skip to main content
10.1145/2753476.2753484acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobisysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Automatic Sensor Data Stream Segmentation for Real-time Activity Prediction in Smart Spaces

Published: 18 May 2015 Publication History

Abstract

Recently, human activity recognition and prediction have become important functionalities in ambient-assisted living. Activity inference algorithms detect what task a human undertakes, by analyzing the data stream pattern generated from various Internet of Things (IoT) devices. However, determining how the data stream should be segmented in real-time, referred to as data segmentation, remains as one of the most difficult challenges. In this paper, we propose an automatic data segmentation approach for real-time activity prediction by employing the Jaro-Winkler Distance measurement. Our approach selects a breakpoint of a stream by comparing the Jaro-Winkler distance between the training dataset and the data stream and finding a peak among the variations. The resultant segment also becomes new training data after being tagged; this removes the need to segment the stream data manually for humans. From the experiment based on MIT's smart home dataset collected from a real living environment, our approach shows reasonable performance of 76% accuracy even though the dataset size is relatively diminutive.

References

[1]
J. A. Stankovic, Research directions for the Internet of Things, IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 3--9, Feb. 2014.
[2]
L. Chen, J. Hoey, C. D. Nugent, D. J. Cook, and Z. Yu, Sensor-based activity recognition. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews, IEEE Transactions on, 42(6), pp. 790--808, 2012.
[3]
L. Bao, and S. S. Intille, Activity recognition from user-annotated acceleration data, In Pervasive computing, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 1--17, 2004.
[4]
P., Palmes, H. K., Pung, T. Gu, W. Xue, and S. Chen, Object relevance weight pattern mining for activity recognition and segmentation, Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 6(1), pp. 43--57. 2010.
[5]
D. J. Cook, and N. Krishnan, Mining the home environment. Journal of intelligent information systems, 43(3), pp. 503--519, 2014.
[6]
E. Kim, and S. Helal, Modeling human activity semantics for improved recognition performance. In Ubiquitous Intelligence and Computing, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 514--528, 2011.
[7]
B. Kim, T. Kim, H. G. Ko, D. Lee, S. J. Hyun, and I. Y. Ko, Personal genie: a distributed framework for spontaneous interaction support with smart objects in a place. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication, ACM, pp. 97. Jan. 2013.
[8]
I. H., Bae, An ontology-based approach to ADL recognition in smart homes. Future Generation Computer Systems, 33, pp. 32--41, 2014.
[9]
Jaro-Winkler distance, {Online} available: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaro%E2%80%93Winkler_distance
[10]
G. Okeyo, L. Chen, H. Wang, and R. Sterritt, Dynamic sensor data segmentation for real-time knowledge-driven activity recognition. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, pp. 155--172, 2012.
[11]
T. V. Kasteren, A. Noulas, G. Englebienne, and B. Kröse, Accurate activity recognition in a home setting. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Ubiquitous computing, ACM, pp. 1--9, Sep. 2008.
[12]
E. M. Tapia, S. S. Intille, and K. Larson, Activity recognition in the home using simple and ubiquitous sensors, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 158--175., 2014.
[13]
J. O. Laguna, A. G. Olaya, and D. Borrajo, A dynamic sliding window approach for activity recognition. In User Modeling, Adaption and Personalization, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 219--230, 2011.
[14]
D. J. Cook, N. C. Krishnan, and P. Rashidi, Activity discovery and activity recognition: A new partnership. Cybernetics, IEEE Transactions on, 43(3), pp. 820--828, 2013.
[15]
J. Wan, M. J. O'Grady, and G. M. O'Hare, Dynamic sensor event segmentation for real-time activity recognition in a smart home context. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, pp. 1--15, 2014.
[16]
X. Hong, and C. D. Nugent, Partitioning time series sensor data for activity recognition. In Information Technology and Applications in Biomedicine, ITAB 2009, 9th International Conference, IEEE, pp. 1--4, Nov. 2009.
[17]
M. S. Ryoo, Human activity prediction: Early recognition of ongoing activities from streaming videos. In Computer Vision (ICCV), 2011 IEEE International Conference, IEEE, pp. 1036--1043, Nov. 2011.
[18]
K. Li, J. Hu, and Y. Fu, Modeling complex temporary composition of actionlets for activity prediction. In Computer Vision-ECCV 2012, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 286--299, 2012.
[19]
M. S. Ryoo, T. J. Fuchs, L. Xia, J. K. Aggarwal, and L. Matthies, Robot-Centric Activity Prediction from First-Person Videos: What Will They Do To Me? HRI' 15, PortLand, USA, Mar. 2015,
[20]
E. M. Tapia, S. S. Intille, and K. Larson, Activity recognition in the home setting using simple and ubiquitous sensors, in Proceedings of PERVASIVE 2004, vol. LNCS 3001, A. Ferscha and F. Mattern, Eds. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, pp. 158--175, 2004.
[21]
X. Zhu, C. Vondrick, D. Ramanan, and C. Fowlkes, Do We Need More Training Data or Better Models for Object Detection?, In BMVC, Vol. 3, p. 5, Sep. 2012.
[22]
K. S. Gayathri, S. Elias, and S. Shivashankar, An Ontology and Pattern Clustering Approach for Activity Recognition in Smart Environments. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Soft Computing for Problem Solving, Springer India, pp. 833--843, Jan. 2014.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
IoT-Sys '15: Proceedings of the 2015 Workshop on IoT challenges in Mobile and Industrial Systems
May 2015
64 pages
ISBN:9781450335027
DOI:10.1145/2753476
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

In-Cooperation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 18 May 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. activity prediction
  2. automatic data stream segmentation
  3. internet of things
  4. jaro-winkler distance.

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

  • ICT R&D program of MSIP/IITP

Conference

MobiSys'15
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

IoT-Sys '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 9 of 18 submissions, 50%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 9 of 18 submissions, 50%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 08 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media