research-article

Charagraph: Interactive Generation of Charts for Realtime Annotation of Data-Rich Paragraphs

Authors:

Sylvain Malacria,

Daniel VogelAuthors Info & Claims

CHI '23: Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Article No.: 146, Pages 1 - 18

https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581091

Published: 19 April 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Documents often have paragraphs packed with numbers that are difficult to extract, compare, and interpret. To help readers make sense of data in text, we introduce the concept of Charagraphs: dynamically generated interactive charts and annotations for in-situ visualization, comparison, and manipulation of numeric data included within text. Three Charagraph characteristics are defined: leveraging related textual information about data; integrating textual and graphical representations; and interacting at different contexts. We contribute a document viewer to select in-text data; generate and customize Charagraphs; merge and refine a Charagraph using other in-text data; and identify, filter, compare, and sort data synchronized between text and visualization. Results of a study show participants can easily create Charagraphs for diverse examples of data-rich text, and when answering questions about data in text, participants were more correct compared to only reading text.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (3544548.3581091-talk-video.mp4)

Pre-recorded Video Presentation

Download
280.66 MB

MP4 File (3544548.3581091-video-preview.mp4)

Video Preview

Download
36.06 MB

MP4 File (3544548.3581091-video-figure.mp4)

Video Figure

Download
99.66 MB

References

[1]

Acland Acland. 2012. From International Blockbusters to National Hits: Analysis of the 2010 UIS Survey on Feature Film Statistics - UNESCO Digital Library. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000217103.

[2]

Mortimer Jerome Adler and Charles Van Doren. 2014. How to Read a Book(touchstone hardcover edition ed.). Simon & Schuster, New York.

[3]

D. G. Altman and J. M. Bland. 1996. Presentation of Numerical Data. BMJ (Clinical research ed.) 312, 7030 (March 1996), 572. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.312.7030.572

[4]

R. Amar, J. Eagan, and J. Stasko. 2005. Low-Level Components of Analytic Activity in Information Visualization. In IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, 2005. INFOVIS 2005.IEEE, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 111–117. https://doi.org/10.1109/INFVIS.2005.1532136

[5]

American Psychologic Association. 2020. Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (6th edition ed.). American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.

[6]

Paul Ayres and Gabriele Cierniak. 2012. Split-Attention Effect. In Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning, Norbert M. Seel (Ed.). Springer US, Boston, MA, 3172–3175. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_19

[7]

Sriram Karthik Badam, Zhicheng Liu, and Niklas Elmqvist. 2019. Elastic Documents: Coupling Text and Tables through Contextual Visualizations for Enhanced Document Reading. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 25, 1 (Jan. 2019), 661–671. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2018.2865119

Digital Library

[8]

Aaron Bangor, Philip T. Kortum, and James T. Miller. 2008. An Empirical Evaluation of the System Usability Scale. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 24, 6 (July 2008), 574–594. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447310802205776

[9]

Scott Bateman, Regan L. Mandryk, Carl Gutwin, Aaron Genest, David McDine, and Christopher Brooks. 2010. Useful Junk?: The Effects of Visual Embellishment on Comprehension and Memorability of Charts. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’10. ACM Press, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 2573. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753716

Digital Library

[10]

Leilani Battle, Peitong Duan, Zachery Miranda, Dana Mukusheva, Remco Chang, and Michael Stonebraker. 2018. Beagle: Automated Extraction and Interpretation of Visualizations from the Web. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174168

Digital Library

[11]

Aaron Bauer and Kenneth R. Koedinger. 2008. Note-Taking, Selecting, and Choice: Designing Interfaces That Encourage Smaller Selections. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries(JCDL ’08). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 397–406. https://doi.org/10.1145/1378889.1378961

Digital Library

[12]

Fabian Beck and Daniel Weiskopf. 2017. Word-Sized Graphics for Scientific Texts. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 23, 6 (June 2017), 1576–1587. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2017.2674958

Digital Library

[13]

Jacques Bertin. 2013. Sémiologie graphique: Diagrammes, les réseaux, les cartes. EHESS, Paris.

[14]

Michelle A. Borkin, Zoya Bylinskii, Nam Wook Kim, Constance May Bainbridge, Chelsea S. Yeh, Daniel Borkin, Hanspeter Pfister, and Aude Oliva. 2016. Beyond Memorability: Visualization Recognition and Recall. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 22, 1 (Jan. 2016), 519–528. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2015.2467732

Digital Library

[15]

Michelle A. Borkin, Azalea A. Vo, Zoya Bylinskii, Phillip Isola, Shashank Sunkavalli, Aude Oliva, and Hanspeter Pfister. 2013. What Makes a Visualization Memorable?IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 19, 12 (Dec. 2013), 2306–2315. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2013.234

Digital Library

[16]

Matthew Brehmer and Tamara Munzner. 2013. A Multi-Level Typology of Abstract Visualization Tasks. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 19, 12 (Dec. 2013), 2376–2385. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2013.124

Digital Library

[17]

Victor Bret. 2011. Explorable Explanations. http://worrydream.com/ExplorableExplanations/.

[18]

John Brooke. 1995. SUS: A Quick and Dirty Usability Scale. Usability Eval. Ind. 189 (Nov. 1995), 7.

