research-article

Plan Early, Revise More: Effects of Goal Setting and Perceived Role of the Feedback Provider on Feedback Seeking Behavior

Authors:

Sneha R. Krishna Kumaran,

Brian P. BaileyAuthors Info & Claims

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Volume 5, Issue CSCW1

Article No.: 24, Pages 1 - 22

https://doi.org/10.1145/3449098

Published: 22 April 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Receiving feedback on preliminary work allows content creators to gain insight and improve outcomes. However, a lack of commitment for gathering feedback and experiencing evaluation apprehension can delay feedback seeking. In this paper, we operationalize goal setting theory for planning feedback goals and test the effects on feedback seeking and revision. In an online experiment, participants (N=245) wrote an initial story after planning feedback goals (or not), submitted the story for feedback at a time of their choice, and revised the story based on feedback received. Participants anticipated feedback from a supervisor or peer to induce different levels of evaluation apprehension. We found that participants who planned proximal feedback goals sought feedback when their stories were less developed and revised the stories more after receiving feedback compared to when participants planned distant goals. Additionally, participants who anticipated feedback from a supervisor, regardless of goal planning, improved the quality of their stories the most. We did not find that goal setting or the provider's role affected evaluation apprehension. Our findings indicate that content creators should be guided to plan proximal feedback goals to encourage sharing of early drafts of creative work and receive feedback from someone in a position of higher perceived power to foster the most revision and improvement on those drafts.

References

[1]

Louise Arnold, Carolyn K. Shue, Barbara Kritt, Shiphra Ginsburg, and David T. Stern. 2005. Medical students' views on peer assessment of professionalism. Journal of General Internal Medicine, Vol. 20, 9 (sep 2005), 819--824. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525--1497.2005.0162.x

[2]

S Ashford. 2003. Reflections on the Looking Glass: A Review of Research on Feedback-Seeking Behavior in Organizations. Journal of Management, Vol. 29, 6 (dec 2003), 773--799. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(03)00079-5

[3]

Susan J Ashford and L.L. Cummings. 1983. Feedback as an individual resource: Personal strategies of creating information. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, Vol. 32, 3 (dec 1983), 370--398. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(83)90156-3

[4]

SUSAN J. ASHFORD and L. L. CUMMINGS. 1985. Proactive feedback seeking: The instrumental use of the information environment. Journal of Occupational Psychology, Vol. 58, 1 (mar 1985), 67--79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1985.tb00181.x

[5]

Albert Bandura and Daniel Cervone. 1983. Self-evaluative and self-efficacy mechanisms governing the motivational effects of goal systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 45, 5 (1983), 1017--1028. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.5.1017

[6]

Albert Bandura and Dale H Schunk. 1981. Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 41, 3 (1981), 586--598. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022--3514.41.3.586

[7]

Aditya Bharadwaj, Pao Siangliulue, Adam Marcus, and Kurt Luther. 2019. Critter. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '19. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1--12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300769

Digital Library

[8]

Julia Cambre, Scott Klemmer, and Chinmay Kulkarni. 2018. Juxtapeer. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '18. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173868

Digital Library

[9]

Kwangsu Cho and Charles MacArthur. 2010. Student revision with peer and expert reviewing. Learning and Instruction, Vol. 20, 4 (2010), 328--338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.006

[10]

Patrick A. Crain and Brian P. Bailey. 2017. Share Once or Share Often?. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition - C&C '17. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 80--92. https://doi.org/10.1145/3059454.3059476

Digital Library

[11]

D. De Stobbeleir, K. E. M., Ashford, S. J., & Buyens. 2011. Self-regulation of creativity at work: The role of feedback-seeking behavior in creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 54, 4 (2011), 811--831.

