skip to main content
10.1145/3528137.3528161acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicedsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Personalized Learning in Science Recommendation System based on Learners’ Preferences

Published: 31 May 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Along with the massive internet digital dataset, it gives the reform motivation and amiabilities to change traditional college teaching and learning in science. How to find the appropriate information that the students are interested, valuable, and easy to be understood in the vast amount of information, and bring their creative ability, needs a personalized full path. A Recommender System (RS) based on learners’ preferences is a powerful tool, which can guarantee the quality and efficiency of the teaching and learning in science and provide one of science research directions with great research value. This paper presents the overall framework design of a wisdom RS in science, which analysis models are based on the students’ preferences, especially, Science Knowledge (SK), using a big data software platform. The research sample is made of totally 708 first year undergraduate students who take the subject of an introductory in Science Concepts (SC) in Computer Studies of Program (CSP), Macao Polytechnic Institution, from 2007 to 2022 academic year. According to the students’ SK, their Conceptual Learning (CL) methods have been classified into six types of thinking modes, which have three different corresponding understanding levels for each mode. The appropriate recommended materials to the students who are interested in the information provided, such as text-based teaching materials on science discussion forums, simulation tools and game activities, can increase the motivations of the students to learn, considered their different characteristics and understanding. The performances of this RS have been tracked over a period of 15 years, which can effectively improve the personalized teaching quality in the area of computer science, since it may be useful in heightening students’ motivation and interest in CL in science.

References

[1]
Jaeger, A. J., Wiley, J., Moher, T. (2016). Leveling the playing field: Grounding learning with embedded simulations in geoscience. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications1(1), 23.
[2]
Aher, S.B., Lobo, L. (2013). Combination of machine learning algorithms for recommendation of courses in E-Learning System based on historical data. Knowledge-Based Systems, 51:1-14.
[3]
Ghauth, K.I., Abdullah, N.A. (2010). Learning materials recommendation using good learners’ ratings and content-based filtering”, Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(6):711-727.
[4]
Liang G., Kong, W.N., Luo, J.Z. (2006). Courseware recommendation in e-learning system, Berlin: Springer,.10-24.
[5]
Milićević, A.K., Vesin, B., Ivanović, M., Budimac, Z.E. (2011). Learning personalization based on hybrid recommendation strategy and learning style identification. Computers & Education, 56(3):885-899.
[6]
Kurilovas, E., Zilinskiene, I., Dagiene, V. (2015). Recommending suitable learning paths according to learners’ preferences: Experimental research results. Computers in Human Behavior, 51:945-951.
[7]
Intayoad W., Becker, T., Temdee, P. (2017). Social Context-Aware Recommendation for Personalized Online Learning”, Wireless Personal Communications, 97(1):163-179.
[8]
Zhou, Y. W., Huang, C. Q. (2018). Personalized learning full-path recommendation model based on LSTM neural networks. Information Sciences, 444:135-152.
[9]
Ingrid Nunes, Dietmar Jannach. 2017. A systematic review and taxonomy of explanations in decision support and recommender systems. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, vol. 27, pp. 393.
[10]
Ngai Cheong. 2019. Application and Research of Modelling Intelligent Learning Systems based on Recommendation System, Proceedings of The 11th Higher Education International Conference on Innovation and Developments in TL Quality Assurance, Macau
[11]
Ngai Cheong. 2018. Teaching in engineering and science areas, From “Learning and Practicing, to “Practicing and Learning”, Proceedings of The 10th Higher Education International Conference on Innovation and Developments in TL Quality Assurance, Macau
[12]
George A. Sielis, Christos Mettouris, Aimilia Tzanavari, George A. (2012). Papadopoulos, Educational Recommender Systems and Technologies.
[13]
Pearl, P., L, C., Rong, H. (2012). Evaluating recommender systems from the user's perspective: survey of the state of the art, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, vol. 22, pp. 317.
[14]
Michael, J., Dietmar, J. (2017). Interacting with Recommenders-Overview and Research Directions, ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems, vol. 7, pp. 1.
[15]
Mei, H.H. (2006). A personalized English learning recommender system for ESL students. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(1):683-688.
[16]
Luiz, F. C., Tomaz, J.A., Rodrigues, N. Jano, M. S., Geraldo, B. X. (2011). Bringing knowledge into recommender systems", Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD) 2011 15th International Conference, pp. 246-252.
[17]
Cooperrider, K., Gentner, D., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2016). Spatial analogies pervade complex relational reasoning: Evidence from spontaneous gestures. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 1(1), 28.
[18]
DeSutter, D., & Stieff, M. (2017). Teaching students to think spatially through embodied actions: Design principles for learning environments in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2(1), 22.
[19]
Malek, N., Hall, J. C., & Hodges, C. (2014). A review and analysis of the effectiveness of alternative teaching methods on student learning in economics. Perspectives on Economic Education Research, 9(1), 75-85.
[20]
Kikot, T., Costa, G., Magalhães, R. (2013). Simulation games as tools for integrative dynamic learning:
[21]
Losco, C. D., Grant, W. D., Armson, A., Meyer, A. J., & Walker, B. F. (2017). Effective methods of teaching and learning in anatomy as a basic science: A BEME systematic review: BEME guide, no. 44. Medical teacher, 39(3),234-243.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
ICEDS '22: Proceedings of the 2022 3rd International Conference on Education Development and Studies
March 2022
175 pages
ISBN:9781450396271
DOI:10.1145/3528137
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 31 May 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. 1. Big Data
  2. 2. Recommender system
  3. 3. Scientific concepts
  4. 4. Conceptual learning
  5. 5. Understanding of X-transformation
  6. 6. Personalized Learning

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

ICEDS'22

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)29
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 06 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media