research-article

Public Access

Sketchy: Drawing Inspiration from the Crowd

Authors:

Gabrielle Bufrem,

Jeff HuangAuthors Info & Claims

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Volume 4, Issue CSCW2

Article No.: 172, Pages 1 - 27

https://doi.org/10.1145/3415243

Published: 15 October 2020 Publication History

Abstract

In-person user studies show that designers draw inspiration by looking at their peers' work while sketching. To recreate this behavior in a virtual environment, we developed Sketchy, a web-based drawing application where users sketch in virtual rooms and use the "Peek'' functionality to gain ideas from their peers' sketches in real-time. To assess if "Peek'' supports individual creativity through finding inspiration, students from a Human-Computer Interaction class sketched user interface design tasks in two studies. Study 1 compares creativity measures with and without Peek between two groups of students, where self-reports reveal Peek increases satisfaction with their final sketch and better supports individual creativity. Study 2 took place in a large classroom, where 90 students, all with Peek enabled, completed different design tasks. Peeking led students to report an intention to change their sketch 18% of the time in Study 1 and 17% of the time in Study 2. Student designers were influenced by sketches that seem closer to completion, contain more details, and are carefully drawn. They were also about three times more likely to clear their canvas and start over if they found a sketch inspirational. Furthermore, sketches created by students with more sketching and design experience influence less experienced student designers. This work explores the directions and benefits of incorporating digital peeking to support individual creativity within a student designer's classroom experience to create more satisfactory final sketches.

References

[1]

Salvatore Andolina, Hendrik Schneider, Joel Chan, Khalil Klouche, Giulio Jacucci, and Steven Dow. 2017. Crowdboard: augmenting in-person idea generation with real-time crowds. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 106--118.

Digital Library

[2]

Manuela Aparicio, Fernando Bacao, and Tiago Oliveira. 2016. An e-learning theoretical framework. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, Vol. 19, 1 (2016), 292--307.

[3]

Ioannis Arapakis, Mounia Lalmas, B Barla Cambazoglu, Mari-Carmen Marcos, and Joemon M Jose. 2014. User engagement in online N ews: Under the scope of sentiment, interest, affect, and gaze. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 65, 10 (2014), 1988--2005.

Digital Library

[4]

Omer Awan and Farouk Dako. 2018. Reply: Use of parametric tests to analyze ordinal data. Journal of nuclear medicine technology, Vol. 46, 3 (2018), 318--318.

[5]

Luca Benedetti, Holger Winnemöller, Massimiliano Corsini, and Roberto Scopigno. 2014. Painting with Bob: assisted creativity for novices. In Proceedings of the 27th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 419--428.

Digital Library

[6]

William Benjamin, Senthil Chandrasegaran, Devarajan Ramanujan, Niklas Elmqvist, SVN Vishwanathan, and Karthik Ramani. 2014. Juxtapoze: supporting serendipity and creative expression in clipart compositions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 341--350.

Digital Library

[7]

Michelle A Borkin, Azalea A Vo, Zoya Bylinskii, Phillip Isola, Shashank Sunkavalli, Aude Oliva, and Hanspeter Pfister. 2013. What makes a visualization memorable? IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, Vol. 19, 12 (2013), 2306--2315.

Digital Library

[8]

Bill Buxton. 2010. Sketching user experiences: getting the design right and the right design .Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington, MA, USA.

[9]

Zoya Bylinskii, Nam Wook Kim, Peter O'Donovan, Sami Alsheikh, Spandan Madan, Hanspeter Pfister, Fredo Durand, Bryan Russell, and Aaron Hertzmann. 2017. Learning visual importance for graphic designs and data visualizations. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 57--69.

Digital Library

[10]

Erin A Carroll, Celine Latulipe, Richard Fung, and Michael Terry. 2009. Creativity factor evaluation: towards a standardized survey metric for creativity support. In Proceedings of the seventh ACM conference on Creativity and cognition. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 127--136.

Digital Library

[11]

Joel Chan, Steven Dang, and Steven P Dow. 2016. Improving crowd innovation with expert facilitation. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1223--1235.

Digital Library

[12]

Tatiana Chemi, Julie Borup Jensen, and Lone Hersted. 2015. Behind the scenes of artistic creativity: Processes of learning, creating and organising .Peter Lang, Bern, Switzerland.