[12]

Steven P Dow, Anand Kulkarni, Scott R Klemmer, Bjö rn Hartmann, and Stanford Hci Group. 2012. Shepherding the crowd yields better work. Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work - CSCW '12 (2012), 1013. https://doi.org/10.1145/2145204.2145355

Digital Library

[13]

Donald B. Fedor, Walter D. Davis, John M. Maslyn, and Kieran Mathieson. 2001. Performance improvement efforts in response to negative feedback: the roles of source power and recipient self-esteem. Journal of Management, Vol. 27, 1 (feb 2001), 79--97. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630102700105

[14]

Eureka Foong, Steven P Dow, Brian P Bailey, and Elizabeth M Gerber. 2017. Online Feedback Exchange. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 4454--4467. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025791

Digital Library

[15]

Steve Graham, Karen R Harris, and Charles Macarthur. 2018. Self-regulation and writing. In Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance 2 ed.), Dale H. Schunk and Jeffrey A. Greene (Eds.). Routledge, New York, NY, USA, Chapter 9, 138--152.

[16]

Emily Harburg, Daniel Rees Lewis, Matthew Easterday, and Elizabeth M. Gerber. 2018. CheerOn. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, Vol. 25, 6 (dec 2018), 1--46. https://doi.org/10.1145/3241043

Digital Library

[17]

John Hattie and Helen Timperley. 2007. The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, Vol. 77, 1 (2007), 81--112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487

[18]

Peter A Heslin, Jay B Carson, and Don Vandewalle. 2007. Practical applications of goal setting theory to performance management. February 2016 (2007), 1--15.

[19]

Catherine M Hicks, Vineet Pandey, C Ailie Fraser, and Scott Klemmer. 2016. Framing Feedback. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 458--469. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858195

Digital Library

[20]

Julie Hui, Amos Glenn, Rachel Jue, Elizabeth Gerber, and Steven Dow. 2015. Using Anonymity and Communal Efforts to Improve Quality of Crowdsourced Feedback. The Third AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing (HCOMP-15) (2015), 72--82. https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/HCOMP/HCOMP15/paper/viewFile/11580/11428

[21]

Julie S Hui, Elizabeth M Gerber, and Steven P Dow. 2014. Crowd-based design activities. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems - DIS '14. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 875--884. https://doi.org/10.1145/2598510.2598538

Digital Library

[22]

Christopher Hundhausen, Anukrati Agrawal, Dana Fairbrother, and Michael Trevisan. 2009. Integrating pedagogical code reviews into a CS 1 course. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, Vol. 41, 1 (mar 2009), 291. https://doi.org/10.1145/1539024.1508972

Digital Library

[23]

Avraham N. Kluger and Angelo DeNisi. 1996. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 119, 2 (1996), 254--284. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033--2909.119.2.254

[24]

Avraham N. Kluger and Angelo DeNisi. 2015. Creating creativity: user interfaces for supporting innovation. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '15, Vol. 44, 1 (2015), 487--515. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702525

Digital Library

[25]

Yasmine Kotturi and McKayla Kingston. 2019. Why do Designers in the "Wild" Wait to Seek Feedback until Later in their Design Process?. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Creativity and Cognition. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 541--546. https://doi.org/10.1145/3325480.3326580

Digital Library

[26]

Markus Krause, Tom Garncarz, Jiao Jiao Song, Elizabeth M. Gerber, Brian P. Bailey, and Steven P. Dow. 2017. Critique style guide: Improving crowdsourced design feedback with a natural language model. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, Vol. 2017-May, May 2018 (2017), 4627--4639. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025883

Digital Library

[27]

Sneha R. Krishna Kumaran, Deana C. McDonagh, and Brian P. Bailey. 2017. Increasing Quality and Involvement in Online Peer Feedback Exchange. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 1, CSCW (2017), 1--18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3134698

Digital Library

[28]

Chinmay E. Kulkarni, Michael S. Bernstein, and Scott R. Klemmer. 2015. PeerStudio. In Proceedings of the Second (2015) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale - L@S '15. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 75--84. https://doi.org/10.1145/2724660.2724670

Digital Library

[29]

Edwin A. Locke. 1966. Relationship of Task Success to Satisfaction: Further Replication. Psychological Reports, Vol. 19, 3_suppl (dec 1966), 1132--1132. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1966.19.3f.1132

[30]

