skip to main content
10.1145/3539489.3539588acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobisysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Enabling Body-Centric Computing Applications with LED-to-Camera Communication

Published: 27 June 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Advances in Visible Light Communication are enabling novel Internet of Things applications. Going forward, we expect that LED-to-Camera links will enable a wide range of body-centric computing applications. Up until now, most LED-to-Camera studies have been following a deploy-and-test approach instead of a principled methodology. This ad-hoc design raises up two problems. First, we cannot compare fairly the various methods proposed in the literature because they use different types of LEDs and cameras. Second, and perhaps more importantly, we cannot identify the fundamental opportunities and limits of these novel links. To overcome these challenges, we propose a simple analytical model that estimates the range and data rate of LED-to-camera links prior to deployment. The model is built from first principles and requires only a limited set of parameters. To validate the accuracy of our model, we consider the two main transmission modes used in the literature: binary transmission and communication based on the rolling shutter effect. Our experimental evaluation confirms the predictions of the analytical model.

References

[1]
G. J. Kim, Human-computer interaction: fundamentals and practice. CRC press, 2015.
[2]
M. M. Gharasuie, N. Jennings, and S. Jain, “Performance monitoring for exercise movements using mobile cameras,” in Proceedings of the Workshop on Body-Centric Computing Systems, BodySys'21, (New York, NY, USA), p. 1–6, Association for Computing Machinery, 2021.
[3]
D. Kim, K. Park, and G. Lee, OddEyeCam: A Sensing Technique for Body-Centric Peephole Interaction Using WFoV RGB and NFoV Depth Cameras, p. 85–97. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2020.
[4]
K. Ahuja, S. Pareddy, R. Xiao, M. Goel, and C. Harrison, “Lightanchors: Appropriating point lights for spatially-anchored augmented reality interfaces,” in Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pp. 189–196, 2019.
[5]
J. Yang and J. A. Landay, “Infoled: Augmenting led indicator lights for device positioning and communication,” in Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pp. 175–187, 2019.
[6]
Z. Yang, Z. Wang, J. Zhang, C. Huang, and Q. Zhang, “Wearables can afford: Light-weight indoor positioning with visible light,” in Proceedings of the 13th Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services, pp. 317–330, 2015.
[7]
Y. Yang, J. Hao, and J. Luo, “Ceilingtalk: Lightweight indoor broadcast through led-camera communication,” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 3308–3319, 2017.
[8]
H.-Y. Lee, H.-M. Lin, Y.-L. Wei, H.-I. Wu, H.-M. Tsai, and K. C.-J. Lin, “Rollinglight: Enabling line-of-sight light-to-camera communications,” in Proceedings of the 13th Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services, pp. 167–180, 2015.
[9]
P. Ji, H.-M. Tsai, C. Wang, and F. Liu, “Vehicular visible light communications with led taillight and rolling shutter camera,” in 2014 IEEE 79th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring), pp. 1–6, IEEE, 2014.
[10]
Y. Yang, J. Nie, and J. Luo, “Reflexcode: Coding with superposed reflection light for led-camera communication,” in Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, pp. 193–205, 2017.
[11]
R. Boubezari, H. Le Minh, Z. Ghassemlooy, and A. Bouridane, “Smartphone camera based visible light communication,” Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 34, no. 17, pp. 4121–4127, 2016.
[12]
C. Danakis, M. Afgani, G. Povey, I. Underwood, and H. Haas, “Using a cmos camera sensor for visible light communication,” in 2012 IEEE Globecom Workshops, pp. 1244–1248, IEEE, 2012.
[13]
S. Verma, “Analysing the Performance and Stability of LED-to-Camera Links,” Master's thesis, Delft University of Technology, the Netherlands, 2017.
[14]
A. Duque, R. Stanica, A. Desportes, and H. Rivano, “Performance evaluation of led-to-camera communications,” in Proceedings of the 22nd International ACM Conference on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems, pp. 135–142, 2019.
[15]
T.-H. Do and M. Yoo, “Performance analysis of visible light communication using cmos sensors,” Sensors, vol. 16, no. 3, p. 309, 2016.
[16]
V. Matus, V. Guerra, C. Jurado-Verdu, J. Rabadán, and R. Perez-Jimenez, “Simulation of rolling shutter acquisition in optical camera communications,” in 2019 15th International Conference on Telecommunications (ConTEL), pp. 1–5, IEEE, 2019.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Enabling Body-Centric Computing Applications with LED-to-Camera Communication

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      BodySys '22: Proceedings of the 2022 Workshop on Body-centric Computing Systems
      July 2022
      28 pages
      ISBN:9781450394024
      DOI:10.1145/3539489
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 27 June 2022

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. analytical model
      2. camera
      3. visible light communication

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Funding Sources

      Conference

      MobiSys '22
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      BodySys '22 Paper Acceptance Rate 4 of 5 submissions, 80%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 9 of 11 submissions, 82%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)15
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
      Reflects downloads up to 17 Jan 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media