[13]

Erin Cherry and Celine Latulipe. 2014. Quantifying the creativity support of digital tools through the creativity support index. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), Vol. 21, 4 (2014), 21.

Digital Library

[14]

Gennaro Costagliola, Vincenzo Deufemia, Giuseppe Polese, and Michele Risi. 2004. A parsing technique for sketch recognition systems. In 2004 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages-Human Centric Computing. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 19--26.

Digital Library

[15]

Arthur J Cropley. 1997. Fostering creativity in the classroom: General principles. The creativity research handbook, Vol. 1, 84.114 (1997), 1--46.

[16]

Nigel Cross. 2004. Expertise in design: an overview. Design studies, Vol. 25, 5 (2004), 42--441.

[17]

Deanna P. Dannels and Kelly Norris Martin. 2008. Critiquing Critiques: A Genre Analysis of Feedback Across Novice to Expert Design Studios. J. Business and Technical Communication, Vol. 22, 2 (2008), 135--159.

[18]

Steven P. Dow, Alana Glassco, Jonathan Kass, Melissa Schwarz, Daniel L. Schwartz, and Scott R. Klemmer. 2010. Parallel Prototyping Leads to Better Design Results, More Divergence, and Increased Self-efficacy. ACM TOCHI, Vol. 17, 4 (2010), 18:1--18:24.

[19]

Mathias Eitz, James Hays, and Marc Alexa. 2012. How Do Humans Sketch Objects? ACM Trans. Graph. (Proc. SIGGRAPH), Vol. 31, 4 (2012), 44:1--44:10.

Digital Library

[20]

Jennifer Fernquist, Tovi Grossman, and George Fitzmaurice. 2011. Sketch-Sketch Revolution: An Engaging Tutorial System for Guided Sketching and Application Learning. In Proceedings of the 24th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 373--382.

Digital Library

[21]

Clive Frankish, Richard Hull, and Pam Morgan. 1995. Recognition accuracy and user acceptance of pen interfaces. In CHI, Vol. 95. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 503--510.

Digital Library

[22]

Jonas Frich, Lindsay MacDonald Vermeulen, Christian Remy, Michael Mose Biskjaer, and Peter Dalsgaard. 2019. Mapping the landscape of creativity support tools in HCI. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 389.

Digital Library

[23]

Yotam Gingold, Etienne Vouga, Eitan Grinspun, and Haym Hirsh. 2012. Diamonds from the rough: Improving drawing, painting, and singing via crowdsourcing. In Workshops at the Twenty-Sixth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

[24]

Kosa Goucher-Lambert and Jonathan Cagan. 2019. Crowdsourcing inspiration: Using crowd generated inspirational stimuli to support designer ideation. Design Studies, Vol. 61 (2019), 1--29.

[25]

Nitesh Goyal, Gilly Leshed, Dan Cosley, and Susan R Fussell. 2014. Effects of implicit sharing in collaborative analysis. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 129--138.

Digital Library

[26]

Nitesh Goyal, Gilly Leshed, and Susan R Fussell. 2013. Leveraging partner's insights for distributed collaborative sensemaking. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work companion. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 15--18.

Digital Library

[27]

REM Harding. 1948. An Anatomy of Inspiration: And An Essay on the Creative Mood. W. Heffer.

[28]

Jim Hewitt and Marlene Scardamalia. 1998. Design principles for distributed knowledge building processes. Educational psychology review, Vol. 10, 1 (1998), 75--96.

[29]

Jason I Hong and James A Landay. 2006. SATIN: a toolkit for informal ink-based applications .ACM, New York, NY, USA.

Digital Library

[30]

Bing Quan Huang, YB Zhang, and Mohand Tahar Kechadi. 2007. Preprocessing techniques for online handwriting recognition. In Seventh International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications (ISDA 2007). IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 793--800.

Digital Library

[31]

Emmanuel Iarussi, Adrien Bousseau, and Theophanis Tsandilas. 2013. The Drawing Assistant: Automated Drawing Guidance and Feedback from Photographs. In Proceedings of the 26th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 183--192.

Digital Library

[32]

Chiaki Ishiguro and Takeshi Okada. 2018. How can inspiration be encouraged in art learning .River Publishers, Denmark. 205--230 pages.