Edwin A Locke. 1969. Purpose without Consciousness: A Contradiction. Psychological Reports, Vol. 25, 3 (dec 1969), 991--1009. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1969.25.3.991

[31]

Edwin A Locke and Gary P Latham. 2002. Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, Vol. 57, 9 (2002), 705--717. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705

[32]

Kurt Luther, Jari-lee Tolentino, Wei Wu, Amy Pavel, Brian P Bailey, Maneesh Agrawala, Bjö rn Hartmann, and Steven P Dow. 2015. Structuring, Aggregating, and Evaluating Crowdsourced Design Critique. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing - CSCW '15. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 473--485. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675283

Digital Library

[33]

Mark Matthews, Elizabeth Murnane, and Jaime Snyder. 2017. Quantifying the Changeable Self: The Role of Self-Tracking in Coming to Terms With and Managing Bipolar Disorder. Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 32, 5--6 (2017), 413--446. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2017.1294983

Digital Library

[34]

Mary L. McHugh. 2012. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med (Zagreb), Vol. 22, 3 (2012), 276--282.

[35]

Gary E. McPherson, Peter Miksza, and Paul Evans. 2017. Self-Regulated Learning in Music Practice and Performance. In Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance. Routledge, 181--193. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315697048-12

[36]

Mark Meyers. 2014. March First Page Picture Prompt. https://kathytemean.wordpress.com/2014/03/14/free-fall-friday-editor-announced/

[37]

Hamideh Mozaffari. 2013. An Analytical Rubric for Assessing Creativity in Creative Writing. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, Vol. 3, 12 (2013), 2214--2219. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.12.2214-2219

[38]

Sean Munson and Sunny Consolvo. 2012. Exploring Goal-setting, Rewards, Self-monitoring, and Sharing to Motivate Physical Activity. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare. IEEE, 25--32. https://doi.org/10.4108/icst.pervasivehealth.2012.248691

[39]

Jasper O'Leary, Holger Winnemö ller, Wilmot Li, Mira Dontcheva, and Morgan Dixon. 2018. Charrette. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '18. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1--11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174109

Digital Library

[40]

Tracey Papinczak, Louise Young, and Michele Groves. 2007. Peer Assessment in Problem-Based Learning: A Qualitative Study. Advances in Health Sciences Education, Vol. 12, 2 (feb 2007), 169--186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-005-5046-6

[41]

Wei Peng and Gary Hsieh. 2012. The influence of competition, cooperation, and player relationship in a motor performance centered computer game. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 28, 6 (nov 2012), 2100--2106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.06.014

Digital Library

[42]

Babak Raji, Martin Tenpierik, and Andy van den Dobbelsteen. 2017. Early-Stage Design Considerations for the Energy-Efficiency of High-Rise Office Buildings. Sustainability, Vol. 9, 4 (apr 2017), 623. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9040623

[43]

Shalini T. Reddy, Matthew H. Zegarek, H. Barrett Fromme, Michael S. Ryan, Sarah-Anne Schumann, and Ilene B. Harris. 2015. Barriers and Facilitators to Effective Feedback: A Qualitative Analysis of Data From Multispecialty Resident Focus Groups. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, Vol. 7, 2 (jun 2015), 214--219. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-14-00461.1

[44]

Kelly A Rocca. 2010. Student Participation in the College Classroom: An Extended Multidisciplinary Literature Review. Communication Education, Vol. 59, 2 (apr 2010), 185--213. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520903505936

[45]

D. Royce Sadler. 1989. Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, Vol. 18, 2 (1989), 119--144. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117714

[46]

Jessica Schroeder, Ravi Karkar, Natalia Murinova, James Fogarty, and Sean A. Munson. 2019. Examining Opportunities for Goal-Directed Self-Tracking to Support Chronic Condition Management. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, Vol. 3, 4 (dec 2019), 1--26. https://doi.org/10.1145/3369809

Digital Library

[47]

Manya Sleeper, Alessandro Acquisti, Lorrie Faith Cranor, Patrick Gage Kelley, Sean A. Munson, and Norman Sadeh. 2015. I Would Like To..., I Shouldn't..., I Wish I.... In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing - CSCW '15. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1058--1069. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675193

Digital Library

[48]

Henry L. Tosi, Edwin A. Locke, and Gary P. Latham. 1991. A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance. The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 16, 2 (apr 1991), 480. https://doi.org/10.2307/258875

[49]

Yaacov Trope and Efrat Neter. 1994. Reconciling competing motives in self-evaluation: The role of self-control in feedback seeking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 66, 4 (1994), 646--657. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.646

[50]

Jeffrey B. Vancouver and Elizabeth Wolfe Morrison. 1995. Feedback Inquiry: The Effect of Source Attributes and Individual Differences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 62, 3 (jun 1995), 276--285. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1995.1050

[51]

Don VandeWalle. 2003. A goal orientation model of feedback-seeking behavior. Human Resource Management Review, Vol. 13, 4 (dec 2003), 581--604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2003.11.004

[52]

Vimal Viswanathan and Julie Linsey. 2011. Design Fixation in Physical Modeling: An Investigation on the Role of Sunk Cost. In Volume 9: 23rd International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology; 16th Design for Manufacturing and the Life Cycle Conference, Vol. 9. ASMEDC, 119--130. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2011-47862

[53]

Vimal K. Viswanathan and Julie S. Linsey. 2013. Role of Sunk Cost in Engineering Idea Generation: An Experimental Investigation. Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 135, 12 (dec 2013), 1--12. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4025290

[54]

Helen Wauck, Yu-Chun Yen, Wai-Tat Fu, Elizabeth Gerber, Steven P Dow, and Brian P Bailey. [n.d.]. From in the Class or in the Wild? Peers Provide Better Design Feedback Than External Crowds. ([n.,d.]). https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025477

Digital Library

[55]

Jane R. Williams, Corey E. Miller, Lisa A. Steelman, and Paul E. Levy. 1999. Increasing feedback seeking in public contexts: It takes two (or more) to tango. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 84, 6 (1999), 969--976. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.6.969

[56]

Y. Wayne Wu and Brian P. Bailey. 2017. Bitter Sweet or Sweet Bitter?. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 137--147. https://doi.org/10.1145/3059454.3059458

Digital Library

[57]

Y. Wayne Wu and Brian P. Bailey. 2018. Soften the Pain, Increase the Gain. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 2, CSCW (nov 2018), 1--20. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274455

Digital Library

[58]

Anbang Xu, Shih-Wen Huang, and Brian Bailey. 2014. Voyant. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing - CSCW '14. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1433--1444. https://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531604

Digital Library

[59]

Yu-chun Grace Yen, Steven P Dow, Elizabeth Gerber, and Brian P Bailey. 2016. Social Network, Web Forum, or Task Market?. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems - DIS '16. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 773--784. https://doi.org/10.1145/2901790.2901820

Digital Library

[60]

Yu-Chun Grace Yen, Steven P. Dow, Elizabeth Gerber, and Brian P. Bailey. 2017. Listen to Others, Listen to Yourself. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 158--170. https://doi.org/10.1145/3059454.3059468

Digital Library

[61]

Yu-chun Grace Yen, Joy O Kim, and Brian P Bailey. 2020. Decipher: An Interactive Visualization Tool for Interpreting Unstructured Design Feedback from Multiple Providers. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376380

Digital Library

[62]

Alvin Yuan, Kurt Luther, Markus Krause, Sophie Isabel Vennix, Steven P Dow, and Bjö rn Hartmann. 2016. Almost an Expert: The Effects of Rubrics and Expertise on Perceived Value of Crowdsourced Design Critiques. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing - CSCW '16. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1003--1015. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819953

Digital Library

[63]

Barry J Zimmerman. 1990. Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: An Overview. Educational Psychologist, Vol. 25, 1 (jan 1990), 3--17. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2501_2 arxiv: arXiv:1011.1669v3

[64]

Barry J. Zimmerman and Adam R. Moylan. 2009. Self-Regulation: where metacognition and motivation intersect. In Handbook of Metacognition in Education, Douglas J. Hacker, John Dunlosky, and Arthur C Graesser (Eds.). Routledge, New York, New York, USA, Chapter 16, 299--315.

Cited By

Kotturi YYu JKhadpe PGatz EZheng HFox SKulkarni C(2024)Peerdea: Co-Designing a Peer Support Platform with Creative EntrepreneursProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373848:CSCW1(1-24)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3637384
E JYen YPan ILin GLi MJin HChen MXia HDow S(2024)When to Give Feedback: Exploring Tradeoffs in the Timing of Design FeedbackProceedings of the 16th Conference on Creativity & Cognition10.1145/3635636.3656183(292-310)Online publication date: 23-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3635636.3656183
Clark T(2024)Perceived Barriers and Strategies to Increasing the BSN-Prepared Nursing WorkforceJournal of Christian Nursing10.1097/CNJ.000000000000115341:2(112-119)Online publication date: 4-Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.1097/CNJ.0000000000001153
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Plan Early, Revise More: Effects of Goal Setting and Perceived Role of the Feedback Provider on Feedback Seeking Behavior
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Collaborative and social computing
    1. Collaborative and social computing theory, concepts and paradigms
      1. Computer supported cooperative work
  2. Human computer interaction (HCI)
    1. HCI design and evaluation methods
      1. Field studies
    2. Interaction paradigms
      1. Collaborative interaction

Recommendations

Easier Said or Easier Done? Exploring the Relative Merits of Common Feedback Presentations
CSCW1

Feedback such as rubrics, pre-authored statements, and free-form comments are widely deployed in classrooms and feedback exchange communities. Despite these formats having different levels of detail and requiring different composition processes, little ...
Psychological Determinants of Academic Achievement among Thai Students in Selected International Schools in Thailand
MISNC '18: Proceedings of the 5th Multidisciplinary International Social Networks Conference

This paper investigated the determinants of academic achievement among Thai students in international schools in Thailand. The research focused on exploring the relationship between scores on the self-efficacy scales and the five sub-scales of the ...
Student Perceptions on the Utilization of Formative Feedback in the Online Environment

This article addresses instructors' formative feedback to graduate student writing. The authors investigated the utilization of a formative feedback option in online master and doctoral degree programs in health education and administration. Two hundred ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction Volume 5, Issue CSCW1

CSCW

April 2021

5016 pages

EISSN:2573-0142

DOI:10.1145/3460939

Editor:
Jeff Nichols
Apple Inc., United States

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © 2021 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 22 April 2021

Published in PACMHCI Volume 5, Issue CSCW1

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Funding Sources

NSF

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

5
Total Citations
View Citations
481
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)60
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6

Reflects downloads up to 08 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Kotturi YYu JKhadpe PGatz EZheng HFox SKulkarni C(2024)Peerdea: Co-Designing a Peer Support Platform with Creative EntrepreneursProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373848:CSCW1(1-24)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3637384
E JYen YPan ILin GLi MJin HChen MXia HDow S(2024)When to Give Feedback: Exploring Tradeoffs in the Timing of Design FeedbackProceedings of the 16th Conference on Creativity & Cognition10.1145/3635636.3656183(292-310)Online publication date: 23-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3635636.3656183
Clark T(2024)Perceived Barriers and Strategies to Increasing the BSN-Prepared Nursing WorkforceJournal of Christian Nursing10.1097/CNJ.000000000000115341:2(112-119)Online publication date: 4-Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.1097/CNJ.0000000000001153
Jamil D(2022)PHYSICAL THERAPIST PARTICIPATION IN GOAL SETTINGS FOR PATIENT MANAGEMENTPakistan Journal of Rehabilitation10.36283/pjr.zu.11.2/00811:2(42-49)Online publication date: 7-Jul-2022
https://doi.org/10.36283/pjr.zu.11.2/008
Shudo YYamaura KYasuda JSato AEbi K(2022)Dietary self-efficacy and social support interactions in junior athletes' acquisition of life skillsFrontiers in Sports and Active Living10.3389/fspor.2022.6736334Online publication date: 28-Sep-2022
https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2022.673633

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Issue’s Table of Contents