skip to main content
10.1145/309847.310007acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free access

Engineering change: methodology and applications to behavioral and system synthesis

Published: 01 June 1999 Publication History
First page of PDF

References

[1]
D. Brand, etal. Incremental synthesis. ICCAD, p.14-18, 1994.
[2]
P. Buch, et al. EC for power optimization using global sensitivity and synthesis flexibility. Low Power Electronics and Design, pp.88-91, 1997.
[3]
S.-C. Chang et al. Postlayout logic restructuring using alternative wires. TCAD, Vo1.16, (no.6), pp.587-96, 1997.
[4]
G. De Micheli. Synthesis and optimization of digital circuits. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1994.
[5]
S. Edwards et al. Design of embedded systems: formal models, validation, and synthesis. Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol.85, (no.3), pp.366-90, 1997.
[6]
W.-J. Fang, et al. A real time RTL engineering change method supporting online debugging for logic emulation applications. DAC, pp.101-6, 1997.
[7]
M.R. Garey and D.S. Johnson. Computers and intractability: a guide to the theory of NP-completeness. W.H. Freeman, 1979.
[8]
C.-T. Hwang, J.-H. Lee, and Y.-C. Hsu. A formal approach to the scheduling problem in high level synthesis. TCAD, Vol.10, (no.4), pp.464-475, 1991.
[9]
S.P. Khatri, et at. Engineering change in a non-deterministic FSM setting. DAC, pp.451-6, 1996.
[10]
F.J. Kurdahi and A.C. Parker. REAL: a program for REgister ALlocation. DAC, pp.210-215, 1987.
[11]
G. Lakshminarayana, et al. Incorporating speculative execution into scheduling of control-flow intensive behavioral descriptions. DAC, pp.108-13, 1998.
[12]
E.A. Lee and D.G. Messerschmitt. Synchronous dataflow. Proc. of the IEEE, Voi.75, (no.9), pp.1235-45, 1987.
[13]
J.C. Madre, et al. Automating the diagnosis and the rectification of design errors with PRIAM. ICCAD, pp.30-3, 1989.
[14]
P.G. Paulin, et al. Force-directed scheduling for the behavioral synthesis of ASICs. TCAD, Vol.8, (no.6), pp.661-679, 1989.
[15]
J. Rabaey, et al. Fast prototyping of data path intensive architectures. Design & Test, Vol.8, (no.2), pp.40-51, 1991.
[16]
G.A. Shaw, et al. Assessing and improving current practice in the design of ASSPs. ICASSP, pp.2707-10, 1995.
[17]
L. Stok and R. van den Born. EASY: multiprocessor architecture optimisation. Logic and Arch. Synthesis for Silicon Compilers, pp.313-328, 1989.
[18]
G. Swamy, et al. Minimal logic re-synthesis for engineering change. ISCS, Vol.3. pp.1596-9, 1997.
[19]
Y. Watanabe and R.K. Brayton. Incremental synthesis for EC. ICCAD, pp.40-3, 1991.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Engineering change: methodology and applications to behavioral and system synthesis

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image ACM Conferences
        DAC '99: Proceedings of the 36th annual ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference
        June 1999
        1000 pages
        ISBN:1581131097
        DOI:10.1145/309847
        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Sponsors

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        Published: 01 June 1999

        Permissions

        Request permissions for this article.

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Conference

        DAC99
        Sponsor:
        DAC99: The 36th ACM/IEEE-CAS/EDAC Design Automation Conference
        June 21 - 25, 1999
        Louisiana, New Orleans, USA

        Acceptance Rates

        DAC '99 Paper Acceptance Rate 154 of 451 submissions, 34%;
        Overall Acceptance Rate 1,770 of 5,499 submissions, 32%

        Upcoming Conference

        DAC '25
        62nd ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference
        June 22 - 26, 2025
        San Francisco , CA , USA

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)25
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)9
        Reflects downloads up to 25 Jan 2025

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        Cited By

        View all

        View Options

        View options

        PDF

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        Login options

        Figures

        Tables

        Media

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media