[19]

L. F. Carter. 1947. An Experiment on the Design of Tables and Graphs Used for Presenting Numerical Data. The Journal of Applied Psychology 31, 6 (Dec. 1947), 640–650. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054246

[20]

Olivier Chapuis and Nicolas Roussel. 2007. Copy-and-Paste between Overlapping Windows. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, San Jose California USA, 201–210. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240657

Digital Library

[21]

Zhutian Chen and Haijun Xia. 2022. CrossData: Leveraging Text-Data Connections for Authoring Data Documents. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New Orleans LA USA, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517485

Digital Library

[22]

Ed H. Chi, Lichan Hong, Michelle Gumbrecht, and Stuart K. Card. 2005. ScentHighlights: Highlighting Conceptually-Related Sentences during Reading. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces(IUI ’05). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 272–274. https://doi.org/10.1145/1040830.1040895

Digital Library

[23]

William S. Cleveland. 2004. The Elements of Graphing Data(2 edition ed.). Hobart Press, Murray Hill, N.J.

[24]

Matthew Conlen and Jeffrey Heer. 2018. Idyll: A Markup Language for Authoring and Publishing Interactive Articles on the Web. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. ACM, Berlin Germany, 977–989. https://doi.org/10.1145/3242587.3242600

Digital Library

[25]

Matthew Conlen, Alex Kale, and Jeffrey Heer. 2019. Capture & Analysis of Active Reading Behaviors for Interactive Articles on the Web. Computer Graphics Forum 38, 3 (2019), 687–698. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.13720

[26]

Patricia Costigan-Eaves. 1986. Edward R. Tufte TheVisual Display of Quantitative Information. Information Design Journal 4, 3 (Jan. 1986), 235–236. https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.4.3.12cos

[27]

Weiwei Cui, Xiaoyu Zhang, Yun Wang, He Huang, Bei Chen, Lei Fang, Haidong Zhang, Jian-Guan Lou, and Dongmei Zhang. 2020. Text-to-Viz: Automatic Generation of Infographics from Proportion-Related Natural Language Statements. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 26, 1 (Jan. 2020), 906–916. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2019.2934785

[28]

Zhe Cui, Sriram Karthik Badam, M Adil Yalçin, and Niklas Elmqvist. 2019. DataSite: Proactive Visual Data Exploration with Computation of Insight-Based Recommendations. Information Visualization 18, 2 (April 2019), 251–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473871618806555

[29]

Hugh M. Culbertson and Richard D. Powers. 1959. A Study of Graph Comprehension Difficulties. Audio Visual Communication Review 7, 2 (1959), 97–110.

[30]

Pierre Dragicevic. 2016. Fair Statistical Communication in HCI. In Modern Statistical Methods for HCI, Judy Robertson and Maurits Kaptein (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 291–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26633-6_13

[31]

Pierre Dragicevic and Yvonne Jansen. 2018. Blinded with Science or Informed by Charts? A Replication Study. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 24, 1 (Jan. 2018), 781–790. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2017.2744298

[32]

Pierre Dragicevic, Yvonne Jansen, Abhraneel Sarma, Matthew Kay, and Fanny Chevalier. 2019. Increasing the Transparency of Research Papers with Explorable Multiverse Analyses. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300295

Digital Library

[33]

Nell K. Duke and P. David Pearson. 2009. Effective Practices for Developing Reading Comprehension. Journal of Education 189, 1-2 (Jan. 2009), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022057409189001-208

[34]

Karolina Duklan and Michael A Martin. 2002. Communicating Effectively with Words, Numbers, and Pictures: Drawing on Experience. Journal of Actuarial Practice 10 (2002), 59.

[35]

Apache 2015. Apache ECharts. Apache. https://echarts.apache.org/en/index.html

[36]

Lei Fang and Jian-Guang Lou. 2021. Part & Whole Extraction: Towards A Deep Understanding of Quantitative Facts for Percentages in Text. arxiv:2110.13505 [cs]

[37]

Gloria D. Feliciano, Richard D. Powers, and Bryant E. Kearl. 1963. The Presentation of Statistical Information. Audio Visual Communication Review 11, 3 (1963), 32–39.

[38]

Fiona Fidler, Geoff Cumming, Neil Thomason, Dominique Pannuzzo, Julian Smith, Penny Fyffe, Holly Edmonds, Claire Harrington, and Rachel Schmitt. 2005. Toward Improved Statistical Reporting in the Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 73, 1 (Feb. 2005), 136–143. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.73.1.136

[39]

Fiona Fidler and Geoffrey R. Loftus. 2009. Why Figures with Error Bars Should Replace p Values: Some Conceptual Arguments and Empirical Demonstrations. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology 217, 1(2009), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1027/0044-3409.217.1.27

[40]

Raymond Fok, Andrew Head, Jonathan Bragg, Kyle Lo, Marti A. Hearst, and Daniel S. Weld. 2022. Scim: Intelligent Faceted Highlights for Interactive, Multi-Pass Skimming of Scientific Papers. arxiv:2205.04561 [cs]

[41]

Tong Gao, Mira Dontcheva, Eytan Adar, Zhicheng Liu, and Karrie G. Karahalios. 2015. DataTone: Managing Ambiguity in Natural Language Interfaces for Data Visualization. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software & Technology. ACM, Charlotte NC USA, 489–500. https://doi.org/10.1145/2807442.2807478

Digital Library

[42]

Tong Gao, Jessica R. Hullman, Eytan Adar, Brent Hecht, and Nicholas Diakopoulos. 2014. NewsViews: An Automated Pipeline for Creating Custom Geovisualizations for News. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3005–3014. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557228

Digital Library

[43]

Andrew Gelman, Cristian Pasarica, and Rahul Dodhia. 2002. Let’s Practice What We Preach. The American Statistician 56, 2 (May 2002), 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1198/000313002317572790

