research-article

Exploring DIY Practices of Complex Home Technologies

Authors:

Carman NeustaedterAuthors Info & Claims

ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), Volume 24, Issue 2

Article No.: 16, Pages 1 - 29

https://doi.org/10.1145/3057863

Published: 11 April 2017 Publication History

Abstract

We are surrounded by increasingly complex networks of smart objects, yet our understanding and attachment to them is rather limited. One way to support stronger end users’ engagement with such complex technologies is by involving them in the design process and, with the advent of Arduino prototyping platform, even in their making. While DIY practice offers the potential for stronger user engagement with physical artifacts, we know little about end users’ DIY practice of making complex electronic technologies and their potential to ensure engagement with such devices. In this article, we report on interviews with 18 participants from two green communities who built and used an open source DIY energy monitor, with the aim to explore the end users DIY practices of making such complex electronic devices. Findings indicate four key qualities of DIY monitors: transparent modularity, open-endedness, heirloom, and disruptiveness, and how they contribute to more meaningful engagement with the DIY monitors, elevating them from the status of unremarkable objects to that of things. We conclude with three implications for design for supporting end user development of complex electronic DIY: designing transparent open hardware technologies, standardizing communication protocols for the current and future DIY of IoT, and deliberately calling for personal investment and labor in the assembling of DIY kits.

References

[1]

W. Abrahamse and L. Steg. 2009. How do socio-demographic and psychological factors relate to households’ direct and indirect energy use and savings? Journal of Economic Psychology 30, 5 (2009), 711--720.

[2]

P. Atkinson. 2006. Do it yourself: Democracy and design. Journal of Design History 19, 1 (2006), 1--10.

[3]

C. Bakker and den M. Hollander. 2013. Six Design Strategies for Longer Lasting Products in Circular Economy. The Guardian.

[4]

E. Blevis and E. Stolterman. 2007. Ensoulment and Sustainable Interaction Design. In Proceedings of IASDR 2007. Hong Kong.

[5]

A. Boden, G. Avram, I. Posch, V. Pipek, and G. Fitzpatrick. 2013. Workshop on EUD for supporting sustainability in maker communities. In End-User Development. Springer, Berlin, 298--303.

[6]

V. Braun and V. Clarke. 2007. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 2006, 3 (2007), 77--101.

[7]

J. Breitbach. 2011. The photo-as-thing: Photography and thing theory. European Journal of English Studies 15, 1 (2011), 31--43.

[8]

B. Brown. 2001. Thing theory. Critical Inquiry, Vol. 28, No. 1, Things (Autumn, 2001), 1--22.

[9]

M. Brown, T. Coughlan, G. Lawson, R. Mortier, R. Houghton, and M. Goulden. 2012. Intergenerational Interpretation of the IoT. Retrieved May 2016 from http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/2969/1/Brown_et_al_IIIoT.pdf.

[10]

J. Burrell. 2012. Invisible Users: Youth in the Internet Cafes of Urban Ghana. MIT Press.

[11]

M. Caillot and A. Nguyen-Xuan. 1995. Adults’ understanding of electricity. Public Understanding of Science 4, 2 (1995), 131--151.

[12]

T. Cooper. 2004. Inadequate life? Evidence of consumer attitudes to product obsolescence. Journal of Consumer Policy 27, 4 (2004), 421--449.

[13]

D. De Roeck, K. Slegers, J. Criel, M. Godon, L. Claeys, K. Kilpi, and A. Jacobs. 2012. October. I would DiYSE for it&excl;: A manifesto for do-it-yourself internet-of-things creation. In Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Making Sense Through Design. ACM, 170--179.

Digital Library

[14]

G. Deleuze and F. Guattari. 1988. A Thousand Plateaus. Capitalism and Schizophrenia. London, The Athlone Press; G. Deleuze and F. Guattari (Eds.), (1994) What is Philosophy? Verso, London, New York.

[15]

L. Devendorf and K. Ryokai. 2015. April. Being the machine: Reconfiguring agency and control in hybrid fabrication. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2477--2486.

Digital Library

[16]

J. Dewey. 1916. Democracy and Education. MacMillan.

[17]

P. Dourish. 2015. August. Not the internet, but this internet: How othernets illuminate our feudal internet. In Proceedings of the Fifth Decennial Aarhus Conference on Critical Alternatives. Aarhus University Press, 157--168.

Digital Library

[18]

P. Dourish, C. Graham, D. Randall, and M. Rouncefield. 2010. Theme issue on social interaction and mundane technologies. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 14, 3 (2010), 171--180.

