skip to main content
10.1145/3510458.3513018acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An empirical investigation on the challenges faced by women in the software industry: a case study

Published: 17 October 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Context: Addressing women's under-representation in the software industry, a widely recognized concern, requires attracting as well as retaining more women. Hearing from women practitioners, particularly those positioned in multi-cultural settings, about their challenges and and adopting their lived experienced solutions can support the design of programs to resolve the under-representation issue. Goal: We investigated the challenges women face in global software development teams, particularly what motivates women to leave their company; how those challenges might break down according to demographics; and strategies to mitigate the identified challenges. Method: To achieve this goal, we conducted an exploratory case study in Ericsson, a global technology company. We surveyed 94 women and employed mixed-methods to analyze the data. Results: Our findings reveal that women face socio-cultural challenges, including work-life balance issues, benevolent and hostile sexism, lack of recognition and peer parity, impostor syndrome, glass ceiling bias effects, the prove-it-again phenomenon, and the maternal wall. The participants of our research provided different suggestions to address/mitigate the reported challenges, including sabbatical policies, flexibility of location and time, parenthood support, soft skills training for managers, equality of payment and opportunities between genders, mentoring and role models to support career growth, directives to hire more women, inclusive groups and events, women's empowerment, and recognition for women's success. The framework of challenges and suggestions can inspire further initiatives both in academia and industry to onboard and retain women.
Women represent less than 24% of employees in software development industry and experience various types of prejudice and bias. Even in companies that care about Diversity & Inclusion, "untying the mooring ropes" of socio-cultural problems is hard. Hearing from women, especially those working in a multi-cultural organization, about their challenges and adopting their suggestions can be vital to design programs and resolve the under-representation issue. In this work we work closely with a large software development organization which invests and believes in diversity and inclusion. We listened to women and the challenges they face in global software development teams of this company and what these women suggest reduce the problems and increase retention. Our research showed that women face work-life balance issues and encounter invisible barriers that prevent them from rising to top positions. They also suffer micro-aggression and sexism, need to show competence constantly, be supervised in essential tasks, and receive less work after becoming mothers. Moreover, women miss having more female colleagues, lack self-confidence and recognition. The women from the company suggested sabbatical policies, the flexibility of location and time, parenthood support, soft skills training for managers, equality of opportunities, role models to support career growth, directives to hire more women, support groups, and more interaction between women, inclusive groups and events, women's empowerment by publishing their success stories in media and recognizing their achievements. Our results had been shared with the company Human Resources department and management and they considered the diagnosis helpful and will work on actions to mitigate the challenges that women still perceive.

References

[1]
2021. Global Gender Gap Report. Technical Report. World Economic Forum. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GGGR_2021.pdf Accessed: 2021-10-18.
[2]
Khaled Albusays, Pernille Bjorn, Laura Dabbish, Denae Ford, Emerson Murphy-Hill, Alexander Serebrenik, and Margaret-Anne Storey. 2021. The diversity crisis in software development. IEEE Software 38, 2 (2021), 19--25.
[3]
Gordon Willard Allport, Kenneth Clark, and Thomas Pettigrew. 1954. The nature of prejudice. (1954).
[4]
A Arlow, Jacob. 1955. Motivation and Personality: By AH Maslow. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1954. 411 pp. Psychoanalytic Quarterly 24 (1955), 447--448.
[5]
Sogol Balali, Igor Steinmacher, Umayal Annamalai, Anita Sarma, and Marco Aurelio Gerosa. 2018. Newcomers' barriers... is that all? an analysis of mentors' and newcomers' barriers in OSS projects. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 27, 3--6 (2018), 679--714.
[6]
Lecia J Barker, Charlie McDowell, and Kimberly Kalahar. 2009. Exploring factors that influence computer science introductory course students to persist in the major. ACM Sigcse Bulletin 41, 1 (2009), 153--157.
[7]
Monica Biernat and Diane Kobrynowicz. 1997. Gender-and race-based standards of competence: lower minimum standards but higher ability standards for devalued groups. Journal of personality and social psychology 72, 3 (1997), 544.
[8]
Pernille Bjørn and Maria Menendez-Blanco. 2019. FemTech: Broadening participation to digital technology development. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Multimedia. 510--511.
[9]
Pernille Bjørn and Daniela K Rosner. 2021. Intertextual design: The hidden stories of Atari women. Human-Computer Interaction (2021), 1--26.
[10]
Maria Brandén. 2014. Gender, gender ideology, and couples' migration decisions. Journal of Family Issues 35, 7 (2014), 950--971.
[11]
Judith Butler. 1999. Gender is burning: Questions of. Feminist film theory: A reader (1999), 336.
[12]
Dafne Calvo. 2021. The (in) visible barriers to free software: Inequalities in online communities in Spain. Studies in Communication Sciences 21, 1 (2021), 163--178.
[13]
Edna Dias Canedo, Rodrigo Bonifácio, Márcio Vinicius Okimoto, Alexander Serebrenik, Gustavo Pinto, and Eduardo Monteiro. 2020. Work Practices and Perceptions from Women Core Developers in OSS Communities. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM). 1--11.
[14]
Edna Dias Canedo, Fabiana Freitas Mendes, Anderson Jefferson Cerqueira, Rodrigo Bonifácio, Márcio Vinicius Okimoto, and Gustavo Pinto. 2021. Breaking one barrier at a time: how women developers cope in a men-dominated industry. In Software Engineering (SBES), 2021 Brazilian Symposium on. IEEE.
[15]
Gemma Catolino, Fabio Palomba, Damian A Tamburri, Alexander Serebrenik, and Filomena Ferrucci. 2019. Gender diversity and women in software teams: How do they affect community smells?. In 2019 IEEE/ACM 41st International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Society (ICSE-SEIS). IEEE, 11--20.
[16]
Pauline Rose Clance and Suzanne Ament Imes. 1978. The imposter phenomenon in high achieving women: Dynamics and therapeutic intervention. Psychotherapy: Theory, research & practice 15, 3 (1978), 241.
[17]
Pauline Rose Clance and Maureen Ann OToole. 1987. The imposter phenomenon: An internal barrier to empowerment and achievement. Women & Therapy 6, 3 (1987), 51--64.
[18]
Oranit B Davidson, Dov Eden, Mina Westman, Yochi Cohen-Charash, Leslie B Hammer, Avraham N Kluger, Moshe Krausz, Christina Maslach, Michael O'Driscoll, Pamela L Perrewé, et al. 2010. Sabbatical leave: who gains and how much? Journal of Applied Psychology 95, 5 (2010), 953.
[19]
Christopher P Earley and Elaine Mosakowski. 2000. Creating hybrid team cultures: An empirical test of transnational team functioning. Academy of Management journal 43, 1 (2000), 26--49.
[20]
Nathan L Ensmenger. 2012. The computer boys take over: Computers, programmers, and the politics of technical expertise. Mit Press.
[21]
Lorelle Espinosa. 2011. Pipelines and pathways: Women of color in undergraduate STEM majors and the college experiences that contribute to persistence. Harvard Educational Review 81, 2 (2011), 209--241.
[22]
Denae Ford, Alisse Harkins, and Chris Parnin. 2017. Someone like me: How does peer parity influence participation of women on stack overflow?. In 2017 IEEE symposium on visual languages and human-centric computing (VL/HCC). IEEE, 239--243.
[23]
Denae Ford, Margaret-Anne Storey, Thomas Zimmermann, Christian Bird, Sonia Jaffe, Chandra Maddila, Jenna L Butler, Brian Houck, and Nachiappan Nagappan. 2020. A tale of two cities: Software developers working from home during the covid-19 pandemic. arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.11147 (2020).
[24]
Katherine Giscombe. 2017. Creating effective formal mentoring programs for women of color. In Mentoring Diverse Leaders. Routledge, 145--158.
[25]
Yehonatan Givati and Ugo Troiano. 2012. Law, economics, and culture: Theory of mandated benefits and evidence from maternity leave policies. The Journal of Law and Economics 55, 2 (2012), 339--364.
[26]
Christy Glass and Alison Cook. 2016. Leading at the top: Understanding women's challenges above the glass ceiling. The Leadership Quarterly 27, 1 (2016), 51--63.
[27]
Peter Glick and Susan T Fiske. 1996. The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of personality and social psychology 70, 3 (1996), 491.
[28]
David E Guest. 2002. Perspectives on the study of work-life balance. Social Science Information 41, 2 (2002), 255--279.
[29]
David R Hannah and Brenda A Lautsch. 2011. Counting in qualitative research: Why to conduct it, when to avoid it, and when to closet it. Journal of Management Inquiry 20, 1 (2011), 14--22.
[30]
Rana Haq. 2013. Intersectionality of gender and other forms of identity: Dilemmas and challenges facing women in India. Gender in Management: An International Journal (2013).
[31]
Michael Harvey. 1998. Dual-career couples during international relocation: The trailing spouse. International Journal of Human Resource Management 9, 2 (1998), 309--331.
[32]
Madeline E Heilman. 2001. Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women's ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of social issues 57, 4 (2001), 657--674.
[33]
Madeline E Heilman. 2012. Gender stereotypes and workplace bias. Research in organizational Behavior 32 (2012), 113--135.
[34]
Mar Hicks. 2017. Programmed inequality: How Britain discarded women technologists and lost its edge in computing. MIT Press.
[35]
Sonja M Hyrynsalmi. 2019. The underrepresentation of women in the software industry: thoughts from career-changing women. In 2019 IEEE/ACM 2nd International Workshop on Gender Equality in Software Engineering (GE). IEEE, 1--4.
[36]
Nasif Imtiaz, Justin Middleton, Joymallya Chakraborty, Neill Robson, Gina Bai, and Emerson Murphy-Hill. 2019. Investigating the Effects of Gender Bias on GitHub. In 2019 IEEE/ACM 41st International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE). IEEE, 700--711.
[37]
Janet Cooper Jackson. 2001. Women middle managers' perception of the glass ceiling. Women in management review (2001).
[38]
Omofolasade Kosoko-Lasaki, Roberta E Sonnino, and Mary Lou Voytko. 2006. Mentoring for women and underrepresented minority faculty and students: experience at two institutions of higher education. Journal of the national medical association 98, 9 (2006), 1449.
[39]
Jana Krause, Werner Krause, and Piia Bränfors. 2018. Women's participation in peace negotiations and the durability of peace. International Interactions 44, 6 (2018), 985--1016.
[40]
Victor Kuechler, Claire Gilbertson, and Carlos Jensen. 2012. Gender differences in early free and open source software joining process. In IFIP International Conference on Open Source Systems. Springer, 78--93.
[41]
William Lawrence Neuman. 2014. Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches.
[42]
Amanda Lee and Jeffrey Carver. 2019. FLOSS Participants' Perceptions about Gender and Inclusiveness: A Survey. In 41st International Conference on Software Engineering.
[43]
Leticia S Machado, Clara Caldeira, Marcelo Gattermann Perin, and Cleidson RB de Souza. 2020. Gendered experiences of software engineers during the COVID-19 crisis. Ieee Software 38, 2 (2020), 38--44.
[44]
Sujata Manohar. 2001. Human rights for women's empowerment. Empowering the Indian Women, Publications Division, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Government of India, New Delhi (2001).
[45]
Jane Margolis, Rachel Estrella, Joanna Goode, Jennifer Jellison Holme, and Kim Nao. 2017. Stuck in the shallow end: Education, race, and computing.
[46]
Jane Margolis and Allan Fisher. 2002. Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in computing. MIT press.
[47]
Álvaro Menezes and Rafael Prikladnicki. 2018. Diversity in software engineering. In Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering. 45--48.
[48]
Sharan B Merriam and Elizabeth J Tisdell. 2015. Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
[49]
Matthew B Miles and A Michael Huberman. 1994. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. sage.
[50]
Michael T Miller and Bai Kang. 1998. A Case Study of Post-Sabbatical Assessment Measures. Journal of Staff Program & Organization Development 15, 1 (1998), 11--16.
[51]
Michael J Muller and Sarah Kuhn. 1993. Participatory design. Commun. ACM 36, 6 (1993), 24--28.
[52]
Samuel Musungwini, Tinashe Gwendoline Zhou, and Linnet Musungwini. 2020. Challenges facing women in ICT from a women perspective: A case study of the Zimbabwean Banking Sector and Telecommunications Industry. Journal of Systems Integration 11, 1 (2020), 21--33.
[53]
Dawn Nafus. 2012. 'Patches don't have gender': What is not open in open source software. New Media & Society 14, 4 (2012), 669--683.
[54]
Barbara Orser, Allan Riding, and Joanne Stanley. 2012. Perceived career challenges and response strategies of women in the advanced technology sector. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 24, 1--2 (2012), 73--93.
[55]
Rajshakhar Paul, Amiangshu Bosu, and Kazi Zakia Sultana. 2019. Expressions of sentiments during code reviews: Male vs. female. In 2019 IEEE 26th International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER). IEEE, 26--37.
[56]
Whitney E Powell, D Scott Hunsinger, and B Dawn Medlin. 2010. Gender differences within the open source community: An exploratory study. Journal of Information Technology 21, 4 (2010), 29--37.
[57]
Teade Punter, Marcus Ciolkowski, Bernd Freimut, and Isabel John. 2003. Conducting on-line surveys in software engineering. In 2003 Intel Symp on Emp Softw Eng. 80--88.
[58]
Huilian Sophie Qiu, Yucen Lily Li, Susmita Padala, Anita Sarma, and Bogdan Vasilescu. 2019. The signals that potential contributors look for when choosing open-source projects. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (2019), 1--29.
[59]
Parvati Raghuram, Clem Herman, Esther Ruiz-Ben, and Gunjan Sondhi. 2017. Women and IT scorecard-India.
[60]
Paul Ralph, Sebastian Baltes, Gianisa Adisaputri, Richard Torkar, Vladimir Kovalenko, Marcos Kalinowski, Nicole Novielli, Shin Yoo, Xavier Devroey, Xin Tan, et al. 2020. Pandemic programming. Empirical Software Engineering 25, 6 (2020), 4927--4961.
[61]
Aditi Ramakrishnan, Dana Sambuco, and Reshma Jagsi. 2014. Women's participation in the medical profession: insights from experiences in Japan, Scandinavia, Russia, and Eastern Europe. Journal of Women's Health 23, 11 (2014), 927--934.
[62]
P Runeson, M Höst, A Rainer, and B Regnell. 2012. Case study research in software engineering-guidelines and examples Wiley.
[63]
Linda J Sax, Jennifer M Blaney, Kathleen J Lehman, Sarah L Rodriguez, Kari L George, and Christina Zavala. 2018. Sense of belonging in computing: The role of introductory courses for women and underrepresented minority students. Social Sciences 7, 8 (2018), 122.
[64]
Sakshi Sharma and Parul Sehrawat. 2014. Glass ceiling for women: Does it exist in the modern India. Journal of Organization & Human Behaviour 3, 2--3 (2014), 9--15.
[65]
Lucy Sharp. 2016. UNESCO's Priority Gender Equality Action Plan 2014--2021. Impact 2016, 1 (2016), 37--38.
[66]
Karina Kohl Silveira and Rafael Prikladnicki. 2019. A systematic mapping study of diversity in software engineering: a perspective from the agile methodologies. In 2019 IEEE/ACM 12th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering (CHASE). IEEE, 7--10.
[67]
Vandana Singh. 2019. Women participation in open source software communities. In Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Software Architecture-Volume 2. 94--99.
[68]
Donna Spencer. 2009. Card sorting: Designing usable categories. Rosenfeld Media.
[69]
Terrell L Strayhorn. 2012. Exploring the impact of Facebook and Myspace use on first-year students' sense of belonging and persistence decisions. Journal of College Student Development 53, 6 (2012), 783--796.
[70]
Jane Sturges and David Guest. 2004. Working to live or living to work? Work/life balance early in the career. Human Resource Management Journal 14, 4 (2004), 5--20.
[71]
Josh Terrell, Andrew Kofink, Justin Middleton, Clarissa Rainear, Emerson Murphy-Hill, Chris Parnin, and Jon Stallings. 2017. Gender differences and bias in open source: Pull request acceptance of women versus men. PeerJ Computer Science 3 (2017), e111.
[72]
Bogdan Vasilescu, Vladimir Filkov, and Alexander Serebrenik. 2015. Perceptions of diversity on git hub: A user survey. In 2015 IEEE/ACM 8th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering. IEEE, 50--56.
[73]
Bogdan Vasilescu, Daryl Posnett, Baishakhi Ray, Mark GJ van den Brand, Alexander Serebrenik, Premkumar Devanbu, and Vladimir Filkov. 2015. Gender and tenure diversity in GitHub teams. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems. 3789--3798.
[74]
Balazs Vedres and Orsolya Vasarhelyi. 2019. Gendered behavior as a disadvantage in open source software development. EPJ Data Science 8, 1 (2019), 25.
[75]
Joan C Williams and Stephanie Bornstein. 2007. Evolution of fred: Family responsibilities discrimination and developments in the law of stereotyping and implicit bias. HastINgs IJ 59 (2007), 1311.
[76]
Katherine Y Williams and AO Charles. 1998. 'Reilly. 1998. Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Research in organizational behavior 20, 20 (1998), 77--140.
[77]
Claes Wohlin and Aybüke Aurum. 2015. Towards a decision-making structure for selecting a research design in empirical software engineering. Empirical Software Engineering 20, 6 (2015), 1427--1455.
[78]
Annika Wolff, Antti Knutas, and Paula Savolainen. 2020. What prevents Finnish women from applying to software engineering roles? A preliminary analysis of survey data. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering Education and Training. 93--102.
[79]
Joyce Yen, Kate Quinn, Sheila Edwards Lange, Eve Riskin, and Denice Denton. 2005. ADVANCE mentoring programs for women faculty in SEM at the University of Washington. In 2005 Annual Conference. 10--134.
[80]
Robert K Yin. 2009. Case study research: Design and methods. Vol. 5. sage.
[81]
Stefano Zacchiroli. 2020. Gender Differences in Public Code Contributions: a 50-year Perspective. IEEE Software (2020).

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
ICSE-SEIS '22: Proceedings of the 2022 ACM/IEEE 44th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Society
May 2022
195 pages
ISBN:9781450392273
DOI:10.1145/3510458
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

In-Cooperation

  • IEEE CS

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 17 October 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. diversity
  2. gender
  3. inclusion
  4. software engineering
  5. women

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

ICSE '22
Sponsor:

Upcoming Conference

ICSE 2025

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)228
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)19
Reflects downloads up to 13 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media