skip to main content
10.1145/3472301.3484363acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesihcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Perspectives on interaction with dead users' profiles on Facebook

Published: 18 October 2021 Publication History

Abstract

With the Covid-19 pandemic, death has become an increasingly present and visible phenomenon on social networks. On Facebook, there is not a homogeneous treatment of death among deceased users' profiles: some remain active, whereas others are turned into memorials, but the criteria for this transformation are not clear. In both cases, privacy settings limit the interaction. These different possibilities give rise to different interactions and reactions among users. This paper addresses how dead users' profiles, multiplied due to the current pandemic, have been treated by Facebook's social-technical system, in comparison to possible posthumous interactions in the physical world. Our main objective is to understand to what extent Facebook's technical system supports or restricts social interactions concerning users' deaths. We carried out a qualitative exploratory analysis of data from 54 Facebook profiles belonging to people who passed away between June 2020 and March 2021. Among other results, we noticed: that Facebook fails to publicize the criteria for transforming active profiles into memorials and who are their heir contacts; that there is a difference in the amount and frequency of interactions between profiles transformed into memorials and those that remain active; and that profiles' privacy settings interfere with social interaction. This situation directly influences the ways other users relate or not with such profiles, which is an object of paramount importance in Human-Computer Interaction studies, especially when considering interaction as existence.

References

[1]
Amanda Lagerkvist. 2017. Existential media: Toward a theorization of digital thrownness. New Media & Society, 19(1), 96--110. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816649921
[2]
Angelo Augusto Silva Sampaio and Maria Amalia Pie Abib Andery. 2010. Comportamento social, produção agregada e prática cultural: uma Análise Comportamental de fenômenos sociais. Psic.: Teor. e Pesq., Brasília, v. 26, n. 1, p. 183--192, Mar. 2010.
[3]
Aron Daniel Lopes, Cristiano Maciel and Vinicius Carvalho Pereira. 2014. Homenagem Virtual aos Mortos: Uma Análise de Memoriais Digitais na Web Social. In: MEISELWITZ, G. (ed.). Computação Social e Mídia Social. Suíça: Springer, Cham, 2014. v.8531, p. 67--78. (Anotações de aula em Ciência da Computação).
[4]
Brasil. 2018. LEI № 13.709, DE 14 DE AGOSTO DE 2018. Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais (LGPD). Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2018/lei/L13709.htm.
[5]
Bruno José Barcellos Fontanella, Bruna Moretti Luchesi, Maria Giovana Borges Saidel, Janete Ricas, Egberto Ribeiro Turato and Débora Gusmão Melo. 2011. Amostragem em pesquisas qualitativas: proposta de procedimentos para constatar saturação teórica." Cadernos de Saúde Pública 27 (2011): 388-394. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2011000200020
[6]
Carl J. Öhman and David Watson. 2019. "Are the dead taking over Facebook? A Big Data approach to the future of death online." Big Data & Society 6.1 (2019): 2053951719842540.
[7]
Carl Öhman and Luciano Floridi. 2017. "The political economy of death in the age of information: a critical approach to the digital afterlife industry." Minds and Machines 27.4 (2017): 639--662.
[8]
Carla Faria Leitão, Cristiano Maciel and Vinicius Carvalho Pereira. 2017. Exploring the Communication of Cultural Perspectives in Death-Related Interactive Systems. In: XVI Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2017, New York. NY, USA:ACM, 2017. n.26, p.10.
[9]
Colin Murray Parkes. 1998. Luto estudos sobre a perda na vida adulta. Vol. 56. Summus editorial, 1998.
[10]
Cristiano Maciel and Vinicius C. Pereira. 2012. The internet generation and its representation of death: considerations for posthumous interaction projects. In: Proceedings of the 11th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems (IHC '12). 2012, Porto Alegre-RS, Brasil:Brazilian Computer Society, 2012. p. 85--94.
[11]
Cristiano Maciel and Vinicius Carvalho Pereira (org.). 2013. Digital Legacy and Interaction: Post-Mortem Issues. 1.ed. Switzerland: Springer, 2013. v. HCI. 144p.
[12]
Cristiano Maciel, Aron Lopes, Vinicius Carvalho Pereira, Carla Leitão and Clodis Boscarioli. 2019. Recommendations for the Design of Digital Memorials in Social Web. In: HCI in Games. HCII 2019. Switzerland:Springer, Cham, v. 11595, p. 64--79, 2019. (Lecture Notes in Computer Science).
[13]
Cristiano Maciel, Vinicius Carvalho Pereira and Monica Sztern. 2015. Internet Users: Legal and Technical Perspectives on Digital Legacy Management for Postmortem Interaction. In: SAKAE, Yamamoto (ed.). Human Interface and the Management of Information. Information and Knowledge Design. Switzerland: Springer, Cham, HIMI 2015. v. 9172, p. 627--639. (Lecture Notes in Computer Science).
[14]
Cristiano Maciel. 2011. Questões do projeto de interação na Web social diante do legado digital da vida após a morte. In: 10° Simpósio Brasileiro de Fatores Humanos em Sistemas de Computação e 5° Congresso Latino-Americano de Interação Humano-Computador (IHC + CLIHC '11), 2011, Porto Alegre-RS.
[15]
Daniele Trevisan and Cristiano Maciel. 2020. Morte, Educação e Tecnologias Digitais: Reflexões em tempos de Pandemia. SBC Horizontes, jul. 2020. ISSN 2175-9235. Disponível em: http://horizontes.sbc.org.br/index.php/2020/07/02/morte-educacao-e-tecnologias-digitais/.
[16]
Diego Cesar do Nascimento, Gabriel Meirelles Nasser, Coves Antonio de Amissis Amorim and Tatiany Honório Porto. 2015. Luto: uma perspectiva da terapia analítico comportamental. Psicologia Argumento. v. 23, n. 83, p. 446--458, out./dez. 2015.
[17]
Digital Legacy Association. What is a digital legacy? Disponível em: https://digitallegacyassociation.org/about/what-is-a-digital-legacy/
[18]
Eduardo Yamauchi, Cristiano Maciel, Fabiana Mendes, Gustavo Ueda and Vinicius Carvalho Pereira. 2021. Digital Legacy Management Systems: Theoretical, Systemic and User's Perspective. In: 23rd International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, 2021, Online Streaming.
[19]
Facebook. Help Facebook: Como faço para informar ao Facebook sobre o falecimento de uma pessoa ou sobre uma conta que precisa ser transformada em memorial? Disponível em: https://www.facebook.com/help/requestmemorialization
[20]
Facebook. Help Facebook: Solicitação de transformação em memorial. https://www.facebook.com/help/contact/234739086860192?helpref=faq_content
[21]
Facebook. Help Facebook. Disponível em: https://www.facebook.com/help/103897939701143?helpref=faq_content
[22]
Facebook. Help Facebook: O que é um contato herdeiro e o que ele pode fazer com minha conta do Facebook?. Disponível em: https://www.facebook.com/help/1568013990080948?helpref=faq_content
[23]
Facebook. Help Facebook: O que são informações públicas no Facebook?. Disponível em: https://www.facebook.com/help/203805466323736
[24]
Flávia Beppu and Cristiano Maciel. 2020. Perspectivas Normativas para o Legado Digital Pós-Morte Face à Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais. In Anais do I Workshop sobre as Implicações da Computação na Sociedade, junho 30, 2020, Cuiabá, Brasil. SBC, Porto Alegre, Brasil, 73--84.
[25]
Gustavo S. Ueda, Aline Verhalen and Cristiano Maciel. 2019. Um Negócio de Dois Mundos: Aspectos da Morte no Mundo Físico Transpostos para Memoriais Digitais. In: X Workshop sobre Aspectos da Interação Humano-Computador para a Web Social, 2019, Vitória. https://doi.org/10.5753/waihcws.2019.7675
[26]
Hornbæk, K. and Oulasvirta, A. (2017, May). What is interaction?. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 5040--5052).
[27]
Jack Holt, James Nicholson and Jan David Smeddinck. 2021. From Personal Data to Digital Legacy: Exploring Conflicts in the Sharing, Security and Privacy of Post-mortem Data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.07807 (2021).
[28]
Jaime de Oliveira, Luís Amaral, Luís Paulo Reis and Brígida Mónica Faria. 2016. " A study on the need of digital heritage management plataforms." Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), 2016 11th Iberian Conference on. IEEE, 2016.
[29]
Juliana Cabral, Cristiano Maciel, Vanice Cunha, Jivago Ribeiro and Daniele Trevisan. 2021. Digital Generation and Posthumous Interaction: A Descriptive Analysis in Social Networks. In: 23rd International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, 2021.
[30]
Katie Z. Gach and Jed R. Brubaker. 2020. Experiences of Trust in Postmortem Profile Management. ACM Trans. Soc. Comput. 3, 1, Article 2 (February 2020), 26 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3365525
[31]
Katie Z. Gach and Jed R. Brubaker. 2021. Getting Your Facebook Affairs in Order: User Expectations in Postmortem Profile Management. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 5, CSCW, Article 174 (April 2021), 29 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3449248
[32]
Katie Z. Gach. 2019. A case for reimagining the UX of post-mortem account deletion on social media. In: Proceedings of the CSCW. 2019.
[33]
Ketelen Lemos de Campos, Thais Justi, Cristiano Maciel and Vinicius Carvalho Pereira. 2017. Digital Memorials: A proposal for data management beyond life. In: XVI Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2017, New York. NY, USA:ACM, 2017. n.23, p.10.
[34]
Maria Lucia B. Villela, Simone IR Xavier, Raquel Oliveira Prates, Marcos O. Prates, Antonio Ap Prates and Alexandre A. Cardoso. 2015. An Exploratory Qualitative Study on People's Attitudes towards Offline and Online Social Networks: A Case Study at a Brazilian University. SBC Journal on Interactive Systems 6.1 (2015): 4--17.
[35]
Mayra Delalibera, Talia Armani Delalibera, Maria Helena Pereira Franco, António Barbosa and Isabel Leal. 2017. Adaptação e validação brasileira do instrumento de avaliação do luto prolongado: PG-13. Psicol. teor. prat., São Paulo, v. 19, n. 1, p. 94--106, abr. 2017.
[36]
Patrícia Peres de Oliveira, Juliana Gimenez Amaral, Selma Maria da Fonseca Veigas and Andrea Bezerra Rodrigues. 2013. Percepção dos profissionais que atuam numa instituição de longa permanência para idosos sobre a morte e o morrer. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva 18 (2013): 2635--2644. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232013000900018
[37]
Raquel Oliveira Prates, Mary Beth Rosson and Clarisse S. de Souza. 2016. Analysis of configuration decision space over time: The google inactive manager account case. In Proceedings of the 15th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems, IHC '15, São Paulo, Brazil.
[38]
Renata Rezende Ribeiro. 2015. A morte midiatizada: como as redes sociais atualizam a experiência do fim da vida. Rio de Janeiro: Eduff, 2015.
[39]
Roberto Pereira, M. Cecília Calani Baranauskas and Sergio Roberto Pereira da Silva. 2010. A discussion on social software: concept, building blocks and challenges. International Journal for Infonomics, v. 3, n. 4, p. 533--542, 2010.
[40]
Thais Justi Toledo, Cristiano Maciel, Luã Marcelo Muriana, Patricia Cristiane de Souza and Vinicius Carvalho Pereira. 2019. Identity and volition in Facebook digital memorials and the challenges of anticipating interaction. In: 18th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems - IHC '19, 2019, Vitória. New York: ACM Press, 2019. n.31.
[41]
Vani Moreira Kenski. 2018. Cultura digital. In: MILL, Daniel. Dicionário crítico de Educação e tecnologias e de educação a distância. Campinas, SP: Papirus (2018): 139--144.
[42]
Victor Kaptelinin. 2016. Making the case for an existential perspective in HCI research on mortality and death. In: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts (CHI EA'16), 352--364.
[43]
Victor Kaptelinin. 2018. Technology and the Givens of Existence: Toward an Existential Inquiry Framework in HCI Research. Em Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, Nova York, NY, EUA, Artigo 270, 1--14. //doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173844
[44]
Cristiano Maciel. Sistemas Gerenciadores de Legado Digital: implicações tecnológicas e legais em redes sociais. In: BRAZILIAN WORKSHOP ON SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS AND MINING (BRASNAM), 10., 2021, Evento Online. Anais [...]. Porto Alegre: Sociedade Brasileira de Computação, 2021. p. 275--286. ISSN 2595-6094.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Perspectives on interaction with dead users' profiles on Facebook

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    IHC '21: Proceedings of the XX Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    October 2021
    523 pages
    ISBN:9781450386173
    DOI:10.1145/3472301
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    In-Cooperation

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 18 October 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. COVID-19
    2. Digital Legacy Management Sytems
    3. Facebook
    4. Social interaction
    5. death
    6. digital memorial
    7. existence
    8. pandemia

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    IHC '21

    Acceptance Rates

    IHC '21 Paper Acceptance Rate 29 of 77 submissions, 38%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 331 of 973 submissions, 34%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)14
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 28 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media