[44]

Douglas J. Gillan, Christopher D. Wickens, J. G. Hollands, and C. Melody Carswell. 1998. Guidelines for Presenting Quantitative Data in HFES Publications. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 40, 1 (March 1998), 28–41. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872098779480640

[45]

Arthur M Glenberg and William E Langston. 1992. Comprehension of Illustrated Text: Pictures Help to Build Mental Models. Journal of Memory and Language 31, 2 (April 1992), 129–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(92)90008-L

[46]

Pascal Goffin, Tanja Blascheck, Petra Isenberg, and Wesley Willett. 2020. Interaction Techniques for Visual Exploration Using Embedded Word-Scale Visualizations. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Honolulu HI USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376842

Digital Library

[47]

Pascal Goffin, Jeremy Boy, Wesley Willett, and Petra Isenberg. 2017. An Exploratory Study of Word-Scale Graphics in Data-Rich Text Documents. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 23, 10 (Oct. 2017), 2275–2287. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2016.2618797

Digital Library

[48]

Pascal Goffin, Wesley Willett, Anastasia Bezerianos, and Petra Isenberg. 2015. Exploring the Effect of Word-Scale Visualizations on Reading Behavior. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1827–1832. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702613.2732778

Digital Library

[49]

Pascal Goffin, Wesley Willett, Jean-Daniel Fekete, and Petra Isenberg. 2014. Exploring the Placement and Design of Word-Scale Visualizations. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 20, 12 (Dec. 2014), 2291–2300. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2014.2346435

[50]

Pascal Goffin, Wesley Willett, Jean-Daniel Fekete, and Petra Isenberg. 2015. Design Considerations for Enhancing Word-Scale Visualizations with Interaction. In Posters of the Conference on Information Visualization (InfoVis). IEEE, Chicago, Illinois, USA, 2.

[51]

Pascal Goffin, Wesley Willett, and Petra Isenberg. 2015. Sharing Information from Personal Digital Notes Using Word-Scale Visualizations. In Proceedings of the IEEE VIS Workshop on Personal Visualization: Exploring Data in Everyday Life. IEEE, Chicago Illinois USA, 5.

[52]

John Gramlich. 2020. What the 2020 Electorate Looks like by Party, Race and Ethnicity, Age, Education and Religion.

[53]

Transparent Statistics in Human-Computer Interaction Working Group. 2019. Transparent Statistics Guidelines. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1186169

[54]

Andrew Head, Kyle Lo, Dongyeop Kang, Raymond Fok, Sam Skjonsberg, Daniel S. Weld, and Marti A. Hearst. 2021. Augmenting Scientific Papers with Just-in-Time, Position-Sensitive Definitions of Terms and Symbols. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Yokohama Japan, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445648

Digital Library

[55]

Jeffrey Heer and George Robertson. 2007. Animated Transitions in Statistical Data Graphics. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 13, 6 (Nov. 2007), 1240–1247. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2007.70539

Digital Library

[56]

Jouni Helske, Satu Helske, Matthew Cooper, Anders Ynnerman, and Lonni Besançon. 2021. Can Visualization Alleviate Dichotomous Thinking? Effects of Visual Representations on the Cliff Effect. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 27, 8 (Aug. 2021), 3397–3409. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2021.3073466

Digital Library

[57]

Ken Hinckley, Shengdong Zhao, Raman Sarin, Patrick Baudisch, Edward Cutrell, Michael Shilman, and Desney Tan. 2007. InkSeine: In Situ Search for Active Note Taking. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’07). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 251–260. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240666

Digital Library

[58]

William E. Hockley. 2008. The Picture Superiority Effect in Associative Recognition. Memory & Cognition 36, 7 (Oct. 2008), 1351–1359. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.7.1351

[59]

Fred Hohman, Matthew Conlen, Jeffrey Heer, and Duen Horng (Polo) Chau. 2020. Communicating with Interactive Articles. Distill 5, 9 (Sept. 2020), e28. https://doi.org/10.23915/distill.00028

[60]

Kasper Hornbæk and Erik Frøkjær. 2003. Reading Patterns and Usability in Visualizations of Electronic Documents. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 10, 2 (June 2003), 119–149. https://doi.org/10.1145/772047.772050

Digital Library

[61]

Kevin Hu, Michiel A. Bakker, Stephen Li, Tim Kraska, and César Hidalgo. 2019. VizML: A Machine Learning Approach to Visualization Recommendation. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Glasgow Scotland Uk, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300358

Digital Library

[62]

Jessica Hullman, Nicholas Diakopoulos, and Eytan Adar. 2013. Contextifier: Automatic Generation of Annotated Stock Visualizations. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2707–2716. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2481374

Digital Library

[63]

Jessica Hullman, Yea-Seul Kim, Francis Nguyen, Lauren Speers, and Maneesh Agrawala. 2018. Improving Comprehension of Measurements Using Concrete Re-expression Strategies. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Montreal QC Canada, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173608

Digital Library

[64]

Junyong In and Sangseok Lee. 2017. Statistical Data Presentation. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 70, 3 (2017), 267. https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2017.70.3.267

[65]

René Jorna. 1988. A Comparison of Presentation and Representation: Linguistic and Pictorial. In Human-Computer Interaction, Gerrit C. van der Veer and Gijsbertus Mulder (Eds.). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 172–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-73402-1_11

[66]

Jonathan P. Kastellec and Eduardo L. Leoni. 2007. Using Graphs Instead of Tables in Political Science. Perspectives on Politics 5, 4 (Dec. 2007), 755–771. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592707072209

[67]

Dave Kelly, Jaap Jasperse, and Ian Westbrooke. 2005. Designing Science Graphs for Data Analysis and Presentation. Science & Technical Publishing, Department of Conservation, Wellington, New Zealand 32(2005), 68.

[68]

Alison Kidd. 1994. The Marks Are on the Knowledge Worker. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’94). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 186–191. https://doi.org/10.1145/191666.191740

Digital Library

[69]

N. W. Kim, S. C. Joyner, A. Riegelhuth, and Y. Kim. 2021. Accessible Visualization: Design Space, Opportunities, and Challenges. Computer Graphics Forum 40, 3 (2021), 173–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.14298

[70]

Sunjung Kim and Linda J. Lombardino. 2015. Comparing Graphs and Text: Effects of Complexity and Task. Journal of Eye Movement Research 8, 3 (Oct. 2015), 17. https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.8.3.2

[71]

Yea-Seul Kim, Jessica Hullman, and Maneesh Agrawala. 2016. Generating Personalized Spatial Analogies for Distances and Areas. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, San Jose California USA, 38–48. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858440

Digital Library

[72]

Torsten L Klein. 2014. Communicating Quantitative Information: Tables vs Graphs. MPRA 60514(2014), 20.

[73]

Nicholas Kong and Maneesh Agrawala. 2012. Graphical Overlays: Using Layered Elements to Aid Chart Reading. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 18, 12 (Dec. 2012), 2631–2638. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2012.229

Digital Library

[74]

Markus Konkol, Christian Kray, and Jan Suleiman. 2019. Creating Interactive Scientific Publications Using Bindings. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, EICS (June 2019), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3331158

Digital Library

[75]

Bum Chul Kwon, Florian Stoffel, and Dominik Jäckle. 2014. VisJockey: Enriching Data Stories through Orchestrated Interactive Visualization. In Computation + Journalism Symposium. New York, NY, USA, 5.

[76]

Chufan Lai, Zhixian Lin, Ruike Jiang, Yun Han, Can Liu, and Xiaoru Yuan. 2020. Automatic Annotation Synchronizing with Textual Description for Visualization. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13.

Digital Library

[77]

Matthew Lamm, Arun Tejasvi Chaganty, Christopher D. Manning, Dan Jurafsky, and Percy Liang. 2018. Textual Analogy Parsing: What’s Shared and What’s Compared among Analogous Facts. arxiv:1809.02700 [cs]

[78]

Jill H. Larkin and Herbert A. Simon. 1987. Why a Diagram Is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words. Cognitive Science 11, 1 (1987), 65–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6708.1987.tb00863.x

[79]

Shahid Latif, Diao Liu, and Fabian Beck. 2018. Exploring Interactive Linking Between Text and Visualization. In EuroVis 2018 - Short Papers. The Eurographics Association, Brno Czech Republic, 4 pages. https://doi.org/10.2312/EUROVISSHORT.20181084

[80]

Shahid Latif, Kaidie Su, and Fabian Beck. 2019. Authoring Combined Textual and Visual Descriptions of Graph Data. In EuroVis. IEEE, Porto, Portugal, 5.

[81]

Shahid Latif, Zheng Zhou, Yoon Kim, Fabian Beck, and Nam Wook Kim. 2022. Kori: Interactive Synthesis of Text and Charts in Data Documents. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 28, 1 (Jan. 2022), 184–194. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2021.3114802

Digital Library

[82]

Elsie Lee-Robbins, Shiqing He, and Eytan Adar. 2022. Learning Objectives, Insights, and Assessments: How Specification Formats Impact Design. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 28, 1 (Jan. 2022), 676–685. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2021.3114811

Digital Library

[83]

Yuxuan Lei, Qi Lu, and Yingqing Xu. 2022. O&O: A DIY Toolkit for Designing and Rapid Prototyping Olfactory Interfaces. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New Orleans LA USA, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3502033

Digital Library

[84]

Deqing Li, Honghui Mei, Yi Shen, Shuang Su, Wenli Zhang, Junting Wang, Ming Zu, and Wei Chen. 2018. ECharts: A Declarative Framework for Rapid Construction of Web-Based Visualization. Visual Informatics 2, 2 (June 2018), 136–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visinf.2018.04.011

[85]

Veronica Liesaputra and Ian H. Witten. 2012. Realistic Electronic Books. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 70, 9 (Sept. 2012), 588–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2012.02.003

Digital Library

[86]

Ziming Liu. 2005. Reading Behavior in the Digital Environment: Changes in Reading Behavior over the Past Ten Years. Journal of Documentation 61, 6 (Jan. 2005), 700–712. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410510632040

[87]

Geoffrey R. Loftus. 1993. A Picture Is Worth a Thousandp Values: On the Irrelevance of Hypothesis Testing in the Microcomputer Age. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 25, 2 (June 1993), 250–256. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204506

[88]

Min Lu, Jie Liang, Yu Zhang, Guozheng Li, Siming Chen, Zongru Li, and Xiaoru Yuan. 2017. Interaction+: Interaction Enhancement for Web-Based Visualizations. In 2017 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis). IEEE, Seoul Republic of Korea, 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1109/PACIFICVIS.2017.8031580

[89]

Yuyu Luo, Xuedi Qin, Nan Tang, and Guoliang Li. 2018. DeepEye: Towards Automatic Data Visualization. In 2018 IEEE 34th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE). IEEE, Paris, 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDE.2018.00019

[90]

Yuyu Luo, Nan Tang, Guoliang Li, Jiawei Tang, Chengliang Chai, and Xuedi Qin. 2022. Natural Language to Visualization by Neural Machine Translation. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 28, 1 (Jan. 2022), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2021.3114848

Digital Library

[91]

Shuai Ma, Taichang Zhou, Fei Nie, and Xiaojuan Ma. 2022. Glancee: An Adaptable System for Instructors to Grasp Student Learning Status in Synchronous Online Classes. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New Orleans LA USA, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517482

Digital Library

[92]

Michael MacDonald-Ross. 1977. How Numbers Are Shown: A Review of Research on the Presentation of Quantitative Data in Texts. AV Communication Review 25, 4 (1977), 359–409.

[93]

Heinz Mandl and Joel R. Levin. 1989. Knowledge Acquisition from Text and Pictures. North-Holland, Amsterdam ; New York : New York, N.Y., U.S.A.

[94]

Damien Masson, Sylvain Malacria, Edward Lank, and Géry Casiez. 2020. Chameleon: Bringing Interactivity to Static Digital Documents. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Honolulu HI USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376559

Digital Library

[95]

Damien Masson, Sylvain Malacria, Daniel Vogel, Edward Lank, and Géry Casiez. 2023. ChartDetective: Easy and Accurate Interactive Data Extraction from Complex Vector Charts. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Hamburg, Germany) (CHI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 17 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581113

Digital Library

[96]

Richard E. Mayer. 2002. Multimedia Learning. In Psychology of Learning and Motivation. Vol. 41. Academic Press, 85–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(02)80005-6

[97]

Andrew McNutt, Gordon Kindlmann, and Michael Correll. 2020. Surfacing Visualization Mirages. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Honolulu HI USA, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376420

Digital Library

[98]

Ronald Metoyer, Qiyu Zhi, Bart Janczuk, and Walter Scheirer. 2018. Coupling Story to Visualization: Using Textual Analysis as a Bridge Between Data and Interpretation. In 23rd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. ACM, Tokyo Japan, 503–507. https://doi.org/10.1145/3172944.3173007

Digital Library

[99]

Joachim Meyer, Marcia Kuskin Shamo, and Daniel Gopher. 1999. Information Structure and the Relative Efficacy of Tables and Graphs. Human Factors 41, 4 (Dec. 1999), 570–587. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872099779656707

[100]

Pam A. Mueller and Daniel M. Oppenheimer. 2014. The Pen Is Mightier Than the Keyboard: Advantages of Longhand Over Laptop Note Taking. Psychological Science 25, 6 (June 2014), 1159–1168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614524581

[101]

Tamara Munzner. 2014. Visualization Analysis and Design(1st edition ed.). A K Peters/CRC Press, Boca Raton.

[102]

Arpit Narechania, Arjun Srinivasan, and John Stasko. 2021. NL4DV: A Toolkit for Generating Analytic Specifications for Data Visualization from Natural Language Queries. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 27, 2 (Feb. 2021), 369–379. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2020.3030378

[103]

C. North. 2006. Toward Measuring Visualization Insight. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 26, 3 (May 2006), 6–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2006.70

Digital Library

[104]

Kenton O’Hara. 1996. Towards a Typology of Reading Goals.

[105]

Kenton O’Hara and Abigail Sellen. 1997. A Comparison of Reading Paper and On-Line Documents. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Atlanta Georgia USA, 335–342. https://doi.org/10.1145/258549.258787

Digital Library

[106]

World Health Organization. 2021. Weekly Epidemiological Update on COVID-19 - 22 June 2021. https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/weekly-epidemiological-update-on-covid-19—22-june-2021.

[107]

World Health Organization. 2021. Weekly Epidemiological Update on COVID-19 - 29 June 2021. https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/weekly-epidemiological-update-on-covid-19—29-june-2021.

[108]

Alvitta Ottley, Aleksandra Kaszowska, R. Jordan Crouser, and Evan M. Peck. 2019. The Curious Case of Combining Text and Visualization. In EuroVis. The Eurographics Association, Porto, Portugal, 5. https://doi.org/10.2312/evs.20191181

[109]

Anshul Vikram Pandey, Katharina Rall, Margaret L. Satterthwaite, Oded Nov, and Enrico Bertini. 2015. How Deceptive Are Deceptive Visualizations? An Empirical Analysis of Common Distortion Techniques. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1469–1478. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702608

Digital Library

[110]

Jonas Parnow and Marian Dörk. 2015. Micro Visualizations: Data-driven Typography and Graphical Text Enhancement. In InfoVis. IEEE, Chicago, Illinois USA, 2.

[111]

Mozilla 2011. PDF.Js. Mozilla. https://mozilla.github.io/pdf.js/

[112]

Jennifer Pearson, George Buchanan, and Harold Thimbleby. 2014. Designing for Digital Reading. Springer International Publishing, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-02330-9

[113]

Joao Pinheiro and Jorge Poco. 2022. ChartText: Linking Text with Charts in Documents. arxiv:2201.05043 [cs]

[114]

Zachary Pousman, John Stasko, and Michael Mateas. 2007. Casual Information Visualization: Depictions of Data in Everyday Life. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 13, 6 (Nov. 2007), 1145–1152. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2007.70541

Digital Library

[115]

Morgan N. Price, Bill N. Schilit, and Gene Golovchinsky. 1998. XLibris: The Active Reading Machine. In CHI 98 Conference Summary on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’98). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 22–23. https://doi.org/10.1145/286498.286510

Digital Library

[116]

PrimeTek Informatics 2017. PrimeReact | React UI Component Library. PrimeTek Informatics. https://www.primefaces.org/primereact

[117]

Chunyao Qian, Shizhao Sun, Weiwei Cui, Jian-Guang Lou, Haidong Zhang, and Dongmei Zhang. 2021. Retrieve-Then-Adapt: Example-based Automatic Generation for Proportion-related Infographics. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 27, 2 (Feb. 2021), 443–452. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2020.3030448

[118]

Jing Qian, Qi Sun, Curtis Wigington, Han L. Han, Tong Sun, Jennifer Healey, James Tompkin, and Jeff Huang. 2022. Dually Noted: Layout-Aware Annotations with Smartphone Augmented Reality. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New Orleans LA USA, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3502026

Digital Library

[119]

Ghulam Jilani Abdul Rahim Quadri. 2021. Constructing Frameworks for Task-Optimized Visualizations. Ph. D. Dissertation. University of South Florida, United States – Florida.

[120]

Napol Rachatasumrit, Jonathan Bragg, Amy X. Zhang, and Daniel S Weld. 2022. CiteRead: Integrating Localized Citation Contexts into Scientific Paper Reading. In 27th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces(IUI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 707–719. https://doi.org/10.1145/3490099.3511162

Digital Library

[121]

Meta 2013. React – A JavaScript Library for Building User Interfaces. Meta. https://reactjs.org/

[122]

Donghao Ren, Matthew Brehmer, Bongshin Lee, Tobias Höllerer, and Eun Kyoung Choe. 2017. ChartAccent: Annotation for Data-Driven Storytelling. In 2017 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis). IEEE, Seoul Republic of Korea, 230–239. https://doi.org/10.1109/PACIFICVIS.2017.8031599

[123]

Nathalie Henry Riche, Christophe Hurter, Nicholas Diakopoulos, and Sheelagh Carpendale. 2018. Data-Driven Storytelling. CRC Press, Natick, Massachusetts, USA.

[124]

Yann Riche, Nathalie Henry Riche, Ken Hinckley, Sheri Panabaker, Sarah Fuelling, and Sarah Williams. 2017. As We May Ink?: Learning from Everyday Analog Pen Use to Improve Digital Ink Experiences. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Denver Colorado USA, 3241–3253. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025716

Digital Library

[125]

Hugo Romat, Nathalie Henry Riche, Ken Hinckley, Bongshin Lee, Caroline Appert, Emmanuel Pietriga, and Christopher Collins. 2019. ActiveInk: (Th)Inking with Data. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Glasgow Scotland Uk, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300272

Digital Library

[126]

Hugo Romat, Emmanuel Pietriga, Nathalie Henry-Riche, Ken Hinckley, and Caroline Appert. 2019. SpaceInk: Making Space for In-Context Annotations. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology(UIST ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 871–882. https://doi.org/10.1145/3332165.3347934

Digital Library

[127]

Bahador Saket, Alex Endert, and Cagatay Demiralp. 2018. Task-Based Effectiveness of Basic Visualizations. arxiv:1709.08546 [cs]

[128]

Manolis Savva, Nicholas Kong, Arti Chhajta, Li Fei-Fei, Maneesh Agrawala, and Jeffrey Heer. 2011. ReVision: Automated Classification, Analysis and Redesign of Chart Images. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology - UIST ’11. ACM Press, Santa Barbara, California, USA, 393. https://doi.org/10.1145/2047196.2047247

Digital Library

[129]

Mike Scaife and Yvonne Rogers. 1996. External Cognition: How Do Graphical Representations Work?International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 45, 2 (Aug. 1996), 185–213. https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.1996.0048

Digital Library

[130]

Bill N. Schilit, Gene Golovchinsky, and Morgan N. Price. 1998. Beyond Paper: Supporting Active Reading with Free Form Digital Ink Annotations. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’98). ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., USA, 249–256. https://doi.org/10.1145/274644.274680

Digital Library

[131]

Wolfgang Schnotz and Maria Bannert. 2003. Construction and Interference in Learning from Multiple Representation. Learning and Instruction 13, 2 (April 2003), 141–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00017-8

[132]

Edward Segel and Jeffrey Heer. 2010. Narrative Visualization: Telling Stories with Data. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 16, 6 (Nov. 2010), 1139–1148. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2010.179

Digital Library

[133]

Vidya Setlur, Sarah E. Battersby, Melanie Tory, Rich Gossweiler, and Angel X. Chang. 2016. Eviza: A Natural Language Interface for Visual Analysis. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology(UIST ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 365–377. https://doi.org/10.1145/2984511.2984588

Digital Library

[134]

Leixian Shen, Enya Shen, Yuyu Luo, Xiaocong Yang, Xuming Hu, Xiongshuai Zhang, Zhiwei Tai, and Jianmin Wang. 2022. Towards Natural Language Interfaces for Data Visualization: A Survey. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (2022), 1–1. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2022.3148007 arxiv:2109.03506 [cs]

Digital Library

[135]

Danqing Shi, Xinyue Xu, Fuling Sun, Yang Shi, and Nan Cao. 2021. Calliope: Automatic Visual Data Story Generation from a Spreadsheet. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 27, 2 (Feb. 2021), 453–463. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2020.3030403

[136]

Herbert A Simon. 1978. On the Forms of Mental Representation. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis(1978), 16.

[137]

Lauren M. Singer and Patricia A. Alexander. 2017. Reading on Paper and Digitally: What the Past Decades of Empirical Research Reveal. Review of Educational Research 87, 6 (Dec. 2017), 1007–1041. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317722961

[138]

Ian Spence. 1990. Visual Psychophysics of Simple Graphical Elements.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 16, 4(1990), 683–692. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.16.4.683

[139]

Ian Spence and Stephan Lewandowsky. 1991. Displaying Proportions and Percentages. Applied Cognitive Psychology 5, 1 (1991), 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350050106

[140]

Arjun Srinivasan, Steven M. Drucker, Alex Endert, and John Stasko. 2019. Augmenting Visualizations with Interactive Data Facts to Facilitate Interpretation and Communication. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 25, 1 (Jan. 2019), 672–681. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2018.2865145

Digital Library

[141]

Arjun Srinivasan, Nikhila Nyapathy, Bongshin Lee, Steven M. Drucker, and John Stasko. 2021. Collecting and Characterizing Natural Language Utterances for Specifying Data Visualizations. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Yokohama Japan, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445400

Digital Library

[142]

Hendrik Strobelt, Daniela Oelke, Christian Rohrdantz, Andreas Stoffel, Daniel A. Keim, and Oliver Deussen. 2009. Document Cards: A Top Trumps Visualization for Documents. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 15, 6 (Nov. 2009), 1145–1152. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2009.139

Digital Library

[143]

Hariharan Subramonyam, Colleen Seifert, Priti Shah, and Eytan Adar. 2020. texSketch: Active Diagramming through Pen-and-Ink Annotations. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Honolulu HI USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376155

Digital Library

[144]

Nicole Sultanum, Fanny Chevalier, Zoya Bylinskii, and Zhicheng Liu. 2021. Leveraging Text-Chart Links to Support Authoring of Data-Driven Articles with VizFlow. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445354

Digital Library

[145]

Kaiwen Sun, Carlo Sugatan, Tanisha Afnan, Hayley Simon, Susan A. Gelman, Jenny Radesky, and Florian Schaub. 2021. “They See You’re a Girl If You Pick a Pink Robot with a Skirt”: A Qualitative Study of How Children Conceptualize Data Processing and Digital Privacy Risks. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Yokohama Japan, 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445333

Digital Library

[146]

Bo Tang, Shi Han, Man Lung Yiu, Rui Ding, and Dongmei Zhang. 2017. Extracting Top-K Insights from Multi-dimensional Data. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Conference on Management of Data. ACM, Chicago Illinois USA, 1509–1524. https://doi.org/10.1145/3035918.3035922

Digital Library

[147]

Craig S. Tashman and W. Keith Edwards. 2011. Active Reading and Its Discontents: The Situations, Problems and Ideas of Readers. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2927–2936. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979376

Digital Library

[148]

Craig S. Tashman and W. Keith Edwards. 2011. LiquidText: A Flexible, Multitouch Environment to Support Active Reading. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Vancouver BC Canada, 3285–3294. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979430

Digital Library

[149]

Edward Tufte. 2006. Beautiful Evidence. Graphics Press, Cheshire, Conn.

[150]

UNESCO Institute for Statistics. 2017. Literacy Rates Continue to Rise from One Generation to the next - UNESCO Digital Library. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000258942?posInSet=1&queryId=826eb5c2-2660-4792-a3c8-83848b42df94.

[151]

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2022. Employment Situation Summary - 2022 M08 Results. https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm.

[152]

Pauli Virtanen, Ralf Gommers, Travis E. Oliphant, Matt Haberland, Tyler Reddy, David Cournapeau, Evgeni Burovski, Pearu Peterson, Warren Weckesser, Jonathan Bright, Stéfan J. van der Walt, Matthew Brett, Joshua Wilson, K. Jarrod Millman, Nikolay Mayorov, Andrew R. J. Nelson, Eric Jones, Robert Kern, Eric Larson, C J Carey, İlhan Polat, Yu Feng, Eric W. Moore, Jake VanderPlas, Denis Laxalde, Josef Perktold, Robert Cimrman, Ian Henriksen, E. A. Quintero, Charles R. Harris, Anne M. Archibald, Antônio H. Ribeiro, Fabian Pedregosa, Paul van Mulbregt, and SciPy 1.0 Contributors. 2020. SciPy 1.0: Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python. Nature Methods 17(2020), 261–272. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2

[153]

J. N. Washburne. 1927. An Experimental Study of Various Graphic, Tabular, and Textual Methods of Presenting Quantitative Material. Journal of Educational Psychology 18, 7 (1927), 465–476. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0070054

[154]

Alan J. Wecker, Joel Lanir, Osnat Mokryn, Einat Minkov, and Tsvi Kuflik. 2014. Semantize: Visualizing the Sentiment of Individual Document. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces - AVI ’14. ACM Press, Como, Italy, 385–386. https://doi.org/10.1145/2598153.2600056

Digital Library

[155]

Kanit Wongsuphasawat, Dominik Moritz, Anushka Anand, Jock Mackinlay, Bill Howe, and Jeffrey Heer. 2016. Voyager: Exploratory Analysis via Faceted Browsing of Visualization Recommendations. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 22, 1 (Jan. 2016), 649–658. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2015.2467191

Digital Library

[156]

Keke Wu, Emma Petersen, Tahmina Ahmad, David Burlinson, Shea Tanis, and Danielle Albers Szafir. 2021. Understanding Data Accessibility for People with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445743

Digital Library

[157]

Sally P. W. Wu and Martina A. Rau. 2019. How Students Learn Content in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Through Drawing Activities. Educational Psychology Review 31, 1 (March 2019), 87–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09467-3

[158]

Qian Yang, Gerard de Melo, Yong Cheng, and Sen Wang. 2017. HiText: Text Reading with Dynamic Salience Marking. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion(WWW ’17 Companion). International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, Republic and Canton of Geneva, CHE, 311–319. https://doi.org/10.1145/3041021.3054168

Digital Library

[159]

Ji Soo Yi, Youn ah Kang, John Stasko, and J.A. Jacko. 2007. Toward a Deeper Understanding of the Role of Interaction in Information Visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 13, 6 (Nov. 2007), 1224–1231. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2007.70515

Digital Library

[160]

Qiyu Zhi, Alvitta Ottley, and Ronald Metoyer. 2019. Linking and Layout: Exploring the Integration of Text and Visualization in Storytelling. Computer Graphics Forum 38, 3 (2019), 675–685. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.13719

Cited By

Gunturu AWen YZhang NThundathil JKazi RSuzuki R(2024)Augmented Physics: Creating Interactive and Embedded Physics Simulations from Static Textbook DiagramsProceedings of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology10.1145/3654777.3676392(1-12)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3654777.3676392
Kim HLe KLim GKim DHong YKim J(2024)DataDive: Supporting Readers' Contextualization of Statistical Statements with Data ExplorationProceedings of the 29th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces10.1145/3640543.3645155(623-639)Online publication date: 18-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3640543.3645155
Hoque EIslam M(2024)Natural Language Generation for Visualizations: State of the Art, Challenges and Future DirectionsComputer Graphics Forum10.1111/cgf.15266Online publication date: 30-Oct-2024
https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.15266
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Charagraph: Interactive Generation of Charts for Realtime Annotation of Data-Rich Paragraphs
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)
    1. Interactive systems and tools
  2. Visualization
    1. Visualization systems and tools

Recommendations

Intelligent Ink Annotation Framework that uses User's Intention in Electronic Document Annotation
ITS '14: Proceedings of the Ninth ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces

Annotating documents is one of the indispensable interaction between human and documents. The annotation system of electronic documents enables to implement effective functions, such as information retrieval and annotation-based navigation, by using the ...
Application of Interactive Computer-Assisted Argument Extraction to Opinionated Social Media Texts
VINCI '18: Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Visual Information Communication and Interaction

The analysis of various opinions and arguments in textual data can be facilitated by automatic topic modeling methods; however, the exploration and interpretation of the resulting topics and terms may prove to be difficult to the analysts. Opinions, ...
Non-Linear Software Documentation with Interactive Code Examples
Documentation enables sharing knowledge between the developers of a technology and its users. Creating quality documents, however, is challenging: Documents must satisfy the needs of a large audience without being overwhelming for individuals. We address ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

CHI '23: Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 2023

14911 pages

ISBN:9781450394215

DOI:10.1145/3544548

Editors:
Albrecht Schmidt
LMU Munich, Germany60028717
,
Kaisa Väänänen
Tampere University, Finland60011170
,
Tesh Goyal
Google Research, USA60006191
,
Per Ola Kristensson
University of Cambridge, UK60031101
,
Anicia Peters
University of Namibia, Namibia60072704
,
Stefanie Mueller
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA60022195
,
Julie R. Williamson
University of Glasgow, UK60001490
,
Max L. Wilson
University of Nottingham, UK60015138

Copyright © 2023 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 19 April 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Funding Sources

NSERC Discovery Grant
LAI Réapp

Conference

CHI '23

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

CHI '23: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 23 - 28, 2023

Hamburg, Germany

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

Upcoming Conference

CHI 2025

Sponsor:
sigchi

ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 26 - May 1, 2025

Yokohama , Japan

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

7
Total Citations
View Citations
1,132
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)624
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)91

Reflects downloads up to 09 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Gunturu AWen YZhang NThundathil JKazi RSuzuki R(2024)Augmented Physics: Creating Interactive and Embedded Physics Simulations from Static Textbook DiagramsProceedings of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology10.1145/3654777.3676392(1-12)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3654777.3676392
Kim HLe KLim GKim DHong YKim J(2024)DataDive: Supporting Readers' Contextualization of Statistical Statements with Data ExplorationProceedings of the 29th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces10.1145/3640543.3645155(623-639)Online publication date: 18-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3640543.3645155
Hoque EIslam M(2024)Natural Language Generation for Visualizations: State of the Art, Challenges and Future DirectionsComputer Graphics Forum10.1111/cgf.15266Online publication date: 30-Oct-2024
https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.15266
Shao HYuan X(2024)CataAnno: An Ancient Catalog Annotator for Annotation Cleaning by RecommendationIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2024.345637931:1(404-414)Online publication date: 16-Sep-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/TVCG.2024.3456379
Rahman MQuadri GDoppalapudi BSzafir DRosen P(2024)A Qualitative Analysis of Common Practices in Annotations: A Taxonomy and Design SpaceIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2024.345635931:1(360-370)Online publication date: 9-Sep-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/TVCG.2024.3456359
Masson DMalacria SCasiez GVogel D(2023)Statslator: Interactive Translation of NHST and Estimation Statistics Reporting Styles in Scientific DocumentsProceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology10.1145/3586183.3606762(1-14)Online publication date: 29-Oct-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3586183.3606762
Shen LZhang YZhang HWang Y(2023)Data Player: Automatic Generation of Data Videos with Narration-Animation InterplayIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2023.332719730:1(109-119)Online publication date: 3-Nov-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/TVCG.2023.3327197

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Full Text

View this article in Full Text.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View full text|Download PDF

View Table of Contents