skip to main content
10.1145/2461381.2461391acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescpsweekConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Low power counting via collaborative wireless communications

Published: 08 April 2013 Publication History

Abstract

Metrics that aggregate the state of neighboring nodes are frequently used in wireless sensor networks. In this paper, we present two primitives that exploit simultaneous communications in 802.15.4 radios to enable a polling node to calculate with low power the number (or set) of its neighbors where some state predicate of interest holds. In both primitives, the poller assigns transmission powers and response lengths to its respective neighbors for their simultaneous response to each of its poll requests. The two primitives adopt complementary schemes for power assignment such that the Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI) of the respective signal from each neighbor is significantly different from that of all others in one primitive and nearly equivalent to that of the others in the other. The first primitive, LinearPoll, suits sparse networks and consumes energy that is linear in the size of its neighborhood, whereas the second primitive, LogPoll, suits dense networks and consumes constant energy. Compared to the state-of-the-art solutions that use multiple sub-carriers, our primitives are simpler and more compute-efficient while provide estimation with comparable quality. Compared to single-carrier solutions, our primitives achieve comparable quality at less than half the energy cost or richer information at comparable energy cost. They are also compatible with other radio physical layers. Based on our implementation for CC2420 radios on the TelosB platform, we evaluate the primitives in different wireless environments and neighborhood topologies to study their performance, the tradeoff between their estimation accuracy and energy cost, and methods for tuning their critical parameters, and we compare them with baseline counting protocols.

References

[1]
IEEE Computer Society Standard for local and metropolitan area networks--part 15.4: Low-Rate Wireless Personal Area Networks (LR-WPANs). IEEE, 2011.
[2]
M. Ammar and G. Rouskas. On the performance of protocols for collecting responses over a multiple-access channel. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies. Networking in the 90s., IEEE, pages 1490--1499, 1991.
[3]
N. Burri, P. Von Rickenbach, and R. Wattenhofer. Dozer: Ultra-low power data gathering in sensor networks. In 2007 6th International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, pages 450--459, 2007.
[4]
Y. Chen and A. Terzis. On the mechanisms and effects of calibrating RSSI measurements for 802.15. 4 radios. Wireless Sensor Networks, pages 256--271, 2010.
[5]
M. Demirbas, O. Soysal, and M. Hussain. A singlehop collaborative feedback primitive for wireless sensor networks. In IEEE INFOCOM The 27th Conference on Computer Communications, pages 2047--2055, 2008.
[6]
M. Demirbas, S. Tasci, H. Gunes, and A. Rudra. Singlehop collaborative feedback primitives for threshold querying in wireless sensor networks. In Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium, pages 322--333, 2011.
[7]
A. Dutta, D. Saha, D. Grunwald, and D. Sicker. Smack: a smart acknowledgment scheme for broadcast messages in wireless networks. In ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Rev., volume 39, pages 15--26, 2009.
[8]
P. Dutta, S. Dawson-Haggerty, Y. Chen, C.-J. M. Liang, and A. Terzis. Design and evaluation of a versatile and efficient receiver-initiated link layer for low-power wireless. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, pages 1--14, 2010.
[9]
C. Intanagonwiwat, R. Govindan, D. Estrin, J. Heidemann, and F. Silva. Directed diffusion for wireless sensor networking. Networking, IEEE/ACM Trans. on, 11(1):2--16, 2003.
[10]
K. Jamieson, H. Balakrishnan, and Y. Tay. Sift: A MAC protocol for event-driven wireless sensor networks. In Wireless Sensor Networks, pages 260--275. Springer, 2006.
[11]
S. R. Madden, M. J. Franklin, J. M. Hellerstein, and W. Hong. TinyDB: an acquisitional query processing system for sensor networks. ACM Trans. Database Syst., 30(1):122--173, 2005.
[12]
V. Namboodiri and A. Keshavarzian. Alert: An adaptive low-latency event-driven mac protocol for wireless sensor networks. In 2008 International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, pages 159--170, 2008.
[13]
F. Österlind, N. Wirström, N. Tsiftes, N. Finne, T. Voigt, and A. Dunkels. Strawman: Making sudden traffic surges graceful in low-power wireless networks. In Workshop on Hot Topics in Embedded Networked Sensors, 2010.
[14]
K. Srinivasan and P. Levis. RSSI is under appreciated. In Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Embedded Networked Sensors, 2006.
[15]
T. Van Dam and K. Langendoen. An adaptive energy-efficient mac protocol for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, page 171, 2003.
[16]
G. Werner-Allen, K. Lorincz, J. Johnson, J. Lees, and M. Welsh. Fidelity and yield in a volcano monitoring sensor network. In OSDI '06: Proceedings of the 7th symposium on Operating systems design and implementation, pages 381--396, Berkeley, CA, USA, 2006. USENIX Association.
[17]
Y. Yao and J. Gehrke. The cougar approach to in-network query processing in sensor networks. In SIGMOD Rec., volume 31, pages 9--18, 2002.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Low power counting via collaborative wireless communications

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    IPSN '13: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Information processing in sensor networks
    April 2013
    372 pages
    ISBN:9781450319591
    DOI:10.1145/2461381
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 08 April 2013

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. counting
    2. energy efficiency
    3. sensor network

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    IPSN 2013
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    IPSN '13 Paper Acceptance Rate 24 of 115 submissions, 21%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 143 of 593 submissions, 24%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 15 Sep 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media