Digital Library

[19]

T. Erickson, M. Li, Y. Kim, A. Deshpande, S. Sahu, T. Chao, and M. Naphade. 2013. The Dubuque electricity portal. In Proceedings of CHI. ACM, 1203--1212.

Digital Library

[20]

J. Fereday and E. Muir-Cochrane. 2008. Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: Journal of qualitative methods 5, 1 (2008), 80--92.

[21]

C. Fischer. 2008. Feedback on household electricity consumption. Energy efficiency 1, 1 (2008), 79--104.

[22]

G. Fischer, E. Giaccardi, Y. Ye, A. G. Sutcliffe, and N. Mehandjiev. 2004. Meta-design: A manifesto for end-user development. Communications of the ACM 47, 9 (2004), 33--37.

Digital Library

[23]

S. Fox. 2014. Third wave do-it-yourself (DIY): Potential for prosumption, innovation, and entrepreneurship by local populations in regions without industrial manufacturing infrastructure. Technology in Society 39 (2014), 18--30.

[24]

S. M. Gelber. 1999. Hobbies: Leisure and the Culture of Work in America. Columbia University Press, New York, NY.

[25]

T. Gillespie. 2006. Designed to “effectively frustrate.” New Media 8 Society 8, 4 (2006), 651--669.

[26]

M. Gubbels and J. Froehlich. 2014. Physically computing physical computing: Creative tools for building with physical materials and computation. IDC’14 Extended Abstracts, Demo Track, Aarhus, Denmark, June 17--20, 2014.

[27]

M. Heidegger. 1971. Poetry, Language, Thought, transl. A Hofstadter. Harper 8 Row, New York.

[28]

G. Hermans. 2014. Investigating the unexplored possibilities of digital--physical toolkits in lay design. International Journal of Design 8, 2 (2014), 15--28.

[29]

G. Hertz. 2011. Arduino microcontrollers and the Queen's hamlet: Utilitarian and Hedonized DIY practices in contemporary electronic culture. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture (ACADIA), 44--47.

[30]

H. B. Holmer, C. DiSalvo, P. Sengers, and T. Lodato. 2015. Constructing and constraining participation in participatory arts and HCI. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 74 (2015), 107--123.

Digital Library

[31]

T. Ingold. 2007. Lines: A Brief History. Routledge, London.

[32]

T. Ingold. 2010. The textility of making. Cambridge Journal of Economics 34 (2010), 91--102.

[33]

T. Ingold. 2012. Toward an ecology of materials. Annual Review of Anthropology 41 (2012) 427--442.

[34]

T. Ingold. 2013. Making: Anthropology, Archaeology, Art and Architecture. Routledge, London.

[35]

I. E. Khairuddin, C. Sas, S. Clinch, and N. Davies. 2016. Exploring motivations among Bitcoin user. In Proceedings of the CHI’16 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2872--2878.

Digital Library

[36]

S. Kuznetsov and E. Paulos. 2010. Rise of the expert amateur: DIY projects, communities, and cultures. In Proceedings of NordiCHI. 295--304.

Digital Library

[37]

S. Kuznetsov, G. N. Davis, E. Paulos, M. Gross, and J. C. Cheung. 2011. Red balloon, green balloon, sensors in the sky. In Proceedings of Ubicomp. ACM, 237--246.

Digital Library

[38]

S. Kuznetsov, W. Harrigan-Anderson, H. Faste, S. Hudson, and E. Paulos. 2013. Community engagements with living sensing systems. In Proceedings of CC. 213--222.

Digital Library

[39]

S. Kuznetsov, S. E. Hudson, and E. Paulos. 2014. February. A low-tech sensing system for particulate pollution. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction. ACM, 259--266.

Digital Library

[40]

S. Lagerström, I. Soute, Y. Florack, and P. Markopoulos. 2014. June. Metadesigning interactive outdoor games for children: A case study. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Interaction Design and Children. ACM, 325--328.

Digital Library

[41]

J. LaMarche, K. Cheney, C. Akers, K. Roth, and O. Sachs. 2012. Home Energy Displays: Consumer Adoption and Response. U.S. Department of Energy.

[42]

J. Lewis and J. Ritchie. 2003. Generalising from qualitative research. Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers, 263--286.

[43]

H. Lieberman, F. Paternò, M. Klann, and V. Wulf. 2006. End-user Development: An Emerging Paradigm. Springer, Netherlands, 1--8.

Digital Library

[44]

S. Lindtner, S. Bardzell, and J. Bardzell. 2016. May. Reconstituting the utopian vision of making: HCI after technosolutionism. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1390--1402.

Digital Library

[45]

S. Lindtner, G. Hertz, and P. Dourish. 2014. Emerging sites of HCI innovation. In Proceedings of CHI, 439--448.

Digital Library

[46]

J. Löwgren and E. Stolterman. 2004. Thoughtful Interaction Design: A Design Perspective on Information Technology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Digital Library

[47]

B. Marenko. 2014a. Material morphogenesis--For an encounter between philosophy and design. Computational Making Workshop--Positioning paper. DCC, London.

[48]

B. Marenko. 2014b. Neo-animism and design: A new paradigm in object theory. Design and Culture, 6, 2, 219--241.

[49]

D. A. Mellis. 2015. Do-it-yourself Devices: Personal Fabrication of Custom Electronic Products. Doctoral Dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

[50]

D. A. Mellis and L. Buechley. 2014. April. Do-it-yourself cellphones: An investigation into the possibilities and limits of high-tech DIY. In Proceedings of CHI. ACM, 1723--1732.

Digital Library

[51]

C. Neustaedter, L. Bartram, and A. Mah. 2013. Everyday activities and energy consumption. In Proceedings of CHI. 1183--1192.

Digital Library

[52]

D. A. Norman. 1983. Some Observations on Mental Models. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA

[53]

M. I. Norton, D. Mochon, and D. Ariely. 2011. The “IKEA effect”: When labor leads to love. Harvard Business School Marketing Unit Working Paper. 11--91.

[54]

D. K. Padgett. 1998. Qualitative Methods in Social Work. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

[55]

M. Pantzar. 1997. Domestication of everyday life technology: Dynamic views on the social histories of artifacts. Design Issues 13, 3 (1997), 52--65.

[56]

F. Paternò. 2013. End user development: Survey of an emerging field for empowering people. ISRN Software Engineering 2013, 11 pages.

[57]

J. Pierce, C. Fan, D. Lomas, G. Marcu, and E. Paulos. 2010. Some consideration on the (in) effectiveness of residential energy feedback systems. In Proceedings of DIS. 244--247.

Digital Library

[58]

J. Pierce and E. Paulos. 2012. Beyond energy monitors. In Proceedings of CHI. ACM, 665--674.

Digital Library

[59]

J. Pierce, Y. Strengers, P. Sengers, and S. Bødker. 2013. Introduction to the special issue on practice-oriented approaches to sustainable HCI. TOCHI 20, 4 (2013), 20.

Digital Library

[60]

S. Pink, K. L. Mackley, V. Mitchell, M. Hanratty, C. Escobar-Tello, T. Bhamra, and R. Morosanu. 2013. Applying the lens of sensory ethnography to sustainable HCI. TOCHI 20, 4 (2013), 25.

Digital Library

[61]

J. Plotz. 2006. Can the sofa speak? A look at thing theory. Criticism, 47, 1 (2006), 109--118.

[62]

A. Reckwitz. 2002. Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory 5, 2 (2002), 243--263.

[63]

Y. Rogers. 2006. Moving on from Weiser's vision of calm computing: Engaging ubicomp experiences. In UbiComp 2006: Ubiquitous Computing. Springer, Berlin, 404--421.

Digital Library

[64]

D. K. Rosner and M. Ames. 2014. Designing for repair? Infrastructures and materialities of breakdown. In Proceedings of CSCW. ACM, 319--331.

Digital Library

[65]

D. K. Rosner, M. Ikemiya, D. Kim, and K. Koch. 2013. Designing with traces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, 2013), CHI’13. ACM, 1649--1658.

Digital Library

[66]

A. Salovaara, K. Hook, K. Cheverst, M. Twidale, M. Chalmers, and C. Sas. 2011. Appropriation and creative use: Linking user studies and design. In Extended Abstracts of CHI 2011. ACM, 37--40.

Digital Library

[67]

M. Sandelowski. 1995. Sample size in qualitative research. Research in Nursing 8 Health, 18, 2 (1995), 179--183.

[68]

C. Sas and R. Chopra. 2015. MeditAid: A wearable adaptive neurofeedback-based system for training mindfulness state. Personal Ubiquitous Computing 19, 7 (October 2015), 1169--1182.

Digital Library

[69]

C. Sas, T. Fratczak, M. Rees, H. Gellersen, V. Kalnikaite, A. Coman, and K. Höök. 2013. AffectCam: Arousal-augmented sensecam for richer recall of episodic memories. In CHI’13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1041--1046.

Digital Library

[70]

C. Sas and I. E. Khairuddin. 2017. Design for Trust: An exploration of the challenges and opportunities of bitcoin users. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2017 (in press).

[71]

C. Sas and I. E. Khairuddin. 2015. Exploring trust in Bitcoin technology: A framework for HCI research. In Proceedings of OZCHI Conference 2015. 338--342.

Digital Library

[72]

C. Sas and S. Whittaker. 2013. Design for forgetting: Disposing of digital possessions after a breakup. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1823--1832.

Digital Library

[73]

C. Sas, A. Whittaker, S. Dow, J. Forlizzi, and J. Zimmerman. 2014. Generating implications for design through design research. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’14). ACM, New York, NY, 1971--1980.

Digital Library

[74]

C. Sas, S. Whittaker, and J. Zimmerman. 2016. Design for rituals of letting go: An embodiment perspective on disposal practices informed by grief therapy. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 23, 4, Article 21 (August 2016), 37 pages.

Digital Library

[75]

P. Schmitt and S. Seitinger. 2009. Plywood punk: A holistic approach to designing animated artifacts. In Proceedings of TEI 2009. ACM, 123--126.

Digital Library

[76]

Schön Donald A. 1992. Designing as reflective conversation with the materials of a design situation. Knowledge-Based Systems 5.1 (1992): 3--14.

Digital Library

[77]

T. Schwartz, S. Denef, G. Stevens, L. Ramirez, and V. Wulf. 2013a. Cultivating energy literacy. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1193--1202.

Digital Library

[78]

T. Schwartz, G. Stevens, L. Ramirez, and V. Wulf. 2013b. Uncovering practices of making energy consumption accountable. TOCHI, 20, 12.

Digital Library

[79]

E. Shove. 2007. The Design of Everyday Life. Berg.

[80]

O. Stickel, D. Hornung, K. Aal, M. Rohde, and V. Wulf. 2015. 3D Printing with marginalized children—an exploration in a Palestinian refugee camp. In Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW’15). Springer International Publishing, 83--102.

[81]

C. Storni. 2009. The ambivalence of engaging technology: Artifacts as products and processes. Nordes 3 (2009), 1--10.

[82]

Y. Strengers. 2011. Designing eco-feedback systems for everyday life. In Proceedings of CHI. 2135--2144.

Digital Library

[83]

Y. Strengers. 2013. Smart Energy Technologies in Everyday Life: Smart Utopia? Palgrave Macmillan.

[84]

I. Tavory and S. Timmermans. 2014. Abductive Analysis: Theorizing Qualitative Research. University of Chicago Press.

[85]

D. Tetteroo, I. Soute, and P. Markopoulos. 2013. December. Five key challenges in end-user development for tangible and embodied interaction. In Proceedings of Conference on Multimodal Interaction. ACM, 247--254.

Digital Library

[86]

P. Tolmie and A. Crabtree. 2008. Deploying research technology in the home. In Proceedings of CSCW. 639--648.

Digital Library

[87]

P. Tolmie, A. Crabtree, S. Egglestone, J. Humble, C. Greenhalgh, and T. Rodden. 2010. Digital plumbing: The mundane work of deploying UbiComp in the home. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 14, 3 (2008), 181--196.

Digital Library

[88]

P. Tolmie, A. Crabtree, T. Rodden, C. Greenhalgh, and S. Benford. 2007. Making the home network at home: Digital housekeeping. In ECSCW 2007. Springer, London, 331--350.

[89]

M. Vaismoradi, H. Turunen, and T. Bondas. 2013. Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing 8 Health Sciences 15, 3 (2013), 398--405.

[90]

A. Vallgårda. 2014. Giving form to computational things: Developing a practice of interaction design. Personal Ubiquitous Computing 18, 3 (2014), 577--592.

Digital Library

[91]

A. Vallgårda and T. Sokoler. 2010. A material strategy: Exploring material properties of computers. International Journal of Design 4, 3 (2010), 1--14.

[92]

S. van Dam, C. Bakker, J. van Hal. 2010. Home energy monitors. Building Research and Information 38, 5 (2010), 458--469.

[93]

R. Wakkary, A. Desjardins, S. Hauser, and L. Maestri. 2013. A sustainable design fiction: Green practices. TOCHI 20, 4 (2013), 23:1--34.

Digital Library

[94]

A. Woodruff, J. Hasbrouck, and S. Augustin. 2008. A bright green perspective on sustainable choices. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 313--322.

Digital Library

Cited By

Sinha R(2024)The Role of Internet of Things (IoT) in Transforming Facilities Management in Smart CitiesInternational Journal for Global Academic & Scientific Research10.55938/ijgasr.v3i2.763:2(36-47)Online publication date: 2-Jul-2024
https://doi.org/10.55938/ijgasr.v3i2.76
Lebloch KRafetseder A(2024)Laying foundations for a “Right to Improve”Frontiers in the Internet of Things10.3389/friot.2024.13212633Online publication date: 19-Feb-2024
https://doi.org/10.3389/friot.2024.1321263
Lechelt SGorkovenko KSpeed C(2024)On Disused Connected Devices: Understanding Disuse, “Holding On,” and Barriers to CircularityACM Journal on Computing and Sustainable Societies10.1145/36511712:2(1-27)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3651171
Show More Cited By

Recommendations

DIY for CHI: methods, communities, and values of reuse and customization
CHI EA '09: CHI '09 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems

People tinker, hack, fix, reuse, and assemble materials in creative and unexpected ways, often codifying and sharing their production process with others. Do-it-yourself (DIY) encompasses a range of design activities that have become increasingly ...
Assistive or Artistic Technologies? Exploring the Connections between Art, Disability and Wheelchair Use
ASSETS '22: Proceedings of the 24th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility

Art has deep connections with both disability and HCI research. From disabled bodies becoming avatars of novel forms of expression, to artistic work being created as an act of resistance, art has been a powerful tool to subvert ableist narratives. ...
Playful, Curious, Creative, Equitable: Exploring Opportunities for AI Technologies with Older Adults
Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2023
Abstract
There has recently been much discussion around OpenAI, Generative AI, use of chatbots and the use of other immersive technologies in the mainstream. These developments have much to offer to older adults in terms of playful, accessible and creative ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction

ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction Volume 24, Issue 2

Special Issue EUD for IoT

April 2017

284 pages

ISSN:1073-0516

EISSN:1557-7325

DOI:10.1145/3077620

Editor:
Ken Hinckley
Microsoft Research

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © 2017 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 11 April 2017

Accepted: 01 January 2017

Revised: 01 January 2017

Received: 01 April 2016

Published in TOCHI Volume 24, Issue 2

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed

Funding Sources

EPSRC

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

26
Total Citations
View Citations
770
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)81
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)8

Reflects downloads up to 05 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Sinha R(2024)The Role of Internet of Things (IoT) in Transforming Facilities Management in Smart CitiesInternational Journal for Global Academic & Scientific Research10.55938/ijgasr.v3i2.763:2(36-47)Online publication date: 2-Jul-2024
https://doi.org/10.55938/ijgasr.v3i2.76
Lebloch KRafetseder A(2024)Laying foundations for a “Right to Improve”Frontiers in the Internet of Things10.3389/friot.2024.13212633Online publication date: 19-Feb-2024
https://doi.org/10.3389/friot.2024.1321263
Lechelt SGorkovenko KSpeed C(2024)On Disused Connected Devices: Understanding Disuse, “Holding On,” and Barriers to CircularityACM Journal on Computing and Sustainable Societies10.1145/36511712:2(1-27)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3651171
Loh SFoth MSanto Y(2024)The more-than-human turn in human-plant interaction design: From utilitarian object to living co-inhabitantInternational Journal of Human-Computer Studies10.1016/j.ijhcs.2023.103128181(103128)Online publication date: Jan-2024
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2023.103128
Song KPaulos E(2023)Vim: Customizable, Decomposable Electrical Energy StorageProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581110(1-18)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3544548.3581110
Nadal CMcCully SDoherty KSas CDoherty G(2022)The TAC Toolkit: Supporting Design for User Acceptance of Health Technologies from a Macro-Temporal PerspectiveProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3502039(1-18)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3491102.3502039
Gayler TSas CKalnikaitė V(2022)Exploring the Design Space for Human-Food-Technology Interaction: An Approach from the Lens of Eating ExperiencesACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/348443929:2(1-52)Online publication date: 16-Jan-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3484439
Zhang TQian ZFan HRen JWang YShi Y(2022)Easily-add battery-free wireless sensors to everyday objects: system implementation and usability studyCCF Transactions on Pervasive Computing and Interaction10.1007/s42486-022-00087-54:1(45-60)Online publication date: 17-Jan-2022
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42486-022-00087-5
Umair MSas CChalabianloo NErsoy C(2021)Exploring Personalized Vibrotactile and Thermal Patterns for Affect RegulationProceedings of the 2021 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3461778.3462042(891-906)Online publication date: 28-Jun-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3461778.3462042
Salovaara ABellucci AVianello AJacucci GKitamura YQuigley AIsbister KIgarashi TBjørn PDrucker S(2021)Programmable Smart Home Toolkits Should Better Address Households’ Social NeedsProceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3411764.3445770(1-14)Online publication date: 6-May-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3411764.3445770
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents