Invisible Women in IT: Examining Gender Representation in K-12 ICT Teaching Materials
Authors: 
Ingrid Maria Christensen, Melissa Høegh Marcher, 
Nanna Inie, Claus BrabrandAuthors Info & Claims
Ingrid Maria Christensen, Melissa Høegh Marcher, Nanna Inie, Claus BrabrandAuthors Info & ClaimsPages 246 - 262
Abstract
The underrepresentation of women in IT has been a long-standing issue. Research has shown that women’s first experience with computing education is vital in shaping their perception of the field and their perception of who “belongs” to it. In this Danish case study, we examine gender representation in the subject Informatics, which is the first mandatory, formal introduction to computing education for many students in Denmark. Across 25% of all Danish HHX high schools, we assess the teaching materials on parameters of gender representation in pronouns, names, images, audio/video material, and potential role models. Our results suggest an overall underrepresentation of women in textual and audio/video material, but not in images. We also find an overall absence of female role models, and a tendency for the materials to feature younger female role models than their male counterparts. We conclude with concrete recommendations for authors and publishers of teaching materials for ICT on the high school level.
References
[1]
[n. d.]. Gender Equality Index | 2023 | DK | European Institute for Gender Equality — eige.europa.eu. https://eige.europa.eu/gender-equality-index/2023/country/DK. [Accessed 25-03-2024].
[2]
Karen Aguar, Hamid R Arabnia, Juan B Gutierrez, Walter D Potter, and Thiab R Taha. 2016. Making CS inclusive: An overview of efforts to expand and diversify CS education. In 2016 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI). IEEE, 321–326.
[3]
Asli Y. Akbulut. 2016. Majoring in Information Systems: An Examination of Role Model Influence. Journal of Educational Computing Research 54, 5 (2016), 660–679. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633115627825
[4]
Catherine T Amelink and Elizabeth G Creamer. 2010. Gender differences in elements of the undergraduate experience that influence satisfaction with the engineering major and the intent to pursue engineering as a career. Journal of Engineering Education 99, 1 (2010), 81–92.
[5]
Mohadeseh Amini and Parviz Birjandi. 2012. Gender Bias in the Iranian High School EFL Textbooks.English Language Teaching 5, 2 (2012), 134–147.
[6]
Linda Nørgaard Andersen, Gry Jexen, and Rikke Lie Halberg. 2024. Vores historiebøger rummer en katastrofal skæv fordeling mellem mænd og kvinder. Politiken (02 Feb 2024).
[7]
L. H Andersen (ISS) and M. K. Andersen (proacteur). 2016. Mangfoldig ledelse giver højere indtjening. http://www.publications.issworld.com/ISS/ISSDanmark/isspresentation/2016/Mangfoldigledelsegiverhjereindtjening/ Available at: http://www.publications.issworld.com/ISS/ISSDanmark/isspresentation/2016/Mangfoldigledelsegiverhjereindtjening/.
[8]
Shaki Asgari, Nilanjana Dasgupta, and Jane G Stout. 2012. When do counterstereotypic ingroup members inspire versus deflate? The effect of successful professional women on young women’s leadership self-concept. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 38, 3 (2012), 370–383.
[9]
Amanda Barton and Lydia Namatende Sakwa. 2012. The representation of gender in English textbooks in Uganda. Pedagogy, Culture & Society 20, 2 (2012), 173–190.
[10]
Eric P Bettinger and Bridget Terry Long. 2005. Do faculty serve as role models? The impact of instructor gender on female students. American Economic Review 95, 2 (2005), 152–157.
[11]
Sylvia Beyer. 2014. Why are women underrepresented in Computer Science? Gender differences in stereotypes, self-efficacy, values, and interests and predictors of future CS course-taking and grades. Computer Science Education 24, 2-3 (2014), 153–192.
[12]
Sylvia Beyer and Susan Haller. 2006. Gender differences and intragender differences in computer science students: Are female CS majors more similar to male CS majors or female nonmajors?Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 12, 4 (2006).
[13]
Silvina Bongiovanni. 2014. “No se preocupe la señora marquesa”: A study of gender bias in example sentences in the RAE grammar textbook. IULC Working Papers 14, 1 (2014).
[14]
Jilana S Boston and Andrei Cimpian. 2018. How do we encourage gifted girls to pursue and succeed in science and engineering?Gifted Child Today 41, 4 (2018), 196–207.
[15]
Olle Bälter, Viggo Kann, Chantal Mutimukwe, and Hans Malmström. 2023. English-medium instruction and impact on academic performance: a randomized control study. Applied Linguistics Review (2023). https://doi.org/
[16]
Børne- og Undervisningsminiteriet. 2023. Vejledning til Informatik C, hhx, htx, stx, hf. https://www.uvm.dk/-/media/filer/uvm/udd/gym/pdf23/aug/vejledninger/230822-vejledning-til-informatik-c–hhx–htx–stx–hf.pdf Available at: https://www.uvm.dk/-/media/filer/uvm/udd/gym/pdf23/aug/vejledninger/230822-vejledning-til-informatik-c–hhx–htx–stx–hf.pdf.
[17]
Bruce Carrington, Peter Tymms, and Christine Merrell. 2008. Role models, school improvement and the ‘gender gap’—do men bring out the best in boys and women the best in girls?British Educational Research Journal 34, 3 (2008), 315–327.
[18]
SRBH Chaturvedi and RC Shweta. 2015. Evaluation of inter-rater agreement and inter-rater reliability for observational data: an overview of concepts and methods. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology 41, 3 (2015), 20–27.
[19]
Juanjuan Chen, Minhong Wang, Paul A Kirschner, and Chin-Chung Tsai. 2018. The role of collaboration, computer use, learning environments, and supporting strategies in CSCL: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research 88, 6 (2018), 799–843.
[20]
Sapna Cheryan, John Oliver Siy, Marissa Vichayapai, Benjamin J Drury, and Saenam Kim. 2011. Do female and male role models who embody STEM stereotypes hinder women’s anticipated success in STEM?Social psychological and personality science 2, 6 (2011), 656–664.
[21]
Ingrid Maria Christensen, Melissa Høegh Marcher, Paweł Grabarczyk, Therese Graversen, and Claus Brabrand. 2021. Computing educational activities involving people rather than things appeal more to women (Recruitment Perspective). In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research. 127–144.
[22]
Code.org. 2013. What Most Schools Don’t Teach. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nKIu9yen5nc Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nKIu9yen5nc.
[23]
Hilde G Corneliussen. 2021. Unpacking the Nordic gender equality paradox in ICT research and innovation. Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics 5, 2 (2021), 25.
[24]
Danmarks Lærerforening. 2022. Projekt om kønsopmærksomhed i folkeskolen. https://www.dlf.org/dlf-mener/koensopmaerksomhed/projekt-om-koensopmaerksomhed-i-folkeskolen Available at: https://www.dlf.org/dlf-mener/koensopmaerksomhed/projekt-om-koensopmaerksomhed-i-folkeskolen.
[25]
Karen Sofie Egebo. 2020. Sociolog: I Danmark gør vi stort set ingenting for at komme kønsstereotyper til livs. Kristeligt Dagblad (14 Jan 2020).
[26]
European Commission. 2022. Employed ICT specialists by sex. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/isoc_sks_itsps/default/table?lang=en Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/isoc_sks_itsps/default/table?lang=en.
[27]
European Commission. 2023. Employment and Social Developments in Europe 2023.
[28]
European Commission. 2023. EU companies face difficulties in hiring ICT experts. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/w/ddn-20230712-1 Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/w/ddn-20230712-1.
[29]
Heidi Fencl and Karen R Scheel. 2006. Making sense of retention: An examination of undergraduate women’s participation in physics courses. Removing barriers: Women in academic science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (2006), 287–302.
[30]
GL. 2023. Ligestilling mellem kønnene i gymnasieuddannelserne. https://www.gl.org/detmenergl/Sider/Ligestillingmellem-koennene-i-gymnasieuddannelserne.aspx Available at: https://www.gl.org/detmenergl/Sider/Ligestillingmellem-koennene-i-gymnasieuddannelserne.aspx.
[31]
Joanna Goode. 2008. Increasing Diversity in K-12 computer science: Strategies from the field. In Proceedings of the 39th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education. 362–366.
[32]
Pawel Grabarczyk, Alma Freiesleben, Amanda Bastrup, and Claus Brabrand. 2022. Computing Educational Programmes with more Women are more about People & less about Things. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education Vol. 1. 172–178.
[33]
Virginia Grande, Anne-Kathrin Peters, Mats Daniels, and Matti Tedre. 2018. “Participating under the influence”: How role models affect the computing discipline, profession, and student population. In 2018 IEEE frontiers in education conference (FIE). IEEE, 1–9.
[34]
Carmen Nayeli Guzman, Anne Xu, and Adalbert Gerald Soosai Raj. 2021. Experiences of Non-Native English Speakers Learning Computer Science in a US University. In Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 633–639.
[35]
Judith R Halasz and Peter Kaufman. 2008. Sociology as pedagogy: How ideas from the discipline can inform teaching and learning. Teaching Sociology 36, 4 (2008), 301–317.
[36]
Hedy. 2024. Textual programming for the classroom. https://www.hedycode.com/ Available at: https://www.hedycode.com/.
[37]
Cedric Herring. 2009. Does diversity pay?: Race, gender, and the business case for diversity. American sociological review 74, 2 (2009), 208–224.
[38]
https://plus.google.com/+UNESCO. [n. d.]. Explore the ICT Gender Equality Paradox — en.unesco.org. https://en.unesco.org/EQUALS/ICT-GE-paradox. [Accessed 26-03-2024].
[39]
Janet S Hyde. 1984. Children’s understanding of sexist language.Developmental psychology 20, 4 (1984), 697.
[40]
Intel and Dalberg. 2016. Decoding Diversity: The Financial And Economic Returns to Diversity in Tech. https://dalberg.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Diversity-report.pdf Available at: https://dalberg.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Diversity-report.pdf.
[41]
IRIS Group on behalf of IDA. 2021. Mismatch på arbejdsmarkedet for it-uddannede i 2030.
[42]
IT Branchen. 2023. Beskæftigelse i it-branchen. https://itb.dk/tema/branchen-i-tal/beskaeftigelse/ Available at: https://itb.dk/tema/it-branchens-talunivers/branchen-i-tal/branchen-i-tal-omsaetning-2-2/.
[43]
IT Branchen. 2023. Løn i it-branchen. Available at: https://itb.dk/tema/it-branchens-talunivers/branchen-i-tal/loen/.
[44]
KEA. [n. d.]. Bliv datamatiker på KEA — youtube.com. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5YViIMjjQrs&t=11s. [Accessed 27-03-2024].
[45]
Khan Academy. 2022. How to keep your online accounts secure. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ukkyJbTSZVQ&t=69s Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ukkyJbTSZVQ&t=69s.
[46]
Kristin Klopfenstein. 2005. Beyond test scores: The impact of Black teacher role models on rigorous math taking. Contemporary Economic Policy 23, 3 (2005), 416–428.
[47]
Theodora Koulouri, Stanislao Lauria, and Robert D Macredie. 2014. Teaching introductory programming: A quantitative evaluation of different approaches. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE) 14, 4 (2014), 1–28.
[48]
M. Krag-Svendsen (Business Danmark). 2023. Er du i den bedst betalte branche?https://businessdanmark.dk/nyheder/artikler/er-du-i-den-bedst-betalte-branche Available at: https://businessdanmark.dk/nyheder/artikler/er-du-i-den-bedst-betalte-branche.
[49]
Kvinfo. 2024. Køn og skole. https://kvinfo.dk/koen-i-skolen/ Available at: https://kvinfo.dk/koen-i-skolen/.
[50]
Jackie FK Lee. 2014. Gender representation in Hong Kong primary school ELT textbooks–a comparative study. Gender and Education 26, 4 (2014), 356–376.
[51]
Jackie FK Lee. 2018. Gender representation in Japanese EFL textbooks–a corpus study. Gender and Education 30, 3 (2018), 379–395.
[52]
Jackie FK Lee and Peter Collins. 2008. Gender voices in Hong Kong English textbooks—Some past and current practices. Sex Roles 59 (2008), 127–137.
[53]
Jackie FK Lee and Peter Collins. 2009. Australian English-language textbooks: the gender issues. Gender and education 21, 4 (2009), 353–370.
[54]
Jackie FK Lee and Peter Collins. 2010. Construction of gender: A comparison of Australian and Hong Kong English language textbooks. Journal of Gender Studies 19, 2 (2010), 121–137.
[55]
Jackie FK Lee and Vahid Mahmoudi-Gahrouei. 2020. Gender representation in instructional materials: A study of Iranian English language textbooks and teachers’ voices. Sexuality & Culture 24, 4 (2020), 1107–1127.
[56]
Richard Lippa. 1998. Gender-related individual differences and the structure of vocational interests: The importance of the people-things dimension. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74, 4 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.4.996
[57]
Richard A Lippa. 2010. Gender differences in personality and interests: When, where, and why?Social and personality psychology compass 4, 11 (2010), 1098–1110.
[58]
Penelope Lockwood. 2006. “Someone like me can be successful”: Do college students need same-gender role models?Psychology of women quarterly 30, 1 (2006), 36–46.
[59]
Elizabeth Mannix and Margaret A Neale. 2005. What differences make a difference? The promise and reality of diverse teams in organizations. Psychological science in the public interest 6, 2 (2005), 31–55.
[60]
Melissa Høegh Marcher, Ingrid Maria Christensen, Paweł Grabarczyk, Therese Graversen, and Claus Brabrand. 2021. Computing educational activities involving people rather than things appeal more to women (cs1 appeal perspective). In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research. 145–156.
[61]
Microsoft Corporation. 2017. Why Europe’s Girls Aren’t Studying STEM.
[62]
Jakob Horn Moller and Lasse Pallesen. 2017. Computerspil. Systime, Aarhus C.
[63]
Megan M Parise. 2021. Gender, sex, and heteronormativity in high school statistics textbooks. Mathematics Education Research Journal 33, 4 (2021), 757–785.
[64]
Caroline Criado Perez. 2019. Invisible women: Data bias in a world designed for men. Abrams.
[65]
Jennifer L Prewitt-Freilino, T Andrew Caswell, and Emmi K Laakso. 2012. The gendering of language: A comparison of gender equality in countries with gendered, natural gender, and genderless languages. Sex roles 66, 3 (2012), 268–281.
[66]
Eric S Roberts, Marina Kassianidou, and Lilly Irani. 2002. Encouraging women in computer science. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 34, 2 (2002), 84–88.
[67]
Els Rommes, Geertjan Overbeek, Ron Scholte, Rutger Engels, and Raymond De Kemp. 2007. ‘I’m not Interested in Computers’: Gender-based occupational choices of adolescents. Information, Community and Society 10, 3 (2007), 299–319.
[68]
Raúl Ruiz-Cecilia, Juan Ramón Guijarro-Ojeda, and Carmen Marín-Macías. 2020. Analysis of heteronormativity and gender roles in EFL textbooks. Sustainability 13, 1 (2020), 220.
[69]
Sandra Schulz, Sarah Berndt, and Anja Hawlitschek. 2023. Exploring students’ and lecturers’ views on collaboration and cooperation in computer science courses-a qualitative analysis. Computer Science Education 33, 3 (2023), 318–341.
[70]
Scratch. 2024. Create stories, games, and animations. Share with others around the world. https://scratch.mit.edu/ Available at: https://scratch.mit.edu/.
[71]
Jørgen Sjaastad. 2012. Sources of Inspiration: The role of significant persons in young people’s choice of science in higher education. International Journal of Science Education 34, 10 (2012), 1615–1636.
[72]
R Patrick Solomon. 1997. Race, role modelling, and representation in teacher education and teaching. Canadian Journal of Education/Revue canadienne de l’éducation (1997), 395–410.
[73]
Steven E Stemler. 2019. A comparison of consensus, consistency, and measurement approaches to estimating interrater reliability. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation 9, 1 (2019), 4.
[74]
Jane G Stout, Nilanjana Dasgupta, Matthew Hunsinger, and Melissa A McManus. 2011. STEMing the tide: using ingroup experts to inoculate women’s self-concept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM).Journal of personality and social psychology 100, 2 (2011), 255.
[75]
Rong Su, James Rounds, and Patrick Ian Armstrong. 2009. Men and things, women and people: a meta-analysis of sex differences in interests.Psychological bulletin 135, 6 (2009), 859.
[76]
Jo Young Switzer. 1990. The impact of generic word choices: An empirical investigation of age-and sex-related differences. Sex roles 22 (1990), 69–82.
[77]
I Talks, I Edvinsson, and J Birchall. 2019. Programmed Out: The Gender Gap in Technology in Scandinavia. Plan International Norway: New York, NY, USA (2019).
[78]
The Boston Consulting Group and The Technical University of Munich. 2017. The Mix That Matters: Innovation through Diversity. https://web-assets.bcg.com/img-src/BCG-The-Mix-That-Matters-Apr-2017_tcm9-153209.pdf Available at: https://web-assets.bcg.com/img-src/BCG-The-Mix-That-Matters-Apr-2017_tcm9-153209.pdf.
[79]
Uddannelsesguiden. 2024. Merkantil studentereksamen (hhx). https://www.ug.dk/uddannelser/gymnasialeuddannelser/merkantil-studentereksamen-hhx Available at: https://www.ug.dk/uddannelser/gymnasialeuddannelser/merkantil-studentereksamen-hhx.
[80]
UX Mastery. 2015. How To Create UX Personas. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B23iWg0koi8 Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B23iWg0koi8.
[81]
Emiliana Vegas, Michael Hansen, and Brian Fowler. 2023. BUILDING SKILLS FOR LIFE: How to expand and improve computer science education around the world. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Building_skills_for_life.pdf Available at: https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Building_skills_for_life.pdf.
[82]
Tina Vrieler and Minna Salminen-Karlsson. 2022. A sociocultural perspective on computer science capital and its pedagogical implications in computer science education. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE) 22, 4 (2022), 1–23.
[83]
Jennifer Wang and Sepehr Hejazi Moghadam. 2017. Diversity Barriers in K-12 Computer Science Education: Structural and Social. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Seattle, Washington, USA) (SIGCSE ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, 615–620. https://doi.org/10.1145/3017680.3017734
[84]
Dexter Yim and Rolian Lee. 2023. A comparative study of gender representation in junior high school EFL textbooks of Hong Kong and Japan. Journal of Language Teaching 3, 10 (2023), 21–39.
Index Terms
- Invisible Women in IT: Examining Gender Representation in K-12 ICT Teaching Materials
Recommendations
Gender stereotypes prevail in ICT: a research review
SIGMIS CPR '09: Proceedings of the special interest group on management information system's 47th annual conference on Computer personnel researchThis paper surveys the research literature on stereotyping of gender and ICT and how it affects girls' participation in ICT education and work. Gender stereotypes can influence girls' choices over time, reducing their confidence and interest in ICT and ...
Silencing Women? Gender and Online Harassment
While gendered online harassment has received increased attention in academic and public debates, there is a lack of empirical studies examining gender differences in experiences with online harassment. Relying on two independent large-scale population ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
August 2024
539 pages
ISBN:9798400704758
DOI:10.1145/3632620
Copyright © 2024 Owner/Author.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 12 August 2024
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Funding Sources
- DIREC (Digital Research Centre Denmark)
Conference
ICER 2024
Sponsor:
ICER 2024: ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research
August 13 - 15, 2024
VIC, Melbourne, Australia
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 189 of 803 submissions, 24%
Upcoming Conference
ICER 2025
- Sponsor:
- sigcse
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 242Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)242
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)56
Reflects downloads up to 18 Jan 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML FormatLogin options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in