[33]

David G. Jansson and Steven M. Smith. 1991. Design Fixation. Design Stud., Vol. 12, 1 (1991), 3--11.

[34]

Hyeonsu B. Kang, Gabriel Amoako, Neil Sengupta, and Steven P. Dow. 2018. Paragon: An Online Gallery for Enhancing Design Feedback with Visual Examples. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 606.

[35]

James C Kaufman and Ronald A Beghetto. 2009. Beyond big and little: The four c model of creativity. Review of general psychology, Vol. 13, 1 (2009), 1--12.

[36]

Swarna Keshavabhotla, Blake Williford, Shalini Kumar, Ethan Hilton, Paul Taele, Wayne Li, Julie Linsey, and Tracy Hammond. 2017. Conquering the cube: learning to sketch primitives in perspective with an intelligent tutoring system. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Sketch-Based Interfaces and Modeling. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2.

Digital Library

[37]

Joy Kim, Maneesh Agrawala, and Michael S Bernstein. 2017. Mosaic: designing online creative communities for sharing works-in-progress. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 246--258.

Digital Library

[38]

Chinmay Kulkarni, Steven P Dow, and Scott R Klemmer. 2014. Early and repeated exposure to examples improves creative work. In Design thinking research. Springer, New York, NY, USA, 49--62.

[39]

Walter S. Lasecki, Juho Kim, Nicholas Rafter, Onkur Sen, Jeffrey P. Bigham, and Michael S. Bernstein. 2015. Apparition: Crowdsourced User Interfaces That Come To Life As You Sketch Them. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1925--1934.

[40]

Sang Won Lee. 2017. Hybrid Use of Asynchronous and Synchronous Interaction for Collaborative Creation. In Adjunct Publication of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 95--98.

[41]

Yong Jae Lee, C. Lawrence Zitnick, and Michael F. Cohen. 2011. ShadowDraw: Real-Time User Guidance for Freehand Drawing. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), Vol. 30, 4 (2011), 27:1--27:9.

Digital Library

[42]

Alex Limpaecher, Nicolas Feltman, Adrien Treuille, and Michael Cohen. 2013. Real-time drawing assistance through crowdsourcing. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), Vol. 32, 4 (2013), 54:1--54:8.

Digital Library

[43]

James S. Lipscomb. 1991. A trainable gesture recognizer. Pattern Recogn., Vol. 24, 9 (1991), 895--907.

Digital Library

[44]

Wenyin Liu. 2003. On-line graphics recognition: State-of-the-art. In International Workshop on Graphics Recognition. Springer, New York, NY, USA, 291--304.

[45]

Xueting Liu, Tien-Tsin Wong, and Pheng-Ann Heng. 2015. Closure-aware sketch simplification. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), Vol. 34, 6 (2015), 168:1--168:10.

Digital Library

[46]

Dastyni Loksa, Nicolas Mangano, Thomas D LaToza, and André van der Hoek. 2013. Enabling a classroom design studio with a collaborative sketch design tool. In 2013 35th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE). IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 1073--1082.

[47]

A Chris Long Jr, James A Landay, Lawrence A Rowe, and Joseph Michiels. 2000. Visual similarity of pen gestures. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 360--367.

[48]

Felix Müller-Wienbergen, Oliver Müller, Stefan Seidel, and Jörg Becker. 2011. Leaving the beaten tracks in creative work--A design theory for systems that support convergent and divergent thinking. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 12, 11 (2011), 2.

[49]

Tricia J Ngoon, C Ailie Fraser, Ariel S Weingarten, Mira Dontcheva, and Scott Klemmer. 2018. Interactive Guidance Techniques for Improving Creative Feedback. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 55.

Digital Library

[50]

Geoff Norman. 2010. Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Advances in health sciences education, Vol. 15, 5 (2010), 625--632.

[51]

Victoria C Oleynick, Todd M Thrash, Michael C LeFew, Emil G Moldovan, and Paul D Kieffaber. 2014. The scientific study of inspiration in the creative process: challenges and opportunities. Frontiers in human neuroscience, Vol. 8 (2014), 436.

[52]

Brandon Paulson and Tracy Hammond. 2008. Paleosketch: accurate primitive sketch recognition and beautification. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1--10.

Digital Library

[53]

Brandon Paulson, Pankaj Rajan, Pedro Davalos, Ricardo Gutierrez-Osuna, and Tracy Hammond. 2008. What!?! no Rubine features?: using geometric-based features to produce normalized confidence values for sketch recognition. In HCC Workshop: Sketch Tools for Diagramming. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 57--63.

[54]

Cecil Piya, Senthil Chandrasegaran, Niklas Elmqvist, Karthik Ramani, et almbox. 2017. Co-3Deator: A Team-First Collaborative 3D Design Ideation Tool. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 6581--6592.

Digital Library

[55]

Yuqing Ren, Sara Kiesler, and Susan R Fussell. 2008. Multiple group coordination in complex and dynamic task environments: Interruptions, coping mechanisms, and technology recommendations. Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 25, 1 (2008), 105--130.

Digital Library

[56]

B Rhorbach. 1969. Kreative nach Regeln: Methode 635, eine neue Technik zum Losen von Problemen. Absatzwirtschaft, Vol. 12 (1969), 73--75.

[57]

Dean Rubine. 1991. Specifying Gestures by Example. Proc. SIGGRAPH, Vol. 25, 4 (1991), 329--337.

Digital Library

[58]

Ugo Braga Sangiorgi, Francc ois Beuvens, and Jean Vanderdonckt. 2012. User interface design by collaborative sketching. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 378--387.

Digital Library

[59]

Stefan Seidel, Felix Müller-Wienbergen, and Jörg Becker. 2010. The concept of creativity in the information systems discipline: Past, present, and prospects. Cais, Vol. 27, 2 (2010), 14.

[60]

Jami J Shah, Noe Vargas-Hernandez, Joshua D Summers, and Santosh Kulkarni. 2001. Collaborative Sketching (C-Sketch)-An idea generation technique for engineering design. The Journal of Creative Behavior, Vol. 35, 3 (2001), 168--198.

[61]

Pao Siangliulue, Joel Chan, Krzysztof Z Gajos, and Steven P Dow. 2015. Providing timely examples improves the quantity and quality of generated ideas. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 83--92.

Digital Library

[62]

Beat Signer, Ueli Kurmann, and M Norrie. 2007. iGesture: a general gesture recognition framework. In Ninth International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR 2007), Vol. 2. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 954--958.

Digital Library

[63]

Gail M Sullivan and Anthony R Artino Jr. 2013. Analyzing and interpreting data from Likert-type scales. Journal of graduate medical education, Vol. 5, 4 (2013), 541--542.

[64]

Lingyun Sun, Wei Xiang, Shi Chen, and Zhiyuan Yang. 2015. Collaborative sketching in crowdsourcing design: a new method for idea generation. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, Vol. 25, 3 (2015), 409--427.

[65]

Charles C. Tappert, Ching Y. Suen, and Toru Wakahara. 1990. The state of the art in online handwriting recognition. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., Vol. 12 (1990), 787--808.

Digital Library

[66]

John Tchalenko. 2007. Eye movements in drawing simple lines. Perception, Vol. 36, 8 (2007), 1152--1167.

[67]

Todd M Thrash, Laura A Maruskin, Scott E Cassidy, James W Fryer, and Richard M Ryan. 2010. Mediating between the muse and the masses: Inspiration and the actualization of creative ideas. Journal of personality and social psychology, Vol. 98, 3 (2010), 469.

[68]

Huawei Tu, Xiangshi Ren, and Shumin Zhai. 2012. A comparative evaluation of finger and pen stroke gestures. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1287--1296.

Digital Library

[69]

Christopher W Tyler and Lora T Likova. 2012. The role of the visual arts in enhancing the learning process. Frontiers in human neuroscience, Vol. 6 (2012), 8.

[70]

Greg Walsh and Eric Wronsky. 2019. AI

[71]

Co-Design: Developing a Novel Computer-supported Approach to Inclusive Design. In Conference Companion Publication of the 2019 on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 408--412.

[72]

Hao-Chuan Wang, Dan Cosley, and Susan R Fussell. 2010. Idea expander: supporting group brainstorming with conversationally triggered visual thinking stimuli. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 103--106.

Digital Library

[73]

Kai Wang and Jeffrey V Nickerson. 2017. A literature review on individual creativity support systems. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 74 (2017), 139--151.

[74]

Blake Williford. 2017. SketchTivity: Improving Creativity by Learning Sketching with an Intelligent Tutoring System. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 477--483.

Digital Library

[75]

Wei Xiang, Ling-yun Sun, Wei-tao You, and Chang-yuan Yang. 2018. Crowdsourcing intelligent design. Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering, Vol. 19, 1 (2018), 126--138.

[76]

Jin Xiangyu, Liu Wenyin, Sun Jianyong, and Zhengxing Sun. 2002. On-line graphics recognition. In 10th Pacific Conference on Computer Graphics and Applications, 2002. Proceedings. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 256--264.

[77]

Zhenpeng Zhao, Sriram Karthik Badam, Senthil Chandrasegaran, Deok Gun Park, Niklas LE Elmqvist, Lorraine Kisselburgh, and Karthik Ramani. 2014. skWiki: a multimedia sketching system for collaborative creativity. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1235--1244.

Digital Library

Cited By

Massachi TRoy JChoi LHoefer GWallace SHuang J(2024)Chirp: The Impact of Private Online Self-Disclosure on Perceived Social SupportProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36869668:CSCW2(1-25)Online publication date: 7-Nov-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3686966
Liu FLv JCui SLuan ZWu KZhou T(2024)Smart "Error"! Exploring Imperfect AI to Support Creative IdeationProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373988:CSCW1(1-28)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3637398
Chan JDing ZKamrah EFuge M(2024)Formulating or Fixating: Effects of Examples on Problem Solving Vary as a Function of Example Presentation Interface DesignProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642653(1-16)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642653
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Sketchy: Drawing Inspiration from the Crowd

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction Volume 4, Issue CSCW2

CSCW

October 2020

2310 pages

EISSN:2573-0142

DOI:10.1145/3430143

Editor:
Jeff Nichols
Apple Inc.

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © 2020 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 15 October 2020

Published in PACMHCI Volume 4, Issue CSCW2

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Funding Sources

National Science Foundation

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

18
Total Citations
View Citations
581
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)210
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)31

Reflects downloads up to 06 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Massachi TRoy JChoi LHoefer GWallace SHuang J(2024)Chirp: The Impact of Private Online Self-Disclosure on Perceived Social SupportProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36869668:CSCW2(1-25)Online publication date: 7-Nov-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3686966
Liu FLv JCui SLuan ZWu KZhou T(2024)Smart "Error"! Exploring Imperfect AI to Support Creative IdeationProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373988:CSCW1(1-28)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3637398
Chan JDing ZKamrah EFuge M(2024)Formulating or Fixating: Effects of Examples on Problem Solving Vary as a Function of Example Presentation Interface DesignProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642653(1-16)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642653
Ciarrone ALeiva LDubiel M(2024)Enricommender: Business Intelligence for User Interface DesignInteracting with Computers10.1093/iwc/iwae037Online publication date: 22-Aug-2024
https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwae037
Narimanzadeh HBadie-Modiri ASmirnova IChen T(2023)Crowdsourcing Subjective Annotations Using Pairwise Comparisons Reduces Bias and Error Compared to the Majority-vote MethodProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36101837:CSCW2(1-29)Online publication date: 4-Oct-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3610183
Fages AFleury CTsandilas T(2023)Conception collaborative au travers de versions parallèles en Réalité AugmentéeProceedings of the 34th Conference on l'Interaction Humain-Machine10.1145/3583961.3583978(1-13)Online publication date: 3-Apr-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3583961.3583978
Maram SPfau JDodechani JSeif El-Nasr M(2023)A Visual Ethnographic Study at Cultural Spaces to Identify Character Creation OpportunitiesProceedings of the 18th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games10.1145/3582437.3582445(1-12)Online publication date: 12-Apr-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3582437.3582445
Sramek ZSato AZhou ZHosio SYatani K(2023)SoundTraveller: Exploring Abstraction and Entanglement in Timbre Creation Interfaces for SynthesizersProceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3563657.3596089(95-114)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3563657.3596089
Zhou TLiu CYang JHuang J(2023)filtered.ink: Creating Dynamic Illustrations with SVG FiltersProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581051(1-15)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3544548.3581051
Wang CWu KJiang W(2023)Web-based drawing for students with different learning styles and cognitive abilitiesEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-022-11542-228:7(9049-9079)Online publication date: 7-Jan-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10639-022-11542-2
Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents