skip to main content
10.1145/3469410.3469422acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmabConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Ubiquitous Memory: A field study on ubiquitous technology systems and interaction design for the symbolic appropriation of spaces through collective memory

Published: 22 October 2021 Publication History

Abstract

This paper presents the results of a case study on how ubiquitous technology can trigger symbolic appropriation dynamics, or placemaking from a community, in the context of building abandonment in the historic downtown. We focus our approach on the creation of an interdisciplinary methodology between communication strategies, information design and interaction systems which converged in the generation of a public interactive display which can mediate sensorial and symbolically appreciations for different audiences through play and interaction. We focus our approach on the creation of an interdisciplinary methodology including communication strategies, information design and interaction systems which converged in the generation of a public interactive display which can mediate sensorial and symbolical appreciations for different audiences through the use of play and interaction.

References

[1]
Moritz Behrens, Ava Fatah Gen. Schieck, Efsathia Kostopoulou, Steve North, Wallis Motta, Lei Ye, and Holger Schnadelbach. 2013. Exploring the effect of spatial layout on mediated urban interactions. PerDis 2013 - Proceedings: 2nd ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays 2013: 79–84. https://doi.org/10.1145/2491568.2491586
[2]
Susanne Bødker. 2006. When second wave HCI meets third wave challenges. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series 189, October: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/1182475.1182476
[3]
Harry Brignull and Yvonne Rogers. 2003. Enticing People to Interact with Large Public Displays in Public Spaces. Human-Computer Interaction–INTERACT’03 53, 9: 17–24.
[4]
Martin Brynskov, Peter Dalsgaard, and Kim Halskov. 2013. Understanding Media Architecture ( Better ): One Space, Three Cases. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: 1–4.
[5]
Glenda Amayo Caldwell, Mirko Guaralda, Jared Donovan, and Markus Rittenbruch. 2016. The InstaBooth. In Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Media Architecture Biennale, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/2946803.2946806
[6]
Stavros Didakis. 2018. Computationally - Enhanced Ecologies, Organisms, and Parasites. Speculative Explorations of Symbiotic Oscillations. In Proceedings of the 4th Media Architecture Biennale Conference, 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1145/3284389.3284496
[7]
Z. Ekim, E. E. Güney, and M. Vatan. 2017. DOCUMENTING THE INTANGIBLE AND THE USE OF “COLLECTIVE MEMORY” AS A TOOL FOR RISK MITIGATION. ISPRS - International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences XLII-2/W5, 2W5: 201–207. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W5-201-2017
[8]
Efraín Foglia Romero. 2013. Arte en la MediaCity. TDX (Tesis Doctorals en Xarxa). Retrieved from http://tdx.cat/handle/10803/132318
[9]
Marcus Foth. 2008. Handbook of research on urban informatics: The practice and promise of the real-time city. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-152-0
[10]
Marcus Foth, Martin Brynskov, and Timo Ojala. 2015. Citizen's Right to the Digital City. Springer Singapore, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-919-6
[11]
Marcus Foth, Martin Tomitsch, Laura Forlano, M. Hank Haeusler, and Christine Satchell. 2016. Citizens breaking out of filter bubbles. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays, 140–147. https://doi.org/10.1145/2914920.2915010
[12]
Joel Fredericks, Martin Tomitsch, Luke Hespanhol, and Ian McArthur. 2015. Digital pop-up: Investigating bespoke community engagement in public spaces. OzCHI 2015: Being Human - Conference Proceedings: 634–642. https://doi.org/10.1145/2838739.2838759
[13]
Adam Frelin and Barbara Nelson, Breathing lights, Retrieved March 26, 2021 from https://breathinglights.com/
[14]
Anne Galloway. 2008. A Brief History of the Future of Urban Computing and Locative Media. Retrieved from http://books.google.com/books?id=py5gPwAACAAJ&pgis=1%5Cnhttp://www.purselipsquarejaw.org/dissertation/galloway_phd_full.pdf%5Cnhttp://www.mendeley.com/research/brief-history-future-urban-computing-locative-media/
[15]
Vito Gentile, Mohamed Khamis, Salvatore Sorce, and Florian Alt. 2017. They are looking at me! Understanding how audience presence impacts on public display users. PerDis 2017 - Proceedings: 6th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays, Diid. https://doi.org/10.1145/3078810.3078822
[16]
Selwyn Goldsmith. 2007. Universal design. Routledge.
[17]
Maurice Halbawachs. 1992. On Collective memory. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
[18]
Luke Hespanhol, Martin Tomitsch, Ian McArthur, Joel Fredericks, Ronald Schroeter, and Marcus Foth. 2015. Vote as you go. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Communities and Technologies, 29–37. https://doi.org/10.1145/2768545.2768553
[19]
Marius Hoggenmueller, Alexander Wiethoff, Andrew vande Moere, and Martin Tomitsch. 2018. A Media Architecture Approach to Designing Shared Displays for Residential Internet-of-Things Devices. In Proceedings of the 4th Media Architecture Biennale Conference, 106–117. https://doi.org/10.1145/3284389.3284391
[20]
Elaine M Huang, Anna Koster, and Jan Borchers. Overcoming Assumptions and Uncovering Practices: When Does the Public Really Look at Public Displays? 228–243.
[21]
Troy Innocent. 2018. Play about Place. In Proceedings of the 4th Media Architecture Biennale Conference, 137–143. https://doi.org/10.1145/3284389.3284493
[22]
Hiroshi Ishii and Brygg Ullmer. 1997. Tangible bits: Towards Seamless Interfaces between People, Bits and Atoms. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in computing systems, 234–241. https://doi.org/10.1145/258549.258715
[23]
Marko Jurmu, Leena Ventä-Olkkonen, Arto Lanamäki, Hannu Kukka, Netta Iivari, and Kari Kuutti. 2016. Emergent practice as a methodological lens for public displays in-the-wild. PerDis 2016 - Proceedings of the 5th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays: 124–131. https://doi.org/10.1145/2914920.2915007
[24]
Efstathia Kostopoulou, Ana Javornik, Petros Koutsolampros, Simon Julier, and Ava Fatah gen. Schieck. 2018. Mediated Spatial Narratives. 118–127. https://doi.org/10.1145/3284389.3284395
[25]
John Krumm. 2010. Ubiquitous Computing Fundamentals. Taylor and Francis Group, Florida.
[26]
Gunnar Liestøl, Anne Doksrød, Šarūnas Ledas, and Terje Rasmussen. 2012. Sensory Media: Multidisciplinary Approaches in Designing a Situated & Mobile Learning Environment for Past Topics. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM) 6, 3: 18–24. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v6i3.2097
[27]
Bertha Alicia López Reveles. 2016. Re-significación del espacio público mediante acciones participativas y de pedagogía urbana como estrategia para la construcción social de sustentabilidad: caso barrio de Analco. 
[28]
Marti Louw. 2003. Diseñando para el deleite. Ars Optika, Mexico.
[29]
Kevin Lynch. 1962. The Image of the City. The M.I.T Press, Massachusetts.
[30]
David R. Millen. 2000. Rapid ethnography: Time deepening strategies for HCI field research. Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques, DIS: 280–286.
[31]
Wiilliam J. Mitchell. 1996. City of Bits: Space, Place, and the Infobahn. The M.I.T Press, Massachusetts.
[32]
Dietmar P.F. Möller. 2016. Guide to Computing Fundamentals in Cyber-Physical Systems. Springer International Publishing, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25178-3
[33]
Jörg Müller, Robert Walter, Gilles Bailly, Michael Nischt, and Florian Alt. 2012. Looking glass: A field study on noticing interactivity of a shop window. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings: 297–306. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2207718
[34]
Jörg Müller, Dennis Wilmsmann, Juliane Exeler, Markus Buzeck, Albrecht Schmidt, Tim Jay, and Antonio Krüger. 2009. Display blindness: The effect of expectations on attention towards digital signage. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) 5538 LNCS: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01516-8_1
[35]
Dan O'Sullivan and Tom Igoe. 2004. Physical Computing: Sensing and Controlling the Physical World with Computers. Course Technology Press, Boston.
[36]
Karen Marcelo Parc and Mark Newman. 2004. Designing for Serendipity: 1–10.
[37]
Fabio Pittarello and Lorenzo Brutti. 2019. A public tangible interface for engaging and informing young citizens about climate change. Proceedings - Pervasive Displays 2019 - 8th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays, PerDis 2019. https://doi.org/10.1145/3321335.3324938
[38]
Sheila Pontis. 2019. Making Sense of Field Research: A Practical Guide for Information Designers. Routledge, New York, NY, USA.
[39]
Aaron Quigley. 2010. From GUI to UUI: Interfaces for Ubiquitous Computing. In Ubiquitous Computing Fundamentals. 237–284.
[40]
Elizabeth Sanders and Pieter Jan Stappers. 2012. Convivial Toolbox How to bring people we serve directly into the design process. BIS Publishers, Amsterdam.
[41]
Gianluca Schiavo, Marco Milano, Jorge Saldivar, Tooba Nasir, Massimo Zancanaro, and Gregorio Convertino. 2013. Agora2.0. 46–54. https://doi.org/10.1145/2482991.2483005
[42]
Staat. 2012. The Windows Are Watching You by …,staat. Retrieved February 21, 2021 from https://www.staat.com/projects/nike-selfridges/
[43]
Nina Simon. 2010. The Participatory Museum. United States: Museum 2.0. 
[44]
Uta Staiger. 2009. Cities, citizenship, contested cultures: Berlin's Palace of the Republic and the politics of the public sphere. cultural geographies 16, 3: 309–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474009105050
[45]
Fabius Steinberger, Marcus Foth, and Florian Alt. 2014. Vote With Your Feet. In Proceedings of The International Symposium on Pervasive Displays, 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1145/2611009.2611015
[46]
Nick Taylor. 2014. Supporting community participation in interactive exhibits. PerDis 2014 - Proceedings: 3rd ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays 2014: 74–79. https://doi.org/10.1145/2611009.2611031
[47]
Nick Taylor, Justin Marshall, Alicia Blum-Ross, John Mills, Jon Rogers, Paul Egglestone, David M. Frohlich, Peter Wright, and Patrick Olivier. 2012. Viewpoint: Empowering communities with situated voting devices. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings: 1361–1370. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208594
[48]
Gabriel Urzaiz, Sergio F Ochoa, Costa Rica, and David Hutchison. 2013. LNCS 8276 - Ubiquitous Computing and Ambient Intelligence. 
[49]
Sergi Valera. 1996. Análisis de los aspectos simbólicos del espacio urbano. Perspectivas desde la Psicología Ambiental. Revista de Psicología Universitas Tarraconensis 18: 63–84. Retrieved from https://www.mendeley.com/viewer/?fileId=14883e4f-857b-1f71-58cd-51ee9a48b29b&documentId=0aaf2c0e-0397-3d95-85ce-038d2be486f9
[50]
Athanasios Vasilakos and Witold Pedrycz. 2006. Ambient Intelligence, Wireless Networking, and Ubiquitous Computing. ARTECH HOUSE, INC, Massachusetts.
[51]
WECOMEINPEACE. BRICK — Interactive store window. Retrieved February 21, 2021 from http://www.wecip.com/portfolio/brick–interactive-store-window/

Index Terms

  1. Ubiquitous Memory: A field study on ubiquitous technology systems and interaction design for the symbolic appropriation of spaces through collective memory
    Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    MAB '20: Proceedings of the 5th Media Architecture Biennale Conference
    June 2021
    226 pages
    ISBN:9781450390484
    DOI:10.1145/3469410
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 22 October 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    MAB20
    MAB20: Media Architecture Biennale 20
    June 28 - July 2, 2021
    Amsterdam and Utrecht, Netherlands

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 27 of 68 submissions, 40%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 89
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)27
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 08 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media