Latency mitigation strategies. Twenty Milliseconds 59 (2013).
[5]
VR Compare. 2013. VR Compare, Oculus Rift Development Kit. https://vr-compare.com/headset/oculusriftdk1 [Accessed: 19.08.2024].
[6]
VR Compare. 2019. VR Compare, HTC Vive Pro Eye. https://vr-compare.com/headset/htcviveproeye [Accessed: 19.08.2024].
[7]
VR Compare. 2023. VR Compare, Pimax Crystal OLED. https://vr-compare.com/headset/pimaxcrystalqled [Accessed: 19.08.2024].
[8]
James J Cummings and Jeremy N Bailenson. 2016. How immersive is enough? A meta-analysis of the effect of immersive technology on user presence. Media psychology 19, 2 (2016), 272–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2015.1015740
[9]
H.B.-L. Duh, J.W. Lin, R.V. Kenyon, D.E. Parker, and T.A. Furness. 2001. Effects of field of view on balance in an immersive environment. In Proceedings IEEE Virtual Reality 2001 (2001-03). IEEE, Yokohama, Japan, 235–240. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2001.913791
[10]
Ajoy S Fernandes and Steven K. Feiner. 2016. Combating VR sickness through subtle dynamic field-of-view modification. In 2016 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI) (2016-03). IEEE, Greenville, SC, USA, 201–210. https://doi.org/10.1109/3DUI.2016.7460053
[11]
Uwe Gruenefeld, Tim Claudius Stratmann, Abdallah El Ali, Susanne Boll, and Wilko Heuten. 2018. RadialLight: exploring radial peripheral LEDs for directional cues in head-mounted displays. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. ACM, New York, NY, United States, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3229434.3229437
[12]
Uwe Gruenefeld, Tim Claudius Stratmann, Wilko Heuten, and Susanne Boll. 2017. PeriMR: a prototyping tool for head-mounted peripheral light displays in mixed reality. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (Vienna, Austria) (MobileHCI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 51, 6 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3098279.3125439
[13]
Sandra G Hart. 2006. NASA-task load index (NASA-TLX); 20 years later. In Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, Vol. 50. Sage publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society., -, 904–908. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931206050009
[14]
Tilo Hartmann, Werner Wirth, Holger Schramm, Christoph Klimmt, Peter Vorderer, André Gysbers, Saskia Böcking, Niklas Ravaja, Jari Laarni, Timo Saari, 2015. The spatial presence experience scale (SPES). Journal of Media Psychology (2015). https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000137
[15]
J. Adam Jones, J. Edward Swan II, and Mark Bolas. 2013. Peripheral Stimulation and its Effect on Perceived Spatial Scale in Virtual Environments. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 19 (apr 2013), 701–710. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2013.37
[16]
Hyun K Kim, Jaehyun Park, Yeongcheol Choi, and Mungyeong Choe. 2018. Virtual reality sickness questionnaire (VRSQ): Motion sickness measurement index in a virtual reality environment. Applied ergonomics 69 (2018), 66–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2017.12.016
[17]
Marc Erich Latoschik and Carolin Wienrich. 2022. Congruence and Plausibility, Not Presence: Pivotal Conditions for XR Experiences and Effects, a Novel Approach. Frontiers in Virtual Reality 3 (June 2022), 694433. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2022.694433
[18]
Chae Heon Lim and Seul Chan Lee. 2023. The Effects of Degrees of Freedom and Field of View on Motion Sickness in a Virtual Reality Context. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 0, 0 (2023), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2241620 Publisher: Taylor & Francis _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2241620.
[19]
J.J.-W. Lin, H.B.L. Duh, D.E. Parker, H. Abi-Rached, and T.A. Furness. 2002. Effects of field of view on presence, enjoyment, memory, and simulator sickness in a virtual environment. In Proceedings IEEE Virtual Reality 2002 (2002-03). IEEE, Orlando, FL, USA, 164–171. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2002.996519 ISSN: 1087-8270.
[20]
Paul Lubos, Gerd Bruder, Oscar Ariza, and Frank Steinicke. 2016. Ambiculus: LED-based low-resolution peripheral display extension for immersive head-mounted displays. In Proceedings of the 2016 Virtual Reality International Conference (Laval, France) (VRIC ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 13, 4 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2927929.2927939
[21]
Takuro Nakao, Masashi Nakatani, Liwei Chan, and Kai Kunze. 2016. Smart glasses with a peripheral vision display. In Proceedings of the 2016 Virtual Reality International Conference. ACM, Laval, France, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1145/2927929.2927938
[22]
Dennis C Neale. 1997. Factors influencing spatial awareness and orientation in desktop virtual environments. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 41. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society., -, 1278–1282. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181397041002123
[23]
Thomas Schubert, Frank Friedmann, and Holger Regenbrecht. 2001. The Experience of Presence: Factor Analytic Insights. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 10, 3 (June 2001), 266–281. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474601300343603
[24]
A. Fleming Seay, David M. Krum, Larry Hodges, and William Ribarsky. 2002. Simulator Sickness and Presence in a High Field-of-View Virtual Environment. In CHI ’02 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA) (CHI EA ’02). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 784–785. https://doi.org/10.1145/506443.506596
[25]
Richard Skarbez, Frederick P. Brooks, and Mary C. Whitton. 2018. Immersion and coherence in a stressful virtual environment. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology. ACM, Tokyo Japan, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3281505.3281530
[26]
Richard Skarbez, Solène Neyret, Frederick P. Brooks, Mel Slater, and Mary C. Whitton. 2017. A Psychophysical Experiment Regarding Components of the Plausibility Illusion. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 23, 4 (April 2017), 1369–1378. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2017.2657158 Conference Name: IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.
[27]
Mel Slater. 2009. Place illusion and plausibility can lead to realistic behaviour in immersive virtual environments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 364, 1535 (Dec. 2009), 3549–3557. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0138
[28]
Mel Slater, Vasilis Linakis, Martin Usoh, and Rob Kooper. 1996. Immersion, presence and performance in virtual environments: An experiment with tri-dimensional chess. In Proceedings of the ACM symposium on virtual reality software and technology. Association for Computing Machinery, Hong Kong, 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1145/3304181.3304216
[29]
Mel Slater, Bernhard Spanlang, and David Corominas. 2010. Simulating virtual environments within virtual environments as the basis for a psychophysics of presence. ACM Transactions on Graphics 29, 4 (July 2010), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/1778765.1778829
[30]
Mel Slater and Anthony Steed. 2000. A Virtual Presence Counter. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 9, 5 (Oct. 2000), 413–434. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474600566925
[31]
Thomas Waltemate, Felix Hülsmann, Thies Pfeiffer, Stefan Kopp, and Mario Botsch. 2015. Realizing a low-latency virtual reality environment for motor learning. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM symposium on virtual reality software and technology. Association for Computing Machinery, Beijing, China, 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1145/2821592.2821607
[32]
Franziska Westermeier, Larissa Brübach, Marc Erich Latoschik, and Carolin Wienrich. 2023. Exploring Plausibility and Presence in Mixed Reality Experiences. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (2023), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2023.3247046 Conference Name: IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.
[33]
Robert Xiao and Hrvoje Benko. 2016. Augmenting the field-of-view of head-mounted displays with sparse peripheral displays. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. Association for Computing Machinery, San Jose, California, USA, 1221–1232. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858212
[34]
Wataru Yamada and Hiroyuki Manabe. 2016. Expanding the field-of-view of head-mounted displays with peripheral blurred images. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 29th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. Association for Computing Machinery, Tokyo, Japan, 141–142. https://doi.org/10.1145/2984751.2985735

Index Terms

  1. The Influence of a Low-Resolution Peripheral Display Extension on the Perceived Plausibility and Presence

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Information & Contributors

          Information

          Published In

          cover image ACM Conferences
          VRST '24: Proceedings of the 30th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology
          October 2024
          633 pages
          ISBN:9798400705359
          DOI:10.1145/3641825
          This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike International 4.0 License.

          Sponsors

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          Published: 09 October 2024

          Check for updates

          Author Tags

          1. VR
          2. congruence
          3. experience
          4. field of view
          5. immersion
          6. plausibility
          7. presence
          8. spatial presence

          Qualifiers

          • Research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Funding Sources

          • Bavarian State Ministry For Digital Affairs in the project XR Hub

          Conference

          VRST '24

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate 66 of 254 submissions, 26%

          Contributors

          Other Metrics

          Bibliometrics & Citations

          Bibliometrics

          Article Metrics

          • 0
            Total Citations
          • 106
            Total Downloads
          • Downloads (Last 12 months)106
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)36
          Reflects downloads up to 16 Jan 2025

          Other Metrics

          Citations

          View Options

          View options

          PDF

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format.

          HTML Format

          Login options

          Media

          Figures

          Other

          Tables

          Share

          Share

          Share this Publication link

          Share on social media